Ms Luna on fire
- Thread starter TigerRagRob
- Start date
Does anyone in our country give a F about the subject of this hearing? Twitter is a private company, and just like Fox, it is not required to be impartial.
Yep, especially when they have shown evidence in these hearings of trump's white house doing THE EXACT SAME THING. They were contacting Twitter executives in order to have tweets removed also.
wow. ALL CAPS!
More whataboutism... from the NY Macho Man.
The previous admin should be held accountable as well, but I'm sure we will find out that it was nothing to the degree of what is being talked about here.
ps I'll be waiting for your butt buddy to send me some useless MSM videos
Nope, it happened. You won’t hear about it in your echo chamber of course
It was said to have happened but later debunked and I guess that never made it to yours.
You go ahead and prove that Trump personally requested twitter to remove a tweet. We know for a fact that massive suppression of true information was facilitated by deep state to help protect commie dems and to hurt America First conservatives.
This is what real fascistic collusion between govt and tech giant looks like to suppress truth and overturn elections.
You’re probably right since too many people in this country only care about their phone, car, hair, and tattoos!
They should care though about the government trying to censor/ silence opposing views. There’s a reason it’s the FIRST amendment. Because it’s the MOST important!
These are companies. If I showed up at your business wearing a sign that said some racist shit would you ask me to leave? Would that be violating my first amendment rights?
"While GOP committee members used much of their time to air personal grievances and smear the ex-Twitter employees, Democrats largely focused on highlighting how Twitter had bent over backward to accommodate Trump and his conservative allies.
Navaroli, for instance, noted how she recommended Twitter take action against a 2019 Trump tweet that told four liberal congresswomen of color to “go back” to “crime infested places from which they came.” Although that tweet was in clear violation of the company’s policy against abusing immigrants, Navaroli testified Wednesday that her recommendation was overridden and the policy was changed.
Roth told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) that the FBI sending over review requests of certain content may not have been a valuable use of the bureau’s resources and time, but it still didn’t represent any First Amendment violations. And even though Jordan disagreed, he also acknowledged that Twitter “isn’t bound by the First Amendment” because it’s a private company.
“My, my, my—what happens when you hold a hearing, and you can't prove your point?” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) snarked in response to Jordan.
The Virginia lawmaker then brought up a 2020 tweet in which Trump threatened to “strongly regulate” or “close” Twitter “down” in retaliation for allegedly “silenc[ing] conservatives.” He then turned to Navaroli to ask about a 2019 Trump tweet heckling Teigen and her husband John Legend, both outspoken critics of the former president.
Navaroli confirmed that after Trump blasting the couple via tweet, he immediately contacted the social-media giant to demand Teigen’s tweet calling him a “pussy ass bitch” be deleted from the site."
Ex-Twitter Officials Confirm to Congress: Trump, Not Biden, Has Tried to Censor Tweets
After one Twitter whistleblower said Trump once tried to get a Chrissy Teigen tweet deleted, other ex-execs noted that Biden has never asked for content removal.
www.thedailybeast.com
Not if a private company is doing it on their own. In this case the Gov is telling them to do it which is a violation...
Z XX
let’s see… the FBI, a government agency deliberately and willingly colluded with Twitter to suppress information which would’ve changed the outcome of the election. No big deal, they’re democrats.
Voter right suppression. Election interference. Suppression of 1st amendment rights by the govt using using proxy. There is more.
MAGA-STAR Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Blasts Fake News Media for False Reporting - Threatens Legal Action If Article Is Not Corrected (VIDEO)
MAGA-STAR Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) said Friday that the Washington Post wrote a smear job on her with several mischaracterizations, and baseless and inaccurate information, including the claim that she only embraced her Hispanic background in order to seek office. This report was then...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Bwah, so your belief is that Trump would have won if Americans had seen more reporting about Hunter's laptop on Twitter LOL? The laptop that didn't prove a damn thing about Joe's involvement in any sort of criminal activity? Would it have been fair if Joe lost because of that? Insane that you believe Twitter is the sole source for determining how Americans will vote.
Just a reminder that the Biden campaign didn't ask Twitter to take down anything except nude pictures of Hunter and the Twitter files only showed that the top brass there erred on the side of caution before reporting on a story that seemed highly suspect, coming out right before the election.
Trump lost because he was a horrible President and an even worse human being and we didn't need a non-story on Twitter to sway our opinion. Insane that right-wing media has you convinced that such a stupid story determined the outcome of the election.
We should also never forget this quote from the repair shop owner who got the laptop originally. This is why not releasing this laptop one week before the election - especially when it had been handled by nefarious liars like Rudy G - was the right thing to do.
“I do know that there have been multiple attempts over the past year-and-a-half to insert questionable material into the laptop as in, not physically, but passing off this misinformation or disinformation as coming from the laptop,” he said. “And that is a major concern of mine because I have fought tooth and nail to protect the integrity of this drive and to jeopardize that is going to mean that everything that I sacrificed will be for nothing.”
Big difference between a news company and Twitter. Twitter was censoring public tweets and deleting accounts per commands from the FBI. The FBI paid Twitter millions of tax payers money to do so.
Oh look, yet another lie from a Republican on TI that can't admit that Trump lost because he sucked donkey balls.
Instead of taking Tucker's word for it, please research the reason the FBI paid Twitter. What you posted is straight bullshit.
It's Bullshit if you don't believe there's a difference between Twitter and news companies.. Who the hell is Tucker ? Hate to tell you I did not vote for Trump in 2020 I also didn't vote for sleepy Joe either... However I did vote for him in 2016... Keep spewing the left wing bull shit of bullying....
Edit... I am a Independent not Republican... I vote for who will put the most money in my pocket, not raise my taxes ,
Last edited:
So your belief is that TRUMP'S FBI paid Twitter to suppress stories that would damage Biden because TRUMP'S own appointments didnt want him to win? Squashing lame stories about a drug addict's laptop were more important than the risk of being fired and they were willing to surreptitiously spend millions of dollars to do so? You people are SO broken!
And call me skeptical that you didn't want Trump to win, while your history shows you only liking pro-Trump posts and frowning on one's that call him out. Sorry, not buying it 😅
Thats why it needs to be fixed regardless of which party interferes with free dissemination of news
Same applies to all the people walking around with classified docs
partisan it does not need to be
Both parties and people need to respect protocols
I would not prosecute any person in this mess other than remind people of what Democracy means
Maybe next time but not this time
Another left wing dumb ass post. A mind reader 🤣😂 I like them because y'all let the other guy's jerk your chain...
Like I said I voted for Trump in 2016 and would have voted for him again in 2020 if he had stayed off Twitter. I voted for the worsted President of all time Carter.. After Obummber healthcare Bullshit no way I was voting for Biden..
I voted Republican in 1980 and that's where my finances turned around. I had no problem with Clinton. No problem with either Bush..
Last edited:
Loses the argument, doesn't mention the original allegation and calls me dumb lol. We know name calling is all you have because when you rely on the right-wing echo chamber, you'll always be wrong.
There you go again Left wing 101. I didn't call you dumb only said it was a dumb post..
The FBI didn't pay Twitter 3.4 m (tax payers money) because they like them. If you believe the 3.4M was for services I got some Ocean front property in Clemson for sell.
Last edited:
No, we know exactly why they paid them, we even have an email that addresses it from the former general counsel at Twitter. All it takes for you to believe it was for something other than what we have proof of is some bad actors talking out their asses to spread disinformation so people like you will be outraged and run to message boards and make outrageous claims. And you still haven't explained why TRUMP'S FBI would want to suppress conservative voices. How does that make sense?
FBI Reimbursed Twitter for Providing User Information - FactCheck.org
In an email to a Twitter lawyer in February 2021, an unidentified Twitter employee wrote that the company had received over $3.4 million from the FBI since October 2019 as reimbursement for Twitter's processing of legal requests for user information. That is not evidence that the FBI paid...
www.factcheck.org
I have a question for you. Imagine that a deepfake was widely circulated on twitter of the republican nominee (Desantis or trump) talking about how he he banged little girls with Jeff Epstein.
Would you want the government to intervene in that situation? It would that be government overreach?
Regardless of either free speech is protected by law. The issue is censoring . If someone is posting something that is directed toward a certain person that is totaled false then is is slanderous and should move onto a lawsuit. There's a reason Trump has filed a lawsuit against Clinton tied to the Russian lies.
No, we know exactly why they paid them, we even have an email that addresses it from the former general counsel at Twitter. All it takes for you to believe it was for something other than what we have proof of is some bad actors talking out their asses to spread disinformation so people like you will be outraged and run to message boards and make outrageous claims. And you still haven't explained why TRUMP'S FBI would want to suppress conservative voices. How does that make sense?
FBI Reimbursed Twitter for Providing User Information - FactCheck.org
In an email to a Twitter lawyer in February 2021, an unidentified Twitter employee wrote that the company had received over $3.4 million from the FBI since October 2019 as reimbursement for Twitter's processing of legal requests for user information. That is not evidence that the FBI paid...
Legal request for user information....🤣😅
Similar threads
