ADVERTISEMENT

Trump supporters with teenage daughters

There's no federal law enshrining abortion. what's the alternative to leaving it up to the states?
He can’t even tell you the substance behind why he’s afraid of his daughters’ rights being in danger. Can’t specify exactly what right, besides abortion, and will just move the goal post when his talking points are depleted. He went from asking about abortion and states to saying “EVERY debated issues that’s not consensus should be sent to the states.”

His well has run dry.
 
How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”

What??? Who would want to own one of them…I can hardly live with them...😆
 
You think it affects a clump of cells more than the woman carrying it? Weird people say you guys don’t give a shit about women’s rights.
We can debate when life actually begins. I think based on evidence it begins when there is fertilization. I think that life is certainly present by time their is a heartbeat which is around the 5th week. A woman may not even realize she is pregnant by this point. So, yes I think abortion affects the baby.

What I find ironic is that the left and the democratic party have always tried to say that they stand up for the oppressed or the "voiceless." But not in this case. The baby has no voice so it's OK to kill it. I think that speaks to broader problem that the left has. They have created this huge block of voters in the working class who feel like the left has ignored their voice and these people are voting for Republicans now. You see it with minority groups especially males. These groups are starting to realize that the left has used them for decades and essentially kept them voiceless. The Republicans' especially Trump, started listening to them, And many of them showed up to vote for him. That is why he won.
 
Ok so if I'm understanding you correctly. The state governments have a right to make this choice. Thats how it should be. That the government, gets to decide.
You’re truly worried about your daughters’ rights in America? Or is this just a cool thing to say?

I worry about a lot of stuff for my daughters, but I have no concern over their rights.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
We can debate when life actually begins. I think based on evidence it begins when there is fertilization. I think that life is certainly present by time their is a heartbeat which is around the 5th week. A woman may not even realize she is pregnant by this point. So, yes I think abortion affects the baby.

What I find ironic is that the left and the democratic party have always tried to say that they stand up for the oppressed or the "voiceless." But not in this case. The baby has no voice so it's OK to kill it. I think that speaks to broader problem that the left has. They have created this huge block of voters in the working class who feel like the left has ignored their voice and these people are voting for Republicans now. You see it with minority groups especially males. These groups are starting to realize that the left has used them for decades and essentially kept them voiceless. The Republicans' especially Trump, started listening to them, And many of them showed up to vote for him. That is why he won.
The dem party has basically given lip service to minorities and low/no wage earners for decades with little results to improve their actual quality of life. In large part, that can only be done through work opportunities that make people no longer dependent on govt.
In reality, their political goal is continued repression and forced reliance. The truth is they have basically said keep voting for me and I will keep letting you stand in line and get your govt cheese, flour, etc.

Under Trump, real wages, labor participation, wage gaps between rich/poor(particularly with minorities) were all at decades level positive levels. The groups that benefitted the most may not have known those statistics at the time, or even now, but they "knew" it when they were living through it based on their improved quality of life. They also know it is not that way now. Trump did the exact thing dems have been promising(and failing) to do for decades.
 
I think there is a balance to be struck. It's absolutely no joyous thing for the woman. It's also not a joyous thing to terminate life. Regardless of how far a woman was into a pregnancy, I would always feel more disturbed by someone kicking her in the stomach than a woman who wasn't pregnant. Seems as though even the potential for full-fledged human life is something we should value and do subconsciously value

Do you think a woman has an absolute right over the baby because she's carrying it? I doubt anyone here is pushing for abortion to be legal during the third trimester. At some point people believe that society's interest in protecting a life outweighs the individual woman's interest in ending one. Is that unfair? It doesn't even need to be a religious thing.

What if I told you that you don't give a shit about human rights if you don't protect human life? It'd get us nowhere, and there's no point insulting you or anyone else.
Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?
 
You think it affects a clump of cells more than the woman carrying it? Weird people say you guys don’t give a shit about women’s rights.
I think you have to have a framework, though. The “clump of cells” has a heartbeat and is 100% life. The argument on which week is purely deciding what is most palatable for an individual’s conscience. For most women, this is a HUGE decision, and the reason is because you are destroying a life. If it’s just a “clump of cells”, then no woman would think twice about abortion.

I totally respect someone having that choice without govt interference. I think it’s silly we tie it to a week. Why should the govt remove a woman’s right to make a choice about her body at week 24, at week 34? That’s inconsistent. You can’t logically be pro-choice at week 15 but not at week 28. There’s no logic.

The reason is it is simply more palatable to destroy life before it looks too much like a baby. And we have to consider if we actually want unwanted babies clogging up our system.

But I am 100% in favor of less govt interference, less taxes from govt, less regulations, etc.
 
You’re truly worried about your daughters’ rights in America? Or is this just a cool thing to say?

I worry about a lot of stuff for my daughters, but I have no concern over their rights.
You’re more than happy to reduce their rights because of your beliefs. You sound like a dad every girl would dream of.
 
Hope your daughters don’t have the misfortune of a condom tearing or forgetting a birth control pill. Would be an awful, preventable tragedy if one of them were to become permanently infertile after a delay in care due to shit abortion laws.

I would feel genuine sympathy for you and your family. Although I guess you and your wife would just disown her from the family because she will have deserved it.
Maybe they'll be informed that actions have consequences. And getting pregnant while having protected sex is one of the outcomes.
 
This is too much of a nuanced issue to really reach a consensus on. I dislike abortion, but I also believe there is nothing more tragic than an unwanted baby being thrown into this world. But in reality, is it really such a tragedy to have to drive up to Charlotte to get your abortion?

This country was designed for the states to have most of the power…if the majority of your state wants a 15 week abortion ban, you live by those rules. The federal government has too much power, and I’m glad to see them giving some of it away.

Oh, and @johnhugh, do your wife and partner know about each other, or have I just misread you all these years? Congrats on getting married though!
 
As per each separate state’s law, yes.

And there’s still between 1,500 and 2,500 abortions PER DAY in America.

The abortion laws are rarely preventing the actual abortions from happening, when desired, even in a lot of the 6 week ban states.
Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.


Sorry but I’m not a fan of violating the constitution because a bunch of pussies are scared of letting women decide what to do with their own bodies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnhugh
Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.


Sorry but I’m not a fan of violating the constitution because a bunch of pussies are scared of letting women decide what to do with their own bodies.
STFU moron.
 
He can’t even tell you the substance behind why he’s afraid of his daughters’ rights being in danger. Can’t specify exactly what right, besides abortion, and will just move the goal post when his talking points are depleted. He went from asking about abortion and states to saying “EVERY debated issues that’s not consensus should be sent to the states.”

His well has run dry.
My well hasn't run dry. I just went to bed at a sensible hour.
Also, I'm asking questions, not accusing people of things.
My concerns and fears are that the Heritage foundation will have top advisors in the white house pushing for a federal ban. https://www.heritage.org/protect-un...terprise will protect,(or better) on abortion.

We will defend the court victory by advancing pro-life legislation in the states and at the federal level and blocking the Democrats’ efforts to enshrine abortion on demand in federal law. The steps outlined below represent significant progress toward these goals that can be achieved even in a divided government.

My concerns are not unfounded as I take these people seriously. They are organized and will execute on their plans.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SGTiger
How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
What you call a “right”
Is the killing of a life
Pray for forgiveness

Your moral high ground
Is, in fact, a field of bones
Repent in His Grace
 
  • Like
Reactions: amynhop
Only about 4-5% of abortions in the United States are because of non-viable fetuses, rape, incest, and most justifiable reasons to have an abortion. The rest are basically an elective procedure because two people (1 man with XY and 1 woman with XX.. I know this confuses a lot of you) make a mistake and have a pregnancy..

I get there’s some variable as it pertains to abortions in state’s with 6 week bans and such, but that’s only 13 states, and the numbers are the numbers. I guess we can agree that maybe more abortions happen because of the justifiable reasons in some of the 13 states if the laws weren’t as strict, but not enough to really move the needle much.

You’re afraid of a hypothetical that has a very minuscule chance of even happening.
This right here!

The left always uses a situation that occurs >5% to try and prove a point.
 
Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.


Sorry but I’m not a fan of violating the constitution because a bunch of pussies are scared of letting women decide what to do with their own bodies.

You are an idiot.

Slavery is a moral issue for sure. No one should be subjected to such an awful practice.

Killing babies is a moral issue for sure. No baby should be killed.

Your opinion is that slavery should not be sent to the states but are content with the fed government abolishing it. You believe that abortion should also be a fed issue.

I personally don’t disagree EXCEPT, you are for killing babies. In your crappy example, that’s like saying you’re ok if the fed government allowed slavery for all states.

There’s a major difference in your idiotic example. Slavery (bad) is abolished (good). Killing babaies (bad) was not abolished (bad).
 
Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?
You are using a less than 3% example to justify the other 1 million elective procedures.

The issue to the pro abortion folks isn’t the 3%. That’s a front.

The issue is just that they want the right to decide wtf they want to do period, even if it’s killing a baby. And if they make that decision, they want no penalty for it even though morally, its as bad as murdering anyone else. No accountability for a nasty decision.

We are truly living in a fallen world. Thank God he’s provided an answer, but unfortunately most won’t take it.
 
To answer the OP's thread title..........my daughter voted for Trump. She's 22 so not in your "teenager" wheelhouse.
 
My well hasn't run dry. I just went to bed at a sensible hour.
Also, I'm asking questions, not accusing people of things.
My concerns and fears are that the Heritage foundation will have top advisors in the white house pushing for a federal ban. https://www.heritage.org/protect-unborn-life-and-family-formation#:~:text=The Heritage enterprise will protect,(or better) on abortion.

We will defend the court victory by advancing pro-life legislation in the states and at the federal level and blocking the Democrats’ efforts to enshrine abortion on demand in federal law. The steps outlined below represent significant progress toward these goals that can be achieved even in a divided government.

My concerns are not unfounded as I take these people seriously. They are organized and will execute on their plans.
Lmao.

In the least shocking news of the day, Lib circles back to yet another hoax boogeyman.

2025 is the proverbial ghosts that I have been referring to.

Thanks for the rational discussion, but I’m through with our conversation. I hope your daughters never have to make a decision on whether to abort a baby or not.
 
How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
My wife is a lifelong Democrat and she is quite pissed that I voted for someone who "doesn't support women's rights". It was quite a shock to see her reaction when he won. I needed some defense, so I did some research. I found this:

More than a million abortions were provided in the U.S. in 2023. That's a major finding from a report published Tuesday by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports access to abortion.

To be precise, researchers estimate there were 1,026,700 abortions in 2023. "That's the highest number in over a decade, [and] the first time there have been over a million abortions provided in the U.S. formal health care system since 2012," explains Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher.

The Guttmacher report also found that medication abortions rose to 63% of all abortions in 2023, up from 53% in 2020. The research was conducted by surveying all in-person and virtual abortion providers in the country and adding up their abortion counts. Guttmacher has been doing this research since 1974.

2023 Abortion Statistics

This doesn't look like a ban on abortions to me. It is obvious that people can still get abortions. It may be harder, but IT SHOULD BE hard to get an abortion. I am pro-life myself, but it wasn't a deciding factor for me.

If Trump does ban abortions from the Federal level, I will certainly have issues with that, but as of right now, your argument stands on shaky ground.
 
Lmao.

In the least shocking news of the day, Lib circles back to yet another hoax boogeyman.

2025 is the proverbial ghosts that I have been referring to.

Thanks for the rational discussion, but I’m through with our conversation. I hope your daughters never have to make a decision on whether to abort a baby or not.
Glad it was informative for you.
I'm relieved to hear you feel that the Heritage foundation will have no say in what the Trump administration executes on.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT