Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Says the guy who will ignore the opinions of 1000 experts in favor of one non-expert propagandist.oh man this must be a tough day for you if we're at reading videos
That sh*t looks staged as hell and knowing O'Keefe's past, it wouldn't surprise me a bit.HTF is that spaz an exec at phizer?
That sh*t looks staged as hell and knowing O'Keefe's past, it wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Video evidence of people incriminating themselves on Jan. 6th led you to believe it was a nothing burger, so there's that.Lmao I love how they like to argue with video evidence of people incriminating themselves
MFers spin like hurricanes
You’re right actuallyVideo evidence of three-letter spooks “incriminating”themselves on Jan. 6th led you to believe it was a nothing burger, so there's that.
Says the guy who will ignore the opinions of 1000 experts in favor of one non-expert propagandist.
Glad you can admit the FBI story line was a nothing burger.You’re right actually
Answer me this - who do you trust more - the majority of the world's epidemiologists or Alex Berenson? We know the answer....yea? give me an example of that.
Answer me this - who do you trust more - the majority of the world's epidemiologists or Alex Berenson? We know the answer....
Better you invent your own facts and move on from there? Why listen to experts in their field when you’ve never studied it for a minute? Not like they have degrees in this shit.no. i take in information from all sides and look at data available and draw my own conclusion. i dont care where the "consensus" sits at all, they have a pretty sht historical record. if i think theyre right id say it, if i dont i dont hide it. plenty of epidemiologists had plenty of problems with the "majority" conclusions and recommendations. the barrington agreement led by kulldorf, gupta, bhattachaya - epi's from little known schools like harvard, oxford, and stanford - didnt agree with the majority either. but i guess theyre just right wing extremists. thousands of health workers didnt. so if the strength of a decision is how many and how qualified are the people who agree with you well...seems pretty justified based on that group. but i would never think that way, i just wasnt raised to just do or think what everybody else does because im afraid of being criticism. my mom woulda slapped my upside the head for being a follower. besides, you dont need an epidemiology degree to identify bullsht. just like you dont need one to process information and data
You just proved my statement correct. You will "do your own research" by simply listening to the handful of naysayers who say something different, because you aint no sheep.no. i take in information from all sides and look at data available and draw my own conclusion. i dont care where the "consensus" sits at all, they have a pretty sht historical record. if i think theyre right id say it, if i dont i dont hide it. plenty of epidemiologists had plenty of problems with the "majority" conclusions and recommendations. the barrington agreement led by kulldorf, gupta, bhattachaya - epi's from little known schools like harvard, oxford, and stanford - didnt agree with the majority either. but i guess theyre just right wing extremists. thousands of health workers didnt. so if the strength of a decision is how many and how qualified are the people who agree with you well...seems pretty justified based on that group. but i would never think that way, i just wasnt raised to just do or think what everybody else does because im afraid of being criticism. my mom woulda slapped my upside the head for being a follower. besides, you dont need an epidemiology degree to identify bullsht. just like you dont need one to process information and data
no. i take in information from all sides and look at data available and draw my own conclusion. i dont care where the "consensus" sits at all, they have a pretty sht historical record. if i think theyre right id say it, if i dont i dont hide it. plenty of epidemiologists had plenty of problems with the "majority" conclusions and recommendations. the barrington agreement led by kulldorf, gupta, bhattachaya - epi's from little known schools like harvard, oxford, and stanford - didnt agree with the majority either. but i guess theyre just right wing extremists. thousands of health workers didnt. so if the strength of a decision is how many and how qualified are the people who agree with you well...seems pretty justified based on that group. but i would never think that way, i just wasnt raised to just do or think what everybody else does because im afraid of being criticism. my mom woulda slapped my upside the head for being a follower. besides, you dont need an epidemiology degree to identify bullsht. just like you dont need one to process information and data
Better you invent your own facts and move on from there? Why listen to experts in their field when you’ve never studied it for a minute? Not like they have degrees in this shit.
If you call the fire department do you explain to them how to put the fire out based on your google searches?
yea couldnt have worked out better. never even knew i had covid what a deadly virus.He did his research guys.
yea couldnt have worked out better. never even knew i had covid what a deadly virus.
what is it about thinking for yourself thats so offensive? its absolutely fascinating to see your war on independent thought. never woulda imagined anyone actively condemning it. hope you dont mind but im gonna stay on the other side of that one. kinda enjoy freedom you know
This guy thinks he can acquire decades of specialized knowledge and education in a few hours of research on the internet and accused others of a "war on independent thought". Lolololol..