⚖️ MURDAUGH MURDERS & TRIAL THREAD ⚖️
- Thread starter OldMTPTiger
- Start date
I have not seen evidence of a manicure. Even if she did, I would think she'd put the ring back on. But this is a nothing piece of evidence anyway.
I owned a good dog named Judge.
He presided over neighborhoods in Clemson and Columbia.
He was, simply, the very best.
No doubt. Honestly, I’d be a terrible juror in this case. The fact that he’s gone through all of these “trials” and hasn’t driven to the middle of moselle and suck started a shotgun tells me he’s a narcissist who will lie at any corner to protect himself.
See my avatar. The Judge liked to fetch sticks.
Well, Judge was followed by Riggs who was followed by Big Dex
There are systems that are way more accurate than 2 meters. I daily achieve 2 inch tolerances with gps. However the system that is in that suv is no where near that capability. Matter of fact it’s not much better than your phone . Which also is going to considerably less than 2 meters. I meant down falls in that equipment not gps as a whole. GPS as a whole is great and getting better every year.
He knew damn good and well the life insurance would pay out if he killed himself. If he wanted to "be gone" why didn't he off himself after Eddie "missed"? Because he would NEVER kill himself. He has always thought he would get out of all of this.
Not sure how anyone can read through this and have reasonable doubt in this case.
www.wjcl.com
Cell phone, vehicle data paint picture of what happened the night Paul and Maggie Murdaugh died
The following information has been presented as evidence in the double murder trial of Alex Murdaugh.
www.wjcl.com
He did that a little bit on the stand as well. It's calculated and performative. He does it in an attempt to exhibit distress.
This is just from memory and I've only watched Waters' cross once, but I believe when Waters says something to the effect of "Ok, let's talk about June 7th," Alex starts to nod and rock back and forth. He wants to show the jury "this subject matter is painful to me but I'm trying my best to get through it."
I'm no body language expert to be clear.
Whose testimony? What was said?
I'm not disputing it. Just asking because I have not seen it. I remember Alex texting Maggie about a pedicure.
Alex still thinks he will get out of all of this. I fully believe that he believes he will never serve a day in any prison.
Blanca or someone said she had been to the pedicure place. I can't recall but it's in the testimony
I have discussed this case with a prosecutor in the 14th circuit who states that Alex will be tried again if hung jury (and no plea deal reached.)
That is a pedicure. You said "manicure". Pedicure = feet. Alex text to her confirms pedicure. Feet.
No shit Sherlock. Harpootlian said manicure. Maybe Blanca corrected him. It's a non issue.
Do we know the manicure had not finished before moving to her feet? The same place does both.
Hey, like Fits, I have inside sources. Fits, me, another 10,000 people and AM knew his scam was up.
Lots of men and women pretend to their families that they are happily married. In America, a successful person, in many places, is supposed to be happily married. It is very common for couples to keep the deep secret that they are miserable very quiet. It has been reported that AM's wife had discussed her situation with a divorce lawyer. It has also been reported she had moved to have a forensic account of AM and her finances to find out the truth and so to know what her status would be if she left AM. AM has admitted that both his wife and his son knew of his drug abuse and were fighting back against it.
Many who have seen others consistently defend AM no matter what comes up, suspect his defenders discredit all such reports.
Others, knowing about AM's deceit, theft, whoring, lying and drug use will make a rational analysis and think it makes perfect sense that his wife would want to leave him. And many would think her sister might be the last to know she was miserable. Others would think it civil and caring for her sister to say Maggie was happily married now that she is dead. The 'reports' make more sense than the lack of them would make.
You are the one who said the testimony mentioned manicure. And you are the one who is wrong. I agree it's a non issue.
I do not think there is a journalistic report of any integrity that mentions divorce lawyer and/or forensic accountant. So give me a link, please.
It did mention the word manicure.
You can watch the trial of you wish and you'll see and hear it for yourself. I believe it was about 9 days ago.
I would think her sister wants justice more than lying while under oath by saying her sister was happy in her marriage.
Here is a snippet for you with regards to nail salons and lack of alleles under fingernails.
Murdaugh trial, Day 16: A jury shakeup and new evidence
Most of the testimony was focused on detailed forensic evidence in the investigation into the deaths of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.
I saw someone ask a couple good questions on a different site. That I believe also need to be addressed.
It was found in court that sled lied about a major piece of evidence to the grand jury when indicting Alex for murder. The other significant piece of evidence was only brought to the states attention during the trial. Take those away and I can’t possibly see how anyone could even indict him let alone him be guilty, so what exactly did they think they had?
It was found in court that sled lied about a major piece of evidence to the grand jury when indicting Alex for murder. The other significant piece of evidence was only brought to the states attention during the trial. Take those away and I can’t possibly see how anyone could even indict him let alone him be guilty, so what exactly did they think they had?
You may think that but in similar situations I see otherwise. Let your significant other make you watch dateline.
Thats perfectly fine. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion. If my sister were murdered I'd want justice served rather than me be polite on the stand (and potentially incriminate myself by giving false testimony).
Defense said they have 4 witnesses left and should rest Monday afternoon. I believe state will then bring in at least two more witnesses. No telling when the jury gets the case - Maybe Thursday? Friday?
As for Waters' exposing Alex, cliffs are:
Alex says that he lied about kennel because he was paranoid. His paranoia was somewhat drug induced, but mainly the result of the following factors (I might leave one out, but point remains)
1. His law partners arrived at scene and told him be careful talking with LE
2. During his interview with David Owen, Alex says he had pills in his pocket
3. Alex says he thought David Owen was a different SLED agent whom Alex believed acted in bad faith 10 years ago
4. Alex says David Owen's questions about his relationship with his wife and son also made him paranoid
Waters then played body cam footage of the first officer on scene. Alex lies to that officer about being at kennel. Thus, his paranoia excuse is exposed as a lie because his lie to that first officer occurs before every single factor that he listed as causes of his paranoia/lie about kennel.
There was absolutely no reason for AM to lie to the police if he truly believed someone had killed his wife and child. Why would you not cooperate with them in hopes of catching the killer?
It's wild to me that people are the facts in this case and have reasonable doubt. It's not at all reasonable to think someone else did this.
I don't put much importance to that. She could have simply lost her ring and not known where it was.
Serious question: Do you know what these relate to? The SLED lie and the other evidence. Or are you asking what the lie was and what the recent evidence is?
You didn't respond to me yesterday, but oh well....
You are saying that you either need video of Alex shooting them or the gun. And even if the state showed you the gun, that doesn't "prove Alex pulled the trigger." You are being unreasonable and failing to connect the dots, IMO. You see "no quality evidence?" What does that even mean?
On top of that, you state that "I don't care if Alex lied." That' damning "quality evidence," is it not? Why does an innocent man lie to LE IMMEDIATELY about being with them? This could be extremely helpful in the investigation.
Answer me this ... Can you imagine any circumstance whatsoever wherein you would lie to LE like Alex did? You find your immediate family dead and lie about being with them? Tell me one single circumstance where you would do that. That is the thought process I hope the jurors undertake.
Last edited:
Mandy Matney recently reported that she was never able to confirm reports that Maggie had talked to a divorce attorney. She believes the story is false.
I don't care for MMatney but I'm not surprised by this development, or lack thereof.
That is just a coping mechanism for someone who is scared/anxious.
Rocking back and forth is soothing mechanism.
Exactly. He even lied about why he lied.
I think he is guilty based on the evidence. Two things I don’t get.
Why did he want to kill Maggie?
Why was he adamant multiple times that no one else was there? It’s like he was protecting someone more than he wanted to raise the possibility that someone else was there to do the murders. I assume that Buster had a verified alibi. The other alternative is that he is protecting someone else that did it for him, in which case he is still guilty. Maybe it means nothing, but it’s weird.
