ADVERTISEMENT

Why do some Republicans hate Zelenskyy?

Quit playing politics and talk about what's occurring at our southern border. There is a hell of a lot of drugs coming still. More than ever imo. Kids being trafficked as slave or prostitutes and other hideous stuff. Cartels functionally control our Southern Border while the current leadership lies about it while at the same time enabling policies that make it worse.

I just want results. I would bend over and praise anyone that got it done. I hate the majority of the repubs too for doing nothing.

We know Trump was getting it done there too. Biden could have just left it as it was and it would of been fine. Everything occurring is purposeful by the biden admin.

You want ME to quit playing politics?

Answer this simple question. Do we have an open border?
 
Almost like they are in need of support to fend off an assault from a much larger neighbor.

He’s not acting about going to the frontlines.

usually when you're in need you ask for help and voice appreciation for any that comes, not think you get to dictate what anyone is obligated to provide for you. but again, he's so far from who he's built up as publicly it's a joke. iykyk
 
Zelensky is an actor turned commie leader. No better than Putin. We are watching a movie.

 
He's an asshole because all I asked was why some Republicans hated Zelenskyy and his response was something bout Biden and Afghanistan, then accused me of lying about Russian collusion, lied that Biden wasn't contributing any money to the border and Zelenskyy is disrespectful for not wearing a suit to the WH - none of which has a damn thing to do with the question I asked. Strangely, he thought it made sense to pop off about a bunch of unrelated shit in a lame attempt to own me.

And now you're giving me the history of Ukraine, which is not what the thread is about. We are talking about NOW and how a peaceful and sovereign nation was invaded by a dictator hell-bent on destroying the country by pulverizing it's infrastructure and killing tens of thousands of it's civilians for no other reason but greed.

MAGAs are making excuses for why we shouldn't be involved, but just think about how many lives would have been saved if we had stopped Hitler when he invaded Poland. This war may be on a different continent but the outcome will have repercussions worldwide. Zelenskyy is doing everything in his power to stop Putin in his tracks, which also helps us because his military is being decimated without the cost of even one single American life. The man is a hero and one of the bravest leaders we've seen in our lifetime and he deserves better than the obnoxious scorn he's receiving from the far right. I don't get it so I was hoping to spark a reasonable discussion that would explain this misplaced hatred but I'm still not seeing it.

Can you explain it without referring to Hunter, Hillary or Obama?
Honest question, did you know who Zelensky was prior to the war? Do you know that he has banned every single opposition party, several of which want to negotiate peace? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/06/23/hxae-j23.html

Also, if you don't understand the history then you can't understand the war. Don't recall mentioning Hunter or Hillary in my response to you, Bill and Obama yes as they have significant roles here. My question still stands, why didn't Obama stop this in 2014 when it really started? You make a mention of Hitler invading Poland and how many lives would have been saved but you're not willing to acknowledge that Obama did sweet f*ck all when Russia took Crimea in 2014. Had the world come down with a heavy hand then, we likely aren't having this debate right now.

There is no justification for invading a country nowadays, zero. The point many are making though is we can't allocate billions of dollars without oversight given the corruption that plagued Ukraine since inception. The other point is why are the United States the most generous? Other countries aren't allocating nearly as much as we are. Why is the United States the most vested in this, what do we gain? Why are we also giving billions to the UN as they sit on the sidelines and watch?

While this war wages on, you've apparently missed the new relationships between Russia, China, Iran and India that have formed. Russia, China and Iran aren't new but India certainly is. There is a new alliance forming and that will be pointed against the US on the world scale at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Honest question, did you know who Zelensky was prior to the war? Do you know that he has banned every single opposition party, several of which want to negotiate peace? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/06/23/hxae-j23.html

Also, if you don't understand the history then you can't understand the war. Don't recall mentioning Hunter or Hillary in my response to you, Bill and Obama yes as they have significant roles here. My question still stands, why didn't Obama stop this in 2014 when it really started? You make a mention of Hitler invading Poland and how many lives would have been saved but you're not willing to acknowledge that Obama did sweet f*ck all when Russia took Crimea in 2014. Had the world come down with a heavy hand then, we likely aren't having this debate right now.

There is no justification for invading a country nowadays, zero. The point many are making though is we can't allocate billions of dollars without oversight given the corruption that plagued Ukraine since inception. The other point is why are the United States the most generous? Other countries aren't allocating nearly as much as we are. Why is the United States the most vested in this, what do we gain? Why are we also giving billions to the UN as they sit on the sidelines and watch?

While this war wages on, you've apparently missed the new relationships between Russia, China, Iran and India that have formed. Russia, China and Iran aren't new but India certainly is. There is a new alliance forming and that will be pointed against the US on the world scale at some point.
TRUTH!!
 
Below is a thread showing Igor Kolomoisky; who had/has a controlling stake in Burisma was funding unrest in Eastern Ukraine, hence my question around it being a front for the CIA. Also worth noting that he was the backer in Zelensky's election and very much affiliated with Zelensky's offshore assets.




Here's why the Hunter Biden laptop isn't just dick pics. He's discussing war crimes with his sister via text here in more than one country. Not suggesting he committed any but he potentially has knowledge of them as well as if Burisma was in fact, funding aggressions against Russia hence the importance of investigating him.




Also, here is how fickle the media are and how they all buy into the same narrative collectively. This is where you need to familiarize yourselves with Joel Harding who was behind all of the social media surveillance and media control. He's. presently doing this in Ukraine.




You really need to ask yourself why one side of the Govt is so anti auditing the Ukraine funding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Honest question, did you know who Zelensky was prior to the war? Do you know that he has banned every single opposition party, several of which want to negotiate peace? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/06/23/hxae-j23.html

Also, if you don't understand the history then you can't understand the war. Don't recall mentioning Hunter or Hillary in my response to you, Bill and Obama yes as they have significant roles here. My question still stands, why didn't Obama stop this in 2014 when it really started? You make a mention of Hitler invading Poland and how many lives would have been saved but you're not willing to acknowledge that Obama did sweet f*ck all when Russia took Crimea in 2014. Had the world come down with a heavy hand then, we likely aren't having this debate right now.

There is no justification for invading a country nowadays, zero. The point many are making though is we can't allocate billions of dollars without oversight given the corruption that plagued Ukraine since inception. The other point is why are the United States the most generous? Other countries aren't allocating nearly as much as we are. Why is the United States the most vested in this, what do we gain? Why are we also giving billions to the UN as they sit on the sidelines and watch?

While this war wages on, you've apparently missed the new relationships between Russia, China, Iran and India that have formed. Russia, China and Iran aren't new but India certainly is. There is a new alliance forming and that will be pointed against the US on the world scale at some point.
How about we help the Ukrainians dismantle the Russian army then, huh?

Make it clear to the Chinese that any invasion of Taiwan will end in the same fashion as Russia’s attempt to grab eastern Ukraine.

Neo-isolationism is a stupid idea
 
How about we help the Ukrainians dismantle the Russian army then, huh?

Make it clear to the Chinese that any invasion of Taiwan will end in the same fashion as Russia’s attempt to grab eastern Ukraine.

Neo-isolationism is a stupid idea
We are......we've been helping them start the conflict since 2014, right after we helped replace the government. I Will never understand anyone that lobbies for war that isn't willing to go fight in one. War is a horrible thing, you don't ever really come back from it.

Note that Ukraine started shelling Donbas 9 days before Russia invaded. Why would they do that while begging the world for help before Russia invaded?

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Honest question, did you know who Zelensky was prior to the war? Do you know that he has banned every single opposition party, several of which want to negotiate peace? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/06/23/hxae-j23.html

Also, if you don't understand the history then you can't understand the war. Don't recall mentioning Hunter or Hillary in my response to you, Bill and Obama yes as they have significant roles here. My question still stands, why didn't Obama stop this in 2014 when it really started? You make a mention of Hitler invading Poland and how many lives would have been saved but you're not willing to acknowledge that Obama did sweet f*ck all when Russia took Crimea in 2014. Had the world come down with a heavy hand then, we likely aren't having this debate right now.

There is no justification for invading a country nowadays, zero. The point many are making though is we can't allocate billions of dollars without oversight given the corruption that plagued Ukraine since inception. The other point is why are the United States the most generous? Other countries aren't allocating nearly as much as we are. Why is the United States the most vested in this, what do we gain? Why are we also giving billions to the UN as they sit on the sidelines and watch?

While this war wages on, you've apparently missed the new relationships between Russia, China, Iran and India that have formed. Russia, China and Iran aren't new but India certainly is. There is a new alliance forming and that will be pointed against the US on the world scale at some point.
Not sure what you're trying to prove but for the record:
  • Ukraine is not the United States so the way they work with opposition parties is distinctly different than how it works here. Zelenskyy had good reasons for banning pro-Putin parties so you can't view it through our lens.
  • I 100% agree that Obama screwed the pooch by not coming down harder when Russia invaded Crimea.
  • I don't have a bit of problem with oversight of the funds we contribute to their cause.
  • What does the new alliance between Russia and other countries have to do with our approach? Are you saying we should just let Russia have what they want so they won't have incentive to ally with other countries?
  • Your following post still went into the abyss of conspiracies around Hunter, Burisma etc...I still don't see how any of that matters when discussing the current situation. Zelenskyy was democratically elected by the Ukrainians and he has been busting his ass to protect them ever since. When Biden offered him a chance to evacuate, he said "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition." He has been boots on the ground ever since, knowing he was an assasination target but he didn't care. He continually puts himself in harm's way to boost the morale of his troops and to show Russia that he will not be intimidated.
  • Allowing him to fight this war helps to ensure that we won't have to fight Russia ourselves on European soil. He is doing us a huge favor at the cost of tens of thousands of Ukrainian lives and we ought to do everything in our power to ensure he wins, because this is our war too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12
Trump convinced a lot of dumb people, not terribly difficult to do btw, that their bad station in life is because the US spends too much money on various causes abroad, just a variation of the original bad trade deals theme
Trump's not wrong on this... We spend WAY too much money assisting other countries IMHO.

Ukraine isn't some great country either. But in this case, we SHOULD support them b/c they are working against an enemy country (Russia). Ukraine is the best thing that happened to us in a LONG time with Russia. Russia has lost a ton of people, money, and equipment there not to even mention that exactly NO ONE is scared of the Russian Army anymore. I mean if you can't logistically support and carry out an attack on a vastly inferior force that you share a border with, you have serious issues with styling yourself a world power.

I think Trump is pretty ambivalent on the whole Russia/Ukraine thing. He's said a few things, but if you can count on one thing with Trump, it's that his mouth will run away with itself. It's Tucker Carlsen that's convincing folks... He loves him some Putin and regularly tries to convince folks that he isn't so bad. As if that butcher doesn't work against US interests all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Trump's not wrong on this... We spend WAY too much money assisting other countries IMHO.

Ukraine isn't some great country either. But in this case, we SHOULD support them b/c they are working against an enemy country (Russia). Ukraine is the best thing that happened to us in a LONG time with Russia. Russia has lost a ton of people, money, and equipment there not to even mention that exactly NO ONE is scared of the Russian Army anymore. I mean if you can't logistically support and carry out an attack on a vastly inferior force that you share a border with, you have serious issues with styling yourself a world power.

I think Trump is pretty ambivalent on the whole Russia/Ukraine thing. He's said a few things, but if you can count on one thing with Trump, it's that his mouth will run away with itself. It's Tucker Carlsen that's convincing folks... He loves him some Putin and regularly tries to convince folks that he isn't so bad. As if that butcher doesn't work against US interests all the time.
Sure, that's an opinion. You're always going to be able to find some program or some idea that we shouldn't spend our money on. As far as its effect on our soft power and diplomacy, it's inherently difficult to quantify.

I disagree on Trump being ambivalent. Pretty clear he's content with Russia grabbing what it can.
 
Yes. We have an operationally open southern border controlled by the Mexican cartels working hand in hand as silent partners with the biden admin.
That's just plain crazy man. Granted the Southern border isn't great, but even you don't really think that Biden and company are working with Mexican Drug Cartels... Right?
 
That's just plain crazy man. Granted the Southern border isn't great, but even you don't really think that Biden and company are working with Mexican Drug Cartels... Right?
it's important to realize that if Growls isn't a troll, he's 100% loony. So, yes he probably does believe that the Mexican cartels are working with the Biden admin to destroy America.

The irony is that the same generation of people that warned us while we were young about how the internet will rot your brain, have in turned had their brains rotted because they are so easily tricked by misinformation. There's a reason that the vast majority of people targeted by, and victim of, online scams are those aged 50+, because they believe everything they see online and are easy marks.
 
Quit playing politics and talk about what's occurring at our southern border. There is a hell of a lot of drugs coming still. More than ever imo. Kids being trafficked as slave or prostitutes and other hideous stuff. Cartels functionally control our Southern Border while the current leadership lies about it while at the same time enabling policies that make it worse.

I just want results. I would bend over and praise anyone that got it done. I hate the majority of the repubs too for doing nothing.

We know Trump was getting it done there too. Biden could have just left it as it was and it would of been fine. Everything occurring is purposeful by the biden admin.

None of those things happened prior to Biden.
 
Serious question - dude is a damn hero and has balls of steel so why do some Republicans speak so lowly of him? Is it because he refused to be bribed by Cinnamon Hitler?




Serious question - dude is a damn hero and has balls of steel so why do some Republicans speak so lowly of him? Is it because he refused to be bribed by Cinnamon Hitler?



 
it's important to realize that if Growls isn't a troll, he's 100% loony. So, yes he probably does believe that the Mexican cartels are working with the Biden admin to destroy America.

The irony is that the same generation of people that warned us while we were young about how the internet will rot your brain, have in turned had their brains rotted because they are so easily tricked by misinformation. There's a reason that the vast majority of people targeted by, and victim of, online scams are those aged 50+, because they believe everything they see online and are easy marks.
I think you and your lib buddies on here are dumb and loony and the worst of it is you feel supremely confident that you are infallibly right at the same time.
 
Last edited:
That's just plain crazy man. Granted the Southern border isn't great, but even you don't really think that Biden and company are working with Mexican Drug Cartels... Right?
Just look at whats occurring and tell me its not circumstantial for what I said. My mind is not locked with absolutes. I am looking at whats occurring and you jabroni's need to do the same. Who's interests are being served in the current scenario?
 
I share that feeling that Ukraine is doing the work the US will now never have to do

It should be abundantly clear the Russians will never have the ability to defeat NATO in a conventional war

Only a Nuke exchange

Hopefully no one will even consider that insanity
Agreed, its really terrifying that the old powers still have nukes and can call upon them in desperation.
 
I am a non interventionist and it has nothing to do with Trump or any other politician. No vital US national security interest at stake in the Ukraine whatsoever. Over a 100B in taxpayer financed debt sent over there with no idea where over half of its going. Zelensky has done multiple things to erode freedoms in his own country and solidify his power during all of this. Who is getting rich?

Its our kids that will have this exploding debt over their heads in years to come. Its our kids who will have a reduced standard of living and probably a shorter lifespan due to all the madness currently occurring. I am America First. Let some foreign power come after us and I will take my old ass and sign up to fight but sending all this money to Ukraine is dumb as F**K. Everyone swallowing this is being played on a grand level. Once again my opinion doesnt have a damn thing to do with Trump. Over a 100B to Ukraine after they fought Trump tooth and nail over less than 10B to fortify our own southern border. Communists have taken over America at the head. Wake up people!!
Oh so you and your ilk were against America joining the War in 1940s.
 
Trump's not wrong on this... We spend WAY too much money assisting other countries IMHO.

Ukraine isn't some great country either. But in this case, we SHOULD support them b/c they are working against an enemy country (Russia). Ukraine is the best thing that happened to us in a LONG time with Russia. Russia has lost a ton of people, money, and equipment there not to even mention that exactly NO ONE is scared of the Russian Army anymore. I mean if you can't logistically support and carry out an attack on a vastly inferior force that you share a border with, you have serious issues with styling yourself a world power.

I think Trump is pretty ambivalent on the whole Russia/Ukraine thing. He's said a few things, but if you can count on one thing with trump, it's that his mouth will run away with itself. It's Tucker Carlsen that's convincing folks... He loves him some Putin and regularly tries to convince folks that he isn't so bad. As if that butcher doesn't work against US interests all the time.
So, Tucker is the problem? Tell something he said that is not correct.

Go back to watching ABC, CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and listening to NPR (which we fund with our tax dollars). I'm sure you never quit watching them in the first place.

You have plenty of sources who agree with your warped sense of what this country is supposed to be. Watch them!

FOX may suck, but they put out a lot more truth than any of the other channels.

Anyone who doesn't wholly support spending BILLIONS in Ukraine loves Putin? Is that your stance?

What about OUR border? What about OUR inflation?

You're a GD mental midget.
 
Not sure what you're trying to prove but for the record:
  • Ukraine is not the United States so the way they work with opposition parties is distinctly different than how it works here. Zelenskyy had good reasons for banning pro-Putin parties so you can't view it through our lens.
  • I 100% agree that Obama screwed the pooch by not coming down harder when Russia invaded Crimea.
  • I don't have a bit of problem with oversight of the funds we contribute to their cause.
  • What does the new alliance between Russia and other countries have to do with our approach? Are you saying we should just let Russia have what they want so they won't have incentive to ally with other countries?
  • Your following post still went into the abyss of conspiracies around Hunter, Burisma etc...I still don't see how any of that matters when discussing the current situation. Zelenskyy was democratically elected by the Ukrainians and he has been busting his ass to protect them ever since. When Biden offered him a chance to evacuate, he said "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition." He has been boots on the ground ever since, knowing he was an assasination target but he didn't care. He continually puts himself in harm's way to boost the morale of his troops and to show Russia that he will not be intimidated.
  • Allowing him to fight this war helps to ensure that we won't have to fight Russia ourselves on European soil. He is doing us a huge favor at the cost of tens of thousands of Ukrainian lives and we ought to do everything in our power to ensure he wins, because this is our war too.
You suggest Ukraine is a democracy but that's true contradiction as you're ok with him legally removing political opposition which suggests that it's not a democracy, it also suggests that you're totally ok with the efforts to suppress and censor opposing parties which is scary for an American. Those opposing parties weren't all Putin supporters by the way, some just wanted a peaceful resolution to the war and make no mistake, a peaceful resolution could have been easily negotiated at any point before and just after they invaded and the world stood by and watched same as they did in 2014. Why would Zelensky nationalize all of the Ukrainian media outlets? Strange thing to do in a democracy, no?

"Because this is our war too"........no, this not "our" war you keyboard warrior. Calling for continued fighting versus a peaceful resolution is embarrassing for someone who isn't doing the fighting. You're like every other politician, you lobby for war and then send your neighbor's kid to fight it.

The Ukraine and our own govt had a hand in starting this conflict. Only a matter of time before we have troops on the ground and then what? War with Russia? At some point, one of these conflicts is going to land on our soil and it will be your war then. I hope your real balls are as big as your keyboard balls.
 
That's just plain crazy man. Granted the Southern border isn't great, but even you don't really think that Biden and company are working with Mexican Drug Cartels... Right?
Live look at El Paso, TX right now .........



Regardless of whether or not you agree or disagree with the cartel craziness, this is a massive security and humanitarian crisis unfolding IN OUR OWN COUNTRY.

We've had north of 2 million illegals enter the country this year. What happens when those folks can't find work, don't have money for food, no shelter, etc? We can't solve our own homeless problems now, take a tour of the Manhattan subways, Penn Station, Grand Central etc if you need some perspective. It's crazy to me that American's don't want to fix problems at home before they take on other parts of the world.

While I understand both sides of the aisle like to use negative current events as weapons, the border issues are not overstated. People seem to forget all of the noise about how our hospital systems were overrun during covid, not enough beds, can't see every patient etc.......well letting 2 million people and growing into the country will compound that issue. Hospitals, schools, food supply......etc. You know where all of the State covid funding went? Not to hospitals or infrastructure.

We are fighting a proxy war over a border demarcation dispute in another country while letting all of South America walk across our own borders. The irony is insane. The only funding you see in the Omnibus bill for Americans is related to gender studies, racism, LGBTQ museums, etc but tons and tons of American tax payer dollars flying out of the country for border related issues.
 

Pretty good article I read earlier this week with regard to the spending. Pretty compelling argument for our continued support when presented as "the US is spending 5.6% of its annual defense budget with no risk to US personnel, and in return our second largest geopolitical threat has its forces completely obliterated and military leadership decapitated."

Our involvement in Ukraine is more about Taiwan and Chinese deterrence than it ever has been about defending democracy, NATO, biolabs, or our famous political crime families.
 
You suggest Ukraine is a democracy but that's true contradiction as you're ok with him legally removing political opposition which suggests that it's not a democracy, it also suggests that you're totally ok with the efforts to suppress and censor opposing parties which is scary for an American. Those opposing parties weren't all Putin supporters by the way, some just wanted a peaceful resolution to the war and make no mistake, a peaceful resolution could have been easily negotiated at any point before and just after they invaded and the world stood by and watched same as they did in 2014. Why would Zelensky nationalize all of the Ukrainian media outlets? Strange thing to do in a democracy, no?

"Because this is our war too"........no, this not "our" war you keyboard warrior. Calling for continued fighting versus a peaceful resolution is embarrassing for someone who isn't doing the fighting. You're like every other politician, you lobby for war and then send your neighbor's kid to fight it.

The Ukraine and our own govt had a hand in starting this conflict. Only a matter of time before we have troops on the ground and then what? War with Russia? At some point, one of these conflicts is going to land on our soil and it will be your war then. I hope your real balls are as big as your keyboard balls.
Boy everything is so cut and dry in your ideological box. Are you suggesting that if a country doesn't conform 100% to American values, we shouldn't help in their defense? They have different geopolitical challenges than we do, so again, you can't view everything through our lens.

Of course a peaceful resolution would be preferred but on whose terms? Sounds like you want Ukraine to capitulate and rollover to Russia's unwarranted aggression so we can all sing kumbaya and eat smores over a crackling fire. Do you really think that will bring peace and Russia will no longer threaten them or any other European countries? We are helping to destroy Russia's ability to wage war in the future and that helps the rest of their neighbors and ultimately us as well.

It's pretty striking that the majority of Americans, including most Republicans, support this war except for those on the far right. You should be embarrassed to align with Marjorie, Tucker and Boebert but you've proven time and time again, that's who you really are. Your MAGA stripes are showing and they aint pretty.

 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12

Pretty good article I read earlier this week with regard to the spending. Pretty compelling argument for our continued support when presented as "the US is spending 5.6% of its annual defense budget with no risk to US personnel, and in return our second largest geopolitical threat has its forces completely obliterated and military leadership decapitated."

Our involvement in Ukraine is more about Taiwan and Chinese deterrence than it ever has been about defending democracy, NATO, biolabs, or our famous political crime families.
Alternate viewpoint.

 
Live look at El Paso, TX right now .........



Regardless of whether or not you agree or disagree with the cartel craziness, this is a massive security and humanitarian crisis unfolding IN OUR OWN COUNTRY.

We've had north of 2 million illegals enter the country this year. What happens when those folks can't find work, don't have money for food, no shelter, etc? We can't solve our own homeless problems now, take a tour of the Manhattan subways, Penn Station, Grand Central etc if you need some perspective. It's crazy to me that American's don't want to fix problems at home before they take on other parts of the world.

While I understand both sides of the aisle like to use negative current events as weapons, the border issues are not overstated. People seem to forget all of the noise about how our hospital systems were overrun during covid, not enough beds, can't see every patient etc.......well letting 2 million people and growing into the country will compound that issue. Hospitals, schools, food supply......etc. You know where all of the State covid funding went? Not to hospitals or infrastructure.

We are fighting a proxy war over a border demarcation dispute in another country while letting all of South America walk across our own borders. The irony is insane. The only funding you see in the Omnibus bill for Americans is related to gender studies, racism, LGBTQ museums, etc but tons and tons of American tax payer dollars flying out of the country for border related issues.

I look forward to seeing what border related bills are proposed by the Republican controlled congress.
 
Boy everything is so cut and dry in your ideological box. Are you suggesting that if a country doesn't conform 100% to American values, we shouldn't help in their defense? They have different geopolitical challenges than we do, so again, you can't view everything through our lens.

Of course a peaceful resolution would be preferred but on whose terms? Sounds like you want Ukraine to capitulate and rollover to Russia's unwarranted aggression so we can all sing kumbaya and eat smores over a crackling fire. Do you really think that will bring peace and Russia will no longer threaten them or any other European countries? We are helping to destroy Russia's ability to wage war in the future and that helps the rest of their neighbors and ultimately us as well.

It's pretty striking that the majority of Americans, including most Republicans, support this war except for those on the far right. You should be embarrassed to align with Marjorie, Tucker and Boebert but you've proven time and time again, that's who you really are. Your MAGA stripes are showing and they aint pretty.

You called it a democracy, I'm just highlighting that it's not one because in democracies, they don't make opposition illegal nor take full control over all media.

The US started spending money in Ukraine back in 1991 to establish "democracy", we made them choose between Europe and Russia when half the country lean towards Russia. The US doesn't give a shit about the Ukrainian people, they want modern weapons on Russia's border. This is about power. Proof is all over this video, especially with Nuland's leaked call pretty much showing we backed the coup to install a more anti-Russian govt.

Now you're a war strategist? What's pretty striking is that people that have never fought wars and very likely won't ever fight wars are lobbying for war.......ie, you. The images you posted make my point for me in respect to a peaceful end. War is tragic and heartbreaking, those images are what you see when there is a war. If those bother you, then calling for more war is just stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
You called it a democracy, I'm just highlighting that it's not one because in democracies, they don't make opposition illegal nor take full control over all media.

The US started spending money in Ukraine back in 1991 to establish "democracy", we made them choose between Europe and Russia when half the country lean towards Russia. The US doesn't give a shit about the Ukrainian people, they want modern weapons on Russia's border. This is about power. Proof is all over this video, especially with Nuland's leaked call pretty much showing we backed the coup to install a more anti-Russian govt.

Now you're a war strategist? What's pretty striking is that people that have never fought wars and very likely won't ever fight wars are lobbying for war.......ie, you. The images you posted make my point for me in respect to a peaceful end. War is tragic and heartbreaking, those images are what you see when there is a war. If those bother you, then calling for more war is just stupid.
So what should Ukraine do Jake? What would be acceptable terms in your opinion?
 
So what should Ukraine do Jake? What would be acceptable terms in your opinion?
This war won't ever end unless they work with other world leaders to find an amenable way forward. What that means for Ukraine, I don't know but it certainly requires compromise on each end hence the need for world leaders to help. It's the same thing it required in 2014 when the US was more interested in unrest than peaceful compromise.

The bigger question is who's running the Ukraine.........is it them or is it the United States?
 
This war won't ever end unless they work with other world leaders to find an amenable way forward. What that means for Ukraine, I don't know but it certainly requires compromise on each end hence the need for world leaders to help. It's the same thing it required in 2014 when the US was more interested in unrest than peaceful compromise.

The bigger question is who's running the Ukraine.........is it them or is it the United States?
Compromise here means Russia gets a land grab and the current line of contact gets militarized to hell. The only point to be negotiated is how much Russia owes Ukraine in reparations.

How many Russian troops got chewed up trying to take Kyiv and Kharkiv to protect the Donbass? Does Russia get to invade Kazakhstan now because there are lots of Russian speakers there too?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Compromise here means Russia gets a land grab and the current line of contact gets militarized to hell. The only point to be negotiated is how much Russia owes Ukraine in reparations.

How many Russian troops got chewed up trying to take Kyiv and Kharkiv to protect the Donbass? Does Russia get to invade Kazakhstan now because there are lots of Russian speakers there too?
Everyone is so hyper focused on Crimea they fail to understand this started well before Russia invaded in 2014. The advance of NATO to Russia's borders and the threat of the Ukraine becoming part of the European Union is had a huge helping hand in kicking off the tension. It was Russia that suggested a tri-party arrangement to allow Russia to remain as an equal trade partner and the European Union wanted to cut Russia out when the Ukraine was largely dependent on Russia for economic solvency up that point. Before 2013, almost 4 million Ukrainians worked in Russia and were allowed to send money back to the Ukraine to support their families. Seems like an awful lot of goodwill got eroded quite quickly with little reasoning as to why. Pressure from the US who was investing billions to insert democracy?

Now ask yourself why an overly liberal US govt would forcefully install a far right Ukranian govt that was anti Russia in the Ukraine in 2014? Why would they do that if there were any intentions to find some diplomacy and somehow agree to a model where Ukraine, the EU, Crimea and Russia could exist cohesively?

Russia certainly isn't innocent here, not by a country mile but you can't get to the root of the problem until you actually review the history and admit the US, the EU and the Ukraine made huge missteps here.

Look up Steven F Cohen on YouTube, very well respected expert on Russia, Ukraine, etc with a different perspective.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
Everyone is so hyper focused on Crimea they fail to understand this started well before Russia invaded in 2014. The advance of NATO to Russia's borders and the threat of the Ukraine becoming part of the European Union is had a huge helping hand in kicking off the tension. It was Russia that suggested a tri-party arrangement to allow Russia to remain as an equal trade partner and the European Union wanted to cut Russia out when the Ukraine was largely dependent on Russia for economic solvency up that point. Before 2013, almost 4 million Ukrainians worked in Russia and were allowed to send money back to the Ukraine to support their families. Seems like an awful lot of goodwill got eroded quite quickly with little reasoning as to why. Pressure from the US who was investing billions to insert democracy?

Now ask yourself why an overly liberal US govt would forcefully install a far right Ukranian govt that was anti Russia in the Ukraine in 2014? Why would they do that if there were any intentions to find some diplomacy and somehow agree to a model where Ukraine, the EU, Crimea and Russia could exist cohesively?

Russia certainly isn't innocent here, not by a country mile but you can't get to the root of the problem until you actually review the history and admit the US, the EU and the Ukraine made huge missteps here.

Look up Steven F Cohen on YouTube, very well respected expert on Russia, Ukraine, etc with a different perspective.
Insert democracy? Russia isn’t innocent here? Holy shit. I wonder if you’re from the same blood related parents family as growls?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT