ADVERTISEMENT

The Fascist War on Trans is Really The War on Civil Rights

Oh my goodness, you ARE indoctrinated! There has never been a WAR on trans, gays or anyone else or any of their rights. A year ago the word trans was never used or talked about. They did their thing and nobody took issue with it. Gender identity was the same. Most Americans were of the philosophy of live and let live, even if they didn't agree. The left chose to make them an issue in the era of Identity politics. Abortion at full term is another that suddenly popped up on the scene. All this shocked the system of rational America and that's when there was push back. The first shots were fired by the radical left.....more like a nuclear bomb. The conservative right is still shaking off the cobwebs and coming to its senses. Using your fiery rhetoric is hateful and just breeds more hate, which is exactly what the left wants.
Just so I can establish a baseline here, do you consider this more or less fiery than right wing claims that democrats and liberals drink the blood of babies that we kill in order to live forever?
 
Oh my goodness, you ARE indoctrinated! There has never been a WAR on trans, gays or anyone else or any of their rights. A year ago the word trans was never used or talked about. They did their thing and nobody took issue with it. Gender identity was the same. Most Americans were of the philosophy of live and let live, even if they didn't agree. The left chose to make them an issue in the era of Identity politics. Abortion at full term is another that suddenly popped up on the scene. All this shocked the system of rational America and that's when there was push back. The first shots were fired by the radical left.....more like a nuclear bomb. The conservative right is still shaking off the cobwebs and coming to its senses. Using your fiery rhetoric is hateful and just breeds more hate, which is exactly what the left wants.

Wait, when did anyone push for Abortion at full term? I've never heard anyone suggest that.

I'd love some links to that.
 
Wait, when did anyone push for Abortion at full term? I've never heard anyone suggest that.

I'd love some links to that.
Trump told that crowd in Waco that democrats do want full term abortions and in some cases even murder the baby after it's born. He's been saying it for years, so it's probably just accepted fact in their alternate reality now.

 
Just astonishingly disgusting claims that they all believe without question, yet I'm awful for calling them fascists.

How bout that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Look up Ralph Norman, former gov. of VA. There was a bill (didn't pass) presented in VA that would have allowed "abortion" up to AND after the baby was born. There is audio of him describing the process the parents would go through in deciding if they wanted to keep the new born baby.
 
Look up Ralph Norman, former gov. of VA. There was a bill (didn't pass) presented in VA that would have allowed "abortion" up to AND after the baby was born. There is audio of him describing the process the parents would go through in deciding if they wanted to keep the new born baby.
No there wasn't
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dungeon09
Yeah that's not what this is really about, so I don't really care. They're just people wanting to live their lives. I don't care if you think they're weird.
Has your son started taking estrogen and and gotten breast implants? Maybe had his male genetalia altered into something unrecognizable, pretending he's a woman? How about get back to us when he has.
 
Look up Ralph Norman, former gov. of VA. There was a bill (didn't pass) presented in VA that would have allowed "abortion" up to AND after the baby was born. There is audio of him describing the process the parents would go through in deciding if they wanted to keep the new born baby.
If it makes the other side sound bad, you can just say anything right? I wonder if you fact-checked this before you posted it? He was referring to rare cases with a non-viable fetus.

 
Look up Ralph Norman, former gov. of VA. There was a bill (didn't pass) presented in VA that would have allowed "abortion" up to AND after the baby was born. There is audio of him describing the process the parents would go through in deciding if they wanted to keep the new born baby.

You really believe this don't you? There is a little bit more nuance to this than you apparently understand.

Nobody that bks that it is ok to abort a viable fetus up to or after birth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I've never had anyone open my eyes like this before.
I never imagined I would know what it's like until it became trendy thanks to the weirdos in media pushing this as completely normal behavior. So yeah, how about get back to us when your kid does this.
 
If it makes the other side sound bad, you can just say anything right? I wonder if you fact-checked this before you posted it? He was referring to rare cases with a non-viable fetus.

Why should I fact check it, sounded true enough and I was just offering some fodder to the conversation. I don't look up anything people post on here, it's just entertainment for me and I take posts on here with a grain of sale. I read this site just to kill time at work when I don't want to work.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iceheart08
Why should I fact check it, sounded true enough and I was just offering some fodder to the conversation. I don't look up anything people post on here, it's just entertainment for me and I take posts on here with a grain of sale. I read this site just to kill time at work when I don't want to work.
Ah I see! As long as it's casual slander, we're good! ;)
 
Why should I fact check it, sounded true enough and I was just offering some fodder to the conversation. I don't look up anything people post on here, it's just entertainment for me and I take posts on here with a grain of sale. I read this site just to kill time at work when I don't want to work.
Alternative facts in a nutshell
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Wait, when did anyone push for Abortion at full term? I've never heard anyone suggest that.

I'd love some links to that.
In the Women's Health Protection Act, partial birth abortion bans that any state had in place would be overridden and it would allow abortions at full term but only if a physician said the life or health of the mother was at stake. This language is fine to some but not to all as it takes the word of an abortion provider as real and valid in these situations. Yes, women do sometimes experience life threatening problems just before birth and a choice might have to be made at that time, and there has never been a question about this. Which medical professionals get to make this determination about the mother's health and how to validate it is in question. I'm aware that 93% of abortions are done before the 24th week and less that 1% near full term, but to pro-life folks, one is too many. The language in the bill was ambiguous, and it did not pass the Senate vote. This was done immediately after the leak about Roe vs. Wade in Supreme Court. It shows there is never a moderation in the woke stance, but continually doubling down on the outrageous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
In the Women's Health Protection Act, partial birth abortion bans that any state had in place would be overridden and it would allow abortions at full term but only if a physician said the life or health of the mother was at stake. This language is fine to some but not to all as it takes the word of an abortion provider as real and valid in these situations. Yes, women do sometimes experience life threatening problems just before birth and a choice might have to be made at that time, and there has never been a question about this. Which medical professionals get to make this determination about the mother's health and how to validate it is in question. I'm aware that 93% of abortions are done before the 24th week and less that 1% near full term, but to pro-life folks, one is too many. The language in the bill was ambiguous, and it did not pass the Senate vote.
Let me guess, you believe red state legislators should be making that determination, amirite? Will they have their abortion police in the room when the decisions needs to be made, since we apparently can't trust doctors to do the right thing?
 
In the Women's Health Protection Act, partial birth abortion bans that any state had in place would be overridden and it would allow abortions at full term but only if a physician said the life or health of the mother was at stake. This language is fine to some but not to all as it takes the word of an abortion provider as real and valid in these situations. Yes, women do sometimes experience life threatening problems just before birth and a choice might have to be made at that time, and there has never been a question about this. Which medical professionals get to make this determination about the mother's health and how to validate it is in question. I'm aware that 93% of abortions are done before the 24th week and less that 1% near full term, but to pro-life folks, one is too many. The language in the bill was ambiguous, and it did not pass the Senate vote.

Thanks for clarifying. I wouldn't have an issue with a Doctor and a women deciding that an abortion was necessary to save the mother's life. All Doctors are licensed and have review processes. The ones I work with are very aware of Standard of Care and would not risk their license
 
Let me guess, you believe red state legislators should be making that determination, amirite? Will they have their abortion police in the room when the decisions needs to be made, since we apparently can't trust doctors to do the right thing?
If a doctor who primarily makes a living preforming abortions can make this decision, it is suspect at best. I realize this would not happen very often, but it allows an "out" for the mother and abortionist to have the abortion without the mother's health actually being threatened.
 
Yet some folks on here will argue till their death that it's not being pushed in schools......

 
Obviously, they will become transgender now that they've seen a rainbow flag in a video, because high school students are unaware of gay people. Thanks Biden
If you replace the word trans with the word gay, it's all the same anti gay hate from the 90s and early 2000s just repurposed.

It's the same hatred of "the other" just directed at a newer, more vulnerable target.

They'll never learn. They just need to be silenced again.
 
Needs its own thread. Just wait...

Next it'll be gay adoption. Then gay marriage. Then gay civil rights.

And they won't stop there either.

This is full bore fascism and the target will eventually be all brown people, and Jews, and academia, and all political enemies.

Don't let it happen. This is not a vote between liberal and conservative. It's a vote between democracy and authoritarianism.
They’re already talking openly about going after gay marriage and no fault divorce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem
If you replace the word trans with the word gay, it's all the same anti gay hate from the 90s and early 2000s just repurposed.

It's the same hatred of "the other" just directed at a newer, more vulnerable target.

They'll never learn. They just need to be silenced again.
Trans obviously doesn't apply to the video the students saw but was just making a point about how the Right has made an attempt to put all "others" in the same category to inflame their irrationally angry base.

Rainbow flag = grooming = trans = indoctrination = pedophila

They are intentionally conflating the issues for propaganda purposes and couldn't care less that this will likely lead to violence against anyone outside of their contrived moral boundaries
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem
Trans obviously doesn't apply to the video the students saw but was just making a point about how the Right has made an attempt to put all "others" in the same category to inflame their irrationally angry base.

Rainbow flag = grooming = trans = indoctrination = pedophila

They are intentionally conflating the issues for propaganda purposes and couldn't care less that this will likely lead to violence against anyone outside of their contrived moral boundaries
Absolutely agree. And I didn't even really intend that to be a direct response to what you said. I was just kind of piggy-backing off of what you posted. The target is everyone under the LGBTQ+ banner.

If they really gave a shit at all about the issue of pedophilia they'd go after the Catholic church. But they don't really care about that. They care about going after people's civil rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
My history professors at Clemson would disagree with you.
That is your biggest problem. You listen to college professors who most likely are Marxist/Socialist/Communist. They couldn't make it in the real world.

Are you still attending Clemson?
 
Trump told that crowd in Waco that democrats do want full term abortions and in some cases even murder the baby after it's born. He's been saying it for years, so it's probably just accepted fact in their alternate reality now.

I seem to remember a couple of years ago where in Washington, DC area there was a doctor performing very late term abortions (even at birth) that had a company picking up the unsanitary wast in bags in drums, and a pro life group encouraged the guy to hand to turn over one of the drums and it had several very late term to birth babies, as an expert studied the babies. They turned this over to a Maryland (or Washington, DC) crime group for investigation and they either refused to investigate or determined, with their usual conclusion, "nothing to see here" comment. Of course there are articles on both sides talking about the killing of these babies, and others about this group being charged for getting the babies from the delivery service truck.

 
That is your biggest problem. You listen to college professors who most likely are Marxist/Socialist/Communist. They couldn't make it in the real world.

Are you still attending Clemson?
Yeah let's just jump right to that conclusion. Lol fvckin morons.

I listen to experts who dedicate their lives to studying their area of expertise. You listen to people who...don't.
 
Last edited:
Yeah let's just jump right to that conclusion. Lol fvckin morons.

I listen to experts who dedicate their lives to studying their area of expertise. You listen to people who...don't.
Are you going to answer the question?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT