I am far from an expert, but I think they all did a very good job with the reality of their case.would you be willing to share your thoughts/evaluation (detailed or more vague) on how the prosecution and defense did over the course of the trial?
if not, no worries...just curious.
On a side note, I would have fired the woman in the row behind the prosecutors who kept making faces whenever Dick and Jim were making points. That is how you can lose a jury no matter how good your case is.I am far from an expert, but I think they all did a very good job with the reality of their case.
Prosecution. I was impressed with entire team. With no direct evidence and a bungled crime scene, they had to focus on the lies and they did that. It was a relatively easy story to tell with the GPS, Onstar, Video and the lying ass liar on the stand, but over 6 weeks, very difficult to stay on point and they did that. I thought Meadors went a bit overboard on the closing, but it may work with the jury. You have to show some anger at a guy that just lies and lies and lies some more.
Defense. Also a good job considering they were blindsided by some of the evidence. Not at trial necessarily, but certainly after they took the case. It is SO hard to overcome a proven liar as a client. Little disappointed with Griffin's close and Dick, well, being Dick sometimes, but they did a very good job overall. I would have hammered and hammered on time of death as that is, in my mind, one of the only variables that helps repair the timeline, but they have forgotten more than I know, so I am sure they had their reasons.
Without knowing the jury makeup, it is impossible to really say who was the most effective, but damn would I hate to have to defend a guy that was a proven liar and thief. So tough.
He's doneDoesn’t it have to be guilty?
I can’t imagine a chance that all members of the jury went Not Guilty in THAT short of time?!?
Yeah, no way it is Not Guilty. Can only be guilty.Doesn’t it have to be guilty?
I can’t imagine a chance that all members of the jury went Not Guilty in THAT short of time?!?
If the verdict is guilty, Poot will reference the juror that was booted… insinuate that some fishy business was going on.How long before ol Poot appeals?
Never, Murdaugh is out of defense funds.How long before ol Poot appeals?
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts!I am far from an expert, but I think they all did a very good job with the reality of their case.
Prosecution. I was impressed with entire team. With no direct evidence and a bungled crime scene, they had to focus on the lies and they did that. It was a relatively easy story to tell with the GPS, Onstar, Video and the lying ass liar on the stand, but over 6 weeks, very difficult to stay on point and they did that. I thought Meadors went a bit overboard on the closing, but it may work with the jury. You have to show some anger at a guy that just lies and lies and lies some more.
Defense. Also a good job considering they were blindsided by some of the evidence. Not at trial necessarily, but certainly after they took the case. It is SO hard to overcome a proven liar as a client. Little disappointed with Griffin's close and Dick, well, being Dick sometimes, but they did a very good job overall. I would have hammered and hammered on time of death as that is, in my mind, one of the only variables that helps repair the timeline, but they have forgotten more than I know, so I am sure they had their reasons.
Without knowing the jury makeup, it is impossible to really say who was the most effective, but damn would I hate to have to defend a guy that was a proven liar and thief. So tough.
If I was a betting man I would say 10 days or less.How long before ol Poot appeals?
So why did Alex lie as well and manipulate people to establish an alibi for him???Some of the rulings of the judge and the fact SLED lied to the grand jury tells me this will eventually get overturned.
GUILTY AS CHARGEDCrazy.....verdict in 3 hours.....
Guy FRIED himself on the stand