ADVERTISEMENT

OT: NFL settles with Kaepernick and Reid

Being reported that the NFL paid between $60-$80 million to settle.

That's a party that was afraid of losing.

That’s literally like me paying someone $60 or $80 bucks to go away. That’s no money to the nfl at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jwilliamsiii
A platform provided by his employer. That's the key here.

Protests, regardless of whether they're peaceful, have consequences. That's why it takes courage to do them. If there was nothing to risk, then there'd be nothing to praise.

I support the awareness towards unnecessary police brutality. I also support peaceful protesting. I didn't like the way Kaep decided to protest, but it didn't bother me as much as it did some people.

At the end of the day, though, he made a team sport about himself and became a distraction. You can argue whether it was a major one or not, but at the end of the day his employer judged the distraction to be more detrimental than the value he brought as a player. That's the biggest thing. Kaep just wasn't very good anymore, and no one seems to want to say that. Had he been better, he would've gotten better offers, but he wasn't and blamed it on his protest.

A couple things. I have no issue with a team releasing him because he did it on company time. Even if you add in the hypocrisy of it with them being paid as a league to be out there in the first place, it's still their league and their team.

My discussion and interest with the NFL is more with if it's collusion or not. That's just an interesting topic.

My disagreeing is more about individuals pretending to give an actual damn about the cause but don't like the protest. Again, I contend those folks don't understand what protest is. Yes the team provides a platform. He uses that platform to promote a message. There were consequences. Again. I'm ok with that. Protestors routinely go to jail. Nothing new there. People, some, not all, hiding their racism by pretending they care about him quietly kneeling is interesting to me. I wouldn't kneel but also don't take it to the level of a not wanting him to have a job in the NFL with my team or any other. While at the same time not showing equal disdain for a violent criminal rejoining my team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ddot7 and trich24
Not sure they were going to lose per say, a lot of information would come out that would hurt their public image. Same could be said for Kaep’s side as well, in the end it was simpler to just pay a settlement than to draw it out in court.
Come on
 
I bet you have made the argument that slavery was actually good for black people.
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wfreeman84
Here’s my thing...NO NFL TEAM SHOULD HAVE TO HIRE ANYBODY THEY DON’T WANT ON THEIR TEAM!

He was a backup (at best) & a sideline distraction...why would anybody want that poison in their locker room?? He didn’t get blackballed...it’s a privilege to play in the league, not a right! I’m sure there are a lot of guys out there right now not on NFL rosters that believe they deserve to be there...can they all sue too?? Hell, can I sue? Why can’t I be there?? I think it’s a conspiracy smh
 
This is where you're completely wrong. I've heard that argument 100 times over the last 2 yrs and frankly, it's not a very well thought out one....no offense. The "clowns" that are getting hired before him like Tom Savage, Josh Johnson, etc...are making pennies on the dollar compared to what Kap was demanding ($16M+ range). Savage made $690k his last year in Houston, Josh Johnson made $148k last year with Washington....for reference.

Aside from the money, players who are distractions to the franchise and team always have and always will be pushed down because their play isn't good enough to justify all the negativity they bring to the franchise. Terrell Owens is a perfect example of that. He had 127 receptions and 14 TD's his last 2 years in the league and couldn't get a job in 2011 because even though he was still a hell of a lot better than at least 75% of the wideouts in the league all the other things that came along with TO were no longer worth his performance. When he was a top 10 wideout in the league it was a different story.

Also....Nathan Peterman made $346,000 last season. It has been reported that Kap wouldn't talk to teams who weren't offering him $16MM+/yr. You tell me what you would rather spend on for a player you hope only has to play in an injury situation.

Love when the racists use fake news to support their argument. Kaep never had a single contract offer since he started his protest.
 
I love how people like you look to call black people racist; if you knew the true definition of racist, you would see that as a black man, he can't be the one who's a racist.
rac·ist
/ˈrāsəst/
noun
  1. 1.
    a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another
Show me were it says a black man cant be racist.
 
Haha are you really trying to say black people can't be racist?

I saw with my own eyes up close a few black racists. This is how their racism works. Again, just the ones that I know.

I don't like those white folks that don't like me. I hate them because they hate me. What about Mr so and so or Mrs so and so. Well no I like them. They are good people. They've always treated me fair and like a human being. That's different. Their racism is a defense mechanism based on how they're treated. They can't really discriminate because they have nothing to offer that the other race needs so to speak. No standing in society. No economic advantage to discriminate so to speak or power to deny any rights or privilege. My conclusion. They only don't like them because they didn't like them first otherwise they'd love them.

My definition upcoming.

A white racist doesn't like black folks period. Think they are inferior to them, would never have them mix blood or in most cases in their home as a guest. In this country they do in many cases have the powers I mentioned above that allows the racism to manifest itself in discrimination.

I'm hoping that's what he meant by black folks can't be racist. That's definitely not a fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeniceTiger
Glad they got paid by the slavemaster league.

Off topic...

We are less than 200 years removed from slavery, so I think your comment is applicable here.

I hope you’re just a Troll, but I have a feeling you are not unfortunately. So, I’m curious on how many decades/centuries into the future you feel that this type of comment will start to be much more inflammatory and do more damage to equality and race relations?

I know you fully realize that comment bothers a lot of the population making less than $100k a year. NFL players do have health risks, but they are compensated greatly compared to 99% of Americans. I just don’t understand the comparison from NFL owner to Slavemaster, or even the metaphor.

I’ve watched in 3 generations, my white extremely bigoted step-granddad speak horribly towards race, now to my white half-brother (his grandchild) marry an African-American wife and have interacial children. Today’s generation is much less racist than prior generations. We move the needle more and more with each generation.

In 50+ years, so much has been accomplished with race relations. Unfortunately, I can’t see the same pace of accomplishment over the next 50 years in the current environment, with the continued focus on dividing each other by race, on each and every side.

I’ll get off my soapbox, now... feel free to tell my how wrong I am.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PKPTigers12
No different than Juan Carlos and Tommie Smith protesting at the Olympics and being treated like trash just for putting on blast how Black Americans were treated in America at the time. Peaceful protest led to unbelievable levels of anger and disdain. Those people were on the wrong side of history much like the snowflakes today.

People using what platform they have to bring awareness and instead of "fellow Americans" showing concern, many just attacked them for peacefully protesting. Zero empathy for their fellow citizens. It's sad.

Thanks to those who might not agree with kneeling but didn't deal with it like spoiled brats, respected how protest in America works and how important and unique of a right it is to us all and some were willing to listen knowing it doesn't impact them directly. Again, thank you.

I get that and respect his right to protest. More power to him using his public platform.

I also respect the rights of potential employers to pass. It's hard to argue that his protests didn't negatively affect the bottom line. The NFL is a business. Kap was bad for business.

I have every right to protest at my job but if it causes the company to lose money and draw unwanted attention I will be fired.

There will not be a golden parachute for me.
 
Racism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity.

I have seen and observed black people (employees and customers) who displayed racist words/actions towards my employees who were from Afghanistan and other countries and vice versa. It is my belief that there are some people within all races/national origins/ethnicities who display racist tendencies towards other races/groups. It is not confined to just one race or group.

Unfortunately racism exists in our country and our world, but I believe it is continuing to decline over time and with each new generation in this country ... it just isn't declining fast enough.
 
I saw with my own eyes up close a few black racists. This is how their racism works. Again, just the ones that I know.

I don't like those white folks that don't like me. I hate them because they hate me. What about Mr so and so or Mrs so and so. Well no I like them. They are good people. They've always treated me fair and like a human being. That's different. Their racism is a defense mechanism based on how they're treated. They can't really discriminate because they have nothing to offer that the other race needs so to speak. No standing in society. No economic advantage to discriminate so to speak or power to deny any rights or privilege. My conclusion. They only don't like them because they didn't like them first otherwise they'd love them.

My definition upcoming.

A white racist doesn't like black folks period. Think they are inferior to them, would never have them mix blood or in most cases in their home as a guest. In this country they do in many cases have the powers I mentioned above that allows the racism to manifest itself in discrimination.

I'm hoping that's what he meant by black folks can't be racist. That's definitely not a fact.
I appreciate the response.

It is sort of amusing to me that when you compare the 2 groups of racists, one comes out standing on a higher moral ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TuesdayJ
He’s plenty good enough to be playing in the NFL. There’s really no debating that. I’m just not sure if he’s worth the distraction that ownership obviously thinks he would bring. The Panthers owner, for instance seems like a fair and good man. He would be a pretty good fit in carolina as a backup because of the type of player Cam is. I don’t think he’s colluding not to hire him. I think he thinks it’s worth the potential hassle or backlash.
 
John Elway said Denver offered him $7million per for 2 years
Before he started protesting. They also didn’t offer him a $7 million deal with no catch. They asked if the 49ers would trade him to the Broncos would be take a $12 million dollar pay cut which in turn would net him the $7 million.

So nobody is taking a $12 million pay cut. He was still under contract with the 49ers. He still played football after this and made $14 million that year with the 49ers.

They never approached him when he was a free agent.
 
Before he started protesting. They also didn’t offer him a $7 million deal with no catch. They asked if the 49ers would trade him to the Broncos would be take a $12 million dollar pay cut which in turn would net him the $7 million.

So nobody is taking a $12 million pay cut. He was still under contract with the 49ers. He still played football after this and made $14 million that year with the 49ers.

They never approached him when he was a free agent.
I’ll take your word for it. In hindsight, one could argue he or his agent (if he had one, seems like he didn’t but not sure) overestimated his value. Either way, it’s a shame the way this ha shaken out because he is doing some really good things (although I don’t agree with all) and I believe he made some mistakes along the way that caused a whole bunch of people to tune him out.
 
rac·ist
/ˈrāsəst/
noun
  1. 1.
    a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another
Show me were it says a black man cant be racist.

Well my friend, this is a convenient definition as created by those who like to water down the true aspect of racism so that any one, singular person can be categorized as "racist". However, racism has always been, and will continue to be a "group phenomenon", where it's real definition is "a competitive relationship between two groups of people that are competing for the ownership and control of resources and power. In which one group (which controls those resources) can exert their political will and influences over the other, based solely on the criteria (in this case, the amount of skin melanoma) established by the controlling group". So if you can tell me a what point in the current society, or even through the historical time of creation and existence of this country, that the black race, either as an individual or collusive group, had the ability, through political power, policy or control of resources, that they could override the collective will of Caucasians in this country, then yes, I would agree that a black man can be racist.

We can be prejudice. We can be biased. What we can't be, either individually, or collectively, is racist. (and you can look up the definition of those two words to get a better understanding of what I am saying).

Simple example given the topic that generated this conversation: At what point in time did the collective black players had enough influence, control, and power to change the outcome of the Kaepernick decision? Answer: they never did because the controlling power doesn't reside with them, but does with the white team owners. So the collective will of the owners said, "to hell with what you want, we are not signing you, thus crippling you economically, and there isn't a thing any of you collectively can do about it."

When you look at the racial issue in this country as one of an individual choice or decision, you seriously do the topic a disservice. By making this a "single person" problem, you would say that racism will be eradicated when each individual changes his/her own mind, when in fact public policies and the systemic (and yes, historical) unequal allocation and distribution of resources are the real issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClemsonReign
It's a well thought out one with all due respect, you're just thinking differently and towards your own end.

Your "distractions" are no different than the ones teams deal with when they bring in other troubled athletes. And any competent organization can justify hiring a peaceful demonstrator especially if the fans think it will help them win. Otherwise a team can man up and do it knowing it'll die down soon enough. Just as everything does in today's society. Plus the dude never says anything. Even with the niners he protested for weeks before anyone knew what he was doing. Someone literally noticed him sitting quietly beside a Gatorade jug out of sight. Sounds like your classic troublemaker right there. SMH. Snowflakes.

And you are right about pennies on the dollar in comparison to Kaep but it also speaks to whether a team is trying to get better or just fill a spot. I'm not mad at the ones just trying to fill a spot but there seemed to be a few opportunities where someone could've used him.

And you gotta be smarter than comparing him to Owens. That's just not well thought out. His teammates love him and have repeatedly said as much. He would cause no distraction in the locker room and any fan uprising will die down quickly because people were already over it.

Again, dude literally says nothing. Stand up to your snowflake fanbase and tell them their job is to try and make the team better. Many that don't like him don't believe in the cause he was fighting for otherwise who cares. There are far worse people in the NFL than him. Standing up to a bunch of fake patriots in the stands is the least any competent organization can do. Guarantee those crybabies would get over themselves in a couple weeks the same way they do with drug users and domestic abusers. Snowflakes. Too many of them on both sides of the aisle.

The salary argument is valid. And these owners are businessmen 1st. Why pay more for less? Our own CJ Spiller was a victim as he priced himself out of the league. There was no need to pay him millions when a rookie could generate the same stats at a portion of the cost.
 
Well my friend, this is a convenient definition as created by those who like to water down the true aspect of racism so that any one, singular person can be categorized as "racist". However, racism has always been, and will continue to be a "group phenomenon", where it's real definition is "a competitive relationship between two groups of people that are competing for the ownership and control of resources and power. In which one group (which controls those resources) can exert their political will and influences over the other, based solely on the criteria (in this case, the amount of skin melanoma) established by the controlling group". So if you can tell me a what point in the current society, or even through the historical time of creation and existence of this country, that the black race, either as an individual or collusive group, had the ability, through political power, policy or control of resources, that they could override the collective will of Caucasians in this country, then yes, I would agree that a black man can be racist.

We can be prejudice. We can be biased. What we can't be, either individually, or collectively, is racist. (and you can look up the definition of those two words to get a better understanding of what I am saying).

Simple example given the topic that generated this conversation: At what point in time did the collective black players had enough influence, control, and power to change the outcome of the Kaepernick decision? Answer: they never did because the controlling power doesn't reside with them, but does with the white team owners. So the collective will of the owners said, "to hell with what you want, we are not signing you, thus crippling you economically, and there isn't a thing any of you collectively can do about it."

When you look at the racial issue in this country as one of an individual choice or decision, you seriously do the topic a disservice. By making this a "single person" problem, you would say that racism will be eradicated when each individual changes his/her own mind, when in fact public policies and the systemic (and yes, historical) unequal allocation and distribution of resources are the real issues.

I feel sorry for you.....and not because you are repressed.
 
I appreciate the response.

It is sort of amusing to me that when you compare the 2 groups of racists, one comes out standing on a higher moral ground.

I think you missed my point if what I said drew that conclusion. It's ok tho. I think honestly the best we can do is worry about ourselves and try to positively influence those around us. So I'm not going to be racist.
 
The salary argument is valid. And these owners are businessmen 1st. Why pay more for less? Our own CJ Spiller was a victim as he priced himself out of the league. There was no need to pay him millions when a rookie could generate the same stats at a portion of the cost.

Where did you read me argue against that point? In this very post I agreed with his pennies on the dollar comment.

Not sure if you've read all my posts, there's been a lot going on in this thread so I understand if you didn't see it. I laid out exactly what my problem was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CUPLAYER1
Here’s my thing...NO NFL TEAM SHOULD HAVE TO HIRE ANYBODY THEY DON’T WANT ON THEIR TEAM!

He was a backup (at best) & a sideline distraction...why would anybody want that poison in their locker room?? He didn’t get blackballed...it’s a privilege to play in the league, not a right! I’m sure there are a lot of guys out there right now not on NFL rosters that believe they deserve to be there...can they all sue too?? Hell, can I sue? Why can’t I be there?? I think it’s a conspiracy smh

I agree with this.

NFL owners have shown they’ll accept anything short of a conviction for murder if it’ll help them win.

Kaepernick would be cancer for a team.
 
I love how people like you look to call black people racist; if you knew the true definition of racist, you would see that as a black man, he can't be the one who's a racist.
Kaps not black though. He’s 50% white and raised by 2 white parents. The dude is just as much white as he is black and can absolutely be racist.
 
Last edited:
I feel sorry for you.....and not because you are repressed.

ehh, not sure that's the word you are looking for, but whatever. Either way, facts are facts, whether you choose to accept them or not.
 
Well my friend, this is a convenient definition as created by those who like to water down the true aspect of racism so that any one, singular person can be categorized as "racist". However, racism has always been, and will continue to be a "group phenomenon", where it's real definition is "a competitive relationship between two groups of people that are competing for the ownership and control of resources and power. In which one group (which controls those resources) can exert their political will and influences over the other, based solely on the criteria (in this case, the amount of skin melanoma) established by the controlling group". So if you can tell me a what point in the current society, or even through the historical time of creation and existence of this country, that the black race, either as an individual or collusive group, had the ability, through political power, policy or control of resources, that they could override the collective will of Caucasians in this country, then yes, I would agree that a black man can be racist.

We can be prejudice. We can be biased. What we can't be, either individually, or collectively, is racist. (and you can look up the definition of those two words to get a better understanding of what I am saying).

Simple example given the topic that generated this conversation: At what point in time did the collective black players had enough influence, control, and power to change the outcome of the Kaepernick decision? Answer: they never did because the controlling power doesn't reside with them, but does with the white team owners. So the collective will of the owners said, "to hell with what you want, we are not signing you, thus crippling you economically, and there isn't a thing any of you collectively can do about it."

When you look at the racial issue in this country as one of an individual choice or decision, you seriously do the topic a disservice. By making this a "single person" problem, you would say that racism will be eradicated when each individual changes his/her own mind, when in fact public policies and the systemic (and yes, historical) unequal allocation and distribution of resources are the real issues.
You seriously said this: they never did because the controlling power doesn't reside with them, but does with the white team

You really think the players have never had the controlling power? All they had to do was stop playing. If the NFL is so bad (racist), the cause is so worthy or the protest so important, the players can just stop playing - that has always been their choice: to work for that ”slavemaster ” employer or not. The player has all the control. Period, End of argument.
 
I think you missed my point if what I said drew that conclusion. It's ok tho. I think honestly the best we can do is worry about ourselves and try to positively influence those around us. So I'm not going to be racist.
I have been drinking. I skimmed over your post to be honest.

"I saw with my own eyes up close a few black racists. This is how their racism works. Again, just the ones that I know."

I assumed you were applying that anecdotal example, "They only don't like them because they didn't like them first otherwise they'd love them." to all black people who are racists. My mistake for not carrying the bold with me as I read through the rest of your post. I believe I see your point.

My definition of racism is simply variance. People believe they are inferior to those who are simply different. The more variance, the more hate. And obviously vice versa, we look for those similar to us and shy away from those who are different. No matter the perspective of the viewer that doesn't change with what side your own. No one is beyond the bounds from that. Cerebral stuff, I know, but it is really that simple IMO. Obviously most people can handle the variance and I'm not implying that everyone hates everyone who is different.

The only unequal/differential hate comes from population numbers or the majority of whichever place it might be. As you mentioned, that is what allows the discrimination to manifest. The majority will always have advantages. So yea, are black people discriminated against in this country? Unfortunately, yes. Do I think there has been substantial improvement? Yes, but that is another conversation.

I'm still laughing at @emajor2 for his posts ITT.
 
I have been drinking. I skimmed over your post to be honest.

"I saw with my own eyes up close a few black racists. This is how their racism works. Again, just the ones that I know."

I assumed you were applying that anecdotal example, "They only don't like them because they didn't like them first otherwise they'd love them." to all black people who are racists. My mistake for not carrying the bold with me as I read through the rest of your post. I believe I see your point.

My definition of racism is simply variance. People believe they are inferior to those who are simply different. The more variance, the more hate. And obviously vice versa, we look for those similar to us and shy away from those who are different. No matter the perspective of the viewer that doesn't change with what side your own. No one is beyond the bounds from that. Cerebral stuff, I know, but it is really that simple IMO. Obviously most people can handle the variance and I'm not implying that everyone hates everyone who is different.

The only unequal/differential hate comes from population numbers or the majority of whichever place it might be. As you mentioned, that is what allows the discrimination to manifest. The majority will always have advantages. So yea, are black people discriminated against in this country? Unfortunately, yes. Do I think there has been substantial improvement? Yes, but that is another conversation.

I'm still laughing at @emajor2 for his posts ITT.

You know, I have received several comments but none yet has refuted what was written. Yes, a lot of snide comments and feign disbelief, but nothing answering the general premise of the question asked, and the basis of the answer given. But I understand completely. So I suggest you re-read what was written and tell me where, factually, I am wrong?

A simple review of history will answer who's right and who isn't.
 
You seriously said this: they never did because the controlling power doesn't reside with them, but does with the white team

You really think the players have never had the controlling power? All they had to do was stop playing. If the NFL is so bad (racist), the cause is so worthy or the protest so important, the players can just stop playing - that has always been their choice: to work for that ”slavemaster ” employer or not. The player has all the control. Period, End of argument.

They've done it before, they can do it again
 
My disagreeing is more about individuals pretending to give an actual damn about the cause but don't like the protest. Again, I contend those folks don't understand what protest is. Yes the team provides a platform. He uses that platform to promote a message. There were consequences. Again. I'm ok with that. Protestors routinely go to jail. Nothing new there. People, some, not all, hiding their racism by pretending they care about him quietly kneeling is interesting to me. I wouldn't kneel but also don't take it to the level of a not wanting him to have a job in the NFL with my team or any other. While at the same time not showing equal disdain for a violent criminal rejoining my team.

I agree with a lot of this.
 
Haha are you really trying to say black people can't be racist?

Unfortunately, there's this theory that the term 'racism' actually defined anyone who has benefited unjustly due to their race. Thus, being racist or racism in general isn't something that an individual determines by how they act, but it is predetermined by the system we live in and what your race is.

I think it's arguably the most liberal, back-asswards thing I've ever heard of and a terrible thing to preach as it then takes the onus away from the individual and allows them to blame a system, but I do know it's taught in a lot of universities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steven15
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT