New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
Because the GRU didn’t bother to pass it on. Keep up, slowballRemember why Julian Assang e didn’t release any dirt on Trump?
“Because we didn’t have any”
Is that a direct quote? Please cite your sources?Because the GRU didn’t bother to pass it on. Keep up, slowball
Please tell us what it said.New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
Damn @TigerGrowls, you own these low IQ dipshits.New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
Wikileaks only leaks what they’re given. The DNC and RNC were both hacked by Russian intelligence and only the DNC’s material made it to Wikileaks. Put those three brain cells together and figure it why.Is that a direct quote? Please cite your sources?
Seth Rich would say otherwise but he's not with us anymore. I admire the chutzpah with you guys hanging onto the Russia fantasies.Wikileaks only leaks what they’re given. The DNC and RNC were both hacked by Russian intelligence and only the DNC’s material made it to Wikileaks. Put those three brain cells together and figure it why.
Because there was nothing to report on Donald Trump.Wikileaks only leaks what they’re given. The DNC and RNC were both hacked by Russian intelligence and only the DNC’s material made it to Wikileaks. Put those three brain cells together and figure it why.
Because there was nothing to report on Donald Trump.
If there was real dirt on Trump there would be no need for Peeing Russian Hookers and 51 intelligence agents. Among all the others .
Honestly I feel like we’re maybe a month away from Trump supporters telling us that Epstein was actually a great guyGuys. You are objectively wrong. They were very clearly friends and spent time together. Does that necessarily mean that the 13 year old girl who accused him of raping her (alongside all those other women) were telling the truth.
But you aren't being objective.
Two "billionaires" connected to the same community lived in the same city for a long long time. They called each other, they spent time with each other.
It's not a question.
Ignore if it you want. But there's something there that you are choosing to ignore.
Desperation.Honestly I feel like we’re maybe a month away from Trump supporters telling us that Epstein was actually a great guy
I will believe if its shown conclusively and support appropriate actions. I do not anticipate that occurring. You need to go back and review some of the chronology of the Trump Epstein relationship as it did not end well. Trump cut him off and disassociated when he found out what Epstein was doing related to underage females.Guys. You are objectively wrong. They were very clearly friends and spent time together. Does that necessarily mean that the 13 year old girl who accused him of raping her (alongside all those other women) were telling the truth.
But you aren't being objective.
Two "billionaires" connected to the same community lived in the same city for a long long time. They called each other, they spent time with each other.
It's not a question.
Ignore if it you want. But there's something there that you are choosing to ignore.
Is there more to the other guys you want prosecuted in the way of actionable evidence than there is against Trump?I will believe if its shown conclusively and support appropriate actions. I do not anticipate that occurring. You need to go back and review some of the chronology of the Trump Epstein relationship as it did not end well. Trump cut him off and disassociated when he found out what Epstein was doing related to underage females.
Trump wouldnt have or deserve any special treatment different from the others but dont count your chickens before they hatch. I have kept up with this closely and there has never been anyone state that Trump went to epstein island or engaged in any illicit activities. I strongly feel that Trump was not involved in any pedo activity but I am listening and watching.Is there more to the other guys you want prosecuted in the way of actionable evidence than there is against Trump?
In no way am I saying anyone should or shouldn’t be charged. Gates, Trump or others. But just ask that if you think Gates should be charged for his name being on lists/logs/etc, then so should Trump.
I hope they do find actual evidence (videos/audio/whatever) to corroborate travel logs, etc and they charge each and every POS that is guilty.
But saying X people should be charged and the FBI aren’t doing their job when the evidence against X is the same as it is against someone you don’t think should be charged is ridiculous.
I’m not counting any chickens. Just won’t call for anyone to be charged (unless there is public evidence of an actual crime; even visiting the island isn’t a crime itself, that they could charge someone with. Scummy, yes. But affiliation itself isn’t a crime, for Trump or otherwise). Nor will I say any law enforcement agency isn’t doing their job if they aren’t charging based on those things.Trump wouldnt have or deserve any special treatment different from the others but dont count your chickens before they hatch. I have kept up with this closely and there has never been anyone state that Trump went to epstein island or engaged in any illicit activities. I strongly feel that Trump was not involved in any pedo activity but I am listening and watching.
I will believe if its shown conclusively and support appropriate actions. I do not anticipate that occurring. You need to go back and review some of the chronology of the Trump Epstein relationship as it did not end well. Trump cut him off and disassociated when he found out what Epstein was doing related to underage females.
I'd have his @$$ on the couch within the first hour.They should do an indoctrination case study on @TigerGrowls for real. Some psychologist could get that shit published.
Your orange god is really showing you how to be the victim.If the media had real dirt on Trump, when it comes to Esptein. They would have released it.
New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
The media has failed us, and in my view will have blood on its hands when Magas start murdering people by the millions.New Epstein files released and Trump’s name appears in them quite a bit, but no one really talking about it? If Biden’s name popped up I’m guessing @TigerGrowls would have started about 13 different threads on it by now.
Thank you for your first paragraph. If they had real dirt on Trump they would not have had to make up fake dirt. It does not pass the logic test.Meh... You guys know how I feel about Trump, but I don't believe any of the Epstein stuff without further evidence. Epstein and Trump ran in the same circles because they were both stupid rich. It only makes sense that there are pictures of them together. That doesn't mean Trump was doing underage girls.
That being said, I feel the same way about anyone in pictures with him. I know the Trumpians on here were making a big deal about Gates being in pictures with Epstein, but defend Trump. Par for the course.
You have to realize something. There's not ONE Trump supporter on here that would stop supporting Trump if he WAS doing underage girls. They'd just deny any evidence and keep on keeping on.
Gate's ex said that she thought Epstein was a bad man and that she hated that Gates had meetings with him. NOTHING about doing underage girls. At least not in the interviews I ever saw. You see what I'm saying? You are my best example. Trump gets a pass, but you are holding on to the Gates stuff. Can you show me where Gate's ex said anything more?Thank you for your first paragraph. If they had real dirt on Trump they would not have had to make up fake dirt. It does not pass the logic test.
Now, for Bill Gates I will have to disagree. His wife Melinda, clearly stated that had something to do with their divorce. If I recall correctly, there is other smoke around Gates too.
Your last paragraph goes back to If they had real dirt on Trump, they would not have had to make up all the fake shit.
"In a 2022 interview with CBS, Melinda Gates said that Bill's meetings with Jeffrey Epstein were a factor that contributed to their divorce. She described Epstein as "evil personified" and stated that she made it clear to Bill that she did not like him meeting with Epstein.
It's important to note that while this association was mentioned as a contributing factor, it was not stated as the sole or primary reason for their divorce. The Gates' divorce, like many high-profile separations, likely involved multiple complex factors."
They are rumors. But Gates has been caught in multiple discrepancies in regards to his relationship with Epstein.Gate's ex said that she thought Epstein was a bad man and that she hated that Gates had meetings with him. NOTHING about doing underage girls. At least not in the interviews I ever saw. You see what I'm saying? You are my best example. Trump gets a pass, but you are holding on to the Gates stuff. Can you show me where Gate's ex said anything more?
Gate's ex said that she thought Epstein was a bad man and that she hated that Gates had meetings with him. NOTHING about doing underage girls. At least not in the interviews I ever saw. You see what I'm saying? You are my best example. Trump gets a pass, but you are holding on to the Gates stuff. Can you show me where Gate's ex said anything more?
Still haven't seen anything other than rumors. The same thing can be said for Trump/Epstein, but as I said, no evidence against Trump. Can you show us where Gates was "caught" lying?They are rumors. But Gates has been caught in multiple discrepancies in regards to his relationship with Epstein.
There have been rumors and speculation about connections between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as allegations involving Gates and underage women. However, it's important to note that many of these claims are unsubstantiated rumors rather than proven facts.
Some of the rumors that have circulated include:
It's crucial to emphasize that these are rumors and unproven allegations. Gates has denied any wrongdoing and stated that his meetings with Epstein were solely for philanthropic purposes. No concrete evidence has been presented to substantiate claims of Gates' involvement with underage women.
- Claims that Gates met with Epstein multiple times, including visits to Epstein's homes.
- Speculation that Gates was involved in or had knowledge of Epstein's alleged trafficking activities.
- Rumors about Gates potentially being involved with underage women through Epstein's network.
- Claims that Gates' divorce from Melinda French Gates was related to his association with Epstein.
- Allegations that Gates flew on Epstein's private jet, sometimes referred to as the "Lolita Express."
Reputable news sources and official investigations should be consulted for factual information on this topic. It's important to approach such sensitive matters with caution and rely on verified information rather than rumors or speculation.
There have been some reports of inconsistencies in Bill Gates' statements regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Some of the alleged inconsistencies include:
- Timing of first meeting: Gates initially stated he met Epstein in 2013, but later reports suggested their first meeting may have occurred earlier, possibly in 2011.
- Frequency of interactions: Gates' early statements downplayed the frequency of his meetings with Epstein, but subsequent reporting indicated they may have met more often than initially disclosed.
- Nature of relationship: Gates initially characterized his interactions with Epstein as purely philanthropic, but later reports suggested a more complex relationship.
- Knowledge of Epstein's background: Gates claimed he was unaware of Epstein's criminal history, but some reports indicate he may have been warned about Epstein's past.
- Reasons for meetings: While Gates maintained the meetings were about philanthropy, some reports suggest discussions may have included other topics.
- Duration of contact: There are discrepancies between Gates' statements about when he ceased contact with Epstein and reports of continued interactions.
It's important to note that these alleged inconsistencies are based on various media reports and investigations. The full picture remains unclear, and Gates maintains that his relationship with Epstein was limited and that he regrets the interactions. As with any complex issue, it's advisable to consult multiple reputable sources for a comprehensive understanding.
The female Australian reporter that called him out to his face comes to mind. You can google it if you care.Still haven't seen anything other than rumors. The same thing can be said for Trump/Epstein, but as I said, no evidence against Trump. Can you show us where Gates was "caught" lying?