ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Witch Hunt



Meet Elizabeth Jean Carroll, known by most as E. Jean Carroll. She has been an avid Trump hater and in 2019 she decided to publish a story claiming Trump assaulted her in a department store.

This claim could’ve easily been refuted because Trump keeps such a detailed record of his life, but this became impossible because Carroll isn’t even sure what year it happened. Normally this would just be a public dispute, but liberals found a way around this.

Liberals in New York changed the laws with the only reasoning behind it behind was so Carroll could sue Trump. Our public officials used official time and changed laws just to go after an enemy. Carroll wasn’t going to pursue a lawsuit until she was persuaded by members of the Lincoln Project like George Conway.

This woman has gone on TV and bragged about her fantasies, has no proof any of this happened, and even gives weird inappropriate names to her pets. This is a huge miscarriage of justice and a very corrupt way to use the justice system.

Carroll and the Lincoln Project members and the politicians who allowed this to happen should all be punished. We can’t have a country where this is allowed to happen.
 
TigerGrowls said:
View embedded media


Meet Elizabeth Jean Carroll, known by most as E. Jean Carroll. She has been an avid Trump hater and in 2019 she decided to publish a story claiming Trump assaulted her in a department store.

This claim could’ve easily been refuted because Trump keeps such a detailed record of his life, but this became impossible because Carroll isn’t even sure what year it happened. Normally this would just be a public dispute, but liberals found a way around this.

Liberals in New York changed the laws with the only reasoning behind it behind was so Carroll could sue Trump. Our public officials used official time and changed laws just to go after an enemy. Carroll wasn’t going to pursue a lawsuit until she was persuaded by members of the Lincoln Project like George Conway.

This woman has gone on TV and bragged about her fantasies, has no proof any of this happened, and even gives weird inappropriate names to her pets. This is a huge miscarriage of justice and a very corrupt way to use the justice system.

Carroll and the Lincoln Project members and the politicians who allowed this to happen should all be punished. We can’t have a country where this is allowed to happen.
Click to expand...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: flotiger and yoshi121374
TigerGrowls said:
View embedded media


Meet Elizabeth Jean Carroll, known by most as E. Jean Carroll. She has been an avid Trump hater and in 2019 she decided to publish a story claiming Trump assaulted her in a department store.

This claim could’ve easily been refuted because Trump keeps such a detailed record of his life, but this became impossible because Carroll isn’t even sure what year it happened. Normally this would just be a public dispute, but liberals found a way around this.

Liberals in New York changed the laws with the only reasoning behind it behind was so Carroll could sue Trump. Our public officials used official time and changed laws just to go after an enemy. Carroll wasn’t going to pursue a lawsuit until she was persuaded by members of the Lincoln Project like George Conway.

This woman has gone on TV and bragged about her fantasies, has no proof any of this happened, and even gives weird inappropriate names to her pets. This is a huge miscarriage of justice and a very corrupt way to use the justice system.

Carroll and the Lincoln Project members and the politicians who allowed this to happen should all be punished. We can’t have a country where this is allowed to happen.
Click to expand...

And just think, If Trump could control his mouth like a decent Human Being he wouldn't be in the mess. At some point are any of you guys gonna hold him accountable for his actions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
yoshi121374 said:
And just think, If Trump could control his mouth like a decent Human Being he wouldn't be in the mess. At some point are any of you guys gonna hold him accountable for his actions?
Click to expand...
I saw Maggie Haberman say in an interview last night that Trump called her recently and said he intended to be in the courtroom for all his cases because he is his own best advocate, LOL. Seems to me that the more he appears, the more he'll owe/lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374



What Are “They” Afraid That a "Dictator”/President Trump Might Do?

Ok, let’s examine what a supposed dictator Trump might do if he were to be elected this November?

1) Will he hide the fact that in 2024 he attempted to hire a foreign ex-spy to work with Russian sources to create a fake anti-Biden dossier (while sneakily hiding his payments behind three paywalls), seed it with the media, and hatch lies that Biden was a “Putin poodle” and “Russian asset”?

2) Would a Trump president weaponize a vengeful FBI to begin contracting with X and Facebook to suppress stories he feels will hurt MAGA candidates? Would his FBI alter FISA warrants to go after his leftwing opponents? Would he and his FBI henchmen have leftwing newspapers blacklisted from X?

3) Would Trump’s future Secretary of State round up 51 right-wing ex-CIA “authorities” to swear and lie on the eve of the balloting that the Russians created the Stormy Daniels nondisclosure agreement?

4) Maybe Trump will get his DOJ to go easy on any future accusations of tax fraud on behalf of his sons by weaponizing the IRS.

5) Maybe Trump will dictatorially cancel student loan debt on the eve of the 2026 midterms. Or would he dare by fiat drain the strategic petroleum reserve merely for Republican advantage in the midterms?

6) Maybe a dictator Trump might appoint a special counsel to investigate the entire Biden family. Would his legal counsel consult with local and state Republican prosecutors to coordinate 90 or so more indictments against ex-president Joe Biden? Will he order the FBI to sweep down on one of the Biden residences to hunt for more missing classified files that Biden removed as a senator and vice president?

7) Will he postfacto declare the 2020 riots to be an armed “insurrection” and retroactively start trying, convicting, and jailing the some 14,000 who were arrested and released—on charges of rioting, looting, arson, murder, and assault, in addition to “illegal parading” and conspiracy to burn a federal courthouse, a city police precinct, a historic church? Would dictator Trump keep in preventative detention indefinitely those arrested in 2020 for rioting and violent protest?

8) Maybe dictator Trump will refuse to discuss all medical questions concerning his 78-year age.

9) Will Trump minions in the media and military start talking about rooting out “leftwing rage”, or Antifa and BLM “domestic terrorists” from the military ranks? Would Trump order the Pentagon to discharge any soldier who refused to get one of his Operation Warp Speed COVID mRNA boosters?

10) Will dictator Trump protect some 500 “sanctuary cities” from ignoring federal laws—as they nullify the endangered species list or federal gun registrations statutes?

11) Would dictator Trump’s America destroy the southern border deliberately and invite in 10 million illegal aliens from countries he thought would ensure new conservative voters?

12 ) Would dictator Trump's America start seeing red-states removing the names of Democratic candidates from the ballot?

13) Would dictator Trump start jailing ex-Biden officials who refused Republican congressional subpoenas?

14) Would dictator Trump’s America turn over $50 billion in weapons and supplies to terrorists like the Taliban?

15) Would dictator Trump’s America see an epidemic of big-city lawlessness, as conservative prosecutors deliberately let out felons convicted of smash and grab and car-jacking, and exempted theft and shoplifting from punishment?

16) Would dictator Trump start shaking down foreign governments to send $30 million into the Trump family coffers?

17) Would dictator Trump camp out at Mar-a-Lago for 3-4 days a week, and turn the presidency into a pastime job?

So what exactly would a “dictator” Trump do that our "civil libertarian” Joe Biden already has not done?
-Victor David Hansen
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat
This is rich!!

Kamala Harris Says We Could “Lose This Democracy” if We Elect a President Who Would Weaponize the DOJ and “Go After Their Political Enemies” (VIDEO)​

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Kamala Harris Says We Could "Lose This Democracy" if We Elect a President Who Would Weaponize the DOJ and "Go After Their Political Enemies" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Kamala Harris sat down for a one-on-one interview with Katie Couric to discuss Joe Biden, Donald Trump and the 2024 election.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
 
TigerGrowls said:
This is rich!!

Kamala Harris Says We Could “Lose This Democracy” if We Elect a President Who Would Weaponize the DOJ and “Go After Their Political Enemies” (VIDEO)​

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Kamala Harris Says We Could "Lose This Democracy" if We Elect a President Who Would Weaponize the DOJ and "Go After Their Political Enemies" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Kamala Harris sat down for a one-on-one interview with Katie Couric to discuss Joe Biden, Donald Trump and the 2024 election.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...
What's the problem Gomer? She's right!

"Former President Trump told his supporters earlier this year he would be their “retribution” if reelected.

He told supporters last week he would direct the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate “every Marxist prosecutor in America.”

And Trump over the weekend vowed to “root out … the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country.”
thehill.com

Trump signals he’s out for revenge in second term

Former President Trump told his supporters earlier this year he would be their “retribution” if reelected. He told supporters last week he would direct the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate “…
thehill.com thehill.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
dpic73 said:
What's the problem Gomer? She's right!

"Former President Trump told his supporters earlier this year he would be their “retribution” if reelected.

He told supporters last week he would direct the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate “every Marxist prosecutor in America.”

And Trump over the weekend vowed to “root out … the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country.”
thehill.com

Trump signals he’s out for revenge in second term

Former President Trump told his supporters earlier this year he would be their “retribution” if reelected. He told supporters last week he would direct the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate “…
thehill.com thehill.com
Click to expand...
She's wrong goober.
 


Just a reminder… that Bish is lying…

E. Jean Carroll’s Rape Allegation Against Donald Trump was from a Law & Order Episode

• The same exact place…
Bergdorf Goodman

• The same exact fantasy…
In the dressing room

• In a FaceBook Post, she admits…
- She was a MASSIVE Apprentice Fan… Donald Trumps hit show at the time.
- She also liked someone’s comment about Law & Order
 
GEzNnxJXoAArFbh.jpg:large
JcT0THQ.png
 
You are correct. It is a shame. It’s also a shame that you are gloating over this garbage.
 


83 million?


Donald Trump in furor stormed out of a New York courtroom for a while, in the defamation suit brought by author and dating/boyfriend/sex-advice columnist E. Jean Carroll.


It was just settled against Trump for $83.3 million! The Carroll suit was largely subsidized by Reid Hoffman the billionaire capitalist, and mega-donor to the Democratic Party and leftwing causes.


The subtext of Trump’s rage, aside from the outrageous monetary size of the defamation ruling, is that he was facing—and angered—a leftwing claimant, a quite hostile leftwing judge, and a leftwing New York jury.


The civil suit serves as a mere preview of four additional leftwing criminal prosecutions, leftwing judges, and leftwing juries to come—all on charges that would never had been filed if Trump either had not run for president or been a liberal progressive.


Yet here we are.


The E. Jean Carroll case is the most baffling of all five. She, the alleged victim, did not remember even the year in which the purported sexual assault took place, nearly three decades ago. Observers have pointed out dozens of inconsistencies in her story.


It was never clear what were the preliminaries that supposedly (Trump denies meeting her) led both, allegedly, willingly to retreat together to a department store dressing room, where during normal business hours the alleged violence took place.


Moreover, the sexual assault complaint came forward decades post facto—and only after Trump was running for and then president.


Carroll eventually sued him for battery, but well after the statute of limitations had expired and thus the case seemed defunct.


Her claims of defamation injuries arise from being fired from her advice column job at ELLE magazine.


She claimed that Trump’s sharp denials and ad hominem retorts led to her career ruin. But the loss for anyone of a column at 76 does not seem such a rare occurrence, and the absence of a salaried job in one’s late seventies for four years does not seem to equate to a $83 million hit.


And note the allegation that her dispute with Trump led to her firing was strongly denied by the very magazine that cut her loose.


But then another strange thing happened. In 2022, a new law (“The Adult Survivors Act”) was passed in the New York legislature. It also post facto established a twelve-month window (beginning six months from the signing of bill) that permitted survivors of long ago alleged sexual assaults suddenly to sue the accused long-ago perpetrator—regardless of the previous statute of limitations.


That unexpected opening suddenly gave Carroll’s prior unsuccessful efforts a rebirth. And she quickly refiled with the help of arch-Trump hating billionaire Hoffman.


Yet the bill may have been introduced with Trump particularly in mind—given the legislator who introduced it, Brad Hoylman-Siga, was known as another Trump antagonist.


More interestingly, he had earlier introduced and had passed another Trump-targeted bill. That “TRUST” act had empowered particular federal Congressional committees to have access to the New York State once sealed tax returns of high-ranking government officials—such as Trump.


That bill’s generally agreed subtext was a green light for anti-Trump members of Congress to obtain legal access to Donald J. Trump's tax returns.


So there is an eerie feeling that the New York legislature may have abruptly passed legislation that was aimed at the past conduct of Donald Trump but only after he entered the political arena.


While these are not quite bills of attainder, there is something unsettling if they are post facto laws aimed at targeting the most famous and controversial man in America and the leading candidate for the presidency.


In essence they were targeted statutes designed to make Trump’s prior legally unactionable behavior suddenly quite legally actionable.


Trump will be subject to such special treatment all summer and fall.


Prosecutors Bragg, James, Smith, and Willis will synchronize their court business for maximum effect.


Trump again will face leftwing prosecutors, judges, and juries on charges that are politically driven, involving alleged behavior that is either usually not criminalized or not to the same degree as Trump’s case. (Do we remember the nearly $375,000 federal fine belatedly leveled at an exempt Obama but only five years after his 2008 illegal garnering of, and not reporting, foreign campaign contributions?)


The stakes are higher each day as Trump closes in on the nomination and thus becomes the hope of half the country to end the Biden madness.


Somehow Trump will have to stay calm, give no opening to his legion of hostile prosecutors, while conducting a nonstop campaign against Biden (and for a while Hayley), and while fighting to keep his name on various state ballots.


So what we are witnessing is not even the extralegal efforts of Steele/Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie/DNC/Hillary Clinton in 2016, or the 2020 “Russian disinformation” ruse/change the voting laws/infuse half a billion dollars to absorb the work of the registrar machinations against Trump.


We are way beyond all that. The legal system itself, hand-in-glove with leftwing politicos (compare campaign boasts of James and Willis, or prosecutorial visits to the January 6 committee and the White House) is turning the process of balloting and elections into an embarrassing farce.


Still, Trump will have to soldier on. He must stay controlled amid the tsunamis, not play into the hands of his accusers, and remember that he may soon be the only eleventh-hour hope to stop this mockery of American law, customs and traditions.
 
You lunatic libs should pray you do not get unjustly attacked and persecuted.



In case you didn’t know, E Jean Carroll has accused many men of raping or sexually assaulting her…

Including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss and CBS chief executive Les Moonves - Per The National Pulse

This is why she’s not credible.
 
jussie smollet must be furious....if he had just said it was trump that had assaulted him at 4 in the morning in the dead of winter in the middle of chicago he'd have at least 80 million more in his bank account.

i mean they actually went through with this? at least christine blasey fords lies took a little bit of work to unravel. they just handed trump another w. he'll never pay a dime of this, all this does is make the justice system look every bit as politically weaponized as he alleges. have to appreciate the fraction of the country without functional brains that live in a delusional echo chamber thinking this means anything tho. those droolers are nothing if not hilariously stupid
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
WapPride said:
I don't know, i'm not familiar with intricacies of the case. It was enough proof to justify a verdict by a jury of his peers, though.
Click to expand...
LOL, you think Trump can get a fair trial in New York? The whole thing is BS and I hope most people can see thru this. Not that I love Trump because I don't. But she can't remember the date , the year, or anything about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
BlueRidgedf said:
LOL, you think Trump can get a fair trial in New York? The whole thing is BS and I hope most people can see thru this. Not that I love Trump because I don't. But she can't remember the date , the year, or anything about it.
Click to expand...
3.3 million people voted for Trump in New York in 2020. If the only way Trump can get a fair trial is for him to have a jury of only his supporters, then idk what to tell you...that's not how it works. Also, wasn't this a defamation case that was brought because Trump couldn't keep his mouth shut on truth/twitter/social media? The sexual assault case was last year and only $5mil, but this one was because of all the shit Trump said on social media, right? Probably should have kept his mouth shut and hired a competent attorney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger and dpic73


They impeached Trump 2x, arrested and indicted him 4x, and charged him 91x.

They changed our voting laws before the 2020 election, colluded with Big Tech to censor stories, and are importing a new electorate.

States are trying to remove him from the ballot. Colorado and Maine already did.

He just got fined $83M in New York for defending himself against an insane & unproven allegation.

Then they say that WE are a threat to democracy.
 


I hope E Jean Carroll didn’t start counting her money because it’s not looking good for her team! The Trump team has now learned that the Judge worked with and was a mentor for the attorney representing Carroll.

In the 90’s Judge Lewis Kaplan worked with Carroll’s attorney and never disclosed this. This is a clear conflict of interest. He should be removed as a Judge. Now we know why he was so against Trump the entire case.

Who’s surprised that once again they’re playing dirty to get Trump?
 


Let’s clear this E Jean Carroll situation up for everyone who doesn’t understand how things work:

- Trump has never been convicted or even investigated for what she accused him of.

- She doesn’t know what year it happened, and has even been caught in a few lies.

- She brought the dress forward, but the dress didn’t even exist in the years she claimed it happened.

- Trump was not on trial for this. He was on trial for calling her a liar and other names.

- The Jury is from a far left district, so Trump had no shot at a fair hearing.

- She didn’t make these accusations until 20 years later. She even said she fantasizes about it happening before.

- The only reason she could even sue was because democrats changed the laws for 1 year in New York. The law was changed the day Trump got out of office.

- She wasn’t going to sue until anti Trump people talked her into it and offered to pay.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TooterTownTiger

Why do people hate Trump

Replies
82
Views
1K
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
letsgocu
letsgocu
P

The World Celebrates the Trump Win

Replies
1
Views
167
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
CUTiger1977
CUTiger1977
A

Trump Cabinet / Major Appointments

Replies
85
Views
2K
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
CUTiger1977
CUTiger1977
dbjork6317

Trump names Wiles Chief of Staff

Replies
2
Views
161
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
SGTiger
SGTiger
okclem

Trump Surges in Critical Poll

Replies
0
Views
204
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
okclem
okclem
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back