The FBI was working on that today, as our system of laws intendedprove it!
The FBI was working on that today, as our system of laws intendedprove it!
Yeah that's pretty much what they're in the process of doing right now.prove it!
explain the Hillary Clinton server investigation and fake Russian Dossier along with Russian money flowing into the Clinton Foundation
or maybe the Joe and Hunter Biden strong arming foreign governments for bribes
of course those don’t matter as you are politically blind
You really don’t understand how the transition of power is made and all the lawyers and oversight
You really are ignorant of the process
I can assure you that what you think is actually hilarious
Help me out on one question
Do you know what a Skif is?
OMG welcome back, this is going to be fun. You back for the November blood letting?Setting aside that you don’t know what a SCIF is and that these are all debunked conspiracy theories….
Do is a favor and let us know if you REALLY want to make this about strong arming foreign governments.
That's pretty much not gonna happen...cheers!Yeah that's pretty much what they're in the process of doing right now.
Scared?
we all know who coined the phraseA for effort in troll.
I’m inHey.... @nytigerfan, @dpic73 and @iceheart08 if Trump is indicted on any of these allegations and held accountable by the end of this year, I will agree to not post for 1 full year! If he is exonerated you agree to not post for the same amount of time?
Calm down Chad.
Also, it's a scif...
Read better. It says defund the FBI and replace with an honest agency.you: I hate the dems. They want to defund the police!
trump breaks the law and the FBI gets a warrant to search his home.
Also You: defund the police!
U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2071 was the purpose of the search warrant........they went after him for taking classified documents out of the white house. Marc Elias already blasted it out all over social media suggesting it's a way to tie him up in litigation so he can't campaign. Is that the quiet part out loud?it was. They had to present enough evidence to a federal judge to show probable cause that a crime was committed to get a warrant, on a ****ing ex president. I can assure you that the fed judge did not take it lightly. There must have been some compelling shit.
it will be hilarious if we find out the judge who approved it was appointed by trump.
Save us the long winded rant.Not at all.
You see, I have this thing called a brain. So I know that the chances of the investigation of an ex president, especially one who used the death of his ex wife as a reason to avoid a deposition, is going to take some time.
So the chances of him being “held accountable” as you put it in the year 2022 are pretty ****ing slim.
But hey, I will bet you. I will bet you that Hunter Biden, or Hilary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Podesta, or mike pence, or Liz Cheney will not be indicted for anything in 2022. if I win it’s a year long ban for you, and vice versa.
deal? Scared?
Setting aside that you don’t know what a SCIF is and that these are all debunked conspiracy theories….
Do is a favor and let us know if you REALLY want to make this about strong arming foreign governments.
Actually the acronym is SKIF and pronounced skiff
The documents if that is what the FBI picked up in the lawyer boxes was under the Presidential Papers Act which is so vague and allows for removal of documents by a President because through his removal the documents are no longer considered classified and the Archives in Conjunction with the typical Presidential Lawyers representing him go through the boxes and determine what might be too sensitive to release to the public at this time do it remains sealed
So having a raid By the FBI is quite bizarre and out the charts strange as multiple lawyers both government and personal are reviewing the papers and typically not a former President directly so it makes me wonder what is the ruffled. Feathers
There are no documents removed from the White House that were not within the rights of the President to remove based on all the previous presidential successions
Looking forward to explanations by FBI and AG
as this may work against those people who think it hurts Trump
If there was a chance of a surfer wave in November this may now have generated a wave that will dwarf skyscrapers as this overreach
Angers and will energize Trump voters
And like all the previous hoaxes on Trump this will pass
the USS Ronald Reagan and it Strike Group are chillin off the east coast of Taiwan. There are two additional groups off the south coast of Japan. We have resources in Okinawa and in Korea.Our greatest threat in the world is threatening invasion of an ally and performing these military drills around their territory but were focused on the former President. Makes sense!
Not at all.
You see, I have this thing called a brain. So I know that the chances of the investigation of an ex president, especially one who used the death of his ex wife as a reason to avoid a deposition, is going to take some time.
So the chances of him being “held accountable” as you put it in the year 2022 are pretty ****ing slim.
But hey, I will bet you. I will bet you that Hunter Biden, or Hilary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Podesta, or mike pence, or Liz Cheney will not be indicted for anything in 2022. if I win it’s a year long ban for you, and vice versa.
deal? Scared?
Save us the long winded rant.
You’re scared.
![]()
Commentary: What the FBI didn't say about Hillary Clinton’s email
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey's recommendation that no charges be brought against Hillary Clinton for her use of an unclassified email server while secretary of state is significant, but what he did not address is equally important.www.reuters.com
Just a reminder
This thread has nothing to do with children. You can go home now.Save us the long winded rant.
You’re scared.
Not really whataboutism, just more of a comparison which the article (from Reuters btw) highlights that her case wasn't treated similarly to other cases with the same type of infractions.a reminder of your whataboutism?
did you review the evidence against Hilary personally? Oh no, that’s right. Tucker told you she was guilty.
Not really whataboutism, just more of a comparison which the article (from Reuters btw) highlights that her case wasn't treated similarly to other cases with the same type of infractions.
I know you support two justice systems with the law only applying to your enemies so your response as written above was totally expected.
But you have no problem with hrc/dems hiring Steele to get info from Russian govt officials on Trump, do you?Gingrich of the $300,000 house ethics violations he had to apologize about after lying about it over and over again--just the bastion of ethics and integrity.
Manafort was on TV yesterday admitting to giving information to the Russians as campaign chair. If you don't want to be investigated for that then don't make Manafort the campaign chair and don't invite Russian operatives to your hotel in Trump Tower and have your son say you loved the idea of getting illegal dirt on a political rival--not hard.
Zero evidence of Joe knowing anything about any bribes--sorry, an invention from the conservative media and reading into unrelated messages with no evidence. Hunter can go to jail if it's proven he did anything illegal.
A federal judge had to sign off on a specific warrant with a Trump appointed FBI director. Let this play out and see what the evidence is, innocent until proven guilty and if they don't have the goods then the FBI deserves a ton of heat.
the fact that you all (even trump) are responding to this by screaming but her emails, literally, without any irony, is just gold.
Except for the Clintons and the Bidens.nobody is above the law.
I know. The thing is, the shoe will be on the other foot one day.
30,000 emails deleted after they were subpoenaed. Two tier justice system. No crying when Trump wins and they lock Hillary up. This is what the dems want, its going to cut both ways.
GOP will do what they always do: nothing. Pure theater.What comes around goes around, but honestly I do not trust McCarthy as far as I could throw him.
No. It's not. So you look extra dumb here. First, by trying to play some big dick game by bringing it up in the first place, and second by doubling down when you obviously don't know what you are talking about.
I agree that I am pretty dumb to engage a razor sharp adversary like yourself
Enjoy your self declared victory
Although I prefer to be an independent I am planning serious support to the Trump 24 Campaign
Hopefully all those that threaten to leave the county if Trump wins will do so