I don’t know why but I’m envisioning a system of mullahs ruling over various newly defined districts.
I don't mind that idea at all. My only question is, how long before the East side takes over the West side? Or more accurately, how long before the West begs to be let back in?Need just give half of US, middle to the West, to the liberals and build a wall and let the conservatives have the middle to the East. They could have a no gun, no police, and divide what they have equally to everyone and they should be happy then.
We would have to build a wall to keep the liberals out. They would have their side torn up in no time and start bitching about how conservatives got the good side. They would turn their half into a thrid world country . What a great idea though.Need just give half of US, middle to the West, to the liberals and build a wall and let the conservatives have the middle to the East. They could have a no gun, no police, and divide what they have equally to everyone and they should be happy then.
Oh and just by the way, California already had an idea like this, to split the state into 2, a Northern and Southern California. I think it was over water, where the northern part of the state did not want to keep giving "their" water to the Southern part of the state.Need just give half of US, middle to the West, to the liberals and build a wall and let the conservatives have the middle to the East. They could have a no gun, no police, and divide what they have equally to everyone and they should be happy then.
Makes you wonder if this is the beginning of the States in the US breaking away into their own country.
Rate is still bad, but look at the drop.Thomson recalls telling his officers. “Don’t call us—we’re not coming back to get you until the end of your shift, so if you got to go to the bathroom, you need to make a friend out here. You want to get something to eat? You better find who the good cook is.”
Lets see... Will pay you $10 an hour to figure out what to do... No bathrooms and no food.... SMH
Yeah this has seemed to worked well...
Article talks about 2011 etc so here is NJ stats 2018
The town with the most violent crime incidents is first and then the rest are in descending order.
- Camden, 1198
- Jersey City, 1233
- Newark, 2069
- Paterson, 1076
- Trenton, 973
- Elizabeth, 897
- Passaic, 406
- Irvington, 354
- East Orange, 333
- New Brunswick, 309
Read More: The 10 most violent cities in New Jersey (and the least) | https://nj1015.com/the-10-most-viol...least/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral
Cleveland is throwing a parade on becoming the 3rd worst city instead of 2nd worst cityThis is kind of good. America needed another Detroit.
Rate is still bad, but look at the drop.
https://www.tapinto.net/towns/camde...icles/camden-sees-crime-drop-over-past-decade
Good day to be a bank robber in MinneapolisGood for them. The winds of change are upon us
Biggest mofo makes the rules.WTH is a “community-led public safety system”
No reason to believe that the same people looting and indiscriminately burning businesses can’t hold order and act with the public’s best interest in mind. Makes sense to me.This social experiment is going to be the model whether it is the right or the wrong thing to do.
Can the Mayor veto this?
I guess the law abiding citizens will be buying a lot of guns to keep themselves safe. What a joke of a government.Good for them. The winds of change are upon us
Rate is still bad, but look at the drop.
https://www.tapinto.net/towns/camde...icles/camden-sees-crime-drop-over-past-decade
The mayor is in agreement with it and behind it.
Seems like it was a "community-led public safety system" that killed Arbery.
LOL! Social experiment? Let them try this pretty much anywhere in the south. The result of that “experiment” will be written about for the next 10,000 years.This social experiment is going to be the model whether it is the right or the wrong thing to do.
He was booed off because he feared political ramifications of a yes or no statement in front of a crowd. If you think this man isn’t involved in this to whatever degree I don’t have the words nor will to argue about it. It’s a microcosm that isn’t worth anymore timereally? Being booed off stage most have changed his point of view
because people had jobs maybe bc of a president that knows how to create an environment where business can thrive. Idk. Maybe.
The winds of stupidityGood for them. The winds of change are upon us
I just imagine it becoming a private sector outsourcing. Would be cheaper than having government pay for it and private sector companies will be more inclined to reign in the BS and good ol’ boy system
Lol at this replyGood for them. The winds of change are upon us
Democrats and Liberals are fine. They are folks that you can hold a discussion with BUT at the end of the convo, you can still have a beer with them. I present to you @iceheart08 as an example.Liberalism is a mental disorder
Democrats and Liberals are fine. They are folks that you can hold a discussion with BUT at the end of the convo, you can still have a beer with them. I present to you @iceheart08 as an example.
Leftists live in a fantasy world and will drag us all into a faithless world where are sexes are nonspecific, we pay for items with love and dried cucumbers, we all make $15k a year, live in 400 sq foot shanties made of wheat and grass, and wrap our selves in rainbows and warm hugs..... and if you don’t agree with this woke world .... F YOU!!! We’ll burn your shit to the ground, rape your humans who identify as women, steal your shit and label you as the aggressor because your ancestors did some bad shit 400 years ago.
Good for them. The winds of change are upon us
Go onSo much ignorance in one thread...
Im not defending it at all. I think that’s the only way it could ever work and no, I don’t think that option is even possible.I can’t imagine being this naive and clueless. First, are you trying to say that the government will now pay for private sector security while also saying it will be cheaper? If you’re not saying that, which I hope for the sake of your intelligence you aren’t, then I assume you are saying that private citizens and companies will now pay for their own security. If you’re saying that, do you honestly believe that people and companies that can afford their own private security will remain in Minneapolis and endure those cost??
I will give you credit though, you’re the first one in this thread even attempting to defend this blatant display of retardation. Dems have truly become a cancer to this Republic.