How is it any less secure than other methods?It’s not a normal practice because it’s not secure. Next question?
How is it any less secure than other methods?It’s not a normal practice because it’s not secure. Next question?
Chain of custody. Very simple.How is it any less secure than other methods?
Ah understood your perspective, I'll still stand by mail in / drop off ballot is by far the best experience I've had, and would argue that it would provide access to more voters and more educated votes.Chain of custody. Very simple.
Paper ballots is the only secure process.
Take as much time as you need at the voting both.Ah understood your perspective, I'll still stand by mail in / drop off ballot is by far the best experience I've had, and would argue that it would provide access to more voters and more educated votes.
Very fair, I do very much want a secure election. I simply feel like a mail in/drop off ballot meets the threshold acceptable to me. When I lived in Western NY, all they did to "be secure" was to see if my signature matched some signature that's on file.Take as much time as you need at the voting both.
If we don’t have secure elections, then we don’t really have elections do we? If people don’t trust the process we won’t have a country.
It’s not too much to ask to take 1 hour out of your day every four years to determine the direction of the country.
Everyone should want secure elections, it’s not a political stance. The only way to guarantee secure elections, at this point in time, is with paper ballots.
The EC has no impact on thatBecause candidates would just focus on policies that appeal to the large population centers and primarily focus on campaigning there. The EC forces candidates to have policies with broader appeal and to acknowledge broader areas of the country.
Election day was just that, a day until 2020. All knew Biden couldn’t win legitimately in ‘20 so had to make it Election weeks. Go back to way it was pre-2020.
Nobody can still explain this ,with a straight face, how 6 swing states stopped counting on election night with Trump holding big leads in each. Then lo & behold, Biden came surging back in all of them in the dark of the night. Yeah, that seems legit.
You need to look no farther than California where the 5 most populous cities control the states politics.What’s wrong with a popular vote? Besides it helping democrats and hurting republicans?
I may be but because its been made hard. Why would that be?
Because the most people live there. Land doesn't voteYou need to look no farther than California where the 5 most populous cities control the states politics.
bro was spitting facts, cope.****ing yikes
My brother in christ, people outside of cities do get to have a say in politics.Because the most people live there. Land doesn't vote
You need to look no farther than California where the 5 most populous cities control the states politics.
I'm curious how'd you prefer a state govern itself if not by focusing on the needs of a majority of people. It is the case that, mostly, that means cities have more political power, but what's the alternative? We've chosen to assign power to individuals in our system of government.
I think we'd prefer to just have the coastal city be its own state (country ideally) that would destroy itself from within with its radical policies. We'd all be much better off. But then they'd probably leave the cities to move to red areas because they will complain about taxes, homelessness, etc etc...They can't answer this because it doesn't fit the narrative. The amount of willful ignorance is frightening.
Just chortling at the idea that people would be fleeing from Charleston County to move to Colleton County because liberal cities are hellscapes.I think we'd prefer to just have the coastal city be its own state (country ideally) that would destroy itself from within with its radical policies. We'd all be much better off. But then they'd probably leave the cities to move to red areas because they will complain about taxes, homelessness, etc etc...
I was referring to California my brotherJust chortling at the idea that people would be fleeing from Charleston County to move to Colleton County because liberal cities are hellscapes.
I'm not saying they don't get a say. But it should be one person one vote.My brother in christ, people outside of cities do get to have a say in politics.
So in Illinois there are some conservatives who want Chicago to be its own state. It would be a complete disaster for the rest of the state. Cities (and blue states) are major economic drivers. Red parts of states and the nation receive far more in federal money than they receive while blue areas put in far more than they get back.I think we'd prefer to just have the coastal city be its own state (country ideally) that would destroy itself from within with its radical policies. We'd all be much better off. But then they'd probably leave the cities to move to red areas because they will complain about taxes, homelessness, etc etc...
The majority of people leaving California for red states are republican voters. It's why you see a larger % growth in California among Democrats than in Republicans, and in those red states it's why there's higher growth among Republican voters over the same time period.I was referring to California my brother
I think we'd prefer to just have the coastal city be its own state (country ideally) that would destroy itself from within with its radical policies. We'd all be much better off. But then they'd probably leave the cities to move to red areas because they will complain about taxes, homelessness, etc etc...
It is?I'm not saying they don't get a say. But it should be one person one vote.
Leaving Chicago was the best thing I ever did.So in Illinois there are some conservatives who want Chicago to be its own state. It would be a complete disaster for the rest of the state. Cities (and blue states) are major economic drivers. Red parts of states and the nation receive far more in federal money than they receive while blue areas put in far more than they get back.
You honestly think that the needs of the metro cities are the same as those in the rural areas? Shouldn't our government be representative of everyone and not just a a majority of people who choose to vote?I'm curious how'd you prefer a state govern itself if not by focusing on the needs of a majority of people. It is the case that, mostly, that means cities have more political power, but what's the alternative? We've chosen to assign power to individuals in our system of government.
Holy Hyperbole BatmanThe election will be a landslide for Trump and will be easily decided on election night.
Kamala is the worst candidate in our lifetimes.
Election day was just that, a day until 2020. All knew Biden couldn’t win legitimately in ‘20 so had to make it Election weeks. Go back to way it was pre-2020.
Nobody can still explain this ,with a straight face, how 6 swing states stopped counting on election night with Trump holding big leads in each. Then lo & behold, Biden came surging back in all of them in the dark of the night. Yeah, that seems legit.
How so?It's been explained like a billion times, but y'all either don't comprehend it or are being willfully obtuse.
How’d that popularity vote work out for you??? 😂😂you realize if America did elections like every other nation in the world instead of sticking to the antiquated system that southern slave owners devised after losing the Civil War that Rs would never win a single vote ever again, right?
Damn.The election will be a landslide for Trump and will be easily decided on election night.
Kamala is the worst candidate in our lifetimes.