ADVERTISEMENT

SCOTUS TO BITCH SLAP COLORADO SUPREME COURT

PalmettoTiger1

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Jan 25, 2009
8,520
7,521
113
Talk about an idiotic decision .

The Supreme Court rules on Trump without any charges or conviction

Colorado official making wild statements justifying outrageous judgments that put all of America in danger

Democracy is under attack from the liberals, left, Democrats and the traitors Barack Obama tyranny machine

Make no mistake Biden is a total moronic puppet being played by Obama

Democracy is dying a horrible death if this is allowed any legtimacy
 


So the group who sued to keep Donald Trump off the ballot in Colorado received over $1.35 million from George Soros organizations and they share employees with Media Matters!

This is foreign interference in our election! Not only should Soros be arrested, the group CREW and Media Matters should be fully investigated and shut down!

How much longer will we allow our elections to be rigged by foreign billionaires who want to destroy America?
 


They know they can’t win. They don’t have control of Twitter anymore, so they can’t shape public perception like they used to, and with citizen journalists able to dismantle their narratives in real time, their propaganda is largely neutralized. We are calling their plays out before they run them. We have the playbook.They are ****ED. And they know it. So they have no choice but to try to jail Trump, keep him off the ballot, or worse.But with every step they take to prevent Trump from reclaiming office, they dig their graves just a little deeper, further justifying their future prosecution.In the end, this will be a net positive for Trump. It will only fuel the anti-establishment movement that much more, and it provides Trump with future political ammunition to unleash on his enemies.
 


They know they can’t win. They don’t have control of Twitter anymore, so they can’t shape public perception like they used to, and with citizen journalists able to dismantle their narratives in real time, their propaganda is largely neutralized. We are calling their plays out before they run them. We have the playbook.They are ****ED. And they know it. So they have no choice but to try to jail Trump, keep him off the ballot, or worse.But with every step they take to prevent Trump from reclaiming office, they dig their graves just a little deeper, further justifying their future prosecution.In the end, this will be a net positive for Trump. It will only fuel the anti-establishment movement that much more, and it provides Trump with future political ammunition to unleash on his enemies.

That pic of Trump is wild. What exactly is the gale force wind indoors supposed to be symbolic of?

These memes are so cringe worthy. It's sad y'all think these images somehow make him look better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan


👨🏽‍🏫 FWIW @realDonaldTrump will not be prevented from running. He is running...and running away with the entire election.

A court cannot keep the Donald off the ballot for violating Section 3 of 14A, simply because there has been no "Insurrection" as defined by Congressional law. The Insurrection Act of 1807 was never invoked by former President Trump on J6, so there was never an "Insurrection."

Moreover, Congress has not made any declaration declaring the J6 perpetrators as Insurrectionists and disqualifying them from public office, while Trump was acquitted by the Democrat Senate for any crimes involving J6. In other words, he was exonerated by the highest legislative body in the United States for any "crimes or misdemeanors" re J6.

Only Congress can disqualify someone from holding office under Section 3 to begin with, not a court. This is underscored by Section 5 of 14A which explicitly states: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

Meanwhile, any attempt by a state to remove Donald J. Trump's name from its ballot under Section 3 of 14A would immediately be enjoined by a higher court, citing a violation of equal protection under Section 1 of 14A, and his due process rights under 4A and 14A. Indeed, Trump has won around 15 court cases on this very issue so far, in very liberal courts as well!

Not to mention, Section 3 of 14A does not specifically name the offices of President and Vice President, which calls into question if it can be applied to POTUS. The Supremes would have to weigh in.

Finally, The Amnesty Act of 1872 removed the penalty of Section 3 of 14A, so this regurgitated "news" that people keep pushing about disqualifying him under 14A is moot. It's rooted in fantasy.

You may ask, "But Max, the AA only applied to the Confederacy." This has never been adjudicated. A literal reading implies it removed the penalties altogether.

Regardless, if the Amnesty Act was only applicable to former Confederates, then Section 3 of 14A - which the AA explicitly cites - is only applicable to former Confederates as well, since it was originally used to disqualify Civil War era Insurrectionists only.

Section 3 of 14A hasn't even been invoked in about a century. When it was invoked last to bar a Socialist from holding office for violation of the Espionage Act, SCOTUS overruled it.

The bottom line is this: The only Constitutional qualifications for President are found under Article 2: a person be 35-years-old, born in the US, and lived here for 14 years. Period. The only disqualification is that he/she not have been elected to the office more than twice, under 22A.

Being a convicted felon doesn't disqualify you. I digress.

Here's my point: they won't be able to stop Donald Trump through legal wranglings. He's going to be the nominee. Relax and enjoy the ride.


~Ⓜ️ax ❤️ 🇺🇸 🇮🇱
 


I have carefully reviewed the unprecedented Colorado Supreme Court opinion barring Trump from that state's primary ballot. The brazenly partisan opinion is a full frontal attack on our constitutional republic that, if allowed to stand, could wreck our elections.

The Democratic Colorado court majority opinion is an assault on the US Constitution, Colorado and federal law, free and fair elections, basic due process, and the fundamental rights of tens of millions Americans. Once again, President Trump's civil rights are being violated by "politicians in robes" abusing the judicial powers entrusted to them by the public.

The Democratic court majority, based solely on its partisan hatred of Trump, ruled to deprive countless Colorado voters who support Trump of the right to vote for the candidate of their choice for president. What an outrage!

What has happened in Colorado would not be out of place in Russia, Iran, China or Venezuela: a summary kangaroo court proceeding to lawlessly bar a disfavored political opponent from office. The US Supreme Court can't act soon enough to tamp down this act of judicial sedition.
 
I'm no fan of Trump, but I agree with the Trumpians here. This should and will be overturned by the SCOTUS. You can't be guilty of insurrection if you haven't been found guilty of insurrection. This seems like a no brainer.

Of course all these folks in this thread (rightfully) siting the constitution are as silent as can be when Trump talks about going against it.
 


👨🏽‍🏫 FWIW @realDonaldTrump will not be prevented from running. He is running...and running away with the entire election.

A court cannot keep the Donald off the ballot for violating Section 3 of 14A, simply because there has been no "Insurrection" as defined by Congressional law. The Insurrection Act of 1807 was never invoked by former President Trump on J6, so there was never an "Insurrection."

Moreover, Congress has not made any declaration declaring the J6 perpetrators as Insurrectionists and disqualifying them from public office, while Trump was acquitted by the Democrat Senate for any crimes involving J6. In other words, he was exonerated by the highest legislative body in the United States for any "crimes or misdemeanors" re J6.

Only Congress can disqualify someone from holding office under Section 3 to begin with, not a court. This is underscored by Section 5 of 14A which explicitly states: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

Meanwhile, any attempt by a state to remove Donald J. Trump's name from its ballot under Section 3 of 14A would immediately be enjoined by a higher court, citing a violation of equal protection under Section 1 of 14A, and his due process rights under 4A and 14A. Indeed, Trump has won around 15 court cases on this very issue so far, in very liberal courts as well!

Not to mention, Section 3 of 14A does not specifically name the offices of President and Vice President, which calls into question if it can be applied to POTUS. The Supremes would have to weigh in.

Finally, The Amnesty Act of 1872 removed the penalty of Section 3 of 14A, so this regurgitated "news" that people keep pushing about disqualifying him under 14A is moot. It's rooted in fantasy.

You may ask, "But Max, the AA only applied to the Confederacy." This has never been adjudicated. A literal reading implies it removed the penalties altogether.

Regardless, if the Amnesty Act was only applicable to former Confederates, then Section 3 of 14A - which the AA explicitly cites - is only applicable to former Confederates as well, since it was originally used to disqualify Civil War era Insurrectionists only.

Section 3 of 14A hasn't even been invoked in about a century. When it was invoked last to bar a Socialist from holding office for violation of the Espionage Act, SCOTUS overruled it.

The bottom line is this: The only Constitutional qualifications for President are found under Article 2: a person be 35-years-old, born in the US, and lived here for 14 years. Period. The only disqualification is that he/she not have been elected to the office more than twice, under 22A.

Being a convicted felon doesn't disqualify you. I digress.

Here's my point: they won't be able to stop Donald Trump through legal wranglings. He's going to be the nominee. Relax and enjoy the ride.


~Ⓜ️ax ❤️ 🇺🇸 🇮🇱

You are on point

The real issue to me is how freaking idiotic are the people who made this so called legal ruling which is convoluted and fantasy legal grounds

But go ahead Colorado as this moronic State Supreme Court has made the election of Trump more likely NOT LESS
 
oh yea? which ways?
Are you aware that not a single J6'er nor Trump has been charged with 18 U.S.C. 2383 which is the legal code for an actual insurrection?

So the leading GOP candidate heading into primaries has been taken off a ballot despite not being charged with the actual thing he's just been removed for and before his trial even starts.

and CNN has "our democracy is at stake" on repeat. The irony
 
What is really a no brainer is the why do something so idiotic as it has been pointed out that the likelihood of Trump winning the highly Blue state was so remote it was no reason to care about him

And the people claiming anything about Trump being a threat to Democracy

I only see a threat to Democracy from the Democratic Party, Barack Obamas deep administrative state following, black radical organizations like BLM, George Soros backed terrorist financiers, Open Boarder Deniers , etc

As sad as it is the White Supremecist’s are more pro-democracy than the Radical sided of the Democratic Party

That should put fear into every American who loves Democracy

Democrats the party of race baiting, racism, hate mongering , equity instead of meritocracy, supporting no security and safety through laws and enforcement

The Democratic elitist blacks and whites don’t mind the higher levels of violence by black criminals against the other black population that likes laws and enforcement encouraged by insane politicians of the left who want to destroy Democracy

Creating a crime and violence against the 12 per cent and then claiming the Republican caused it and are the racists

Democratic Party you have been outed

Democrats are the greatest threat to American Democracy by miles not inches
 
Go listen to this podcast if you want to understand how weaponized this entire sham of indictments are. All of these cases will get turned over by the Supreme Court, minus maybe.....maybe an obstruction charge in Florida.

He hasn't even been charged with insurrection as it stands in the legal code. Nor have any of the J6'ers.


 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Go listen to this podcast if you want to understand how weaponized this entire sham of indictments are. All of these cases will get turned over by the Supreme Court, minus maybe.....maybe an obstruction charge in Florida.

He hasn't even been charged with insurrection as it stands in the legal code. Nor have any of the J6'ers.




Of course. The left is trying to make the Supreme Court seem biased so they can justify adding members to the bench and negate the conservative majority.

Mark my words, if Biden is re-elected the Supreme Court will expand.
 
To protect democracy democrats must stop people from voting. And it’s not just Trump, they are bypassing elections to let the DNC convention decide on the dem nominee…

It’s been hilarious watching trump turn the Democratic Party into a bunch of neocons. Unfortunately they are too ignorant to understand.
 
Trump has literally said out loud he was running for another 4 years and then after that ‘we’ll see’.

But yeah, liberals want a dictator.
Y’all aren’t liberals. Y’all are neocons.

It’s been over a decade since liberals stood for anti war and anti 3 letter agencies. Now the pro, FBI, CIA, unlimited war party is those proud democrats.

I’m shocked y’all liberals haven’t rallied behind roundup and against anti science claim that it causes cancer.
 
Are you aware that not a single J6'er nor Trump has been charged with 18 U.S.C. 2383 which is the legal code for an actual insurrection?

So the leading GOP candidate heading into primaries has been taken off a ballot despite not being charged with the actual thing he's just been removed for and before his trial even starts.

and CNN has "our democracy is at stake" on repeat. The irony
Have any of you actually taken the time to read up on the details of this case? Again, this was not a criminal trial, it was a ruling on an amendment of the Constitution brought by citizen petitioners. The court heard all the arguments and ruled on the evidence.

"In a 132-page opinion, the majority of Colorado Supreme Court justices noted the gravity of their decision, saying, in part, "we do not reach these conclusions lightly" noting they "travel in uncharted territory" as the first court in the nation to find Trump engaged in an insurrection.

They said they had "little difficulty" concluding, that Trump's actions leading up to, and on Jan. 6, 2021, "constituted overt, voluntary and direct participation" in an insurrection."


Do you belive in the constitution or do you not?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT