Your three biggest advocates are a guy who acted in a run of dogshit movies and played a guy who humped people on SNL, James woods’ corpse, and a guy who calls himself catturd.
But the MSM is definitely the problem.
Libs are not smart
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
But the MSM is definitely the problem.
I was an early fence sitter on Trump. These were the kind of "facts" that made me question everything that is said sbout the guy after a couple of years. Apparently, Trump is not a golden shower guy as well as not a conservative.
A
anon_gwg7wjjhm2lka
Guest
The irony that you of all people posted this. You post nonsense from Catturd and the gateway pundit (daily); and when it is easily debunked, you say: “I didn’t say it was true I just thought it was interesting.”
Go find a mirror. Look into it.
Moat of the stuff I post has not been debunked. I will say that a lot of it hasn't been conclusively proven either. Hey...beating the deep state is not an easy task.
How do you make a conservative mad?
Lie to them.
How do you make a leftist mad?
Tell them the truth.
Long list to explain the obvious.
Liberals are not and have never been smart. They're easily triggered, lack true critical thinking abilities and generally aren't very good looking or athletic.
Just the truth!!
You might not suck one, but you'd definitely hold one in your mouth until the swelling went down, and swallow the evidence.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
I consider liberals to be at the genius level
Look at the freakin lunatic crazy bizarre ideology they sell to people who are so ignorant that they will follow any person who disparages common sense and practical wise government
it is a total shit show the Liberal Left wing socialists communists Democrats are selling to the ignorant masses who are swallowing the crap whole
I only pray that someone who will clean ip the mess that has been created by you un American crackpots
God needs to help America and leave the blessing for later
At the moment America is in crisis
I agree and to prove it I think the Magas and the non-Magas on the board should take IQ tests. Who do you think would get the higher scores?
Should people like this be allowed to vote? How about requiring everyone to pass a basic test before being allowed to vote?
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
Not saying it applies here, but it may be more efficient to take petroleum/gasoline to electricity in a powerplant for use in cars than to have cars convert gas to power individually.
It's less work to cook for 1,000 people at once than 1 person 1,000 times if you have the means to do it.
I see the angle but it doesn't make any sense to me since the supposed idea is to stop using oil to save the climate.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
Well, I think that's the goal; we clearly can't stop all at once. I'm not giving up hamburgers and steak because cows fart.
Mining lithium isn't great for the environment either (to say the least). On the other hand, the argument is that we're fighting time and trying to manage risk. You take the lithium problem if it means sea levels don't rise as much, the ocean retains more oxygen and less carbonic acid, and global currents don't collapse. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment raise your risk of developing secondary cancer. You deal with that problem later
I don't think it's silly at all to point out that a lot of what's marketed as "green" isn't as immediately great for the environment as we'd like, but at the bare minimum, I count acknowledgement of the problem as progress of some kind. My biggest issue with the GOP on the subject is that they're so beholden to big oil, they don't see an issue at all.
I don't know if it was you or someone else, but there was a post a while back saying lots of carbon dioxide is good in the atmosphere because it's good for plants. Ok, in and of itself that's probably not a bad thing, but you have to realize most plant life is in the ocean. More CO2 in the atmosphere will lead to more carbonic acid there, and I'm not keen to find out how good phytoplankton are at surviving dropping pH. Point is, the butterly effect is real, and it's a time for education and caution. I don't see it from the GOP.
Last edited by a moderator:
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
No doubt about that. But I'll settle for everyone at least acknowledging there is a problem. We aren't even there yet
I don't think there is a consensus on that either. For the record I am all for protecting the environment.
