Appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional.
Teflon Don.
It’s in the cards.
Or to see it as what it is. Unconstitutional overreach. Political persecution needs to stop and thankfully it is.Might be a gesture to calm things down a notch...
You are so awesome. Too funny.@nytigerfan
@PrimeIsGettingComfortable
Thoughts? Hope both of you are having a great start to your week.
We can only hope they get what is coming to them. I'm guessing they will get a "strongly worded letter"."For more than 18 months, Special Counsel Smith’s investigation and prosecution has been financed by substantial funds drawn from the Treasury without statutory authorization"
-District Judge Aileen Cannon
Is this not a crime?
The appeal will be filed to Judge Clarence Thomas. Good Luck.On Monday, in a surprise decision, Judge Aileen Cannon ruled the classified documents case should be thrown out because she said the appointment of special prosecutor Jack Smith was improper and violated the Constitution. The decision by Cannon, a Trump appointee, is likely to be appealed given that other courts have made contradictory rulings.
On Monday, in a surprise decision, Judge Aileen Cannon ruled the classified documents case should be thrown out because she said the appointment of special prosecutor Jack Smith was improper and violated the Constitution. The decision by Cannon, a Trump appointee, is likely to be appealed given that other courts have made contradictory rulings.
Teflon Don.
It’s in the cards.
Therapy for both as it gets worse@nytigerfan
@PrimeIsGettingComfortable
Thoughts? Hope both of you are having a great start to your week.
On Monday, in a surprise decision, Judge Aileen Cannon ruled the classified documents case should be thrown out because she said the appointment of special prosecutor Jack Smith was improper and violated the Constitution. The decision by Cannon, a Trump appointee, is likely to be appealed given that other courts have made contradictory rulings.
Try this. Barron's is not fake news IMHO. Article is specifically related to djt stock performance.No courts to my knowledge have ruled on this
Please furnish the reliable source for this claim
Why did you delete the comments. Seems out of line if you are a moderator. Was not even a political post.Try this. Barron's is not fake news IMHO. Article is specifically related to djt stock performance.
Trump Classified Documents Case Is Dismissed. DJT Stock Jumps.: https://www.barrons.com/articles/djt-stock-price-trump-media-truth-social-26aff407
In short....yes."For more than 18 months, Special Counsel Smith’s investigation and prosecution has been financed by substantial funds drawn from the Treasury without statutory authorization"
-District Judge Aileen Cannon
Is this not a crime?