ADVERTISEMENT

The media is always telling lies

In the days after the debate when the dems decided Joe needed to go, there were multiple reports quoting dem donors and as well as dem staff giving first hand accounts of meetings with biden where it was evident he was impaired.
Again, just a casual observer who only saw om on TV should have been able to see it. However, if it was clear to dem donors and staff based on personal interaction, there is zero chance the media, who constantly references inside sources, was unaware.
What possible other explanation could the be other than purposefully cover it up?
I looked but I don't see big dem donors or staff on the record about impairment worries, other than some post debate performance reporting. Having editors and reporters in my family, I firmly believe reporters will report if they have a confirmed story, doesn't matter the politics. I'm sure reporters are coerced occasionally to sit on something, or have some bias, but that's the exception not the rule. I appreciate what you're saying, but I think you're extrapolating a conclusion from not enough information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem
I looked but I don't see big dem donors or staff on the record about impairment worries, other than some post debate performance reporting. Having editors and reporters in my family, I firmly believe reporters will report if they have a confirmed story, doesn't matter the politics. I'm sure reporters are coerced occasionally to sit on something, or have some bias, but that's the exception not the rule. I appreciate what you're saying, but I think you're extrapolating a conclusion from not enough information.
It's hard to find particular articles after the fact. There are a couple below that reference some of the reports that were out there. It was only a few days after the debate that any were reported, and that has since stopped since biden his out now.




Again, though. Even without the direct confirmation from those close to him, it should have been apparent. At the very least, it should have been questioned. Why else would he not be giving regular press conferences and taking questions like every other potus before him? Why would he regularly have cheat sheets with names and faces of reporters? Why would he repeatedly admit he was only "allowed" to take a certain # of questions? It has been obvious to any objective person he has been being handled by his staff to mitigate revealing his decline.
 
I'm not deflecting. You're advocating for a fascist. I'm not going to legitimize fascism by arguing its merits. It has none.
You are absolutely deflecting. I was not advocating for anyone. The discussion was not even about trump - it was about kamala. You just are not an honest person.

Kamala is an extremist by any standard. It's fine if you support her, that is absolutely your right. It does not change the fact that she is far left by any objective standard you can come up with.
 
You are absolutely deflecting. I was not advocating for anyone. The discussion was not even about trump - it was about kamala. You just are not an honest person.

Kamala is an extremist by any standard. It's fine if you support her, that is absolutely your right. It does not change the fact that she is far left by any objective standard you can come up with.
Yeah you're probably right that the prosecutor turned attorney general of California is a far left extremist.
 
That's the dumbest thing I've heard so far today, but it's still early. It's incredible how you can ignore all facts and metrics that point to the exact opposite. Is any "media" perfect? No. But it's intellectually dishonest to ignore the efforts that Fox, the Fox wannabes, and conservative social media have gone to promote misinformation, half truths, and conspiracy theories. Liberal talking heads, and corresponding social media pale in comparison to the Magas. The use of pageantry, rhetoric, blaming any misfortune on an "other" is straight out of Mussolini/Hitler history.
Nope, your response was.
 
It's hard to find particular articles after the fact. There are a couple below that reference some of the reports that were out there. It was only a few days after the debate that any were reported, and that has since stopped since biden his out now.




Again, though. Even without the direct confirmation from those close to him, it should have been apparent. At the very least, it should have been questioned. Why else would he not be giving regular press conferences and taking questions like every other potus before him? Why would he regularly have cheat sheets with names and faces of reporters? Why would he repeatedly admit he was only "allowed" to take a certain # of questions? It has been obvious to any objective person he has been being handled by his staff to mitigate revealing his decline.
The reason the liberal media doesn’t want to now acknowledge that Biden stepped down because of his cognitive decline is because it would make their now appointed nominee to be an outright liar… because there are numerous videos in the past where she said on camera that there was nothing wrong with Biden when asked point blank about his condition. In Biden’s speech to the nation this past week he never even mentioned the real reason he’s not seeking reelection now. He just said it’s to pass the torch on to the next generation because this election is too important (blah blah bs bs).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat
The reason the liberal media doesn’t want to now acknowledge that Biden stepped down because of his cognitive decline is because it would make their now appointed nominee to be an outright liar… because there are numerous videos in the past where she said on camera that there was nothing wrong with Biden when asked point blank about his condition. In Biden’s speech to the nation this past week he never even mentioned the real reason he’s not seeking reelection now. He just said it’s to pass the torch on to the next generation because this election is too important (blah blah bs bs).
Are you under the impression that President Biden owes anyone an explanation of why he withdrew from the race?
 
Are you under the impression that President Biden owes anyone an explanation of why he withdrew from the race?
Absolutely I do… any truly concerned citizen should. This was a historic decision on his part , and he didn’t quit a job at McDonalds….he decided to not seek reelection for President of the US. (After repeatedly saying he wouldn’t give in to the pressure and he was staying in the race)
 
Absolutely I do… any truly concerned citizen should. This was a historic decision on his part , and he didn’t quit a job at McDonalds….he decided to not seek reelection for President of the US. (After repeatedly saying he wouldn’t give in to the pressure and he was staying in the race)
He didn't quit any job. He changed his mind about seeking reelection. Joe Biden has quite a history of public bluster.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but he doesn't owe you one, and that's why you didn't get one. Donald Trump could drop out of the race tomorrow for any reason he chooses and I wouldn't ask why. It's none of my business. And besides, weren't y'all kind of demanding for months that he was too old and unfit for the job?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Just remember that you're communicating with people who believe men can have babies and you can't define what "woman" is. That is Bizarre
Dude :rolleyes:

200w.gif
 
Are you under the impression that President Biden owes anyone an explanation of why he withdrew from the race?
He absolutely owes the country an explanation. He CHOSE to enter the primary and be the dem candidate for potus. He CHOSE to campaign for ptus again and be the nominee for potus. He absolutely owes teh country an explanation for dropping out at the last minute. Every potus owes the country an explanation for things they do as political candidates representing the voters that voted for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfurn
He absolutely owes the country an explanation. He CHOSE to enter the primary and be the dem candidate for potus. He CHOSE to campaign for ptus again and be the nominee for potus. He absolutely owes teh country an explanation for dropping out at the last minute. Every potus owes the country an explanation for things they do as political candidates representing the voters that voted for them.
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
 
He didn't quit any job. He changed his mind about seeking reelection. Joe Biden has quite a history of public bluster.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but he doesn't owe you one, and that's why you didn't get one. Donald Trump could drop out of the race tomorrow for any reason he chooses and I wouldn't ask why. It's none of my business. And besides, weren't y'all kind of demanding for months that he was too old and unfit for the job?
Re-read my post.. I said that he didn’t seek re-election.

In your second paragraph you’re just being disingenuous and not being honest. He does owe the public an ‘honest’ explanation as President of the US. Look, I know why he dropped out. Everyone with a brain knows. So he doesn’t have to tell me. Just wondering why your side of the aisle lies and distorts the truth all the time. But of course you’ll say that doesn’t happen and around and round we go,
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
Re-read my post.. I said that he didn’t seek re-election.

In your second paragraph you’re just being disingenuous and not being honest. He does owe the public an ‘honest’ explanation as President of the US. Look, I know why he dropped out. Everyone with a brain knows. So he doesn’t have to tell me. Just wondering why your side of the aisle lies and distorts the truth all the time. But of course you’ll say that doesn’t happen and around and round we go,
No my side lies and distorts the truth all the time. But my side still believes in democracy, and yours doesn't. So miss me with this bullshit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
No my side lies and distorts the truth all the time. But my side still believes in democracy, and yours doesn't. So miss me with this bullshit.
good lord… well at least you admitted your side lies and distorts the truth all the time. That’s a beginning, that’s a beginning.
 
Damn. It's like you live in bizarro world. That's all patently false. You're in some fantasy land where grass is blue and sky is green, and no one can tell you different. It's like you believe 2+2=5.
No help available to someone as stupid as you.

I wish the best for you idiot.
 
It has already happened. At some point some of y'all are gonna start realizing it's a different world outside the echo chamber.

The anti Trump coalition has accepted her with open arms and enthusiasm. The only ones who won't buy the rebranding are magas, so who cares? I don't mean that to be insensitive. I mean from a practical sense, you don't need to concern yourself with what is already being said about her in maga world.

Out here, it is self evident that she's very popular now.
Your meltdown will be epic. 😂
 
Ah, so your personal opinion. Got it.

Ms. Harris was rated the most left wing liberal by a ratings service beyond Bernie Sanders

It was an objective rating and not subjective

So YES CAMELA HARRIS WAS THE MOST LBERAL FAR LEFT SENATOR WHEN SHE WAS IN THE SENATE

IT HAS BEEN TAKEN DOWN NOW TO LIE TO AMERICA AS EXPECTED BY THE DEMOCRATS
 
Ms. Harris was rated the most left wing liberal by a ratings service beyond Bernie Sanders

It was an objective rating and not subjective

So YES CAMELA HARRIS WAS THE MOST LBERAL FAR LEFT SENATOR WHEN SHE WAS IN THE SENATE

IT HAS BEEN TAKEN DOWN NOW TO LIE TO AMERICA AS EXPECTED BY THE DEMOCRATS
Which ratings service? I'm asking because I've heard that repeated many times, and it's always a mysterious, nameless service or group that said this back then.

But I've never seen anyone produce a shred of evidence that this is actually true. Which service?
 
No help available to someone as stupid as you.

I wish the best for you idiot.
I know how hard it is for you to understand actual facts, your maga infected brain has been rewired to only except the doctrine of "alternative facts" as spoken by your orange god. So in case I confused you by using the analogy of 2+2=5 in my response......here's a hint....it's not 5. It's 4. Just count it out on your fingers like you usually do.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT