Why would I as a level minded conservative adult want to try and decipher the madness of the liberal hive mind? They dont call it the woke mind virus for nothing. LOL!!
Trump on X with Elon
- Thread starter CUTiger1977
- Start date
A quick glance at the polls and the betting markets this morning show that the libs don't have much to worry about 😅
hell yes. we're back to getting a steady drip from GWP. thank you growls. i was worried you were gonna let them go under.Libs running scared!!
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz’s Campaign in Complete Meltdown Over Elon Musk’s Space with President Donald Trump
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz's Campaign in Complete Meltdown Over Elon Musk's Space with President Donald Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Former President Donald Trump held a groundbreaking interview with tech mogul Elon Musk on Monday.www.thegatewaypundit.com
This is the Kamala we all know. When put in front of a camera and challenged, Americans will see her radical agenda and one that was kept quiet for the last 3.5 years.
She's no moderate even if MSM tries to portray her as such. Just like we knew Biden was not mentally fit, the truth eventually comes out.
So you're going to use a clip from early 2016 to explain what she will do now that she's been VP for four years? There are indications that her views have changed and she's moved more to the middle on a lot of issues, so why don't you wait until she's asked about this again? Do you think Trump has changed his position on any issues since he ran in 2016? Hell, he flipped on his position about EVs overnight after Elon endorsed him.
I can only take her at her word. She said that. Has her radical opinion changed? Maybe, but she has yet to sit down and take an interview. As I said, there was a reason why Biden was not put in front of the camera very often until he absolutely had to. We saw how that worked out.
I look forward to hearing Kamala have to explain her ideas, policy and agenda. I think that's when most Americans will be able to get some answers and quite frankly, some honesty from her.
She is no moderate and you know it.
I didn't say she was a moderate, I said she's moved more to the middle, how much we'll have to see. You will get what you want from her but give her some space to work out her policy details before casting judgment, as she found herself in this position virtually overnight. I'm sure that four years as VP can do a lot for how you approach an issue - after all, what better place to learn about how policies affect real world issues than that?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
run for the hills! trump did a safe space interview!
trump being back on twatter is the best thing that has happened to Kamala. Let more people see his crazy tweets and the ramblings of a senile old man.
"I am crushing kamala in the real polls!"
"she should be disqualified and I am suing her for taking biden's money!"
Let the world see his fear and desperation.
There's no way that Kamala has changed her mind on anything during the Trump era. Anyone who thinks that is a cuck shitlib. Now, about JD Vance calling Trump America's Hitler...
I asked you specifically because you showed some integrity in accepting the ban, and seem to be pretty reasoned, accepting faults from both parties not just the "other", etc. I know you don't care about my approval lol, just giving you context for why I singled you out with that question.
I ask because the amount of smoke from last election that when it investigated or reviewed by bipartisan people involved (nefarious suitcases that turned out to be completely standard storage to that area, things "deleted" where the person just didn't know what to look for, "thumb drives" that were actually mints, complete recounts, cyber ninja's audit adding votes to Biden, etc etc) it turns out the smoke was just a fog machine by people looking for anything to explain their feelings. They care so much and all of their bubble care so much and the rally's show so many people with fervor that they just can't believe it. So you look for anything to latch on to (maybe not you specifically). So with that in mind, if all that "smoke" was enough last cycle, I just don't see any chance the "machine" of die hard "investigators" aren't able to create that same fog again. So if court case after court case, debunking after debunking wasn't enough this cycle, I am not sure what could possibly change next cycle.
Similar threads
