I think it's much more complicated than that. Conspiracies are a coping mechanism for them. Having everything boiled down to an "easy" answer is comforting.I think they do, they're just being ornery because they don't like taking these measures.
I think it's much more complicated than that. Conspiracies are a coping mechanism for them. Having everything boiled down to an "easy" answer is comforting.I think they do, they're just being ornery because they don't like taking these measures.
Pfizer stock. Pays 4.15% divvy.
Don’t be angry... make money.
Easy!
Do people seriously not understand how wearing a mask and social distancing could reduce the chances of spreading a virus?
Inflation is at 2.6% but yeah4% lol. Break even with inflation nice.
Fauci has changed his position on more things about this virus than any “expert” should need to. He is loving his time in the spotlight and throwing things against the wall to see who will follow him.I could actually explain all of this to you, but would it matter? I'll take advice from Dr. Fauci over the eye doctor 10/10 even if he was THE BEST eye doctor in the world.
Fauci has changed his position on more things about this virus than any “expert” should need to. He is loving his time in the spotlight and throwing things against the wall to see who will follow him.
Why would this surprise anyone?
Flu is a virus, coronavirus is a virus. Viruses mutate over short period of times. What worked well against last year’s variant doesn’t work against the new variants. Ergo, a revaccination is required.
Do people seriously not understand how wearing a mask and social distancing could reduce the chances of spreading a virus?
^^^^^^^^^^THISI keep seeing this term “post-vax”. We aren’t post-vax yet. That happens when enough people have received it, so that we achieve herd immunity. That’s when things really get back to normal.
If airbags are so effective, why do I need to wear a seatbelt?
Yes. Just a few exceptions like measles, mumps, polio, smallpox, Rubella, and chickenpox. Presumed lifetime for those puppies.Why would this surprise anyone?
Flu is a virus, coronavirus is a virus. Viruses mutate over short period of times. What worked well against last year’s variant doesn’t work against the new variants. Ergo, a revaccination is required.
I see some cognitive dissonance going on. Something like ressentiment. But I don't think you're wrong.I think it's much more complicated than that. Conspiracies are a coping mechanism for them. Having everything boiled down to an "easy" answer is comforting.
Someone already added all the key viruses that act differently ... dont lump all viruses together, much like you shouldnt lump all bacteria together in terms of the antibiotics they are treated with. Most people dont think about it but classes of bacteria are treated differently as well and with some being more likely to develop resistance to treatment than others just as viruses do with mutations.Polio and small pox are 2 viruses that have not mutated --- yet. If they do the world will be in deep doo doo.
............and apparently = very curable in animals.
Odd,
Who is curing it in animals exactly?............and apparently = very curable in animals.
Odd, huh?
Right, changing recommendations based on new information. How dare he.Fauci has changed his position on more things about this virus than any “expert” should need to. He is loving his time in the spotlight and throwing things against the wall to see who will follow him.
Check out the new research on cholesterol. They are saying now that cholesterol is just a by product of inflammation that you already have. Your cells which are made of cholesterol is just trying to fix the real issue of inflammation in arteries. Also new studies say saturated fat isn’t bad at all, it’s sugar that causes heart disease. A lot of new information coming out on these topics.I'm more concerned about by cholesterol and body mass index.
I'm not a people person anyway, so unless it's a hot female, I prefer that people not violate my personal space. I do agree that masks are inconvenient and will end up in the oceans and landfills, but it wouldn't be a bad idea if people wore them in stores or on mass transportation during traditional cold and flu seasons. It was great not catching any colds this year.Great let's just stay away from each other and wear masks forever then. Don't forget that big mac or 6 pack of alcohol at the corner spot on every street in America
There was no “new” information when he initially said (lied) that the public did not need to wear masks. Just one example. There are many more if you really want to go back and look.Right, changing recommendations based on new information. How dare he.
Someone already added all the key viruses that act differently ... dont lump all viruses together, much like you shouldnt lump all bacteria together in terms of the antibiotics they are treated with. Most people dont think about it but classes of bacteria are treated differently as well and with some being more likely to develop resistance to treatment than others just as viruses do with mutations.
Throw in big pharma as well, they’ve got Fauci in their pocketDude come on. Dont you know that if we actually show proof that the left and liberals are wrong they will just change the definition? Now some one will cancel Webster until the definitions are changed.
The main stream media and liberals continue to move the goal posts constantly. Then back track, then quietly make a correction after the outrage and damage is done. Look at the outrage that was made about the Russian bounties on our soldiers and Trumps lack of response, only to now learn that Biden's intel chief said the reports were wrong then, and basically proving Trump was right.
You cannot with a straight face believe the cancelling culture and big tech is not a huge influencer of liberal plans.
Could it be that cities that did it the most are also the most densely populated? Naw couldn’t be that...Yet the cities that did both the most are in the worsts shape, so I guess things aren't what they seem?
All information was new when he said that. Once they researched how COVID was spread they then recommended masks. I can’t believe this is so hard for people to understand.There was no “new” information when he initially said (lied) that the public did not need to wear masks. Just one example. There are many more if you really want to go back and look.
I'm not a people person anyway, so unless it's a hot female, I prefer that people not violate my personal space. I do agree that masks are inconvenient and will end up in the oceans and landfills, but it wouldn't be a bad idea if people wore them in stores or on mass transportation during traditional cold and flu seasons. It was great not catching any colds this year.
This is not true. Suicides actually decreased in the US in 2020.There is also a flip side to social distancing, we've seen suicide rates, child abuse at home, drug and alcohol addiction, mental illness, depression, ect. all.sky rocket the past year. Those things should bother you and are a result of lockdowns.
This is not true. Suicides actually decreased in the US in 2020.
Total number of suicides for 2020 was down 5%. Accidental drug overdoses were up. There’s some truth in what you’re saying but suicide rates did not skyrocket.The study you and most main stream outlets are talking about right now is primarily looking at data through July of 2020. Lockdowns have severe mental health consequences, and other consequences like I mentioned above. There is a reason why health experts have warned against further lockdowns
Total number of suicides for 2020 was down 5%. Accidental drug overdoses were up. There’s some truth in what you’re saying but suicide rates did not skyrocket.
Where do you see data through the end of 2020?
![]()
The Leading Causes of Death in the US for 2020
This Viewpoint from the US National Center for Health Statistics reports a 2020 mortality estimate 17.7% higher than that of 2019, with leading causes of death comprising heart disease, cancer, and COVID-19.jamanetwork.com
You’re correct, these are provisional. So maybe you’re right and there’s a significant uptick in suicides post June, but most “lockdowns” were over by then so you’d probably have to get more localized data to make the case that an increase in suicides from june-december were related to lockdowns. This seems to indicate that when full on lockdowns were going on in most places across the country, suicides decreased.The article you posted says provisional data for 2020 through June does it not? If I'm wrong I will stand corrected but I don't think we have data through 2020 yet.
"Increases in other leading causes, especially heart disease, Alzheimer disease, and diabetes, may also reflect disruptions in health care that hampered early detection and disease management. Increases in unintentional injury deaths in 2020 were largely driven by drug overdose deaths. Final mortality data will help determine the effect of the pandemic on concurrent trends in drug overdose deaths.
Provisional, national mortality data show that the COVID-19 pandemic substantially affected mortality in 2020. Early estimates of life expectancy at birth, based on provisional data for January to June 2020, show historic declines not seen since World War II (1942-1943)."
I think there’s also something to be said for the ever present daily conflict and division that Americans seemed to be in for the last year that would have also contributed to anxiety/depression/mental health issues that could also have lead to an increase in drug and alcohol use. I don’t think its fair to conclude that an increase in these things is solely related to covid related lockdowns.