The fraud was targeted and mimicked in 5 key battleground cities. They all followed the exact same pattern.
And I really don't care what you or anyone else thinks about the changing of the rules in 2020, the way they were changed wasn't Constitutional. The power and responsibility for election protocols falls under the purview of the State Legislature - in all 5 of these battleground states they had no say in the changes and in all 5 they sat on their hands while their power was stolen.
And breaking the chain of custody of a ballot is a major opportunity for fraud. I've yet to hear 1 decent rebuttal to 2000 Mules, and what's interesting is data mining teams are finding possible sources for all of those ballots the mules stuffed the boxes with.
Fractal, a data mining firm, is examining voter rolls in Wisconsin and Florida. What they're finding is *someone* is using database latency to create a flood of undeliverable ballots. In one county they found 31.5k voters who's zip code was temporarily changed in the database. So they get all of their mail, except for their ballot. Shortly after it's "corrected".
It'll be interesting to see how much they turn up on this, but it's one small example of why mail-in voting is insecure - and a key clue as to why Democrats simply refuse to maintain voter rolls. Harvesting is another (which isn't even illegal in some states). But the core principle is you need a flood of unclaimed ballots for the harvesters and the mules.
Database latency -- a geeky term, but that’s how they did it! A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer reports that three hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store -- so the police are on alert. ...
www.americanthinker.com