Ivermectin

[hopefultiger13]

The cdc/fda still recommends low fat high carb diet for diabetics.

So? I've never maintained that the CDC (or any government agency) is perfect. I'm saying that that it's better to listen to them than some dumbass with a webpage selling supplements or some Dr. rambling on about "Demon Sex".

PLUS... I'm not seeing what you are seeing from the CDC: Here's their website for meal planning. Can you point out the low fat, high carb part? I'm seeing that they are suggesting limiting carbs by eating more non starchy veggies, but recommend a balanced diet that focuses on keeping your blood sugar in check rather than what you are eating:

Meal Planning

Find out how to get the nutrition you need while keeping your blood sugar levels in your target range.

www.cdc.gov

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

2 things are true

1. Covid was a real virus and people were killed.

2. It was and has always been, a calculated scam.

I agree with both

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

The cdc/fda still recommends low fat high carb diet for diabetics.

That’s funny as my doctor had me meet with a specialist regarding foods to eat to help or avoid diabetes .

It was all about high good fats consumption with proteins and high fiber all the while reducing highly processed carbohydrates

Carbohydrates were not totally bad Just the ones like processed wheats, sugars in any form added to foods, high glycemic index , saturated fats, fried foods and especially any wheat based product

Love milk and I get the highly processed one

 

[TigerGrowls]

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving


It was recently revealed that vaccine pusher Chris Cuomo is taking ivermectin for "long COVID."


He admits, "Joe Rogan was right" and that the public was misled about ivermectin.


Ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID and spike protein syndromes, but people who take this "miracle drug" will also enjoy these 6 benefits:


#1 - It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, which is why it’s included in the FLCCC flu and RSV protocols.


#2 - It reduces inflammation throughout the body.


#3 - Improves the gastrointestinal microbiome by boosting levels of the probiotic Bifidobacterium.


#4 - It revolutionized veterinary medicine and arguably stabilized the world’s food supply.


#5 - May help with athletic and sports performance by boosting cellular energy output in the heart.


#6 - It has profound anti-cancer properties.


Best of all, Ivermectin is incredibly safe and cheap.


When you compare Molnupiravir and Ivermectin head-to-head in the context of COVID-19, you can see what a disgraceful, overpriced stink-bomb Molnupiravir actually is:


Ivermectin: 62% improvement, 99 studies, $1 per pill


Merck’s Show Pony: 15% improvement, 34 studies, $707 per pill


This information was gathered from an article written by @MDMichaelTurner (give him a follow).


Read the full in-depth article in the comment below:

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving


It was recently revealed that vaccine pusher Chris Cuomo is taking ivermectin for "long COVID."


He admits, "Joe Rogan was right" and that the public was misled about ivermectin.


Ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID and spike protein syndromes, but people who take this "miracle drug" will also enjoy these 6 benefits:


#1 - It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, which is why it’s included in the FLCCC flu and RSV protocols.


#2 - It reduces inflammation throughout the body.


#3 - Improves the gastrointestinal microbiome by boosting levels of the probiotic Bifidobacterium.


#4 - It revolutionized veterinary medicine and arguably stabilized the world’s food supply.


#5 - May help with athletic and sports performance by boosting cellular energy output in the heart.


#6 - It has profound anti-cancer properties.


Best of all, Ivermectin is incredibly safe and cheap.


When you compare Molnupiravir and Ivermectin head-to-head in the context of COVID-19, you can see what a disgraceful, overpriced stink-bomb Molnupiravir actually is:


Ivermectin: 62% improvement, 99 studies, $1 per pill


Merck’s Show Pony: 15% improvement, 34 studies, $707 per pill


This information was gathered from an article written by @MDMichaelTurner (give him a follow).


Read the full in-depth article in the comment below:

April 2024

Here’s What You Need to Know ​

• The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.
• The FDA has determined that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID 19 in humans.
• Animal ivermectin products are different formulations than those approved for humans. Due to the lack of testing of these formulations in humans, the safety of these products in humans is not known. Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people.
• Taking large doses of ivermectin can be dangerous.

Ivermectin and COVID-19

The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.

www.fda.gov

 

[Cocks are Number 1]

April 2024

Here’s What You Need to Know ​

• The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.
• The FDA has determined that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID 19 in humans.
• Animal ivermectin products are different formulations than those approved for humans. Due to the lack of testing of these formulations in humans, the safety of these products in humans is not known. Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people.
• Taking large doses of ivermectin can be dangerous.

Ivermectin and COVID-19

The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals.

www.fda.gov

Payroll response.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

 

[Cabotiger]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

Alex Jones has to pay like 1.5 billion dollars for discussing his opinion about a mass shooting, which hurt NO ACTUAL people, but none of the “news” outlets that lied to us about Ivermectin and caused people to die have had to pay anything.

Why is that.

They knowingly lied and tried to permanently cancel anyone who told the truth.

When will they be held accountable.

Serious question.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

And the libtards on this board basically put it on a level with meth because the TV told them so. No independent thought detected.



Did you know that Ivermectin: all from the government’s own website.

Was discovered in 1975

Won 2015 Nobel Prize for medicine

FDA approved for human use in “1987”

On the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines

Shows robust antiviral action towards HIV-! & C0VID

No resistance in humans has yet been confirmed in over 25 years.

A safe, potent agent likely to be used as such long into the future

 

[dpic73]

And the libtards on this board basically put it on a level with meth because the TV told them so. No independent thought detected.

View embedded media

Did you know that Ivermectin: all from the government’s own website.

Was discovered in 1975

Won 2015 Nobel Prize for medicine

FDA approved for human use in “1987”

On the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines

Shows robust antiviral action towards HIV-! & C0VID

No resistance in humans has yet been confirmed in over 25 years.

A safe, potent agent likely to be used as such long into the future

Dude is just anotrher scam artist who wants to sell you supplemnts Gomer. He's a radiologist, not trained in internal medicine. If you believe it cures all that shit just because you saw it on the internet, you are a hopeless idiot.



Richard Higgs
@higgsri

"Physician" my foot. Physicians know the difference between in vitro & in vivo. They know to use drugs off-label with extreme discretion and to never recommend a drug sight unseen. They understand that a drug cannot win a Nobel prize. Are you a shill for Merck?


And it doesn't do a damn thing against COVID but quaff as much as you'd like and while you're at it, inject some Clorox, we don't give a shit.

A large study finds that ivermectin does not reduce risk of Covid-19 hospitalization.​

by Carl Zimmer
The anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, which has surged in popularity as an alternative treatment for Covid-19 despite a lack of strong research to back it up, showed no sign of alleviating the disease, according to results of a large clinical trial published on Wednesday.

News: A large study finds that ivermectin... (The New York Times) - Behind the headlines - NLM

(The New York Times) A large study finds that ivermectin does not reduce risk of Covid-19 hospitalization.. Associated research findings from the National Library of Medicine.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

At a Higher Dose and Longer Duration, Ivermectin Still Not Effective Against COVID-19

A Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 published through April 2022 concluded that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.1 Since May 2022, an additional 3 large randomized clinical trials including...

jamanetwork.com

You're so dumb

 

[TigerGrowls]

Dude is just anotrher scam artist who wants to sell you supplemnts Gomer. He's a radiologist, not trained in internal medicine. If you believe it cures all that shit just because you saw it on the internet, you are a hopeless idiot.



Richard Higgs
@higgsri

"Physician" my foot. Physicians know the difference between in vitro & in vivo. They know to use drugs off-label with extreme discretion and to never recommend a drug sight unseen. They understand that a drug cannot win a Nobel prize. Are you a shill for Merck?


And it doesn't do a damn thing against COVID but quaff as much as you'd like and while you're at it, inject some Clorox, we don't give a shit.

A large study finds that ivermectin does not reduce risk of Covid-19 hospitalization.​

by Carl Zimmer
The anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, which has surged in popularity as an alternative treatment for Covid-19 despite a lack of strong research to back it up, showed no sign of alleviating the disease, according to results of a large clinical trial published on Wednesday.
https://x.com/drdenwalker
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/15867/#:~:text=The%20anti%2Dparasitic%20drug%20ivermectin,clinical%20trial%20published%20on%20Wednesday.

At a Higher Dose and Longer Duration, Ivermectin Still Not Effective Against COVID-19

A Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 published through April 2022 concluded that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.1 Since May 2022, an additional 3 large randomized clinical trials including...

jamanetwork.com

https://x.com/drdenwalker

You're so dumb

You are the dumb one. The bullet point facts about Ivermectin are correct. You cannot refute the facts so you try and kill the messenger. For the record he hasnt sold me shit. I have never personally taken ivermectin but I would if I needed it and could get it in this growing police state that you obviously want. The info you posted on ivermectin related to covid is...........................................................................................................................................................FAKE NEWS!!

 

[dpic73]

You are the dumb one. The bullet point facts about Ivermectin are correct. You cannot refute the facts so you try and kill the messenger. For the record he hasnt sold me shit. I have never personally taken ivermectin but I would if I needed it and could get it in this growing police state that you obviously want. The info you posted on ivermectin related to covid is...........................................................................................................................................................FAKE NEWS!!

Please take it....daily....several times a day at least...in large quantities please...you dumbass

An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own ‘Severe’ Symptoms.

(Vice) Danny Lemoi took a daily dose of veterinary-grade ivermectin and told his thousands of followers to give the drug to children. He died of a common side effect of the medication. Just before …

www.unmc.edu

Death from COVID-19 of a 57-year-old man refusing medical care and self-medicating with ivermectin - PubMed

Since December 2019, the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus causes COVID-19 disease worldwide, which occurs mainly in unvaccinated elderly and polymorbid patients with a more severe course and increased risk of complications and death. Vaccination and specific therapy for the disease using mainly new...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Man whose wife won a lawsuit to treat his COVID-19 with ivermectin has died

Keith Smith, who had been on a ventilator, received two doses of the controversial drug before his condition worsened. He died Sunday at age 52.

www.usatoday.com

 

[TigerGrowls]

Please take it....daily....several times a day at least...in large quantities please...you dumbass

An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own ‘Severe’ Symptoms.

(Vice) Danny Lemoi took a daily dose of veterinary-grade ivermectin and told his thousands of followers to give the drug to children. He died of a common side effect of the medication. Just before …

www.unmc.edu

Death from COVID-19 of a 57-year-old man refusing medical care and self-medicating with ivermectin - PubMed

Since December 2019, the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus causes COVID-19 disease worldwide, which occurs mainly in unvaccinated elderly and polymorbid patients with a more severe course and increased risk of complications and death. Vaccination and specific therapy for the disease using mainly new...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Man whose wife won a lawsuit to treat his COVID-19 with ivermectin has died

Keith Smith, who had been on a ventilator, received two doses of the controversial drug before his condition worsened. He died Sunday at age 52.

www.usatoday.com

Why I am going to listen to a lib who is not smart on anything?

 

[dpic73]

Why I am going to listen to a lib who is not smart on anything?

The real question should be why would you get your information from some jabroni on the internet over the information derived from multiple, high quality clinical trials?

Because you're dumber than Cooter Brown and you don't care about the truth. He made up some bullshit that sounded good to you, so you come running over here with your hair on fire thinking you're owning the libs. You're ridiculous

 

[TigerGrowls]

The real question should be why would you get your information from some jabroni on the internet over the information derived from multiple, high quality clinical trials?

Because you're dumber than Cooter Brown and you don't care about the truth. He made up some bullshit that sounded good to you, so you come running over here with your hair on fire thinking you're owning the libs. You're ridiculous

I have god given intelligence and a thing called discernment you pompous prick. Its always the dumbest ones that think they know it all.

 

[dpic73]

I have god given intelligence and a thing called discernment you pompous prick. Its always the dumbest ones that think they know it all.

Dude, he said Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize, even though a medicine can't win a prize. Your discernment is shit.

 

[DW4_2016]

I have god given intelligence and a thing called discernment you pompous prick. Its always the dumbest ones that think they know it all.

You think ivermectin can cure all cancers. Which is this an example of; the god given intelligence or the discernment?

 

[TigerGrowls]

You think ivermectin can cure all cancers. Which is this an example of; the god given intelligence or the discernment?

Where did I say that bubba?

 

[gardentiger]

So, skepticism of the vaccines is good. Skepticism of the doctor means I’m a sheep. Insane logic.

only when its the guy who invented the tech for the vaccine.

 

[DW4_2016]

Where did I say that bubba?

Sorry, I forget you’re a bot who can’t read.

 

[hopefultiger13]

Where did I say that bubba?

Well, you are promoting the guy that is... according to you, not only ALL CANCERS, but Kidney, Heart, and Lung problems as well. It also cures MS, Diabetes, and Aids. It even reverses AUTISM!!

It helps eyesight, ringing in the ears, and any scars that you might have.

I guess that as usual, you didn't bother reading or rather comprehending the crap you are posting... an unfortunately VERY common habit with you.

Dude, everyone knows why you like this drug. The foremost virologist in the world, Donald Trump said it was good for COVID. And that was more than enough for you. You were all on board and now believe all the hype about it even though this is straight out of the "snake oil salesman's" handbook.

On behalf of all of us here, let me give you this pro tip: When you get that email from the Nigerian Finance Minister offering to deposit millions in your bank account, don't give him the account numbers, it's a scam.

Also, no one on here thinks Ivermectin is like Meth. It's a good drug that's been approved by the FDA since the mid 90s. It's primarily been used to help combat parasitic infections. It even made sense to give it a try with COVID. It just doesn't work for that and there are several fairly large scale studies that show this.

 

[DW4_2016]

Well, you are promoting the guy that is... according to you, not only ALL CANCERS, but Kidney, Heart, and Lung problems as well. It also cures MS, Diabetes, and Aids. It even reverses AUTISM!!

It helps eyesight, ringing in the ears, and any scars that you might have.

I guess that as usual, you didn't bother reading or rather comprehending the crap you are posting... an unfortunately VERY common habit with you.

Dude, everyone knows why you like this drug. The foremost virologist in the world, Donald Trump said it was good for COVID. And that was more than enough for you. You were all on board and now believe all the hype about it even though this is straight out of the "snake oil salesman's" handbook.

On behalf of all of us here, let me give you this pro tip: When you get that email from the Nigerian Finance Minister offering to deposit millions in your bank account, don't give him the account numbers, it's a scam.

Also, no one on here thinks Ivermectin is like Meth. It's a good drug that's been approved by the FDA since the mid 90s. It's primarily been used to help combat parasitic infections. It even made sense to give it a try with COVID. It just doesn't work for that and there are several fairly large scale studies that show this.

dont forget acne!

@Cocks are Number 1 you still agree it cures MS and acne?

 

[TigerRagRob]

Dude is just anotrher scam artist who wants to sell you supplemnts Gomer. He's a radiologist, not trained in internal medicine. If you believe it cures all that shit just because you saw it on the internet, you are a hopeless idiot.



Richard Higgs
@higgsri

"Physician" my foot. Physicians know the difference between in vitro & in vivo. They know to use drugs off-label with extreme discretion and to never recommend a drug sight unseen. They understand that a drug cannot win a Nobel prize. Are you a shill for Merck?


And it doesn't do a damn thing against COVID but quaff as much as you'd like and while you're at it, inject some Clorox, we don't give a shit.

A large study finds that ivermectin does not reduce risk of Covid-19 hospitalization.​

by Carl Zimmer
The anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, which has surged in popularity as an alternative treatment for Covid-19 despite a lack of strong research to back it up, showed no sign of alleviating the disease, according to results of a large clinical trial published on Wednesday.
https://x.com/drdenwalker
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/15867/#:~:text=The%20anti%2Dparasitic%20drug%20ivermectin,clinical%20trial%20published%20on%20Wednesday.

At a Higher Dose and Longer Duration, Ivermectin Still Not Effective Against COVID-19

A Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 published through April 2022 concluded that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.1 Since May 2022, an additional 3 large randomized clinical trials including...

jamanetwork.com

https://x.com/drdenwalker

You're so dumb

Grammar Nazi might want to learn to spell another

The real question should be why would you get your information from some jabroni on the internet over the information derived from multiple, high quality clinical trials?

Because you're dumber than Cooter Brown and you don't care about the truth. He made up some bullshit that sounded good to you, so you come running over here with your hair on fire thinking you're owning the libs. You're ridiculous

Says the guy who gets his info from some jabroni on the internet...

 

[dpic73]

Grammar Nazi might want to learn to spell another

Says the guy who gets his info from some jabroni on the internet...

Dude, just shut the f u with your nonsense. I attached an article from the Jamanetwork which detailed the results from multiple clinical trials, which is clearly NOT some jabroni on the internet.

"Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 published through April 2022 concluded that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.1 Since May 2022, an additional 3 large randomized clinical trials including several thousand participants have been published, each reaching a similar conclusion.2-4

Today JAMA publishes a new trial of ivermectin treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 that addresses the possibility that the existing literature may have missed the efficacy of ivermectin because the previously tested dose (approximately 400 μg/kg daily for 3 days) was insufficient.5 At a higher treatment dose (600 μg/kg daily) and longer treatment duration (6 days), Naggie and colleagues again conclude that ivermectin is not beneficial for the treatment of COVID-19."

 

[TigerGrowls]

Sorry, I forget you’re a bot who can’t read.

View embedded media

I still didnt say that. I think it might but I havent seen it first hand and any researchers in the US that try to prove alternate cancer treatments get put in jail. Protected mafioso style setup for the cancer establishment.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Dude, just shut the f u with your nonsense. I attached an article from the Jamanetwork which detailed the results from multiple clinical trials, which is clearly NOT some jabroni on the internet.

"Cochrane meta-analysis of 11 eligible trials examining the efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 published through April 2022 concluded that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for people with COVID-19.1 Since May 2022, an additional 3 large randomized clinical trials including several thousand participants have been published, each reaching a similar conclusion.2-4

Today JAMA publishes a new trial of ivermectin treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 that addresses the possibility that the existing literature may have missed the efficacy of ivermectin because the previously tested dose (approximately 400 μg/kg daily for 3 days) was insufficient.5 At a higher treatment dose (600 μg/kg daily) and longer treatment duration (6 days), Naggie and colleagues again conclude that ivermectin is not beneficial for the treatment of COVID-19."

You STFU. These bs rigged studies by big pharma prove nothing. Just keep taking your covid boosters.

 

[DW4_2016]

I still didnt say that. I think it might but I havent seen it first hand and any researchers in the US that try to prove alternate cancer treatments get put in jail. Protected mafioso style setup for the cancer establishment.

You posted the tweet. Your posts on this thread have supported his statements. Sack up and own it. You’re shilling for so many retards at this point it must get confusing.

Libs are gullible idiots.

 

[TigerGrowls]

You posted the tweet. Your posts on this thread have supported his statements. Sack up and own it. You’re shilling for so many retards at this point it must get confusing.

Libs are gullible idiots.

I think its a good discussion related to if it cures cancer or not, but its a stone cold fact that it effectively treated covid. Take that and smoke it.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[hopefultiger13]

View embedded media

Oh look...



Now, truthfully, NEITHER my or OP's posts above even REMOTELY qualify as a reputable source. So which one is correct? I HAVE NO IDEA!!! And neither does Growlz.