ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Ancestry DNA Kit

TKL67

Lake Baikal
Dec 25, 2011
4,150
14,539
113
Sherwood Forest
Just sent mine in. What have your experiences been like?

I'm more interested in my genetic/ethnic makeup then connecting with distant family members.

Anyone find out they had a closely related family member they didn't know about?
 
Just sent mine in. What have your experiences been like?

I'm more interested in my genetic/ethnic makeup then connecting with distant family members.

Anyone find out they had a closely related family member they didn't know about?
My biological father was adopted in a closed adoption, so mine turned up some interesting results. I found several 2nd cousins that I had no idea about. My heritage was interesting as well. I knew I had some German lineage, but everything else was a surprise.
 
I think you will enjoy your results. One thing I found to be interesting was that we were always told my great-grandmother was 100% Cherokee. When my results came back with 0% native american blood, I was a little surprised. Just goes to show you that you can't believe even your most revered family legends sometimes.
 
I did this and it was fascinating. Just wanted the ethnicity results and did not explore the family tree stuff much, maybe later when I find some time.

40% German, 36% Irish, 14% British. 11% Scandinavian, and some various small %s.

Thought I would be more British. There were these tales of Cherokee Indians on my mother's side. It was BS- no trace of Native American.
 
I think you will enjoy your results. One thing I found to be interesting was that we were always told my great-grandmother was 100% Cherokee. When my results came back with 0% native american blood, I was a little surprised. Just goes to show you that you can't believe even your most revered family legends sometimes.
Same here. Those stories or legends are common.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petegroove
Mine was pretty neat. Surprisingly Mediterranean.

25% of some combination of Iberian/Spanish, Greek, Italian, North African, Middle Eastern. Also heavily Scandinavian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hkytiger
I did this and it was fascinating. Just wanted the ethnicity results and did not explore the family tree stuff much, maybe later when I find some time.

40% German, 36% Irish, 14% British. 11% Scandinavian, and some various small %s.

Thought I would be more British. There were these tales of Cherokee Indians on my mother's side. It was BS- no trace of Native American.
My father-in-law did it and was expecting almost an entirely British Isles background. He ended up having a significant amount of Scandavian descent.

What I found very interesting was the breakdown that he received about how peoples moved throughout the centuries. More than likely, his people were all from the British Isles, but Scandinavian blood lines were inserted through the Viking conquests.

I'm currently under the assumption that I'm 50% English, 25% Irish, and 25% Polish. Since Poland was the stomping ground of Europe for centuries, I'm very curious to see what shows up there.
 
It’s a scam. Their ability to identify your heritage is limited to Western Europe..
Mmmm... it is worldwide. The entire continent of Africa has very similar DNA among natives and is consider one pool. The entire western hemisphere is a single gene pool in regards to Native Americans. The natives in the Falkland Islands of Argentina and the Eskimo peoples of the Artic and Alaska and all in between have very similar DNA.

Europe and Asia are broken down into many unique gene pools.
 
Protect your DNA...you can do a name search and find out 80-90% of what these DNA tests will show you.

I searched my last name years ago and found out Western European Celtic/ Scottish/ Irish/ German ancestry. I found our family coat of arms and how the spelling had changed through the years.

There's no way I'd put my DNA in a vial and send it to some nameless, faceless, cough... cough... government database.
 
I did it, found it interesting. I love all this heraldry/ancestry-type stuff.

They'll give you the breakdown of what country/region. Then you get a webpage showing any cousins you have who took it, and how Ancestry believes they're related to you (2nd/3rd/4th cousin, etc). If you have family tree info then you'll be able to figure out stuff.

If youre not going to go through the family tree info then I'm not sure what you'll get out of it. You will probably notice some cousins you've forgotten when they show you your relatives. They do not tell you that so & so is exactly this (2nd cousin on your moms side, for example), you have to figure that out.

That is where I think they don't do a great job, its not a wonderful tool to find long-lost relatives or connections when youre in your ancestry research. Its not searchable in that way.

if you want to find out how your chances are of getting prostate cancer, they will let you download your DNA data to a text file (which doesnt have your name or anything in it). You then upload that to other sites that will tell you that stuff. For that, the 23andMe test is better as Ancestry doesn't collect some things that they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TKL67
It was the best thing that I could have ever done. I had hit a brick wall with my grandmother's surname of Ross, as well as her mother's father (my 2nd great-grandfather) Joseph Banner Sprague who came from Canada. DNA was able to verify who I thought the next generation of parents were. I got my last surviving aunt to do it, now one of my sisters got a kit. For someone with 100,000 people and growing on their tree, it has opened up a multitude of possibilities. As a genealogist, I encourage everyone to do this, if not for themselves, for their children.
 
I think you will enjoy your results. One thing I found to be interesting was that we were always told my great-grandmother was 100% Cherokee. When my results came back with 0% native american blood, I was a little surprised. Just goes to show you that you can't believe even your most revered family legends sometimes.


Same here.
 
I think you will enjoy your results. One thing I found to be interesting was that we were always told my great-grandmother was 100% Cherokee. When my results came back with 0% native american blood, I was a little surprised. Just goes to show you that you can't believe even your most revered family legends sometimes.

I had the same info and the same discovery. Her surname was even something the Cherokee had used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clemsonalex
I think you will enjoy your results. One thing I found to be interesting was that we were always told my great-grandmother was 100% Cherokee. When my results came back with 0% native american blood, I was a little surprised. Just goes to show you that you can't believe even your most revered family legends sometimes.

Apparently Native Americans have declined to participate in DNA testing, giving ancestry very little to use for reference sampling for North American Native Americans. Unless things have changed, that could be the problem. My Grandpa's Granddad was 100% Cherokee and I did not receive any percentage in my DNA. I could trace my family all the way back to him, but then it goes cold. It could just be a coincidence as well though.
 
Protect your DNA...you can do a name search and find out 80-90% of what these DNA tests will show you.

I searched my last name years ago and found out Western European Celtic/ Scottish/ Irish/ German ancestry. I found our family coat of arms and how the spelling had changed through the years.

There's no way I'd put my DNA in a vial and send it to some nameless, faceless, cough... cough... government database.
Where do you search for this? I’d be interested in seeing what the results would be.
 
I'm no expert on genealogy so yall bear with me if I'm way off base.

I thought, though, that different traits passed along family lines in different patterns. Thus I and my sister may have inherited different portions of the family line. So, I may be 30% Irish and she 20% or something along those lines.

That may be why some of you aren't seeing the native american descent within the results....Your pale ass just didn't get those genes, haha. For any experts out there, am I anywhere close to correct here?
 
Apparently Native Americans have declined to participate in DNA testing, giving ancestry very little to use for reference sampling for North American Native Americans. Unless things have changed, that could be the problem. My Grandpa's Granddad was 100% Cherokee and I did not receive any percentage in my DNA. I could trace my family all the way back to him, but then it goes cold. It could just be a coincidence as well though.
They have plenty of Native American DNA samples. Interestingly, the entirety of North and South American native people are derived from a single gene pool.
 
The entire western hemisphere is a single gene pool in regards to Native Americans.
True, sort of. It's mainly because Native Americans are VERY resistant to DNA testing (has to do with the chance that they'll lose money they get paid already). So it has to be one group for them. If they had more testing results, it could be narrowed down much further to geographic regions and tribes.

The natives in the Falkland Islands of Argentina and the Eskimo peoples of the Arctic and Alaska and all in between have very similar DNA.
Most South American "natives" are more genetically similar to Polynesians than they are to most North American "natives". This has led to the belief that the "land bridge theory" is probably not correct. They came on boats. Easter Island is a key component to this as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emaximus
Apparently Native Americans have declined to participate in DNA testing, giving ancestry very little to use for reference sampling for North American Native Americans. Unless things have changed, that could be the problem. My Grandpa's Granddad was 100% Cherokee and I did not receive any percentage in my DNA. I could trace my family all the way back to him, but then it goes cold. It could just be a coincidence as well though.
This is correct. They don't want to stand the chance to lose money that they are currently given. I don't exactly blame them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emergence
Apparently Native Americans have declined to participate in DNA testing, giving ancestry very little to use for reference sampling for North American Native Americans. Unless things have changed, that could be the problem. My Grandpa's Granddad was 100% Cherokee and I did not receive any percentage in my DNA. I could trace my family all the way back to him, but then it goes cold. It could just be a coincidence as well though.

I found your grandpa's grandad's cousins sister.
200w.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tigerpaw00
Just sent mine in. What have your experiences been like?

I'm more interested in my genetic/ethnic makeup then connecting with distant family members.

Anyone find out they had a closely related family member they didn't know about?
I did 23andme for myself, and AncestryDNA for my mother, father, wife, mother-in-law, and father-in-law. I also participate in some online DNA and genetics forums. 23andme's ancestry portion is extremely unreliable. In fact, they will erroneously cite Togo/Benin for some DNA that is not even from the continent of Africa. But 23andme is great for medical DNA testing. That's what I used it for. 23andme uses 1 heritage test, and AncestryDNA uses 3. So AncestryDNA is the best thing going, and you chose correctly.

Keep in mind that as more data and information comes in, the results will evolve. Some are already quite refined (mostly Western and Northern Europe, and some parts of Eastern Asia). But even they will get more specific and better.

It's really fascinating stuff. I've now met 2 cousins I had no idea existed. One of them has developed her family tree to the point that it has over 1,000 entries. I also found out significant portions of my heritage that we didn't know existed. It has also filled in a blank on my mother's side of the family with regard to a significant portion of family lineage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TKL67
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT