Nikki Haley
- Thread starter iceheart08
- Start date
Haley throws the race card and claims she was made fun of for being brown. I knew many girls as "brown" as Haley in high school and they were usually very popular. The ones who were made fun of, usually by other girls, were the girls with pale skin who couldn't get a tan. Just an example of Haley throwing people, her hometown, South Carolina under the bus to get ahead. Those Clemson sorority girls and frat boys better watch out.
Talking about reputable Republicans in public service that have real ideas and solutions. As opposed to the ones holding the party hostage with their aggrieved politics and propaganda. Was that not what you were talking about?
I'm hearing you. You keep stating things that aren't reality. Simple as that. Yet you keep insisting they are fact. Yet nothing backs them up. Other then more erroneous takes that you get from your favorite propagandists.
This was sarcasm.
Decisive: Have we come together under Biden? Any better?
Corrupt: Look at the border. Under Biden, this corrupt administration has let millions of illegal immigrants come into the county and flood it with drug that are killing millions of Americans. How's the border looking?
Worst: History will tell, but it ain't looking good for the home team. How's the approval rating?
Maybe stop and smell what YOUR propaganda sheep herders are feeding you!
**try and leave trump name out of this, since this is about biden. (I know it will be hard)
Dow rises more than 100 points to close above 38,000 for the first time ever: Live updates
Stocks rose Monday as investors built on the previous session's historic move to record highs.
I saw that, awesome!Dow rises more than 100 points to close above 38,000 for the first time ever: Live updates
Stocks rose Monday as investors built on the previous session's historic move to record highs.www.cnbc.com
Point?
I have been quite surprised and pleasantly so. That said, I wouldn't call it all flowers and rainbows.
Notice I didn't mention another president that had a nice economy going.
I have been quite surprised and pleasantly so. That said, I wouldn't call it all flowers and rainbows.
Notice I didn't mention another president that had a nice economy going.
I would opine that the job that has been done coming out of a complete economic shutdown post global pandemic is harder than the prior economic situation.
I would also caution everyone from giving or blaming Presidents for the current economic situation since there are lots of moving parts, not much of which the president controls. That said, this is one bullet point to support the fact that America is not in a terrible position, and while I'd rather Biden wasn't the nominee, he hasn't done a terrible job either
I would politely DISAGREE!
Thats what makes the world go round.
btw- Just heard America's Most Wanted is coming back to TV, so maybe Joe can hang his hat on Mr. Walsh finding all these terrorist and drug pushers he's let come and call our backyard, home away from home.
Maybe I should just dip into my growing IRA now before I get shot?
Yes, except for those that are profiting politically who strive to spread division. Republicans.
Border is a complicated situation that has moral and economic impacts that need to be carefully worked through. Your take is ridiculous and untrue. Lies.
History? Approval ratings? Lol.
Propaganda is lies, false constructs, and misrepresentations. You can not find anything from Democrats, at the moment, that rises to that definition. It takes only a couple minutes to come up with dozens from a number of Republican grifters. Try it.
What else you got?
This is all I need!
Your answers are proof in the pudding and generally mind blowing!
It's ALL republicans fault. LOL
"Border is complicated" No, No it's not!
Approval ratings don't matter if it's a democratic president, it's just propaganda. LMAO
Thanks Flo!
It's like talking to a child with you. I know it would be mentally hard for you to acknowledge that you have no idea what you're talking about. But try, it's what adults do.
You are clueless and keep proving it every single post. The border is complicated because we have laws that protect the rights of immigrants seeking asylum. The Legislative branch needs to put forth some changes to the law to change what's happening at the border.
Remind me what articles of legislation the current Congress has proposed to address immigration. That's right, nothing.
So you think Haley is making this thing up? About being made fun of for being brown?
So the biden admin claims climate change is the biggest threat to national security and an immediate one that demands actions now to combat it. At the same time it has done nothing to pressure China (the largest contributor by far) to adopt ANY of the standards he want to impose. Anything we do is basically pissing in the wind without getting China to join the effort.
Meanwhile Newsome, who might be more retarded than biden on this issue temporarily cleans up the streets and kicks out the homeless to host said county's dictator.
If the threat is as great and immediate as claimed by democrats- how can you justify the biden admins treatment of China? We have several means we could use to pressure them reduce their carbon output and other pollution.
Either democrats are seriously overstating the threat of climate change or they are being completely derelict in their duty to combat it.
Do you ever fact-check your bullshit before you post it?
"In the face of stalled progress on the diplomatic front, the Biden administration has started to explore other tools to nudge China to reduce emissions and act more ambitiously on climate issues, including through tariffs that would be linked to the carbon footprint of Chinese imports."
China and US pledge to fight climate crisis ahead of Xi-Biden summit
Announcement fuels hope rivals can use Apec summit as a chance to reduce tensions
China and the US pledge to step up climate efforts ahead of Biden-Xi summit and UN meeting
China and the U.S. have pledged to accelerate their efforts to address climate change ahead of a major U.N. meeting on the issue.
apnews.com
That is simply not true. Not only did they propose it, they passed it.
U.S. House passes border bill shaped by Texas Republicans as Title 42 ends
The Secure the Border Act would resume construction of the border wall, limit asylum eligibility and require asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico. It faces tough going in the Senate.
www.texastribune.org
Not to mention pubs wanted more funding to expand the number of border patrol agents in the budget battle (rather than border funding for other uses).
obviously, this is all a lot more complicated than the simple binary choice you've presented at the end here. i'd describe it as intellectually dishonest to frame the choice that way. again, it's a **** ton more complicated than you seem to think.
I will simplify it for you. Climate change is a scam.
Yes, I do. Show me anywhere in either of those articles where China has committed to doing anything that impact climate change. As usual, you don't even read the bs articles you post. There is absolutely nothing in those articles that says China has even agreed to do anything to help matters(other than think/talk about it.Do you ever fact-check your bullshit before you post it?
"In the face of stalled progress on the diplomatic front, the Biden administration has started to explore other tools to nudge China to reduce emissions and act more ambitiously on climate issues, including through tariffs that would be linked to the carbon footprint of Chinese imports."
China and US pledge to fight climate crisis ahead of Xi-Biden summit
Announcement fuels hope rivals can use Apec summit as a chance to reduce tensionswww.theguardian.com
China and the US pledge to step up climate efforts ahead of Biden-Xi summit and UN meeting
China and the U.S. have pledged to accelerate their efforts to address climate change ahead of a major U.N. meeting on the issue.
Either you lack the ability to understand what you read or you just read the title and post the bs- which is exactly what they want you to do.
Here is one quote that pretty much sums the whole thing up:
"Myllyvirta said the plan is very generic without any measurable emissions targets, so “follow-up on that front will be important.”"
China will agree to vague language to try harder and blow smoke up biden's rear end, but they are not actually doing anything concrete to change.
I see you're ignoring that I blew up your stupid statement and now you've resorted to your usual tactic of spinning it it through your pretzel logic. Just admit you were busted dumbass - it's not ok to make up imaginary stories to fit your narrative.
"In the face of stalled progress on the diplomatic front, the Biden administration has started to explore other tools to nudge China to reduce emissions and act more ambitiously on climate issues, including through tariffs that would be linked to the carbon footprint of Chinese imports."
How about this. Keep the border policy that was in place 4 years ago!
Who is clueless?
I have no idea and you have all the right answers. Sounds like a little teenager to me!
Check yourself!
I'm not saying it is not complicated. What is not complicated is that there is little we can do to make a meaningful difference in climate change without China- along with many underdeveloped countries who are excluded from climate agreements.
If this were trying to negotiate more favorable trade terms, or the like, where the need to be friendly and coax them into agreement were applicable, it would be a whole different story.
However, if the threat is as great and immediate as claimed and it is our greatest national security threat, we should be be taking the bull in the china shop(pun intended) approach. You can't just accept vague token bs speech about trying harder without clearly defined limits and timelines under those circumstances.
Either the threat is not as great as we are being told or we are not doing enough to combat the threat. One of those statements is true. You can pick which one you believe.
Really? Your answer to showing me something that has actually been done is to quote that they are thinking about things they might can do? Please tell me what impact that has had on the climate?
Did they just now find out they had these tools? Were they stuck in his corvette garage in a tool box behind the boxes of govt documents he didn't know he had, lol?
but, again, you are missing the nuance.
i'd certainly agree that we aren't doing enough to combat the threat. But your black-and-white view of our efforts here doesn't reflect reality, only a political talking point. It's just not at all true that it makes no difference for us to make a significant effort unless China does. Every effort we make, big or small, makes a difference, big or small.
the extremists in the environmental movement agree with you, we should be doing everything we possibly can to move china. BUT, the fact that we arent or can't doesnt call the whole scheme into question.
REALLY!!! 42% of all registered voters in N.H. are independents. Independents can vote in either Reupublican or democrat primaries and general elections but must declare for one or the other when voting. Democrats can vote in the Republican primary or general election by simply declaring independent by the required signup date indicated in the state law. REGISTERED democrats can only vote in the democrat primary or general election. Factually, Trump is correct, just register as an independent by the state required dates!
Your "Fact Check" statement is incorrect!! Your "Facts First" statement is correct. If you are a democrat in N.H. just register as an independent and you can vote in the Republican primary or democrat primary according to the rules outlined by the N.H. Secretary of State.
Guy makes insane claim. I say, no, that's not how it's happening, and you want ME to show me my facts? Yea, that checks out for you guys.
This is observable and measured. If this were happening at scale someone could easily go look at the voter roll and see how many people did the thing. This is publicly available information for anyone.
But, of course, this definitely isn't happening at scale, and you people continue to make shit up. Even if this one is particularly dumb, given how easy it is to disprove.
As I understand it, the Secret Service actually has some authority to ‘make’ the President move to a secure location whether he wants to or not.
But why not just tell people that rather than lie?
I say what we should ALL do is pull for the Lions to win the Super Bowl. I think that’s listed as a sign of the apocalypse which would fix the whole thing.
Plus, on a personal level, to be honest I’ve been kinda bored lately so some apocalypse might be just what I need.
Don't ramble, debunk his statement!! 42% of N.H. voters are independents yet the state is a democrat state!!
I do think it’s POSSIBLE in SC as there are no checks on party affiliation (that I recall).
Now whether it is actually HAPPENING at any significant level is a different argument.
Wow, your house is burning to the ground and you are high-fiving your Dem friends about all the insurance money you are going to get!!Dow rises more than 100 points to close above 38,000 for the first time ever: Live updates
Stocks rose Monday as investors built on the previous session's historic move to record highs.
Then disprove it!! you are the one that says it isn't happening!! 42% of N.H. voters are registered as independent yet the state is a democrat state!!
im not sure what you think this proves? it certainly doesnt prove the point that trump is trying to make, that democrats are conspiring to steal the election from him.
44% of the state in Colorado is unafilliated. we (dems) control pretty much everything of consequence in the state. that proves that unafilliated voters like dems more than republicans. jjust like in NH. there arent "independent" or "unafilliated" candidates that run or matter. is that what you are questioning? why the state isnt controlled by the "independent" party?
again, your logic is ****ing stupid and makes no sense, and you are twisting yourself into a shape that is unrecognizable to support a claim dear leader made.
this is stupid.
