New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
Why isn’t anyone talking about Epstein?
- Thread starter dbjork6317
- Start date
Remember why Julian Assang e didn’t release any dirt on Trump?
“Because we didn’t have any”
“Because we didn’t have any”
Damn @TigerGrowls, you own these low IQ dipshits.
Wikileaks only leaks what they’re given. The DNC and RNC were both hacked by Russian intelligence and only the DNC’s material made it to Wikileaks. Put those three brain cells together and figure it why.
Seth Rich would say otherwise but he's not with us anymore. I admire the chutzpah with you guys hanging onto the Russia fantasies.
Because there was nothing to report on Donald Trump.
If there was real dirt on Trump there would be no need for Peeing Russian Hookers and 51 intelligence agents. Among all the others .
Guys. You are objectively wrong. They were very clearly friends and spent time together. Does that necessarily mean that the 13 year old girl who accused him of raping her (alongside all those other women) were telling the truth? No.
But you aren't being objective.
Two "billionaires" connected to the same community lived in the same city for a long long time. They called each other, they spent time with each other.
It's not a question.
Ignore if it you want. But there's something there that you are choosing to ignore.
Last edited:
Honestly I feel like we’re maybe a month away from Trump supporters telling us that Epstein was actually a great guy
I will believe if its shown conclusively and support appropriate actions. I do not anticipate that occurring. You need to go back and review some of the chronology of the Trump Epstein relationship as it did not end well. Trump cut him off and disassociated when he found out what Epstein was doing related to underage females.
If the media had real dirt on Trump, when it comes to Esptein. They would have released it.
Is there more to the other guys you want prosecuted in the way of actionable evidence than there is against Trump?
In no way am I saying anyone should or shouldn’t be charged. Gates, Trump or others. But just ask that if you think Gates should be charged for his name being on lists/logs/etc, then so should Trump.
I hope they do find actual evidence (videos/audio/whatever) to corroborate travel logs, etc and they charge each and every POS that is guilty.
But saying X people should be charged and the FBI aren’t doing their job when the evidence against X is the same as it is against someone you don’t think should be charged is ridiculous.
Trump wouldnt have or deserve any special treatment different from the others but dont count your chickens before they hatch. I have kept up with this closely and there has never been anyone state that Trump went to epstein island or engaged in any illicit activities. I strongly feel that Trump was not involved in any pedo activity but I am listening and watching.
I’m not counting any chickens. Just won’t call for anyone to be charged (unless there is public evidence of an actual crime; even visiting the island isn’t a crime itself, that they could charge someone with. Scummy, yes. But affiliation itself isn’t a crime, for Trump or otherwise). Nor will I say any law enforcement agency isn’t doing their job if they aren’t charging based on those things.
They should do an indoctrination case study on @TigerGrowls for real. Some psychologist could get that shit published.
If they had real dirt, why would they fabricate dirt? Still waiting for this to be answered?
