ADVERTISEMENT

God Bless America. We have lost our way.

explain the Hillary Clinton server investigation and fake Russian Dossier along with Russian money flowing into the Clinton Foundation

or maybe the Joe and Hunter Biden strong arming foreign governments for bribes

of course those don’t matter as you are politically blind

You really don’t understand how the transition of power is made and all the lawyers and oversight

You really are ignorant of the process

I can assure you that what you think is actually hilarious

Help me out on one question

Do you know what a Skif is?

Setting aside that you don’t know what a SCIF is and that these are all debunked conspiracy theories….

Do is a favor and let us know if you REALLY want to make this about strong arming foreign governments.
 

Not at all.

You see, I have this thing called a brain. So I know that the chances of the investigation of an ex president, especially one who used the death of his ex wife as a reason to avoid a deposition, is going to take some time.

So the chances of him being “held accountable” as you put it in the year 2022 are pretty ****ing slim.

But hey, I will bet you. I will bet you that Hunter Biden, or Hilary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Podesta, or mike pence, or Liz Cheney will not be indicted for anything in 2022. if I win it’s a year long ban for you, and vice versa.

deal? Scared?
 
We are here at the moment.
iu

We will be here before this is over.
iu


It never gets old to watch dems swear up and down that they have Trump.
 

Disturbing, but I believe it could be attempted.

 
So based on initial reports this fishing expedition is not even related to J6. We shall see.
 
Calm down Chad.

Also, it's a scif...

Actually the acronym is SKIF and pronounced skiff

The documents if that is what the FBI picked up in the lawyer boxes was under the Presidential Papers Act which is so vague and allows for removal of documents by a President because through his removal the documents are no longer considered classified and the Archives in Conjunction with the typical Presidential Lawyers representing him go through the boxes and determine what might be too sensitive to release to the public at this time do it remains sealed

So having a raid By the FBI is quite bizarre and out the charts strange as multiple lawyers both government and personal are reviewing the papers and typically not a former President directly so it makes me wonder what is the ruffled. Feathers

There are no documents removed from the White House that were not within the rights of the President to remove based on all the previous presidential successions

Looking forward to explanations by FBI and AG
as this may work against those people who think it hurts Trump

If there was a chance of a surfer wave in November this may now have generated a wave that will dwarf skyscrapers as this overreach
Angers and will energize Trump voters

And like all the previous hoaxes on Trump this will pass
 
it was. They had to present enough evidence to a federal judge to show probable cause that a crime was committed to get a warrant, on a ****ing ex president. I can assure you that the fed judge did not take it lightly. There must have been some compelling shit.

it will be hilarious if we find out the judge who approved it was appointed by trump.
U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2071 was the purpose of the search warrant........they went after him for taking classified documents out of the white house. Marc Elias already blasted it out all over social media suggesting it's a way to tie him up in litigation so he can't campaign. Is that the quiet part out loud?

Going to bet it has nothing to do with January 6th and likely more around Russiagate and the release of the classified documents he gave an exec order to release which Wray denied after the fact.
 
Not at all.

You see, I have this thing called a brain. So I know that the chances of the investigation of an ex president, especially one who used the death of his ex wife as a reason to avoid a deposition, is going to take some time.

So the chances of him being “held accountable” as you put it in the year 2022 are pretty ****ing slim.

But hey, I will bet you. I will bet you that Hunter Biden, or Hilary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Podesta, or mike pence, or Liz Cheney will not be indicted for anything in 2022. if I win it’s a year long ban for you, and vice versa.

deal? Scared?
Save us the long winded rant.

You’re scared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
Setting aside that you don’t know what a SCIF is and that these are all debunked conspiracy theories….

Do is a favor and let us know if you REALLY want to make this about strong arming foreign governments.

Really Set some up in Charleston SC

Been in a few

CAC card with clearances to go way up
The ladde

Worked on issues at Andrew’s AFB with the armed escorts on Air Force One

so maybe I have seen a thing or many

But now retired and observe stuff
 
Last edited:
Actually the acronym is SKIF and pronounced skiff

The documents if that is what the FBI picked up in the lawyer boxes was under the Presidential Papers Act which is so vague and allows for removal of documents by a President because through his removal the documents are no longer considered classified and the Archives in Conjunction with the typical Presidential Lawyers representing him go through the boxes and determine what might be too sensitive to release to the public at this time do it remains sealed

So having a raid By the FBI is quite bizarre and out the charts strange as multiple lawyers both government and personal are reviewing the papers and typically not a former President directly so it makes me wonder what is the ruffled. Feathers

There are no documents removed from the White House that were not within the rights of the President to remove based on all the previous presidential successions

Looking forward to explanations by FBI and AG
as this may work against those people who think it hurts Trump

If there was a chance of a surfer wave in November this may now have generated a wave that will dwarf skyscrapers as this overreach
Angers and will energize Trump voters

And like all the previous hoaxes on Trump this will pass

No. It's not. So you look extra dumb here. First, by trying to play some big dick game by bringing it up in the first place, and second by doubling down when you obviously don't know what you are talking about.



 
Last edited:
Our greatest threat in the world is threatening invasion of an ally and performing these military drills around their territory but were focused on the former President. Makes sense!
the USS Ronald Reagan and it Strike Group are chillin off the east coast of Taiwan. There are two additional groups off the south coast of Japan. We have resources in Okinawa and in Korea.

I believe additional Navy resources are also conducting "war games" with India nearby as well.

Specifically, what would you suggest we do ? and just to be clear:

- Moving military resources within Taiwan waters would be a declaration of war
- Moving military resources within the strait of Taiwan could be viewed as a declaration of war
- Selling offensive weapons to Taiwan, could be viewed as a declaration of war
- Sending troops to Taiwan would be a declaration of war
- Sanctioning China would be a declaration of war
- If you believe the intel (which I dont, fully), the current resources in the region are at great risk because of the Chinese sonic missile capability

... soooo specifically what would you suggest we do?
 
Not at all.

You see, I have this thing called a brain. So I know that the chances of the investigation of an ex president, especially one who used the death of his ex wife as a reason to avoid a deposition, is going to take some time.

So the chances of him being “held accountable” as you put it in the year 2022 are pretty ****ing slim.

But hey, I will bet you. I will bet you that Hunter Biden, or Hilary Clinton, or Joe Biden, or Podesta, or mike pence, or Liz Cheney will not be indicted for anything in 2022. if I win it’s a year long ban for you, and vice versa.

deal? Scared?

Just a reminder
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Just a reminder

a reminder of your whataboutism?

did you review the evidence against Hilary personally? Oh no, that’s right. Tucker told you she was guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
a reminder of your whataboutism?

did you review the evidence against Hilary personally? Oh no, that’s right. Tucker told you she was guilty.
Not really whataboutism, just more of a comparison which the article (from Reuters btw) highlights that her case wasn't treated similarly to other cases with the same type of infractions.

I know you support two justice systems with the law only applying to your enemies so your response as written above was totally expected.
 
Not really whataboutism, just more of a comparison which the article (from Reuters btw) highlights that her case wasn't treated similarly to other cases with the same type of infractions.

I know you support two justice systems with the law only applying to your enemies so your response as written above was totally expected.

actually it’s the opposite. If they raided Hunter Biden’s house tomorrow I would not think twice about it. I’d probably laugh at him.

You’ll recall that your lord and savior trump fired Comey, maybe because he was incompetent?
 
Gingrich of the $300,000 house ethics violations he had to apologize about after lying about it over and over again--just the bastion of ethics and integrity.

Manafort was on TV yesterday admitting to giving information to the Russians as campaign chair. If you don't want to be investigated for that then don't make Manafort the campaign chair and don't invite Russian operatives to your hotel in Trump Tower and have your son say you loved the idea of getting illegal dirt on a political rival--not hard.

Zero evidence of Joe knowing anything about any bribes--sorry, an invention from the conservative media and reading into unrelated messages with no evidence. Hunter can go to jail if it's proven he did anything illegal.

A federal judge had to sign off on a specific warrant with a Trump appointed FBI director. Let this play out and see what the evidence is, innocent until proven guilty and if they don't have the goods then the FBI deserves a ton of heat.
But you have no problem with hrc/dems hiring Steele to get info from Russian govt officials on Trump, do you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
the fact that you all (even trump) are responding to this by screaming but her emails, literally, without any irony, is just gold.

I know. The thing is, the shoe will be on the other foot one day.

30,000 emails deleted after they were subpoenaed. Two tier justice system. No crying when Trump wins and they lock Hillary up. This is what the dems want, its going to cut both ways.
 
Last edited:
I know. The thing is, the shoe will be on the other foot one day.

30,000 emails deleted after they were subpoenaed. Two tier justice system. No crying when Trump wins and they lock Hillary up. This is what the dems want, its going to cut both ways.


call me naïve and I know its naïve, but I just keep hoping that we will elect a person of integrity .....
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
No. It's not. So you look extra dumb here. First, by trying to play some big dick game by bringing it up in the first place, and second by doubling down when you obviously don't know what you are talking about.




I agree that I am pretty dumb to engage a razor sharp adversary like yourself

Enjoy your self declared victory

Although I prefer to be an independent I am planning serious support to the Trump 24 Campaign

Hopefully all those that threaten to leave the county if Trump wins will do so
 
I agree that I am pretty dumb to engage a razor sharp adversary like yourself

Enjoy your self declared victory

Although I prefer to be an independent I am planning serious support to the Trump 24 Campaign

Hopefully all those that threaten to leave the county if Trump wins will do so

This is a pretty amazing response in the face of your being objectively wrong.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT