But thats not what the news says....If you’ve had the Chinavirus no need to get the vaccine! Take off the mask too!
But thats not what the news says....If you’ve had the Chinavirus no need to get the vaccine! Take off the mask too!
Yea, I wouldn’t trust that FakeNews crap. They want us to follow the science except when the science doesn’t say what they want it to say!!!But thats not what the news says....
i had the j and j a couple of weeks ago. .One and done !Are you getting the vaccine? Already Vaccinated?
Are you getting the vaccine? Already Vaccinated?
Can you believe trump got the vaccine done in under a year? Truly amazing!Biden has done a tremendous job in ramping up production. We are holding steady at 3M vaccinations per day.
Keep readingCan you believe trump got the vaccine done in under a year? Truly amazing!
Bunch of old people voting early.
By your response that is quite debatableOf course, OP. I'm not a complete blithering idiot.
By your response that is quite debatable
Biden has done a tremendous job in ramping up production. We are holding steady at 3M vaccinations per day.
Yeah going to need those numbers to go up. Maybe some of the people on the fence will change their minds in the next few months once they see more success.On the one hand, it’s good that 70% are already vaccinated or saying they will get vaccinated. On the other hand, it’s not great that as many are saying they still get vaccinated as those saying they won’t. Probably gonna need more than 70% of the population vaccinated. 54% is also much higher than the number of people who’ve gotten vaccinated nationally, so we must have a bit of a skewed sample here.
Vaccines are not space shuttles, though. Space shuttles didn’t fail all that often, but they still failed much, much more often than vaccines, which are one of the safest forms of medicine. For instance, severe allergic reactions are only occurring in between 2-11 people out of a million receiving the mRNA vaccines. That’s far less than the proportion of the whole population who has died from COVID, let alone the death and severe illness rate of people who actually get COVID.Watched a Netflix documentary on the Challenger disaster the other night.
While it may not be an accurate comparison, it's absolutely frightening what the government will overlook when there is pressure from leadership.
It's a pretty good watch. I voted no, but my decision was made prior to watching the documentary.
I have people in my life that I worry for, but they're already vaccinated. If the vaccine truly works then I don't need it because they already have it. If it doesn't work, then there's no need for me to get it.
While I support schools and certain employers requiring vaccinations, I’m not sure how requiring a vaccine that’s only got an EUA is going to work. Supposedly, you cannot require people to take a vaccine approved under an EUA. But Rutgers only required it for attendance by students, not for its employees, so maybe there’s a distinction.I'm hopeful that the "wait and see" crowd and even some of the skeptics will come forward in the coming months as more and more of the "crowd" gets it. I also feel like we'll start to see it required (a la Rutgers) in the coming months pushing a lot of those from the sidelines into the game.
For me, it finally feels like we are so close to seeing this horrible pandemic come to a close. Its hard to not be excited and get the vaccine in my mind. Which makes it that much harder to understand people who see it as "others" job to get the vaccine instead of themselves.Vaccines are not space shuttles, though. Space shuttles didn’t fail all that often, but they still failed much, much more often than vaccines, which are one of the safest forms of medicine. For instance, severe allergic reactions are only occurring in between 2-11 people out of a million receiving the mRNA vaccines. That’s far less than the proportion of the whole population who has died from COVID, let alone the death and severe illness rate of of people who actually get COVID.
As far as not needing the vaccine because other people are getting it, that only makes sense if nearly everybody else gets it. The more people who try to freeload off of others immunity, the less likely it is that vaccines are able to provide population immunity. You’re basically saying that other people need to not follow your example to get a result you think everybody should desire. Plus, there’s really not any good reason not to just go ahead and get the vaccine, especially after what we’ve had to go through with harsh public health measures over the last year.
What does “experimental” mean here? Are you saying you’ll never take a vaccine? Did you know there is a no-fault compensation program for people injured by vaccines?Hey. I resent that remark. 68, recovered from COVID and will not take an experimental treatment until the drug companies can be sued if it kills or injures someone.
I guess I don’t get what they’re afraid of, or how it makes sense that they’re more afraid of vaccines than either the virus or continued public health measures against the virus. Probably has something to do with being less afraid of the devil you know.For me, it finally feels like we are so close to seeing this horrible pandemic come to a close. Its hard to not be excited and get the vaccine in my mind. Which makes it that much harder to understand people who see it as "others" job to get the vaccine instead of themselves.
While most employers will never require vaccination, you will see many make it uncomfortable to not have it (i.e. require PPE, take protective measures, etc.). Just ask a hospital RN what work life is like during flu season if they decline to get the flu shot.While I support schools and certain employers requiring vaccinations, I’m not sure how requiring a vaccine that’s only got an EUA is going to work. Supposedly, you cannot require people to take a vaccine approved under an EUA. But Rutgers only required it for attendance by students, not for its employees, so maybe there’s a distinction.
I think he means "experimental" because the long term ramifications of these vaccines are unknown because they haven't been out long enough. Truly making it an "experiment" on a huge segment of the population.What does “experimental” mean here? Are you saying you’ll never take a vaccine? Did you know there is a no-fault compensation program for people injured by vaccines?
That would be incorrect usage, then. These vaccines have already gone through three phases of trials.I think he means "experimental" because the long term ramifications of these vaccines are unknown because they haven't been out long enough. Truly making it an "experiment" on a huge segment of the population.
The vaccines only being approved for emergency use is a pretty big legal difference, from what I understand. But yeah, obviously it's not unusual for schools to require certain vaccinations.While most employers will never require vaccination, you will see many make it uncomfortable to not have it (i.e. require PPE, take protective measures, etc.). Just ask a hospital RN what work life is like during flu season if they decline to get the flu shot.
On a side note, it is not rare at all to see students at a university be required to have certain vaccinations that employees are not. The only difference here, as stated, is that these vaccines have only been approved for emergency use.
Has the vaccine been tested on anyone with studies ranging beyond about the 6 month mark? "incorrect usage" or not I'd say that is quite experimentalThat would be incorrect usage, then. These vaccines have already gone through three phases of trials.
If you're confused about risk, just compare the risk to the entire population of dying from COVID (550,000/328,000,000, or a .167% rate) versus the risk of even having severe side-effects from vaccines (as much as 11/1,000,000, or a .0011% rate). The rate of death in the entire population (that's looking at everybody, not just people who actually get COVID) is over 150 times higher than the rate of severe anaphylaxis (so far, the only known severe side-effects of the vaccines) for people actually getting the vaccines (really, that's an apples to oranges comparison, since we're looking at the death rate from COVID for the whole population, while we're only looking at the rate of severe anaphylaxis for people who've already been vaccinated).