tax subsidy stops when they get to pick and choose who they serveMakes more sense. This kind of follows my poison pill logic earlier in the thread. Yea, gay marriage should be legal, but forcing a religious organization to perform one should not be. Everyone on this board should agree with that. And if the latter protection was in jeopardy, I can see why some people voted against the bill. I can't imagine why the religious protection would not have been added though... Perhaps our friends in the senate can amend the bill, make it inclusive of all factors, pass it and send it back to the house for a clean vote.
tax subsidy stops when they get to pick and choose who they serve
Labor unions should be way ahead on that list.
religious organizations should lose their tax exempt status
por que no los dos?Labor unions should be way ahead on that list.
I'd be good with not allowing political contributions from either.por que no los dos?
Yep. And the pubs still hated him for being a muslim. Look the greater good is at stake here and we should not bring up old crap to derail it.It's 2022. It's time to move the F on from gay marriage. I hope Cruz doesn't go down that path.
Did you know: The last executive branch to vocalize that marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman was the first term of Obama/Biden.
So have your super special Bible marriage in your church and leave the government out of it which is clearly spelled our in our constitution.There was marriage long before there was a United States. Hence the reason I said under our Constitution, we must recognize a union between two people. However, in Biblical terms and pretty much throughout all of history, it is a union between a man and a woman. And saying that isn't meant to denigrate anyone else's view on this matter.
So have your super special Bible marriage in your church and leave the government out of it which is clearly spelled our in our constitution.
Yah sure manBe happy to. But that isn't clear in the bill that just passed. And your condescension is noted as per usual. You might have noticed quite a few religious denominations being torn asunder over this issue because the leftists want it all. The less choice and the less freedom the better for those folks.
Yah sure man
Republicans want to tell you what books you can read, what meds you can take, what words you can say, what history you can learn, what you can do with your uterus, who you can love… but tell me more about how the Dems are “coming for your freedoms”
The books weren't banned, they were removed from "required" reading lists but still available in the library. A wholly different approach from banning math books because they teach CRT. SMFH![]()
'To Kill a Mockingbird,' Other Books Banned in Schools Over Racism Concerns
Mark Twain's "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" and Mildred D. Taylor's 'Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry" among other books banned.www.newsweek.com
![]()
Illinois community leaders want to abolish history lessons in schools | CNN
An Illinois lawmaker and community leaders are calling for the immediate removal of history books and suspension of history lessons in their school districts because they say current materials and lesson plans "lead to white privilege and a racist society."www.cnn.com
![]()
Somerville City Council bans crisis pregnancy centers - The Tufts Daily
The Somerville City Council passed an ordinance on March 24 banning crisis pregnancy centers, defining them as deceptive, limited services pregnancy centers that do not directly provide or refer clients for abortions or emergency contraception.tuftsdaily.com
Your last post is rather remarkable. You have such a one-sided way of seeing things. Probably because you only read one side. It makes you rather ignorant. The one about words is pretty rich. It is unbelievable that you actually think that. It's also ironic to me how you refer to what someone can do with their uterus rather than what someone can do with an unborn baby. Pretty barbaric stuff there bud.
"After parent complaints about the use of racist epithets in To Kill a Mockingbird; Adventures of Huckleberry Finn; The Cay; Of Mice and Men; and Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, the Burbank (CA) Unified School District superintendent issued a statement removing the books from the district’s required reading lists for its English curriculum and banned the use of the N-word in all school classes. The books will be allowed in classroom libraries, but no student can be required to read them. At a board meeting, the superintendent stated, “This is not about censorship, this is about righting the wrongs of the past.”
religious organizations should lose their tax exempt status
no, i think churches, and unions, should lose tax exempt status. there's no real reason for it, especially when they have the ability to throw millions of dollars towards political endeavors. sure this'll probably hurt the small rural churches, but it seems the big mega ones are swimming in cashSo you want to take away their tax exempt status over supporting something as fundamental as life? The vitriol by some folks here toward religion is really scary. Why don't you come to church with me and you can see reality? I'd love to meet you anyway.
no, i think churches, and unions, should lose tax exempt status. there's no real reason for it, especially when they have the ability to throw millions of dollars towards political endeavors. sure this'll probably hurt the small rural churches, but it seems the big mega ones are swimming in cash
no argument from me on the good that comes from churches. my family is incredibly engaged with the church i grew up attending, and they (the church) do a tremendous service for those in need. and i'd probably also argue that the overwhelming majority (not data to support this but my gut thinks it's probably 95%+) run on a tight budget and don't donate any of their excess funds to political causes. however, my big gripe is more focused on televangelists, mega churches, and institutions like the above that choose to donate to certain political causes and skirt by on not having to pay any taxes.I would not be tremendously opposed to making some caveats to try and limit political action by churches. It would have to be very clearly defined and I don't know that abortion should fit there. I think advocating against the murder of unborn babies is pretty basic humanity type of stuff. That being said, most churches don't do that. All the cash they are swimming in (if they in fact are) is from donations by members. However, I fervently disagree with politics from the pulpit. It has no place there. The salvation offered by God is not politically dependent. I would never attend a church engaged in such things.
It also bears noting again that more aid, more service toward those in need, more disaster relief, more free counselling, more food for the hungry, more humanitarian assistance, etc. is done by Christian churches than any other non-governmental group in the world and more than most governments as well. That never seems to get talked about but hundreds of millions are served by the people through the love that comes to us through Jesus Christ.
Again, a school district deciding to no longer require a book to be on a reading list or a publisher deciding not to print any more copies of a book is not the same as a governor banning math books over a fake culture war issue. The examples you provided don't describe banning books, got it?![]()
Democrats' drive to ban assault-style rifles roils U.S. House panel
A Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives panel on Wednesday worked toward approving legislation to ban assault-style rifles such as those used in recent mass shootings, and another bill allowing lawsuits against firearms manufacturers.www.reuters.com
![]()
Democrats Propose Banning Gendered Language in House Rules
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday proposed a series of House rule changes that include banning the use of gendered terms in favor of more inclusive ones, ditching "he" and "she" for "they."Instead of using the pronouns "he" or "she," members would be required to use "member," "delegate," or...news.yahoo.com
![]()
Lieu 'Glad' Dr. Seuss Books 'Cancelled,' Dems Focused on Stimulus Checks
The California Democrat questioned the extent to which Americans care about the decision that several of the author's books will no longer be published.www.newsweek.com
![]()
Half of Democrats support a ban on hate speech | YouGov
Most Americans support expanded federal hate crime laws, and most Democrats support banning hate speechtoday.yougov.com
I could go on and on with this but I just wanted to make the point.I haven't even started with social media censorship, etc. that Democrats quietly push and support but only from one side.
Oh look, someone used their google box to find some anecdotal examples of things that are rarely and infrequently taught, in hopes of convincing us that everybody is learning harmful lessons about black history that will scar them and make them feel guilty. This includes history as experienced by people other than Northern European white men. Oh the horror, we mustn't allow that to happen - it will harm the children! Only white history is true and pure enough for innocent ears, say the culture warriors on the Right! We must scrub the curriculum and remove all other perspectives or our country will be destroyed by wokeness!
![]()
Homepage
Resources and guidance to support Black, LatinX, and Multilingual students to thrive in grades 6-8 A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction is an integrated approach to mathematics that centers Black, Latinx, and Multilingual students in grades 6-8, addresses barriers to math equity, and aligns...equitablemath.org
![]()
Bad Education
A Philadelphia elementary school recently forced fifth-grade students to celebrate “black communism” and simulate a Black Power rally in honor of political radical Angela Davis. According to whistleblower documents and a source within the school, a fifth-grade teacher at the inner-city William...www.city-journal.org
jcpsdep Publisher Publications - Issuu
Jefferson County Public Schools | Diversity, Equity, and Poverty Departmentissuu.com
![]()
The 1619 Project curriculum taught in over 4,500 schools — Frederick County Public Schools has the option - Medill News Service
Teachers in Frederick County Public Schools have the option to teach slavery via The 1619 Project curriculum.dc.medill.northwestern.edu
![]()
K-12
Critical Race Training in primary and secondary education is a growing issue and one that’s significantly more difficult to track.criticalrace.org
I can go on and on with this too. No, CRT in it's original form is not taught in K-12 schools. However, curriculum has been created that is based in CRT tenants and this is everywhere. Saying CRT isn't taught in schools is true and spectacularly dishonest all at once. So you can stand on your little data point against the avalanche of evidence that demonstrates the impact of CRT in public schools. It is literally everywhere! The 1619 project is an example. It's taught in thousands of schools. It isn't a subject for debate. It is factually inaccurate from it's origin through it's conclusions. Just in no way is it historically accurate.
The concept of equity is evil, false, impossible, divisive, destructive and it is not a path to progress. Creating an illusion there can be equity is just insane. We should strive for equality in every way possible but equity has been slipped in there and it is so corrosive to any hopes for progress as a society.
By mega church I agree, if you mean like Elevation and Newspring and that ilk, right on. It’s also interesting that those mega churches, the pastors usually turn up to be very corrupt (Newspring had an alcoholic preacher at some point in time, probably 7ish years ago, I was at Clemson when this occurred). Don’t get me wrong definitely all for preaching Gods word, and I admittedly have been to Newspring on several occasions when I was in college and they have great sermons, but I’m on board with you that the cash flow is ridiculous for those entitiesno argument from me on the good that comes from churches. my family is incredibly engaged with the church i grew up attending, and they (the church) do a tremendous service for those in need. and i'd probably also argue that the overwhelming majority (not data to support this but my gut thinks it's probably 95%+) run on a tight budget and don't donate any of their excess funds to political causes. however, my big gripe is more focused on televangelists, mega churches, and institutions like the above that choose to donate to certain political causes and skirt by on not having to pay any taxes.
I’ve read just a smidge of this thread, and you seem to be crying buckets.I love making you cry
Those are happy tears from laughing at you.I’ve read just a smidge of this thread, and you seem to be crying buckets.
But I’ve not been around this thread. LolThose are happy tears from laughing at you.
I make the rulesBut I’ve not been around this thread. Lol
Spot freaking on.Agree that we should find a spot b/w 10-20 weeks of pregnancy for legal abortions. Sadly we have these all or nothing debates when we should instead be focusing on finding a morally agreeable cutoff time (which would require sacrifice on both sides to reach a consensus).
But later on Obama retracted that statement.It's 2022. It's time to move the F on from gay marriage. I hope Cruz doesn't go down that path.
Did you know: The last executive branch to vocalize that marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman was the first term of Obama/Biden.
We will see. I get that argument for sure... I just don't believe it when it comes out of a lot of folk's mouths and that includes Ted Cruz. IF Cruz and company aren't lying their asses off, they will vote in favor of gay marriage and contraception. I'm not holding my breath and will frankly be STUNNED if he does. I would be willing to bet a small amount that he votes no.Ted Cruz did not say they should ban gay marriage. He said it was a bad decision, just like Roe. And he's right. If Republicans will speak plainly and not kowtow to the Left's false narratives, they'll do much better.
I agree with this for sure. There's a pretty strong minority on both sides of the aisle that will vote no on any bill that comes from the opposite side, regardless of merit.It also passed by over a hundred votes in a house that is very narrowly divided. So what's your problem? There are a litany issues that Democrats will vote against which would be good for people. I guess you just can't take the win and instead want to make a political spectacle out of it.
i finally received a response from HarrisHave you heard an explanation for the NO vote?