Trump 2024
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
She didn't have anything to do with the investigation, she just gave birth to the whole story. She made it up out of thin air.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
Is it taxation without representation if Congress sends Missouri some money to build a bridge without my explicit consent?
And look, I can be as critical of foreign aid as anyone. I think we’re being outright robbed and humiliated by the Israelis, the largest recipient of our aid, and have been for some time.
I don’t call that taxation without representation. It’s elected representatives funding things I sometimes disagree with. You know, an inherent consequence of representative democracy
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you ever tire of lying Piggy Goebbels?
- The FBI decided to investigate whether President Trump's campaign colluded with Russia after early foreign-policy adviser George Papadopoulos told a top Australian diplomat that Russia had compromising information on Hillary Clinton, The New York Times reported.
- Though there were several events that prompted the bureau to investigate the campaign, Papadopoulos' conversation with the diplomat was reportedly the one that led the bureau to formally launch its probe.
- Newly obtained emails also show that Papadopoulos' reach and influence within the campaign was greater than previously known.
We now know the tipping point that prompted the FBI to launch its Trump-Russia investigation
George Papadopoulos reportedly told a top Australian diplomat that Russia had compromising information on Hillary Clinton, sparking the FBI's Russia probe.
www.businessinsider.com
Im not sure what you are getting at. You are taxed and you are reprsented in that situation.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
Who decides the federal government’s budget?
Congress. Am I represented there? Yes, even if I don’t like the representatives.
There’s no difference. I don’t get a direct say in how Congress budgets my money or how many bullets the pentagon buys with it.
That’s not taxation without representation.
Do you ever tire of lying Piggy Goebbels?
- The FBI decided to investigate whether President Trump's campaign colluded with Russia after early foreign-policy adviser George Papadopoulos told a top Australian diplomat that Russia had compromising information on Hillary Clinton, The New York Times reported.
- Though there were several events that prompted the bureau to investigate the campaign, Papadopoulos' conversation with the diplomat was reportedly the one that led the bureau to formally launch its probe.
- Newly obtained emails also show that Papadopoulos' reach and influence within the campaign was greater than previously known.
We now know the tipping point that prompted the FBI to launch its Trump-Russia investigation
George Papadopoulos reportedly told a top Australian diplomat that Russia had compromising information on Hillary Clinton, sparking the FBI's Russia probe.
If you honestly believe that i feel sorry for you. You have had the wool pulled so far over your eyes. Im being serious.
It is a well known fact Hillary Clinton started the Russian collusion accusation against Trump. Its also known that Obama and his cabinet knew this.
The New York Times? You are aware they are a mouthpiece for the FBI correct? A literal mouthpiece.
It IS NOT well-known dumbass, that's the conspiracy cooked up in magat world to once again, blame everyone but Trump for things he did or others did on his behalf. Trey Gowdy explicitly said that the dossier had nothing to do with the investigation, which started seven weeks before they were even aware of it. Your perpetual victimhood tears are delicious though.
It's well known to anyone that doesn't watch CNN and Rachel Maddow. Also mouthpieces for the FBI.
The only tears i have are the ones laughing at the ineptness of the democratic party. Drink up.
Why aren't you outraged about what Papadopolous did to try and damage Hillary? I'm using Trey Gowdy's own words, not Rachel Maddow's you dingleberry.
And sure the Democratic party is so inept that they were able to develop the greatest election fraud scheme in history without a single person being caught! And you better chug this Republican clown-show Congress while you can because it will be the last time they're in power for a long, long time.
“Not to me, it doesn’t — and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it,” Gowdy, who recently announced he will not seek reelection, said.
“There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica.”
He added that the dossier has “nothing to do with George Papadopoulos’s meeting in Great Britain.”
“It also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there’s going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier,” he said.
Gowdy: Memo has no impact on Russia probe
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said during an interview airing Sunday that the previously classified memo alleging abuse of government surveillance powers by the Justice Department has no impact on …
thehill.com
Why aren't you outraged about what Papadopolous did to try and damage Hillary? I'm using Trey Gowdy's own words, not Rachel Maddow's you dingleberry.
And sure the Democratic party is so inept that they were able to develop the greatest election fraud scheme in history without a single person being caught! And you better chug this Republican clown-show Congress while you can because it will be the last time they're in power for a long, long time.
“Not to me, it doesn’t — and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it,” Gowdy, who recently announced he will not seek reelection, said.
“There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica.”
He added that the dossier has “nothing to do with George Papadopoulos’s meeting in Great Britain.”
“It also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there’s going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier,” he said.
Gowdy: Memo has no impact on Russia probe
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said during an interview airing Sunday that the previously classified memo alleging abuse of government surveillance powers by the Justice Department has no impact on …
What did Papadopolous do?
He was interested in doing harm to her campaign but instead of wringing your hands about that, you want to cry like a little bitch over a dossier that had nothing to do with the Collusion investigation. It's ok to do her harm but not the other way around in your mind, because you're a slave to Trump's victimhood fantasies. You and the propaganda machine on the right are destroying this country with your non-stop assault on the truth. It's digusting.
The truth is that Hillary concocted the Russian collusion allegations to harm Trump.
A fat pig is the perfect choice for your handle because you are an insufferable swine.
Thats ok then. The US should quit financially contributing to NATO which is basically a european group of nations until every nato members actually contributes and lets put it at minimum 5% gdp to catch them up. Im good with that at minimum.
They don't contribute to NATO per se, because the agreement is that they will invest 2% to their own defense Gomer. Which means if the US quit contributing, they wouldn't be funding our own military ddeerrpp
Thats one of your dumber responses....ddddddddddddeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrpppppppppppppp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You need to quit listening to Illuminatibot and FatMAGAfromPeoria1776 Gomerrrrrr
The 2% defence investment guideline
In 2006, NATO Defence Ministers agreed to commit a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending to continue to ensure the Alliance's military readiness. This guideline also serves as an indicator of a country's political will to contribute to NATO's common defence efforts since the defence capacity of each member has an impact on the overall perception of the Alliance's credibility as a politico-military organisation.
While the 2% of GDP guideline alone is no guarantee that money will be spent in the most effective and efficient way to acquire and deploy modern capabilities, it remains an important indicator of the political resolve of individual Allies to devote to defence a relatively small but still significant level of resources.
Budget allocation is a national, sovereign decision, but NATO Allies have agreed that at least 20% of defence expenditures should be devoted to major equipment spending, including the associated research and development, perceived as a crucial indicator for the scale and pace of modernisation.
To learn more, visit Funding NATO.
OK and how many nato members are abiding by this agreement? The US has to abide while the others do not. The US can still spend as much money on military as it wants but just quit participating in nato related expenditures.
The US is the only NATO country who has ever invoked the charter and the alliance stuck with us through thick and thin in Iraq and Afghanistan, in fact they were there with us for 20 years at the cost of many of their own lives and billions of dollars. They are proven partners who will show up when needed so you need to stop trying to put sprinkles on Trump's despicable, morally bankrupt turds. He is a disgusting human being, totally unfit for office and especially for THIS country.
Finally found a candidate I can get behind (I already do so daily)....
I don't see the name Hillary and I also don't see why it would be wrong to spy on people suspected of colluding with the Russians. Fvck all those alt-right propagandists on the twatter as well. Enemies within.
Do you have any "sources" that aren't Twitter accounts? You are laughably ignorant.
Honest questions, what do you do professionally and what age are you?
Trump just can't shut his stupid mouth for 5 seconds and all he has done is give the left their new talking points.
NY03 looks like it will go blue.
MAGA lost the Presidency
MAGA didn't win back the senate
MAGA just barely won the house.
If this is winning I'm ready to start losing.
MAGA lost the Presidency
MAGA didn't win back the senate
MAGA just barely won the house.
If this is winning I'm ready to start losing.
Last edited:
The source is not twitter, it’s Michael Shellenberger. Surely you know how to discern the difference. But maybe not 🤷♂️.
Youv’e asked me what I do / who I am 3 times now. Stop stalking and worry about your own house. Most people in here know who I am irl, I’m not hiding anything.
Doesn’t see why it’s wrong to spy on your own citizens! You want the stassi?
You have to admit the timing of that was pretty impeccable. You were making the argument and then a bombshell article comes out 3 minutes later that destroys your whole narrative. 😂
A bombshell article that no one but magats will read or even care about. Trump lost LOL, get over your tired self.
Sure, sure but we don't care. After what Trump said about letting Putin have his way with our NATO allies, people are jumping off the sympathy train. "They spied on my Campaign!" 😭😭 Derp....no one cares...
I’ve found that you don’t have an ability to articulate your point or backup your position without relying on random tweets from random right wing accounts.
