US attorney who has led Hunter Biden probe offers to publicly testify to Congress this fall
Biden Crime Family Investigations
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
HUGE! Devon Archer to Testify Hunter Biden Put Then-VP Dad Joe on the Phone with Overseas Business Partners at Least 2 Dozen Times | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Devon Archer (L) with Joe and Hunter Biden Hunter Biden’s former associate and convicted felon, Devon Archer, is reportedly cooperating with Republican lawmakers and will testify this week on the $10 million Ukraine-Biden bribe.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
HUGE! Devon Archer to Testify Hunter Biden Put Then-VP Dad Joe on the Phone with Overseas Business Partners at Least 2 Dozen Times
By Cristina Laila Jul. 24, 2023 9:30 am
Devon Archer (L) with Joe and Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden’s former associate and convicted felon, Devon Archer, is reportedly cooperating with Republican lawmakers and will testify this week on the $10 million Ukraine-Biden bribe.
According to New York Post reporter Miranda Devine, Devon Archer is going to sing like a canary and tell Congress that Hunter Biden put his dad, then-VP Joe Biden on speakerphone into meetings with his foreign business associates at least two dozen times.
Archer, who is currently facing one year in prison for defrauding an Indian tribe, will testify to the House Oversight Committee about at least two dozen meetings he witnessed Joe Biden attend either in person or by phone at Hunter’s request.
Devon Archer will also confirm to lawmakers that Joe Biden is indeed the “Big Guy.”
As Central Banks Stockpile Gold, a Christian Company Helps Americans Get Ahead of the “Retirement Bubble”
In 2017, James Gilliar, a business associate involved in the CEFC joint venture, broke down a payment structure in an email to Tony Bobulinski and Hunter Biden: “10 held by H for the big guy?”
Mykola Zlochevsky also referred to Joe Biden as “the big guy” in the FBI’s FD-1023 form.
Via The New York Post:
According to Miranda Devine, congressional investigators will ask Devon Archer why Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky requested an urgent call with Joe Biden in 2015.
Three days after the urgent speakerphone call, Joe Biden was set to travel to Kiev to deliver an address to the Urkrainian parliament about the country’s corruption.
Meanwhile Zlochevsky was a target of investigations.
Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma and Zlochevsky for corruption and several homes and vehicles belonging to the oligarch were seized.
A month later Viktor Shokin was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion from Ukraine.
Joe Biden publicly bragged about bribing Ukraine with $1 billion to fire Viktor Shokin, the Ukrainian Prosecutor General who was investigating Burisma corruption.
“I looked at him and I said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired,” Biden said in 2018.
Click here to read Miranda Devine’s full report on Devon Archer’s upcoming testimony.
There doesn't need to be a money trail to Joe for him to be compromised. The FBI has now on record said the laptop is real, there are witnesses willing to testify of his involvement, there are whistleblowers (IRS and FBI) testifying that they weren't allowed to prosecute Hunter for felonies or investigate, there is evidence of censorship and suppression of the laptop pre-election.........why do you need a money trail to Joe to tell your brain that he's corrupt and shouldn't be in office?
The IRS weren't even allowed to question Hunter's children, Joe's brother, the grandkids, his sister, etc.......the banks all filed suspicious activity reports on more than 25 transactions. They were all laundering money.
I get it, no one likes to be wrong but you'd have to be learning challenged or just a willful idiot to think he's innocent at this point.
Shocker
"Notably, those dates are all long after Hunter Biden’s scheduled guilty plea, which is set to take place Wednesday. He has agreed to plead guilty to two federal tax misdemeanors as part of a plea dea"
They will come up with a phony story to feed to congress along with a sprinkling of cannot answer this question to protect sources and methods.
- We know the laptop is real but for the thousandth time, there is nothing in it that implicates Joe in a "crime"
- Involvement in what? A crime? There has been zero proof of that
- Stop confusing Hunter with Joe. Remember, Joe could have easily fired the state's attorney investigating Hunter when he took office but left him in place to allow him to finish his work. He didn't have to.
- This is 100% political payback for Trump's two impeachments that he deserved. Trump committed his treachery brazenly out in the open and left them no choice lest we let him turn the country into a lawless banana republic.
- This is the definition of a witch hunt - despite there being no evidence that he committed any crimes, the Pubs are holding nationally televised hearings in search of one. If he's guilty then do what you must but this is by all intents and purposes a performative, malignant clown show, as Hakeem Jeffries put it.
- The Pubs spent two years before the mid-terms asking the public to put them in office by harping on inflation, crime and the border but now that they're seated, their motives are clear and show that they lied to us. This was their ulterior motive all along.
- This is helping no one.
Last edited:
We've known for weeks now that he would plead guilty but it makes sense to let the sentencing play out before Weiss testifies - "under oath"
Why does it make sense to not have him testify before a ruling is made on his plea deal? He can't be tried for the same crimes twice, right?
How many people are in these branches of government that have some tie back to these criminals? Like ticks ....
If you believe all this ….I have some beach front property in North Dakota for sale.
Wow!!
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Hunter Biden Legal Team Responds to Allegations of Impersonating Republican Attorney to Court Clerk, Claims It was ‘Misunderstanding’- “There Was No Misrepresentation”
Hunter Biden Legal Team Responds to Allegations of Impersonating Republican Attorney to Court Clerk, Claims It was 'Misunderstanding'- "There Was No Misrepresentation" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Attorneys for Hunter Biden have responded to allegations of deceiving a court clerk to remove certain documents from a court docket, claiming it was a simple “misunderstanding.” The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Hunter Biden’s legal team is facing possible sanctions after they lied...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Long read but pretty shocking when you see all of the facts in one place. This was a brief filed in the Hunter case with some interesting notes regarding what the DOJ has done in preparation of Weiss having to testify. When you read the entire thing, it just wreaks of corruption at the highest levels. When the left talks about the attacks on our democracy, well this is it.
-The DOJ has ensured there is no way Weiss is going to incriminate himself or the DOJ. He legally doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to and the Govt offered a plea agreement that prevents any further investigation.....yikes.
(" The letter contains a number of carefully lawyered caveats that appear to be designed to allow Weiss to refuse to answer any question he finds “difficult” at any eventual hearing. Particularly odd is the reference to limitations of testimony at “this early juncture” to “protect the ongoing matter.” Id. If this case is at an “early juncture” and on-going, then why has the Government offered a plea agreement that by all accounts does not in any way further a related investigation?")
-The DOJ is full stop preventing the release of any information that would either prove innocence of the accused or send him to prison, why would they do that if this has been done by the books?
("The Department is using every possible procedural and substantive mechanism to withhold key records—that may inform the Court of whether the plea before it is in the interest of justice—from Congress, Amici, and the public. Again, these records would go directly to resolving the profound conflicts between the Attorney General, Weiss, and the Whistleblowers.")
-The DOJ has ensured there is no way Weiss is going to incriminate himself or the DOJ. He legally doesn't have to answer any questions he doesn't want to and the Govt offered a plea agreement that prevents any further investigation.....yikes.
(" The letter contains a number of carefully lawyered caveats that appear to be designed to allow Weiss to refuse to answer any question he finds “difficult” at any eventual hearing. Particularly odd is the reference to limitations of testimony at “this early juncture” to “protect the ongoing matter.” Id. If this case is at an “early juncture” and on-going, then why has the Government offered a plea agreement that by all accounts does not in any way further a related investigation?")
-The DOJ is full stop preventing the release of any information that would either prove innocence of the accused or send him to prison, why would they do that if this has been done by the books?
("The Department is using every possible procedural and substantive mechanism to withhold key records—that may inform the Court of whether the plea before it is in the interest of justice—from Congress, Amici, and the public. Again, these records would go directly to resolving the profound conflicts between the Attorney General, Weiss, and the Whistleblowers.")
"We are deeply concerned by any misrepresentations about our work—whether deliberate or arising from misunderstandings—that could unduly harm public confidence in the evenhanded administration of justice, to which we are dedicated," Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte wrote in a letter to Jordan, adding that the DOJ believes "it is strongly in the public interest for the American people and for Congress to hear directly from U.S. Attorney Weiss on these assertions and questions about his authority at a public hearing." Weiss in letters to Jordan has repeatedly denied any interference in his investigation, writing that he had the "ultimate authority" to make charging decisions in the case. "Somehow, I don't think Jim Jordan is going to like the answers US Atty Weiss is going to give," predicted former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance."
DOJ fires back at Jim Jordan over GOP’s “misrepresentations” about Hunter Biden probe
“I don't think Jim Jordan is going to like the answers US Atty Weiss is going to give,” ex-prosecutor predicts
Cannot make this up. The crooks have every angle covered. No wonder Joe is grinning and eating ice cream all the time.
Hunter Biden investigation: Close Biden political aide worked for Weiss when inquiry began© Provided by Washington Examiner
Aclose associate of the Biden family appears to have spent years working in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, including during the months when whistleblowers said the office took up an investigation of Hunter Biden.
Alexander Mackler served as press secretary in Joe Biden’s Senate office and, later, as legal counsel in his vice presidential office. Mackler managed the late Beau Biden’s successful campaign for Delaware attorney general in 2010.
And Mackler served on the Biden-Harris transition team in 2020, helping the Biden administration create the blueprint for its Justice Department.
Mackler also appeared to have a close personal relationship with Hunter Biden. In emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, Mackler corresponded frequently with Hunter Biden and his business associates and even referred to Hunter Biden fondly as a “brother” in October 2018. Mackler was working under U.S. Attorney David Weiss in the office at that time, according to his LinkedIn page, which lists him as having worked in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office from August 2016 to May 2019.
According to testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee from Joseph Ziegler, a top IRS agent on the Hunter Biden case for years, the Delaware office had an investigation into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings by January 2019.
The close relationship between Hunter Biden and a former member of the prosecutorial office investigating him could come under scrutiny as House Republicans dig into the reasons why members of Weiss’s team appeared to slow or block key elements of the Hunter Biden investigation.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf featured prominently in the testimony of two IRS agents who spent years working on the Hunter Biden investigation. Both Gary Shapley and Ziegler, the IRS whistleblowers, said Wolf intervened to stop multiple investigative steps from moving forward, including by preventing FBI agents from asking witnesses any questions about Joe Biden’s involvement in foreign business affairs and by tipping off Hunter Biden’s attorneys about a planned search of his storage unit.
Wolf worked alongside Mackler in the U.S. attorney’s office before Mackler’s departure. She and Mackler prosecuted a major case together, for example.
How their relationship may have factored into the decisions by Wolf that whistleblowers found inexplicable remains unclear.
Mackler now works under Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings. In February, Hunter Biden’s attorneys implored Jennings to open an investigation into the Delaware computer repair shop owner who helped publicize the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, as well as the Donald Trump associates who helped spread the laptop’s contents.
Jennings’s office did not respond to a request for comment about Mackler’s relationship to the Biden’s, as well as whether her office did ultimately open the investigation into the dissemination of the Hunter Biden laptop.
Jennings herself has extensive ties to the Biden family. She endorsed him almost immediately upon his entry into the presidential race in 2019, boasting to social media that she has known the Biden family “for most of my life.”
Mackler’s deep connections to the Biden family raise questions about whether he should ever have come close to an investigation involving the Bidens.
He emailed with Hunter Biden and Eric Schwerin, one of Hunter Biden’s business partners, on what appears to be the first day of his new job at the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to talk about the office’s email retention policy.
Schwerin joked to Mackler that his response was “the last email you ever receive from me.”
Days after Mackler had started working for the U.S. attorney’s office, he was still working with the Bidens, according to Hunter Biden’s emails.
Mackler helped edit public statements related to the launch of an institute in Joe Biden’s name at the University of Delaware while working for the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, for example.
In late August 2016 — after, it would seem, Mackler began his job at the U.S. attorney’s office — Mackler fired off an email to Hunter Biden and Schwerin opining on the public perception of Hillary Clinton’s lucrative work with the Clinton Foundation. He argued that there should be a distinction between powerful people who make money once out of office and those who appear to be monetizing their current or future access to government power.
“When someone leaves public life and they or their spouse no longer hold prominent government positions … they can do almost whatever they want and take money from almost anyone they can personally stomach and who passes their personal barometer,” Mackler wrote. “That's the point (and the good news for us).”
House Republicans are gearing up to conduct a potentially explosive interview next week with Devon Archer, a former business partner of Hunter Biden’s who, facing a conviction and prison time on fraud charges, could have more of an incentive to divulge details to congressional investigators than other witnesses in Hunter Biden’s orbit.
Archer is reportedly poised to testify that Joe Biden frequently spoke to Hunter Biden’s prospective foreign business partners on speakerphone as his son sought to flex his access to his powerful father in the course of negotiations — a clear departure from Joe Biden’s denials of ever having discussed business matters with his son.
The Justice Department said Monday that it would make Weiss available to testify as soon as Sept. 27 — one week after Attorney General Merrick Garland is slated to appear before Congress.
That time frame could clash with what congressional investigators have planned, however; in a letter to the Biden administration last week, House Republicans said they wanted to conduct transcribed interviews with other witnesses, including Wolf, before they held a hearing with Weiss.
MSN
www.msn.com
Hunter Biden investigation: Close Biden political aide worked for Weiss when inquiry began
Story by Sarah Bedford • Yesterday 5:25 AMHunter Biden investigation: Close Biden political aide worked for Weiss when inquiry began© Provided by Washington Examiner
Aclose associate of the Biden family appears to have spent years working in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, including during the months when whistleblowers said the office took up an investigation of Hunter Biden.
Alexander Mackler served as press secretary in Joe Biden’s Senate office and, later, as legal counsel in his vice presidential office. Mackler managed the late Beau Biden’s successful campaign for Delaware attorney general in 2010.
And Mackler served on the Biden-Harris transition team in 2020, helping the Biden administration create the blueprint for its Justice Department.
Mackler also appeared to have a close personal relationship with Hunter Biden. In emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, Mackler corresponded frequently with Hunter Biden and his business associates and even referred to Hunter Biden fondly as a “brother” in October 2018. Mackler was working under U.S. Attorney David Weiss in the office at that time, according to his LinkedIn page, which lists him as having worked in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office from August 2016 to May 2019.
According to testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee from Joseph Ziegler, a top IRS agent on the Hunter Biden case for years, the Delaware office had an investigation into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings by January 2019.
The close relationship between Hunter Biden and a former member of the prosecutorial office investigating him could come under scrutiny as House Republicans dig into the reasons why members of Weiss’s team appeared to slow or block key elements of the Hunter Biden investigation.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf featured prominently in the testimony of two IRS agents who spent years working on the Hunter Biden investigation. Both Gary Shapley and Ziegler, the IRS whistleblowers, said Wolf intervened to stop multiple investigative steps from moving forward, including by preventing FBI agents from asking witnesses any questions about Joe Biden’s involvement in foreign business affairs and by tipping off Hunter Biden’s attorneys about a planned search of his storage unit.
Wolf worked alongside Mackler in the U.S. attorney’s office before Mackler’s departure. She and Mackler prosecuted a major case together, for example.
How their relationship may have factored into the decisions by Wolf that whistleblowers found inexplicable remains unclear.
Mackler now works under Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings. In February, Hunter Biden’s attorneys implored Jennings to open an investigation into the Delaware computer repair shop owner who helped publicize the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, as well as the Donald Trump associates who helped spread the laptop’s contents.
Jennings’s office did not respond to a request for comment about Mackler’s relationship to the Biden’s, as well as whether her office did ultimately open the investigation into the dissemination of the Hunter Biden laptop.
Jennings herself has extensive ties to the Biden family. She endorsed him almost immediately upon his entry into the presidential race in 2019, boasting to social media that she has known the Biden family “for most of my life.”
Mackler’s deep connections to the Biden family raise questions about whether he should ever have come close to an investigation involving the Bidens.
He emailed with Hunter Biden and Eric Schwerin, one of Hunter Biden’s business partners, on what appears to be the first day of his new job at the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to talk about the office’s email retention policy.
Schwerin joked to Mackler that his response was “the last email you ever receive from me.”
Days after Mackler had started working for the U.S. attorney’s office, he was still working with the Bidens, according to Hunter Biden’s emails.
Mackler helped edit public statements related to the launch of an institute in Joe Biden’s name at the University of Delaware while working for the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, for example.
In late August 2016 — after, it would seem, Mackler began his job at the U.S. attorney’s office — Mackler fired off an email to Hunter Biden and Schwerin opining on the public perception of Hillary Clinton’s lucrative work with the Clinton Foundation. He argued that there should be a distinction between powerful people who make money once out of office and those who appear to be monetizing their current or future access to government power.
“When someone leaves public life and they or their spouse no longer hold prominent government positions … they can do almost whatever they want and take money from almost anyone they can personally stomach and who passes their personal barometer,” Mackler wrote. “That's the point (and the good news for us).”
House Republicans are gearing up to conduct a potentially explosive interview next week with Devon Archer, a former business partner of Hunter Biden’s who, facing a conviction and prison time on fraud charges, could have more of an incentive to divulge details to congressional investigators than other witnesses in Hunter Biden’s orbit.
Archer is reportedly poised to testify that Joe Biden frequently spoke to Hunter Biden’s prospective foreign business partners on speakerphone as his son sought to flex his access to his powerful father in the course of negotiations — a clear departure from Joe Biden’s denials of ever having discussed business matters with his son.
The Justice Department said Monday that it would make Weiss available to testify as soon as Sept. 27 — one week after Attorney General Merrick Garland is slated to appear before Congress.
That time frame could clash with what congressional investigators have planned, however; in a letter to the Biden administration last week, House Republicans said they wanted to conduct transcribed interviews with other witnesses, including Wolf, before they held a hearing with Weiss.
Then why would they (the DOJ) give Weiss the ability to simply not answer any question he chooses not to with no legal repercussions?"We are deeply concerned by any misrepresentations about our work—whether deliberate or arising from misunderstandings—that could unduly harm public confidence in the evenhanded administration of justice, to which we are dedicated," Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte wrote in a letter to Jordan, adding that the DOJ believes "it is strongly in the public interest for the American people and for Congress to hear directly from U.S. Attorney Weiss on these assertions and questions about his authority at a public hearing." Weiss in letters to Jordan has repeatedly denied any interference in his investigation, writing that he had the "ultimate authority" to make charging decisions in the case. "Somehow, I don't think Jim Jordan is going to like the answers US Atty Weiss is going to give," predicted former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance."
DOJ fires back at Jim Jordan over GOP’s “misrepresentations” about Hunter Biden probe
“I don't think Jim Jordan is going to like the answers US Atty Weiss is going to give,” ex-prosecutor predictsnews.yahoo.com
Also, why wait until after the plea deal? They know that if a judge agrees to it, his testimony means f*ck all.
Because Weiss may still be investigating other allegations but that doesn't mean he WON'T answer.
Maybe he doesn't want it to appear that he's influencing the sentencing?
Cannot make this up. The crooks have every angle covered. No wonder Joe is grinning and eating ice cream all the time.
MSN
www.msn.com
Hunter Biden investigation: Close Biden political aide worked for Weiss when inquiry began
Story by Sarah Bedford • Yesterday 5:25 AM
Hunter Biden investigation: Close Biden political aide worked for Weiss when inquiry began© Provided by Washington Examiner
Aclose associate of the Biden family appears to have spent years working in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, including during the months when whistleblowers said the office took up an investigation of Hunter Biden.
Alexander Mackler served as press secretary in Joe Biden’s Senate office and, later, as legal counsel in his vice presidential office. Mackler managed the late Beau Biden’s successful campaign for Delaware attorney general in 2010.
And Mackler served on the Biden-Harris transition team in 2020, helping the Biden administration create the blueprint for its Justice Department.
Mackler also appeared to have a close personal relationship with Hunter Biden. In emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, Mackler corresponded frequently with Hunter Biden and his business associates and even referred to Hunter Biden fondly as a “brother” in October 2018. Mackler was working under U.S. Attorney David Weiss in the office at that time, according to his LinkedIn page, which lists him as having worked in the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office from August 2016 to May 2019.
According to testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee from Joseph Ziegler, a top IRS agent on the Hunter Biden case for years, the Delaware office had an investigation into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings by January 2019.
The close relationship between Hunter Biden and a former member of the prosecutorial office investigating him could come under scrutiny as House Republicans dig into the reasons why members of Weiss’s team appeared to slow or block key elements of the Hunter Biden investigation.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf featured prominently in the testimony of two IRS agents who spent years working on the Hunter Biden investigation. Both Gary Shapley and Ziegler, the IRS whistleblowers, said Wolf intervened to stop multiple investigative steps from moving forward, including by preventing FBI agents from asking witnesses any questions about Joe Biden’s involvement in foreign business affairs and by tipping off Hunter Biden’s attorneys about a planned search of his storage unit.
Wolf worked alongside Mackler in the U.S. attorney’s office before Mackler’s departure. She and Mackler prosecuted a major case together, for example.
How their relationship may have factored into the decisions by Wolf that whistleblowers found inexplicable remains unclear.
Mackler now works under Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings. In February, Hunter Biden’s attorneys implored Jennings to open an investigation into the Delaware computer repair shop owner who helped publicize the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, as well as the Donald Trump associates who helped spread the laptop’s contents.
Jennings’s office did not respond to a request for comment about Mackler’s relationship to the Biden’s, as well as whether her office did ultimately open the investigation into the dissemination of the Hunter Biden laptop.
Jennings herself has extensive ties to the Biden family. She endorsed him almost immediately upon his entry into the presidential race in 2019, boasting to social media that she has known the Biden family “for most of my life.”
Mackler’s deep connections to the Biden family raise questions about whether he should ever have come close to an investigation involving the Bidens.
He emailed with Hunter Biden and Eric Schwerin, one of Hunter Biden’s business partners, on what appears to be the first day of his new job at the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to talk about the office’s email retention policy.
Schwerin joked to Mackler that his response was “the last email you ever receive from me.”
Days after Mackler had started working for the U.S. attorney’s office, he was still working with the Bidens, according to Hunter Biden’s emails.
Mackler helped edit public statements related to the launch of an institute in Joe Biden’s name at the University of Delaware while working for the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office, for example.
In late August 2016 — after, it would seem, Mackler began his job at the U.S. attorney’s office — Mackler fired off an email to Hunter Biden and Schwerin opining on the public perception of Hillary Clinton’s lucrative work with the Clinton Foundation. He argued that there should be a distinction between powerful people who make money once out of office and those who appear to be monetizing their current or future access to government power.
“When someone leaves public life and they or their spouse no longer hold prominent government positions … they can do almost whatever they want and take money from almost anyone they can personally stomach and who passes their personal barometer,” Mackler wrote. “That's the point (and the good news for us).”
House Republicans are gearing up to conduct a potentially explosive interview next week with Devon Archer, a former business partner of Hunter Biden’s who, facing a conviction and prison time on fraud charges, could have more of an incentive to divulge details to congressional investigators than other witnesses in Hunter Biden’s orbit.
Archer is reportedly poised to testify that Joe Biden frequently spoke to Hunter Biden’s prospective foreign business partners on speakerphone as his son sought to flex his access to his powerful father in the course of negotiations — a clear departure from Joe Biden’s denials of ever having discussed business matters with his son.
The Justice Department said Monday that it would make Weiss available to testify as soon as Sept. 27 — one week after Attorney General Merrick Garland is slated to appear before Congress.
That time frame could clash with what congressional investigators have planned, however; in a letter to the Biden administration last week, House Republicans said they wanted to conduct transcribed interviews with other witnesses, including Wolf, before they held a hearing with Weiss.
And yet this site continues to make stuff up, so, I guess in actuality, You can Make this stuff up.
Nothing about the Mackler story is made up. Come back with some details to support your claim.
How about Rudy, he admitted he made stuff up and that there was no proof in Georgia about those ladies.
The Mackler story didn't help him in court today now did it? Conspiracy squashed!
Next
That's bs. There is a video and they are not going to admit fraud. It would be prison time. Whatever Rudy may have done was the best legal decision for him at this time. Those slimy dems working in these big city election offices are all crooked.
It's not squashed. We need to know every detail.
Last edited:
Detail of what? That someone who knew Hunter coincidentally worked in the "Delaware" office? Scandalous!!
The video doesn't show what Rudy claimed it does. He is admitting he was wrong, and trying to say that he's sorry, he didn't mean to hurt them, it was reasonable, but completely wrong. Once again, No Fraud. Sorry @TigerGrowls .
This video of the two Ladies in Georgia was one of your biggest examples of "Fraud" that you claimed proved it. Are you ready to admit that you were wrong about it yet? I mean, Rudy admitted in court that it didn't show fraud, but I've never seen you admit something was wrong.
@TigerGrowls
@TigerGrowls
Completed this. My cell phone must have posted it when I got distracted mid post.
That's bs. There is a video and they are not going to admit fraud. It would be prison time. Whatever Rudy may have done was the best legal decision for him at this time. Those slimy dems working in these big city election offices are all crooked.
This is a legal maneuver only. That video clearly shows CHEATING!!..............and we all know it.
This is second hand opinion as this guy wasn't in the courtroom but if this is accurate, the DOJ should be investigated full stop. I'm personally shocked a Delaware judge was willing to buck the system in all honesty.
Simply remove the dem vs pub battle that occurs on this board daily and just think about if you were facing the same allegations/charges, would you have help from the DOJ not to send you to prison for 10 years? If your last name isn't Biden, you're going to prison. I am sure there are examples of the same on the right but at what point should we stop arguing and agree that these elites should be held to same laws as the rest of us?
Cut and paste from the links below:
Typically, if the Government is offering to a defendant that it will either drop charges or decline to bring new charges in return for the defendant's guilty plea, the plea is structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A). An agreement not to prosecute Hunter for FARA violations or other crimes in return for his pleading guilty to the tax misdemeanors, for example, would usually be a (c)(1)(A) plea. This is open, transparent, subject to judicial approval, etc.
In Hunter's case, according to what folks in the courtroom have told me, Hunter's plea was structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), which is usually just a plea in return for a joint sentencing recommendation only, and contained no information on its face about other potential charges, and contained no clear agreement by DOJ to forego prosecution of other charges.
Instead, DOJ and Hunter's lawyers effectively hid that part of the agreement in what was publicly described as a pretrial diversion agreement relating to a § 922(g)(3) gun charge against Hunter for being a drug user in possession of a firearm. That pretrial diversion agreement as written was actually MUCH broader than just the gun charge. If Hunter were to complete probation, the pretrial diversion agreement prevented DOJ from ever bringing charges against Hunter for any crimes relating to the offense conduct discussed in the plea agreement, which was purposely written to include his foreign influence peddling operations in China and elsewhere.
DOJ, attempting to save face and save its case, then stated on the record that the investigation into Hunter was ongoing and that Hunter remained susceptible to prosecution under FARA. Hunter's lawyers exploded. They clearly believed that FARA was covered under the deal, because as written, the pretrial diversion agreement language was broad enough to cover it. They blew up the deal, Hunter pled not guilty, and that's the current state of play.
https://twitter.com/willscharf/status/1684331594864025602
Simply remove the dem vs pub battle that occurs on this board daily and just think about if you were facing the same allegations/charges, would you have help from the DOJ not to send you to prison for 10 years? If your last name isn't Biden, you're going to prison. I am sure there are examples of the same on the right but at what point should we stop arguing and agree that these elites should be held to same laws as the rest of us?
Cut and paste from the links below:
Typically, if the Government is offering to a defendant that it will either drop charges or decline to bring new charges in return for the defendant's guilty plea, the plea is structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A). An agreement not to prosecute Hunter for FARA violations or other crimes in return for his pleading guilty to the tax misdemeanors, for example, would usually be a (c)(1)(A) plea. This is open, transparent, subject to judicial approval, etc.
In Hunter's case, according to what folks in the courtroom have told me, Hunter's plea was structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), which is usually just a plea in return for a joint sentencing recommendation only, and contained no information on its face about other potential charges, and contained no clear agreement by DOJ to forego prosecution of other charges.
Instead, DOJ and Hunter's lawyers effectively hid that part of the agreement in what was publicly described as a pretrial diversion agreement relating to a § 922(g)(3) gun charge against Hunter for being a drug user in possession of a firearm. That pretrial diversion agreement as written was actually MUCH broader than just the gun charge. If Hunter were to complete probation, the pretrial diversion agreement prevented DOJ from ever bringing charges against Hunter for any crimes relating to the offense conduct discussed in the plea agreement, which was purposely written to include his foreign influence peddling operations in China and elsewhere.
So they put the facts in the plea agreement, but put their non-prosecution agreement in the pretrial diversion agreement, effectively hiding the full scope of what DOJ was offering and Hunter was obtaining through these proceedings. Hunter's upside from this deal was vast immunity from further prosecution if he finished a couple years of probation, and the public wouldn't be any the wiser because none of this was clearly stated on the face of the plea agreement, as would normally be the case.
DOJ, attempting to save face and save its case, then stated on the record that the investigation into Hunter was ongoing and that Hunter remained susceptible to prosecution under FARA. Hunter's lawyers exploded. They clearly believed that FARA was covered under the deal, because as written, the pretrial diversion agreement language was broad enough to cover it. They blew up the deal, Hunter pled not guilty, and that's the current state of play.
https://twitter.com/willscharf/status/1684331594864025602
The DOJ just tried to give Hunter Biden full immunity on ALL of the actual felony charges and any future FARA charges with an insane plea deal and a tiny little tap on the wrist.
You can shove this post right up your butthole.
