Starts tomorrow
I would hate to be on the jury after reading about his son’s gruesome injuries. Don’t want to see those photos
Hopefully they publicly hang him from the oldest tree by the courthouse.
Starts tomorrow
I would hate to be on the jury after reading about his son’s gruesome injuries. Don’t want to see those photos
lolOnly takes one juror to refuse to believe a father would murder his son. Everybody understands heat-of-passion spouse killings, but not children.
For real! Queef that was an unsettling statement.lol
Sounds like you and your missus have some epic arguments.
Whenever prosecutors intentionally leak evidence it is usually a sign of a weak case. Not always, but sometimes is an indicator. IF true, Dick will create the doubt necessary for a not guilty>.Serious question…I haven’t followed this close enough to know but how the hell would he get off the murder charges? Everything I read made it feel pretty slam dunk
So what’s the story here? Why’d he kill the boy?
That last part isn’t always true. It takes time even in obvious cases sometimes.He's going to pull some major stunts. Blame the crack head that also shot him, claim his law firm knew all along that he was stealing money, bring up drugs etc. He would have been arrested long before he was it it was a slam dunk case.
His son was a Fvck up and he probably got tired of bailing his ass out of shitSo what’s the story here? Why’d he kill the boy?
He’s a coldhearted psychopath, and I believe he’s guilty of everything we have heard and moreThat last part isn’t always true. It takes time even in obvious cases sometimes.
Believe he went to kill his wife and his showed up and was collateral damageOnly takes one juror to refuse to believe a father would murder his son. Everybody understands heat-of-passion spouse killings, but not children.
Who else had more to gain from Maggie’s death than Alex or would want her dead? The Beaches as revenge for the boat crash? Doubtful. Drug dealers making a statement with Alex? No evidence for that. Alex was there when he had previously said he wasn’t. Maggie texted a friend that she felt something was up when Alex wanted her at Mosell that night. All circumstantial at this point until we get the real evidence in the trial.Anyone else believe he's innocent?
That has been reportedWasnt the shirt he wore with the blood splatter on it destroyed during testing?
As he probably should…He will get off the murder charges but the financial charges run so deep he may die in jail
He may not have been the one that pulled the trigger on his wife and kid, but no way is he innocent.Anyone else believe he's innocent?
I don’t for one second. But it’s stupid crap like what was reported Friday that’s going to screw it up for law enforcement.Anyone else believe he's innocent?
Unless the expert blood spatter scientist can adequately explain why he changed his opinion, which is very possible, the prosecution may not admit it as evidence. Both the Defense and Prosecutor have a lot riding on how that is handled. Defense has big risk in over questioning the expert on the testing. He could really drive home the point it was high impact spatter.I don’t for one second. But it’s stupid crap like what was reported Friday that’s going to screw it up for law enforcement.
I don’t know how to link articles so I’ll try to be brief. The shirt he was wearing when police arrived had blood on it. SLED used a forensics expert out of Colorado to examine it. His initial report was that it was blood transfer. He re-examined the shirt again at SLEDS request and issued a report stating it was high velocity blood splatter. How do we know this? The Attorney generals office accidentally sent Murdaughs lawyers the first report by mistake. His lawyers were arguing Friday to have the evidence thrown out and that SLED pressured the expert to change his report. So common sense says have the shirt examined by another expert. But…. Oh wait…… the shirt was destroyed by chemicals and no longer exist.
You can’t make this s#!t up. Defense attorneys will have a field day with this.
My sons boss is in the jury pool.
FTR I don't think he's innocent. The sociopath description above was pretty accurateWho else had more to gain from Maggie’s death than Alex or would want her dead? The Beaches as revenge for the boat crash? Doubtful. Drug dealers making a statement with Alex? No evidence for that. Alex was there when he had previously said he wasn’t. Maggie texted a friend that she felt something was up when Alex wanted her at Mosell that night. All circumstantial at this point until we get the real evidence in the trial.
[facepalm]I don’t for one second. But it’s stupid crap like what was reported Friday that’s going to screw it up for law enforcement.
I don’t know how to link articles so I’ll try to be brief. The shirt he was wearing when police arrived had blood on it. SLED used a forensics expert out of Colorado to examine it. His initial report was that it was blood transfer. He re-examined the shirt again at SLEDS request and issued a second report stating it was high velocity blood splatter. How do we know this? The Attorney generals office accidentally sent Murdaughs lawyers the first report by mistake. His lawyers were arguing Friday to have the evidence thrown out and that SLED pressured the expert to change his report. So common sense says have the shirt examined by another expert right?But…. Oh wait for it…… the shirt was destroyed by chemicals and no longer exist.
You can’t make this s#!t up. Defense attorneys will have a field day with this.
Agreed. Will be one heck of a cat and mouse game. But you only need to instill doubt in the mind of one juror. Going to be interesting.Unless the expert blood spatter scientist can adequately explain why he changed his opinion, which is very possible, the prosecution may not admit it as evidence. Both the Defense and Prosecutor have a lot riding on how that is handled. Defense has big risk in over questioning the expert on the testing. He could really drive home the point it was high impact spatter.
I don't know man, if it is so obvious it was high velocity spatter, how did he get it wrong the 1st time. And how did the shirt get destroyed. I have no skin in this and think Alex is guilty as hell, but those are some big questions.Unless the expert blood spatter scientist can adequately explain why he changed his opinion, which is very possible, the prosecution may not admit it as evidence. Both the Defense and Prosecutor have a lot riding on how that is handled. Defense has big risk in over questioning the expert on the testing. He could really drive home the point it was high impact spatter.
Will the Snapchat video put at the scene at the time he said he was visiting his father?I don't know man, if it is so obvious it was high velocity spatter, how did he get it wrong the 1st time. And how did the shirt get destroyed. I have no skin in this and think Alex is guilty as hell, but those are some big questions.
likely paid by assignment of the TV rights or something like thatFor someone supposedly broke, AM has some high priced legal representation
There's lots of info in the pinned thread in the Other Forum. With good attorneys, nothing is ever a slam dunk.Serious question…I haven’t followed this close enough to know but how the hell would he get off the murder charges? Everything I read made it feel pretty slam dunk
Yeah that’s the question, why did he change his opinion? No idea. But one expert that I listened to this evening on the latest Murdaugh Family Murders podcast said she has worked with the blood spatter guy and trusted he would have good reasons for changing his evaluation.I don't know man, if it is so obvious it was high velocity spatter, how did he get it wrong the 1st time. And how did the shirt get destroyed. I have no skin in this and think Alex is guilty as hell, but those are some big questions.
That shirt may not be allowed as evidenceYou don’t think they have the goods on him? High impact spatter seems to indicate he was at least there or maybe you know something I don’t.
Id like to remind you that this thread is being monitored by the authorities (chris has mentioned this). Dont say anything about the case on here once trial beginsSo is my wife.
Yeah that’s the question, why did he change his opinion? No idea. But one expert that I listened to this evening on the latest Murdaugh Family Murders podcast said she has worked with the blood spatter guy and trusted he would have good reasons for changing his evaluation.
As to why the shirt was destroyed it was partly due to the number of tests that had to be run for the various tests. I think one test, maybe DNA , required getting samples from several areas to ensure that it was all consistent. Of course , LE may have made sure there wasn’t any additional shirt remaining for independent analysis.
Id like to remind you that this thread is being monitored by the authorities (chris has mentioned this). Dont say anything about the case on here once trial begins