Dude has got the liar’s playbook down. Lots of words, lots of meaningless details.
Nobody’s falling for it!
Is this Matney and Co.? So they're jury experts now.
*no bias just journalism
Dude has got the liar’s playbook down. Lots of words, lots of meaningless details.
Nobody’s falling for it!
My daughters are convinced he’s innocent after yesterdays testimony. He’s not gong to be convicted.Reported on Courtv that 2 female jurors cried when A was talking about “Mags” and “Paul Paul” and one handed him the Kleenex box. I think we will definitely have a hung jury.
Yep - every lie that he has now admitted to would only be necessary to cover his guilt.Think about this, people...
If Alex were innocent, he would've immediately told 911 and LE that he was JUST RIGHT THERE WITH THEM AT THE KENNELS. "I was down here with them right before I left and they were fine, I had to get the chicken out the dog's mouth, they were fine!" He'd be frantic to assist LE with this accurate and possibly extremely helpful information.
An innocent man has no reason to lie about being there, because an innocent man does not know their time of death and doesn't really know he needs to lie. An innocent Alex doesn't know if they died at 8:49 or 10:04. Only a guilty man knows their time of death is so close to 8:44, and thus he needs to remove himself from the scene.
Just think.
Convinced after yesterday's testimony or convinced after watching the entire trial?My daughters are convinced he’s innocent after yesterdays testimony. He’s not gong to be convicted.
My daughters are convinced he’s innocent after yesterdays testimony. He’s not gong to be convicted.
That’s why Waters is trying to slow this down and show the jury over and over that Alex is capable of smooth talking his way to benefitting himself, and he’s done it over and over and over in many different ways. No, simply being a thief does not automatically make you a murderer. The deceit knows no bounds and he’s the ultimate wolf in sheep’s wool. Waters has got to keep hammering this point on cross and in closing. Because Alex knows that he can turn on just enough charm to take advantage of someone else’s feelings and a juror’s guilt about having to convict someone of murder, much less a Murdaugh. Mindhunter.My daughters are convinced he’s innocent after yesterdays testimony. He’s not gong to be convicted.
I agree that he humanized himself enough to convince one person yesterday
but games not over
Agree that it ends in a hung jury.My daughters are convinced he’s innocent after yesterdays testimony. He’s not gong to be convicted.
Alex spoke a few truths yesterday but the most telling were
“I get paranoid”
“I would never intentionally hurt my family”
again narcissistic
almost like whatever happened, it wasn’t really me therefore I am not guilty
I think Waters, as many have said, is drawing out the true AM, 2-sentence answer for a yes/no question, just so he (AM) can control the conversation
Paw-Paw is his way of making it like there were two sons - the one he loved and the one he thought he had to kill.
AS WATERS HAS SAID - NO ONE EVER MENTIONED “PAW PAW” in ANY STATEMENT UNTIL YESTERDAY
self-serving and total act to make him look loving
Waters will elicit testimony about drug use leading up to the day of murders
went to u of scWatching that killer on the stand I couldn't believe he was smart enough to get a degree.
A liar. A killer.
Hang the bastard already.
Paw-Paw is his way of making it like there were two sons - the one he loved and the one he thought he had to kill.
AS WATERS HAS SAID - NO ONE EVER MENTIONED “PAW PAW” in ANY STATEMENT UNTIL YESTERDAY
Just consumed it myself in one sitting last night. Unreal.Just watched the Netflix from last night. What a slimy family-all of them.
Hope the jurors watch it.
You and I are 100% on the same page.Think about this, people...
If Alex were innocent, he would've immediately told 911 and LE that he was JUST RIGHT THERE WITH THEM AT THE KENNELS. "I was down here with them right before I left and they were fine, I had to get the chicken out the dog's mouth, they were fine!" He'd be frantic to assist LE with this accurate and possibly extremely helpful information.
An innocent man has no reason to lie about being there, because an innocent man does not know their time of death and doesn't really know he needs to lie. An innocent Alex doesn't know if they died at 8:49 or 10:04. Only a guilty man knows their time of death is so close to 8:44, and thus he needs to remove himself from the scene.
Just think.
People keep saying he’s charismatic and I don’t see it. He looks like a dead eyed sociopath to me.
Maybe. The whole family looks like they need a punch in the face with Buster topping the list.He is EXTREMELY charismatic and has a warmth about him. Take that to the bank. If you met him today and knew nothing of his past, you'd like him a lot. You would want to be his friend.
I threw mine in a pond last week. My fishing partner threw his in at the same time. Unfortunately, both of us were thrown into the pond with our phones. Managed to gather the one rod that fell out with me and the boat righted itself after spitting us out. Happily, both of our phones still worked.What happens if you throw it in the toilet? Let us know.
Shotguns possibly but rifles with noise suppressors? i live near waterfowl impoundments and am rarely awakened by shots.I’m sure this has been talked about and I know the defense called(bought) an “expert” witness detailing the gunshot decibels and what they would have been in the house, but there is no way that you could be only 3 football fields away from the shooting and not hear the gunshots. I live in the country surrounded by hunt clubs and clearly hear every deer within a half a mile of our house get shot every evening during deer season, even while watching tv. It seems as though the jury should take a field trip. I hope the prosecution brings some rebuttal witnesses and it this point, maybe even bring “cousin” Eddie back as a rebuttal witness if that is possible. I don’t see what the prosecution has to lose at this point considering Alex had jurors crying and handing him tissue yesterday during his gross testimony. Unless things change, the best case I see is a hung jury. Hope I’m wrong.
Both daughters went into the trial thinking he was guilty. The turning point for them is what Poot has been driving home for the entire trial - they can’t see him killing his son. Most witnesses have attested to the closeness of the family and his grief seems genuine. Plus that’s not a lot of time to do what he’s accused of doing.Agree that it ends in a hung jury.
This is not a shot at your daughter's thinking, but lots of folks are going to base their opinion solely on AMs testimony. That's just the way a lot of brains work. Evidence be damned.
AM is by far the least credible person to testify during this trial. He's the only one that had anything to gain from testimony. Much of his testimony so far has been about his web of lies, and his new alibi of resting on the couch after leaving the kennels directly conflicts with his cell phone steps. I hope Waters drills him on that.
Yet, many people aren't going to be able to see past all the facts for the emotion. AM was upset on the stand, and many will take that as a sign of innocence despite the fact that this trial has proven he's a pathological liar.
Do you think he dragged out the financial stuff yesterday so they could go over his testimony and match to the evidence before today's questioning? Not sure the phone stuff supports his testimony yesterday that he went to the house and took a 5-10 minute nap before leaving. Catch him in another lie.I would want photos of AM with guns entered today
ADD drug use talk about how much money spent
-if not lying then basically a zombie who “without sleep” (insert snot drip) could snap
ALSO where is the F’n MONEY? (got into that yesterday)
MAYBE hookers finally come in to the game
Waters has been so good all trial but it only matters if you have enough gas in the 4th quarter.
Please keep in mind that this is a very difficult case for the prosecution
so a hung jury is not a loss - but maybe it was headed that way all along
Bingo, no way he wouldn’t have heard all those shots based on the new and improved alibi. I don’t care how loud the tv was. He would’ve heard those gunshots.I’m sure this has been talked about and I know the defense called(bought) an “expert” witness detailing the gunshot decibels and what they would have been in the house, but there is no way that you could be only 3 football fields away from the shooting and not hear the gunshots. I live in the country surrounded by hunt clubs and clearly hear every deer within a half a mile of our house get shot every evening during deer season, even while watching tv. It seems as though the jury should take a field trip. I hope the prosecution brings some rebuttal witnesses and it this point, maybe even bring “cousin” Eddie back as a rebuttal witness if that is possible. I don’t see what the prosecution has to lose at this point considering Alex had jurors crying and handing him tissue yesterday during his gross testimony. Unless things change, the best case I see is a hung jury. Hope I’m wrong.
A midget apparently.Finally watched yesterday after watching the Netflix show, so obviously I think he's guilty and whole family are pieces of shit. I think he won't get convicted of the murders because at least one juror won't go for it - but has there even been a shred of evidence that anyone besides Maggie, Paul, and Alex were at the scene of the murders?
There was the Midget of Hampton County — a 5’2” stone cold killer.Finally watched yesterday after watching the Netflix show, so obviously I think he's guilty and whole family are pieces of shit. I think he won't get convicted of the murders because at least one juror won't go for it - but has there even been a shred of evidence that anyone besides Maggie, Paul, and Alex were at the scene of the murders?
In my re-creation with my iPhone I found it did not light up with dropping or throwing.What in the world are you talking about? My point was simply...your claim that your phone works in a certain way therefore that means AM couldn't have thrown MM's phone from the car is anecdotal. I tried to recreate with my phone and I could...even so, say you don't 100% buy that ONE piece of evidence, why would the mean you throw out the other 2 dozen?
That has nothing to do with convicting a guy of murder on one item that the state presented over 3 weeks of testimony. That is bonkers.
Every post you make is 100% buying the AM story hook, line and sinker. Your mind is/was made up and you seem to have a serious case of confirmation bias. Anything that confirms your opinion on the matter is 100% air tight, no bubbles; anything that goes against is questioned and weak. Problem is, there is very, very little that suggests AM is innocent. Way more suggests he was involved.
That's the scales of justice, for sure--is the weight strong enough? Clearly you say no; For me, I think it is thus far, but I'm not viewing every piece of information through an already decided on the outcome lens.
Very rarely will a hair drug screen be taken from the scalp. Typically the hair is removed from an arm or leg.Did the defense have his head shaved early in this saga so that his hair could not be tested for drugs? Or is there another reason one would shave his head?
Understand and I get where they're coming from. I'd go as far to say that the grief is genuine.Both daughters went into the trial thinking he was guilty. The turning point for them is what Poot has been driving home for the entire trial - they can’t see him killing his son. Most witnesses have attested to the closeness of the family and his grief seems genuine. Plus that’s not a lot of time to do what he’s accused of doing.