Pretty remarkable story related to the Twitter files

[jakefest]

You're making an assumption that there were things that would have changed our minds, if we had only known. Trump was on display front and center daily in every medium, so we were all firsthand witnesses to what an abomination he was. There was no need to see what Taibbi thinks we missed because it's clear there is no there, there.

Why aren't you asking about the requests the Trump administration made to Twitter? It's easy to say it was one-sided if that's the only side being covered.

Yep, because when there is evidence of an insanely coordinated effort to restrict the views, opinions and thoughts of a political party and it's most loyal supporters , there is only one thing you can do and that's assume the impact was detrimental based on deductive reasoning. Sorry pal but the left and liberals earned it in this case as they were calling for it from the mountaintops. Doesn't matter how you feel about Trump, the country was in much better shape than it is now.

Remember this Time article? It basically tells you what happened. They didn't leave it up to the people, they helped push in a single direction all via changing election laws, dark funding, social shaming, etc. This isn't example of a democracy, it's how coups are ran in foreign countries. I told you this back in 2021 and you called me a conspiracy theorist but it's all right there in front of your face.

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions

time.com

 

[dpic73]

Yep, because when there is evidence of an insanely coordinated effort to restrict the views, opinions and thoughts of a political party and it's most loyal supporters , there is only one thing you can do and that's assume the impact was detrimental based on deductive reasoning. Sorry pal but the left and liberals earned it in this case as they were calling for it from the mountaintops. Doesn't matter how you feel about Trump, the country was in much better shape than it is now.

Remember this Time article? It basically tells you what happened. They didn't leave it up to the people, they helped push in a single direction all via changing election laws, dark funding, social shaming, etc. This isn't example of a democracy, it's how coups are ran in foreign countries. I told you this back in 2021 and you called me a conspiracy theorist but it's all right there in front of your face.

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions

time.com

Things were in good shape under Obama as well and all Trump did was cut taxes(unneeded) and remove regulations that made it easier to pollute. A tax cut that I might add, added 2 trillion dollars to the deficit.

And no matter if you thought that made things better, Presidents are held accountable for their entire record and his was terrible when it came to divisiveness, lies and managing a crisis - things that you conveniently ignore. No matter how many times you tell us the sky is green, all we have to do is look up.

If you can't win, it can't be because your candidate sucked, it had to be because of the way Twitter suppressed Hunter's dick pics, or it was election fraud. Then if that doesn't work, you just accuse all the winners of being pedophiles and before you know it, you're a professional victim who has the right to overturn the will of the people by force.

 

[jakefest]

Things were in good shape under Obama as well and all Trump did was cut taxes(unneeded) and remove regulations that made it easier to pollute. A tax cut that I might add, added 2 trillion dollars to the deficit.

And no matter if you thought that made things better, Presidents are held accountable for their entire record and his was terrible when it came to divisiveness, lies and managing a crisis - things that you conveniently ignore. No matter how many times you tell us the sky is green, all we have to do is look up.

If you can't win, it can't be because your candidate sucked, it had to be because of the way Twitter suppressed Hunter's dick pics, or it was election fraud. Then if that doesn't work, you just accuse all the winners of being pedophiles and before you know it, you're a professional victim who has the right to overturn the will of the people by force.

The most taxes collected in the nations history were under Trump, in fact almost double Obama. The tax cut narrative doesn't hold water fella.

If Trump divided the country, then what the actual f*ck is Biden doing? This country has never been more divided and Trump isn't the president at present, you need to blame who's in charge.

Oh no, it absolutely can be because the candidate sucked but how would we ever know if that's what the American people chose when there was such a large concerted effort, in many cases quite sinister, to ensure a victory for the dems?

Also, what's on Hunter's laptop isn't just pics of his wiener, the fact that you keep suggesting it's a nothing burger shows you're willfully ignorant. The contents are ample proof that the Biden's have been abusing the office for years, doing dodgy deals with sanctioned foreign countries and avoiding taxes (the irony given you hate tax cuts). It puts Joe at dinners with dodgy people, hosting meetings in the white house, sharing an office with the son he claims he had no knowledge of his business dealings etc etc........it shows that Biden lied during his campaign and continues to lie. Why would you support a liar after you've been so vehemently vocal against Trump's lies? Are you nothing more than a hypocritical liar yourself? Starting to look that way.

The country gets the right to understand if Joe is compromised and is a potential security threat based on what's on that laptop. Who has leverage over Joe? Especially after of those former CIA officers and security experts called it Russian disinformation.........

 

[Jjh7]

The most taxes collected in the nations history were under Trump, in fact almost double Obama. The tax cut narrative doesn't hold water fella.

If Trump divided the country, then what the actual f*ck is Biden doing? This country has never been more divided and Trump isn't the president at present, you need to blame who's in charge.

Oh no, it absolutely can be because the candidate sucked but how would we ever know if that's what the American people chose when there was such a large concerted effort, in many cases quite sinister, to ensure a victory for the dems?

Also, what's on Hunter's laptop isn't just pics of his wiener, the fact that you keep suggesting it's a nothing burger shows you're willfully ignorant. The contents are ample proof that the Biden's have been abusing the office for years, doing dodgy deals with sanctioned foreign countries and avoiding taxes (the irony given you hate tax cuts). It puts Joe at dinners with dodgy people, hosting meetings in the white house, sharing an office with the son he claims he had no knowledge of his business dealings etc etc........it shows that Biden lied during his campaign and continues to lie. Why would you support a liar after you've been so vehemently vocal against Trump's lies? Are you nothing more than a hypocritical liar yourself? Starting to look that way.

The country gets the right to understand if Joe is compromised and is a potential security threat based on what's on that laptop. Who has leverage over Joe? Especially after of those former CIA officers and security experts called it Russian disinformation.........

first off whats up with all the dong pic talk? this fixation with them bringing those up is a little weird. can't say i've seen any pictures of hunters peepee so either they go outta their way to look for them or parroting another nebulous and misleading tribal talking point again to avoid the subject. people living in reality have concerns about the emails on hunter's laptop (most of which were made available by tony bobulinski who came forward with knowledge of how things were handled along with the aforementioned emails but for some reason that was just allowed to be swept under the rug). the inability to address the real issue in and of itself is a bit of a giveaway as to where they know this is going.

don't get me wrong if tho if they wanna look at wrenches all day, i hope they keep living their best life. just gotta understand that's a personal interest and is irrelevant to the broader population's questions relating to the emails / wire transfers etc. don't wanna disappoint but don't really give a sht about hunters pisspiece

and spot on re trump's income tax receipts. cbo's original estimates have been revised from a 1.1bb 10y cost to a 600mm increase in tax receipts. biggest things i believe were capital gains taxes paid with market ripping and getting corps to repatriate offshore dollars - would imagine that compounded with reinvestment with trumps push for us production but been a minute since i looked into it. cbo numbers in attached in case anyone cares to check

The Numbers Are In: Trump’s Tax Cuts Paid Off

The Congressional Budget Office’s May 2022 forecast shows that the government now expects to bring in more tax revenue in the decade following the 2017 “Trump tax cuts” than it had projected prior to the December 2017 passage of tax reform.

www.heritage.org

 

[dpic73]

The most taxes collected in the nations history were under Trump, in fact almost double Obama. The tax cut narrative doesn't hold water fella.

If Trump divided the country, then what the actual f*ck is Biden doing? This country has never been more divided and Trump isn't the president at present, you need to blame who's in charge.

Oh no, it absolutely can be because the candidate sucked but how would we ever know if that's what the American people chose when there was such a large concerted effort, in many cases quite sinister, to ensure a victory for the dems?

Also, what's on Hunter's laptop isn't just pics of his wiener, the fact that you keep suggesting it's a nothing burger shows you're willfully ignorant. The contents are ample proof that the Biden's have been abusing the office for years, doing dodgy deals with sanctioned foreign countries and avoiding taxes (the irony given you hate tax cuts). It puts Joe at dinners with dodgy people, hosting meetings in the white house, sharing an office with the son he claims he had no knowledge of his business dealings etc etc........it shows that Biden lied during his campaign and continues to lie. Why would you support a liar after you've been so vehemently vocal against Trump's lies? Are you nothing more than a hypocritical liar yourself? Starting to look that way.

The country gets the right to understand if Joe is compromised and is a potential security threat based on what's on that laptop. Who has leverage over Joe? Especially after of those former CIA officers and security experts called it Russian disinformation.........

If you're suggesting that if Americans knew about Hunter's laptop, Trump would have won, then he shouldn't have been President in the first place after he suppressed the stories of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal before the 2016 election. Those were "actual crimes" that his lawyer paid dearly for. But you think Biden would have lost in 2020 over "innuendo" that right-wingers have read into some emails that did not prove a damn thing. That would have been a ****ing disgrace if he lost because of that.

That's how ridiculous you MAGAs have become. Trump lost because of what we all witnessed firsthand. Your two-year BDS butthurt campaign is glorious to watch though.

The country continues to be divided because you deranged MAGAs won't accept reality. Biden has nothing to do with it other than calling your bullshit what it is.

Did the 2017 tax cut—the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—pay for itself? | Brookings

William Gale disproves a popular mischaracterization of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

www.brookings.edu

 

[dpic73]

first off whats up with all the dong pic talk? this fixation with them bringing those up is a little weird. can't say i've seen any pictures of hunters peepee so either they go outta their way to look for them or parroting another nebulous and misleading tribal talking point again to avoid the subject. people living in reality have concerns about the emails on hunter's laptop (most of which were made available by tony bobulinski who came forward with knowledge of how things were handled along with the aforementioned emails but for some reason that was just allowed to be swept under the rug). the inability to address the real issue in and of itself is a bit of a giveaway as to where they know this is going.

don't get me wrong if tho if they wanna look at wrenches all day, i hope they keep living their best life. just gotta understand that's a personal interest and is irrelevant to the broader population's questions relating to the emails / wire transfers etc. don't wanna disappoint but don't really give a sht about hunters pisspiece

and spot on re trump's income tax receipts. cbo's original estimates have been revised from a 1.1bb 10y cost to a 600mm increase in tax receipts. biggest things i believe were capital gains taxes paid with market ripping and getting corps to repatriate offshore dollars - would imagine that compounded with reinvestment with trumps push for us production but been a minute since i looked into it. cbo numbers in attached in case anyone cares to check

The Numbers Are In: Trump’s Tax Cuts Paid Off

The Congressional Budget Office’s May 2022 forecast shows that the government now expects to bring in more tax revenue in the decade following the 2017 “Trump tax cuts” than it had projected prior to the December 2017 passage of tax reform.

www.heritage.org

"The removal has been seized upon by critics as evidence of the social media platform's bias in favor of Democratic politicians — and owner Elon Musk went so far as to call them a violation of the First Amendment — but the tweets contained no political content at all and instead depicted pictures and videos of Hunter Biden that had been circulated without his consent.

Twitter's non-consensual nudity policy specifically prohibits sharing "images or videos that are taken in an intimate setting and not intended for public distribution." California state law, where Twitter is headquartered, also makes sharing such imagery illegal.

"Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no judicial review, is," Musk tweeted in response to readers who argued the Biden campaign's request was a violation of the constitution's First Amendment.

However, legal experts were quick to point out that, since any representatives of the 2020 Biden campaign were not operating in any official government capacity as they were not yet government officials and because they were requesting illegal posts be removed, the contentious issue is not related to the constitution at all.

"For the millionth time, the First Amendment only applies to the government," Alejandra Caraballo, a clinical instructor at Harvard Law School's Cyberlaw Clinic, tweeted in response to Musk. "Biden was a private individual and his campaign wasn't the government. The links were literally to accounts that posted nude pictures of Hunter Biden, which is revenge porn and is unlawful in many states."

Elon Musk's 'Twitter Files' drop revealed some of the tweets the Biden campaign asked the social app to remove were nude photos of Hunter Biden spread without his consent

Photos and videos of the President's son were already in apparent violation of Twitter's non-consensual nudity policy.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[TigerGrowls]

This is mind bottling.

 

[jakefest]

If you're suggesting that if Americans knew about Hunter's laptop, Trump would have won, then he shouldn't have been President in the first place after he suppressed the stories of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal before the 2016 election. Those were "actual crimes" that his lawyer paid dearly for. But you think Biden would have lost in 2020 over "innuendo" that right-wingers have read into some emails that did not prove a damn thing. That would have been a ****ing disgrace if he lost because of that.

That's how ridiculous you MAGAs have become. Trump lost because of what we all witnessed firsthand. Your two-year BDS butthurt campaign is glorious to watch though.

The country continues to be divided because you deranged MAGAs won't accept reality. Biden has nothing to do with it other than calling your bullshit what it is.

Did the 2017 tax cut—the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—pay for itself? | Brookings

William Gale disproves a popular mischaracterization of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

www.brookings.edu

Again, collected more in taxes under Trump as per the chart below than any Obama year. If you're collecting more in income tax, that means corporations were in fact applying the savings to growth as individual income taxes collected rose.

The difference in corp tax collected from 2015 to 2021 was 2% (11% in 2015 and 9% in 2021), which guess where you can find the 2%? In individual income tax collected as it went from 49% to 51%.

You can argue both sides of trickle down economics but you can't argue that we collected more money under Trump than we did Obama. Also, it's already been proven that money didn't come from the middle or lower tax brackets.

Maga this, Maga that......the amount of times you post stuff with Maga or Trump in a day is quite honestly alarming. The country is divided because of the present leadership, he continues to alienate 49/50% of the voter base. That has nothing to do with Trump.

FISCAL YEAR	REVENUE
FY 2021	$4.05 trillion
FY 2020	$3.42 trillion
FY 2019	$3.46 trillion
FY 2018	$3.33 trillion
FY 2017	$3.32 trillion
FY 2016	$3.27 trillion
FY 2015	$3.25 trillion
FY 2014	$3.02 trillion
FY 2013	$2.78 trillion
FY 2012	$2.45 trillion
FY 2011	$2.30 trillion
FY 2010	$2.16 trillion
FY 2009	$2.11 trillion
FY 2008	$2.52 trillion

 

[dpic73]

Yep, because when there is evidence of an insanely coordinated effort to restrict the views, opinions and thoughts of a political party and it's most loyal supporters , there is only one thing you can do and that's assume the impact was detrimental based on deductive reasoning. Sorry pal but the left and liberals earned it in this case as they were calling for it from the mountaintops. Doesn't matter how you feel about Trump, the country was in much better shape than it is now.

 

[TigerGrowls]

View embedded media

View embedded media

View embedded media

Someone is irritated and deflecting heavily. Just go ahead and admit twitter was a communist cluster f**k and then walk away from it like I know you can. This total denial is very weak and I do not even think you believe it.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[dpic73]

Someone is irritated and deflecting heavily. Just go ahead and admit twitter was a communist cluster f**k and then walk away from it like I know you can. This total denial is very weak and I do not even think you believe it.

Maybe I need to adjust my tinfoil hat because I read the same things you did and came away wondering what I was missing. That's because I was missing nothing - no bombshells, no earth shaking revelations, no nothing. Just some amateur hour partisan hacks framing innocuous conversations as something sinister that didn't exist.

As a true believer in the power of lies, I'm not surprised you see it differently.

 

[Jjh7]

"The removal has been seized upon by critics as evidence of the social media platform's bias in favor of Democratic politicians — and owner Elon Musk went so far as to call them a violation of the First Amendment — but the tweets contained no political content at all and instead depicted pictures and videos of Hunter Biden that had been circulated without his consent.

Twitter's non-consensual nudity policy specifically prohibits sharing "images or videos that are taken in an intimate setting and not intended for public distribution." California state law, where Twitter is headquartered, also makes sharing such imagery illegal.

"Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no judicial review, is," Musk tweeted in response to readers who argued the Biden campaign's request was a violation of the constitution's First Amendment.

However, legal experts were quick to point out that, since any representatives of the 2020 Biden campaign were not operating in any official government capacity as they were not yet government officials and because they were requesting illegal posts be removed, the contentious issue is not related to the constitution at all.

"For the millionth time, the First Amendment only applies to the government," Alejandra Caraballo, a clinical instructor at Harvard Law School's Cyberlaw Clinic, tweeted in response to Musk. "Biden was a private individual and his campaign wasn't the government. The links were literally to accounts that posted nude pictures of Hunter Biden, which is revenge porn and is unlawful in many states."

Elon Musk's 'Twitter Files' drop revealed some of the tweets the Biden campaign asked the social app to remove were nude photos of Hunter Biden spread without his consent

Photos and videos of the President's son were already in apparent violation of Twitter's non-consensual nudity policy.

www.businessinsider.com

not really sure what the point of this is? not like i denied pictures exist, i just haven't seen them and don't care about them. they are irrelevant in the discussion.

 

[dpic73]

not really sure what the point of this is? not like i denied pictures exist, i just haven't seen them and don't care about them. they are irrelevant in the discussion.

The point is you asked me why there was so much talk about them. It's because all the MAGAloons went batshit crazy at the way they were framed and the ex-President even called for overturning part of the Constitution. But the only thing the Biden campaign asked them to remove were naked pics of Hunter. Somehow that's evidence of a sinister plot to silence conservative voices. Got it?

 

[Jjh7]

The point is you asked me why there was so much talk about them. It's because all the MAGAloons went batshit crazy at the way they were framed and the ex-President even called for overturning part of the Constitution. But the only thing the Biden campaign asked them to remove were naked pics of Hunter. Somehow that's evidence of a sinister plot to silence conservative voices. Got it?

thats great and all but i don't give a sht about them, they aren't why the laptop is significant. and no, they removed the story entirely. i don't care about potential election impact. i care about the fbi involving itself in killing a true story. i care about 50 ex intelligence/govt employed people signing off on it being russian misinformation. i have a problem with govt involving itself in what people know and appoint themselves arbiters of truth. what that involves and who it implicates in any given story doesn't matter in the least. its way more about what happened more than the story itself, although in this story the emails make it pretty obvious what the biden family business was about and that too is a problem.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Lays it out well.

Twitter Employees Cheered When President Trump Was Kicked Off Their Platform as Khomeini and Other Tyrants Remain - Same People Cheered BLM Violence

Twitter employees cheered when President Donald Trump was kicked off their platform. At the same time, Twitter kept Iran’s Khomeini on the platform and backed BLM’s destruction of American cities. Tonight Twitter reported that the day President Trump, arguably their greatest user ever, was...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[TigerGrowls]

UPDATED: It's Not Just Twitter: Facebook Bans User for Posting Gateway Pundit's Factual Report on Hunter Biden's Upcoming Lawsuit - Alleging Sexual Exploitation! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Of course, this is not news but is also censoring, shadowbanning, and silencing conservative users and websites since 2017.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[TigerGrowls]

Now were talking................

 

[CUTiger1977]

UPDATED: It's Not Just Twitter: Facebook Bans User for Posting Gateway Pundit's Factual Report on Hunter Biden's Upcoming Lawsuit - Alleging Sexual Exploitation! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Of course, this is not news but is also censoring, shadowbanning, and silencing conservative users and websites since 2017.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[dpic73]

thats great and all but i don't give a sht about them, they aren't why the laptop is significant. and no, they removed the story entirely. i don't care about potential election impact. i care about the fbi involving itself in killing a true story. i care about 50 ex intelligence/govt employed people signing off on it being russian misinformation. i have a problem with govt involving itself in what people know and appoint themselves arbiters of truth. what that involves and who it implicates in any given story doesn't matter in the least. its way more about what happened more than the story itself, although in this story the emails make it pretty obvious what the biden family business was about and that too is a problem.

If you don't give a shit, you might be in the wrong thread.

 

[Jjh7]

If you don't give a shit, you might be in the wrong thread.

it would appear you've spent all your time scouring the internet for hunters peepee and haven't done any work on reading comprehension. i'm not mad, i'm disappointed.

 

[dpic73]

it would appear you've spent all your time scouring the internet for hunters peepee and haven't done any work on reading comprehension. i'm not mad, i'm disappointed.

Sure man, you nailed it. You're challenging my posts in a thread about the Twitter files. I responded to your question and now you're moving the goalposts. Maybe find another thread to dirty up?

 

[Jjh7]

Sure man, you nailed it. You're challenging my posts in a thread about the Twitter files. I responded to your question and now you're moving the goalposts. Maybe find another thread to dirty up?

yea, i pretty explicitly laid out why obsessing over dick pics was irrelevant to the significance of the laptop as well as what the significant topics of discussion were. if the material parts of this story are beyond your capabilities to discuss or the willful ignorance of the echo chamber has blinded you to them i can't help you.

 

[dpic73]

yea, i pretty explicitly laid out why obsessing over dick pics was irrelevant to the significance of the laptop as well as what the significant topics of discussion were. if the material parts of this story are beyond your capabilities to discuss or the willful ignorance of the echo chamber has blinded you to them i can't help you.

You can't be helped anyway if you're still blaming everyone and everything for Trump's loss, except him, two years later. It's the candidate stupid.

 

[Jjh7]

You can't be helped anyway if you're still blaming everyone and everything for Trump's loss, except him, two years later. It's the candidate stupid.

you do realize you're just having a conversation with yourself right? not a single word of this is even remotely related to anything i said. great googly moogly man are you illiterate or just fully committed to ignorance.

 

[dpic73]

you do realize you're just having a conversation with yourself right? not a single word of this is even remotely related to anything i said. great googly moogly man are you illiterate or just fully committed to ignorance.

Bullshit. The world is aligned against you snowflake and when you can't accept the truth, you'll just make up some shit based on nothing more than innuendo and the way a story is framed.

i care about the fbi involving itself in killing a true story. i care about 50 ex intelligence/govt employed people signing off on it being russian misinformation. i have a problem with govt involving itself in what people know and appoint themselves arbiters of truth. what that involves and who it implicates in any given story doesn't matter in the least. its way more about what happened more than the story itself, although in this story the emails make it pretty obvious what the biden family business was about and that too is a problem

 

[Jjh7]

Bullshit. The world is aligned against you snowflake and when you can't accept the truth, you'll just make up some shit based on nothing more than innuendo and the way a story is framed.

the guy that was crying because tucker framed a story in a manner he didn't like because it was going to flip the election throwing around snowflake.

but jesus i'm starting to think you're actually iliterate. just avoiding the subject because you know you can't rationally defend the emails on that laptop. or you're a blithering fukking idiot.

what you seem completely incapable of processing is that government oversteps are an issue for everyone. politics is a pendulum, and when it shifts the other direction well...if you were crying about a tucker story i can't wait to see how you respond to what goes on then. what you're too brainwashed to comprehend is i'm looking out for you. but hey don't listen to me, there's other dems like bill maher, russell brand, joe rogan, jimmy dore, elon musk etc trying to tell you effectively the same message...well you call them far right extremists now because they dared question the party, but they're still liberals. they just have principles and spine, a novel concept i know but i can explain if you need. but hey you just keep on keepin on with your tribal absolutist position...its an entertaining level of impotent.

 

[CUT93]

The challenge here is Twitter are a private company and can censor and suppress however they want, they will use the refusal to bake a cake for the gay couple example and they will use the current case in the supreme court where the small business didn't want to do a website for same sex weddings as a private companies right to choose their own terms and conditions. This rebuttal is already all over twitter and social media.

The reality.....it's a slippery slope. You have to concede on the above if you want action against Twitter. I think what Twitter did is entirely wrong and I think it absolutely helped move the election needle in one direction, I also don't understand why anyone would refuse to make a cake or build a website. I don't care if people of the same sex want to get married but I'm not overly religious. That said, if they refused, I would just find another baker as I don't have the time or the inclination to battle these types of things. While the twitter scenario looks entirely different at a 20 thousand foot view, when you apply the constitution/1st amendment to it, it's the same thing when you get to a 10 foot view.

The only way this becomes a real issue is if the Govt were directing the suppression and the censoring. Then it's overreach and abuse of power. The other way might be discrimination against a particular group of people but you need the above cases to swing in the favor of the people vs small business to go after twitter.

As a collective, no one here should be ok with the suppression and censoring of conservatives only because it could easily happen to the other side at any moment. Very dangerous to a democracy and a great example of why I think the country is in real trouble. Going to get a lot worse before it gets better I'm afraid.

Your comparisons are not similar in the least. The baker/website examples involve religious expression- or more aptly the constitutionality of forced religious expression. The examples of the cake/website business owners was not that they would not do business with homosexuals', but rather would not create specific content expressing agreement/support for homosexuality based on religious objections. there were willing to bake cakes or design websites for homosexuals that did not promote homosexuality. That has zero to do with twitter censoring political content.

 

[nytigerfan]

Yep, because when there is evidence of an insanely coordinated effort to restrict the views, opinions and thoughts of a political party and it's most loyal supporters , there is only one thing you can do and that's assume the impact was detrimental based on deductive reasoning. Sorry pal but the left and liberals earned it in this case as they were calling for it from the mountaintops. Doesn't matter how you feel about Trump, the country was in much better shape than it is now.

Remember this Time article? It basically tells you what happened. They didn't leave it up to the people, they helped push in a single direction all via changing election laws, dark funding, social shaming, etc. This isn't example of a democracy, it's how coups are ran in foreign countries. I told you this back in 2021 and you called me a conspiracy theorist but it's all right there in front of your face.

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions

time.com

con·fir·ma·tion bi·as
noun

1. the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

 

[nytigerfan]

the guy that was crying because tucker framed a story in a manner he didn't like because it was going to flip the election throwing around snowflake.

but jesus i'm starting to think you're actually iliterate. just avoiding the subject because you know you can't rationally defend the emails on that laptop. or you're a blithering fukking idiot.

what you seem completely incapable of processing is that government oversteps are an issue for everyone. politics is a pendulum, and when it shifts the other direction well...if you were crying about a tucker story i can't wait to see how you respond to what goes on then. what you're too brainwashed to comprehend is i'm looking out for you. but hey don't listen to me, there's other dems like bill maher, russell brand, joe rogan, jimmy dore, elon musk etc trying to tell you effectively the same message...well you call them far right extremists now because they dared question the party, but they're still liberals. they just have principles and spine, a novel concept i know but i can explain if you need. but hey you just keep on keepin on with your tribal absolutist position...its an entertaining level of impotent.

Truth social has been banning people who bring up the January 6th hearings. Fox News refused to even cover it.

Should that negate the republicans win in the house? Was their win a massive fraud?

 

[Jjh7]

Truth social has been banning people who bring up the January 6th hearings. Fox News refused to even cover it.

Should that negate the republicans win in the house? Was their win a massive fraud?

how hard is it to process i disagree with censorship. period. if its not illegal like a threat, say whatever the fuk you want. that said, this is not comparable in any way.

the problem with censorship and banning people at twitter isn't that the company did it, that's just them being needledicks but that's their prerogative. i don't know how many more ways i can say my issue with censorship at twitter is that the government was involving itself in what thoughts were allowed to be expressed and who was allowed to express them. history makes it pretty clear on where censorship leads. i'm sure this time is different though, this cause is justified...that's how they always rationalize it.

 

[jakefest]

con·fir·ma·tion bi·as
noun

1. the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

Lolz.....sure buddy. All these facts just slapping you in the face and you can't do anything about it other than use liberal media buzzwords.

 

[jakefest]

how hard is it to process i disagree with censorship. period. if its not illegal like a threat, say whatever the fuk you want. that said, this is not comparable in any way.

the problem with censorship and banning people at twitter isn't that the company did it, that's just them being needledicks but that's their prerogative. i don't know how many more ways i can say my issue with censorship at twitter is that the government was involving itself in what thoughts were allowed to be expressed and who was allowed to express them. history makes it pretty clear on where censorship leads. i'm sure this time is different though, this cause is justified...that's how they always rationalize it.

Until there is an actual email or recorded phone call of a Govt official telling the Twitter guy who wrote his PHD thesis on Grindr and underage children, these idiots aren't going to believe the Govt were directing traffic. It pretty much will have to take a big sh*t on their faces and even then, the loser you're responding to will just respond with "Confirmation Bias, Ilk, Maga, Trump, Jan 6th" blah blah blah.

Everyone on this board is reading the same insanity we are and even the most die hard liberals know that it's really bad but they will never admit it as it skull f*cks the narrative they've been arguing for 2 + years.

 

[Jjh7]

Until there is an actual email or recorded phone call of a Govt official telling the Twitter guy who wrote his PHD thesis on Grindr and underage children, these idiots aren't going to believe the Govt were directing traffic. It pretty much will have to take a big sh*t on their faces and even then, the loser you're responding to will just respond with "Confirmation Bias, Ilk, Maga, Trump, Jan 6th" blah blah blah.

Everyone on this board is reading the same insanity we are and even the most die hard liberals know that it's really bad but they will never admit it as it skull f*cks the narrative they've been arguing for 2 + years.

yea i just can't figure out many are brainwashed, how many are willfully ignorant, and how many are just too stupid to think for themselves. like you said seems like as soon as you present an alternative opinion they just start hissing their buzz words. which...is kinda funny tho. would be funnier if they weren't cheerleading this cultural and financial disaster. they've officially taken us from an income statement problem to a balance sheet problem spending other peoples money. (i can hear the herd charging "durrrrrr trump spent money"). yea, too much. nice detective work sherlock. they're so blinded they can't see the hypocrisy in positions they take (ie you have to change this with how things are done because something bothers me about it....but if bothers me to have to do something stupid just to make you happy? no that doesn't count and you questioning it makes you a bigot) and they're like goldfish that seemingly can't remember things they said 5 minutes ago (ie fauci on his fawning-media-only retirement tour denying pushing lockdowns - where of course he receives absolutely no pushback. buddy, we have alllll the receipts).

 

[nytigerfan]

Lolz.....sure buddy. All these facts just slapping you in the face and you can't do anything about it other than use liberal media buzzwords.

You're claiming that some Twitter executives suppressing images of Hunter Biden's cock from a social media platform – something they were perfectly legal to do – constitutes a fraudulent and stolen election.

I want you to write that on the chalkboard at school as many times as it takes you to realize how utterly absurd you sound. I am not hopeful this method will work for you, but it might.

 

[jakefest]

You're claiming that some Twitter executives suppressing images of Hunter Biden's cock from a social media platform – something they were perfectly legal to do – constitutes a fraudulent and stolen election.

I want you to write that on the chalkboard at school as many times as it takes you to realize how utterly absurd you sound. I am not hopeful this method will work for you, but it might.

Lolz at you thinking this is about Hunter's dick pics.......and not that his Dad is involved in his business dealings but keep deflecting I guess.

 

[dpic73]

Everyone on this board is reading the same insanity we are and even the most die hard liberals know that it's really bad but they will never admit it as it skull f*cks the narrative they've been arguing for 2 + years.

LOLOL, yes we have been reading the same things you have, and you don't have a ****ing ounce of proof that Joe did anything criminal. NOT ONE OUNCE.

You've spent the last two years defending all of Trump's proven corruption, which is all a nothingburger to you, but by god, you see the words "Big Guy" and you've wet your panties at the horrific cOnSpiRaCy that isn't.

Now back to your sippy cup!

 

[nytigerfan]

LOLOL, yes we have been reading the same things you have, and you don't have a ****ing ounce of proof that Joe did anything criminal. NOT ONE OUNCE.

You've spent the last two years defending all of Trump's proven corruption, which is all a nothingburger to you, but by god, you see the words "Big Guy" and you've wet your panties at the horrific cOnSpiRaCy that isn't.

Now back to your sippy cup!

This. And even if you were able to prove that the "big guy" was Biden and he did get some money from Hunter Biden, is that illegal?

I read MTG's impeachment resolution. There was really no mention of an actual crime. Just sensational, broad accusations.

 

[dpic73]

This. And even if you were able to prove that the "big guy" was Biden and he did get some money from Hunter Biden, is that illegal?

I read MTG's impeachment resolution. There was really no mention of an actual crime. Just sensational, broad accusations.

Not illegal as he wasn't in office at that time, but he may not have been aware of it either. If that's all you got, you got nothing!

 

[nytigerfan]

Not illegal as he wasn't in office at that time, but he may not have been aware of it either. If that's all you got, you got nothing!

Well, I think we can all agree it is a good thing that Elon Muck has reinstated free speech at Twitter. Oh wait....

The college student tracking Elon Musk's jet lashes out after Twitter bans his account. He says he'll keep posting.

Jack Sweeney said he's more motivated than ever to keep sharing Elon Musk's jet data on other sites. Twitter banned his personal account Wednesday.

www.businessinsider.com