ADVERTISEMENT

Elon Musk and Twitter

Did we know what the truth was when that was happening? Do we know now?

Did Trump testify?
Did Mueller absolve him?
At the very least, he welcomed Russia's involvement and cooperated.
What was Manafort doing?

And lastly, do you ever get tired of recounting this tired tale?
I am not tired of it at all. Very excited for the beatdown thats on the way. Popcorn in hand and watching.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
Give me a fvcking break. If you're black in Florida, they have passed laws to make it illegal to talk about your history, now they just gerrymandered you out of representation and if you protest, it's now legal to run you over!

That's REAL shadow banning
I’m loving the histrionics coming from your delusional ass lately, really entertaining to behold
 
  • Like
Reactions: AugTig
Did we know what the truth was when that was happening? Do we know now?

Did Trump testify?
Did Mueller absolve him?
At the very least, he welcomed Russia's involvement and cooperated.
What was Manafort doing?

And lastly, do you ever get tired of recounting this tired tale?
I will gladly concede that we did not know anything for certain at the time. However, you had Democrats light Chuck Schumer and the media claiming there was Trump collusion for certain, that there was absolutely 100% proof of this, which we know for certain was a lie then and it is a lie now. They also knew that all the dullards like you who had no critical thinking skills would be swayed by your bias and lack of objectivity and just eat whatever excrement they put on the plate. They count on the fact that most people cannot objectively think for themselves, look at what is actually known and make their own determination and instead will just believe whatever they are told. So to your point, no I don’t get tired of repeating it because I think everyone should be reminded of the fact. Do you ever get tired of the January 6 tale you bring up so often?
 
I will gladly concede that we did not know anything for certain at the time. However, you had Democrats light Chuck Schumer and the media claiming there was Trump collusion for certain, that there was absolutely 100% proof of this, which we know for certain was a lie then and it is a lie now. They also knew that all the dullards like you who had no critical thinking skills would be swayed by your bias and lack of objectivity and just eat whatever excrement they put on the plate. They count on the fact that most people cannot objectively think for themselves, look at what is actually known and make their own determination and instead will just believe whatever they are told. So to your point, no I don’t get tired of repeating it because I think everyone should be reminded of the fact. Do you ever get tired of the January 6 tale you bring up so often?

can you please remind us what your stance on Jan 6th is?
 
I will gladly concede that we did not know anything for certain at the time. However, you had Democrats light Chuck Schumer and the media claiming there was Trump collusion for certain, that there was absolutely 100% proof of this, which we know for certain was a lie then and it is a lie now. They also knew that all the dullards like you who had no critical thinking skills would be swayed by your bias and lack of objectivity and just eat whatever excrement they put on the plate. They count on the fact that most people cannot objectively think for themselves, look at what is actually known and make their own determination and instead will just believe whatever they are told. So to your point, no I don’t get tired of repeating it because I think everyone should be reminded of the fact. Do you ever get tired of the January 6 tale you bring up so often?
Look chump, I'm not interested in re-hashing your version of something I didn't care about in the first place. But I'll ask again - DID TRUMP TESTIFY? If your star witness refuses to be deposed because he knows he'll perjure himself, we never actually got to the bottom of it.

I swear you'd look for a way to insert this narrative into a thread about pudding if you could. Enough, we don't care.
 
Last edited:
Shocking that a member of Vanilla ISIS doesn't care about the attempted overthrow of our government by a corrupt despot. You all about that Civil War right Sniffstain?
He clearly told people not break the law and to not engage in violence. Like, there’s video of it. But no, I don’t care that a bunch of losers broke into the capitol

You can spin it however you want, it’s just not something most people care about. Only extreme left wing ideologues who buy into stupid media narratives like yourselves
 
He clearly told people not break the law and to not engage in violence. Like, there’s video of it. But no, I don’t care that a bunch of losers broke into the capitol

You can spin it however you want, it’s just not something most people care about. Only extreme left wing ideologues who buy into stupid media narratives like yourselves
How many cops did you beat with your Trump flagpole that day?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
next level delusion.

Delusion. HA

No, delusion is grown men crying about a bunch of dumbasses breaking into(ushered into) the Capitol and doing literally nothing but yelling and beating on doors

Delusion is believing we have an actual white supremacy problem in the West

Delusion is believing you can be whatever gender you choose, believing men can get pregnant, etc

Delusion is actually believing Joe Biden isn’t the worst President in this nation’s history

I could go on... and on. and on.
 
Delusion. HA

No, delusion is grown men crying about a bunch of dumbasses breaking into(ushered into) the Capitol and doing literally nothing but yelling and beating on doors

Delusion is believing we have an actual white supremacy problem in the West

Delusion is believing you can be whatever gender you choose, believing men can get pregnant, etc

Delusion is actually believing Joe Biden isn’t the worst President in this nation’s history

I could go on... and on. and on.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell disagreed Tuesday with the Republican National Committee’s recent censure of two GOP lawmakers, as well as its characterization of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

“We all were here. We saw what happened. It was a violent insurrection for the purpose of trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after a legitimately certified election, from one administration to the next. That’s what it was,” McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters at his weekly news conference.
 
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell disagreed Tuesday with the Republican National Committee’s recent censure of two GOP lawmakers, as well as its characterization of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

“We all were here. We saw what happened. It was a violent insurrection for the purpose of trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after a legitimately certified election, from one administration to the next. That’s what it was,” McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters at his weekly news conference.
So MM regurgitates hyperbolic talking points like you. Cool. Still doesn’t change the fact that it’s a big nothing burger

Who got hurt/killed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CUTiger1977
Lol

FRM_H5bXEAYMjr-



ezgif.com-gif-maker.jpg
 

ezgif.com-gif-maker.jpg
Plenty of room for Elon to re-trade on purchase price also. They haven't made it through due diligence and it's quite easy for buyers of companies to find things they don't like. The twitter share price also down, along with the rest of the market FWIW and if users are exiting the platform at higher rates, he would have room to renegotiate.

The country thinks this is about free speech but it's about really about advertising and market influence. I presented an idea to Google about 5 years ago around using their advertising framework as a stock locate capability. So think like when you and nytiger get a popup for a webstore to buy an AOC Tax the Rich t-shirt, the same model can be used for stock locate......ie, you get a popup from an asset manager/bank saying they have a 5,000 lot Apple position at x price....one click trade, etc etc which is all based on your search history. Google shot it down as they didn't want to be regulated and thought the usage of search history might be scrutinized (despite them already doing that) but they did like the idea.

I'm not suggesting Twitter turns into the above but social sentiment is a great indicator of market momentum. There are lots of great innovation ideas that can be built around that which have nothing to do with free speech.

Lastly, the breakup clauses in SPA's (purchase agreements) are usually quite granular as to what can constitute a breakup and what would trigger the $1b fee. It's not just capital at risk, it's reputation as well. He will be under pressure from those servicing the debt as well as his banker structuring the deal. M&A costs tons of money......the risk on a lower tesla stock price has already been factored into this, well before the offer was made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harristeeter
This is a pretty dumb move by Elon. He's a very wealthy person though so he can afford to be idealistic
 
Plenty of room for Elon to re-trade on purchase price also. They haven't made it through due diligence and it's quite easy for buyers of companies to find things they don't like. The twitter share price also down, along with the rest of the market FWIW and if users are exiting the platform at higher rates, he would have room to renegotiate.

The country thinks this is about free speech but it's about really about advertising and market influence. I presented an idea to Google about 5 years ago around using their advertising framework as a stock locate capability. So think like when you and nytiger get a popup for a webstore to buy an AOC Tax the Rich t-shirt, the same model can be used for stock locate......ie, you get a popup from an asset manager/bank saying they have a 5,000 lot Apple position at x price....one click trade, etc etc which is all based on your search history. Google shot it down as they didn't want to be regulated and thought the usage of search history might be scrutinized (despite them already doing that) but they did like the idea.

I'm not suggesting Twitter turns into the above but social sentiment is a great indicator of market momentum. There are lots of great innovation ideas that can be built around that which have nothing to do with free speech.

Lastly, the breakup clauses in SPA's (purchase agreements) are usually quite granular as to what can constitute a breakup and what would trigger the $1b fee. It's not just capital at risk, it's reputation as well. He will be under pressure from those servicing the debt as well as his banker structuring the deal. M&A costs tons of money......the risk on a lower tesla stock price has already been factored into this, well before the offer was made.


More to my point, the books were just completed for Q1 so possible that the QOE (quality of earnings) will need to be updated to reflect the 35% rise in expenses. Yet another good data point for Elon to shape purchase price.
 
That's Q! I didnt know he was running for office in AZ. I thought he lived in the Philippines.

@JoeBidenSniffsKids , @TigerGrowls - did you know your boy Q was running for office?
Not a Q guy, never been a Q guy, no matter how hard you’ve tried tried to label me as one. Which is strange that you try so hard to attach that label to me, but hey, it’s what your side does
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
can you please remind us what your stance on Jan 6th is?
My stance is this. The people who stormed the capital were wrong, but I don't think it was some highly orchestrated coup attempt lead by Trump( or anyone else for that matter). If I had been in charge of security, there would have been clear warnings given that if anyone tried to breach the building they would be shot. Then I would have shot the first first few who tried it. You simply can not allow a group to breach the capital building. I don't care who or what they are protesting.
Anyone who has any basic understanding of human psychology should realize things can get out of hand when a crowd gathers and and gets angry. Things that were not planned or thought out happen. Were there a few nutjobs there? I am sure there were, just like there are at every protest. Again, if this was some type of planned coup, it was the worst one ever attempted. How do you attempt an insurrection without guns, and a significant number of them? Why do you not fire any shots once in the building? Why do you not have a better plan to breach interior entry doors than beating on them with sticks or you fists? If you looked at the videos, you would have to be an idiot to think this was some type of coordinated effort by a large group. You would have to be an even bigger idiot to think that Trump and/or congressional allies were somehow involved and the people in the building were still clueless as to where to go to find whoever they were looking for or that they would not have been told what type of exit strategies lawmakers would have once they breached the building. There is not enough tinfoil to make a hat that big.
 
Not a Q guy, never been a Q guy, no matter how hard you’ve tried tried to label me as one. Which is strange that you try so hard to attach that label to me, but hey, it’s what your side does
you guys cry and whine that i won't tell you who i voted for and then this projection. excellent work.
 
My stance is this. The people who stormed the capital were wrong, but I don't think it was some highly orchestrated coup attempt lead by Trump( or anyone else for that matter). If I had been in charge of security, there would have been clear warnings given that if anyone tried to breach the building they would be shot. Then I would have shot the first first few who tried it. You simply can not allow a group to breach the capital building. I don't care who or what they are protesting.
Anyone who has any basic understanding of human psychology should realize things can get out of hand when a crowd gathers and and gets angry. Things that were not planned or thought out happen. Were there a few nutjobs there? I am sure there were, just like there are at every protest. Again, if this was some type of planned coup, it was the worst one ever attempted. How do you attempt an insurrection without guns, and a significant number of them? Why do you not fire any shots once in the building? Why do you not have a better plan to breach interior entry doors than beating on them with sticks or you fists? If you looked at the videos, you would have to be an idiot to think this was some type of coordinated effort by a large group. You would have to be an even bigger idiot to think that Trump and/or congressional allies were somehow involved and the people in the building were still clueless as to where to go to find whoever they were looking for or that they would not have been told what type of exit strategies lawmakers would have once they breached the building. There is not enough tinfoil to make a hat that big.

I am going to give you points for not still trying to blame what happened on ANTIFA and BLM.

There absolutely was a planned coup that day. Go read Peter Navarro's book, he comes right out and talks about working with Steve Bannon and 100 republican congresspeople to make it happen. Their goal was to delay the certification and give them more time to convince a swing state's republican leadership to simply overturn the results in their state. Ironically, the violent mob of magidiots probably F'd up the plan and made some members of congress rethink it.

Now, Steve Bannon, MTG, Trump etc. all were very vocal about getting people fired up and down there to the Capitol. Did they PLAN on the violence that occurred (beating police officers, etc)? I am guessing not. But Trump certainly didn't do shit to stop the violence once it started.

And please answer this question honestly. We know that Navarro, Trump and other Trump minions are refusing to sit and answer questions in front of congress. If Hilary had refused to attend just one of the ELEVEN Benghazi hearings that the republicans in congress held trying to F her, what would you have called her? I am guessing you would say she was GUILTY?
 
My stance is this. The people who stormed the capital were wrong, but I don't think it was some highly orchestrated coup attempt lead by Trump( or anyone else for that matter). If I had been in charge of security, there would have been clear warnings given that if anyone tried to breach the building they would be shot. Then I would have shot the first first few who tried it. You simply can not allow a group to breach the capital building. I don't care who or what they are protesting.
Anyone who has any basic understanding of human psychology should realize things can get out of hand when a crowd gathers and and gets angry. Things that were not planned or thought out happen. Were there a few nutjobs there? I am sure there were, just like there are at every protest. Again, if this was some type of planned coup, it was the worst one ever attempted. How do you attempt an insurrection without guns, and a significant number of them? Why do you not fire any shots once in the building? Why do you not have a better plan to breach interior entry doors than beating on them with sticks or you fists? If you looked at the videos, you would have to be an idiot to think this was some type of coordinated effort by a large group. You would have to be an even bigger idiot to think that Trump and/or congressional allies were somehow involved and the people in the building were still clueless as to where to go to find whoever they were looking for or that they would not have been told what type of exit strategies lawmakers would have once they breached the building. There is not enough tinfoil to make a hat that big.
Exactly
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT