There's no federal law enshrining abortion. what's the alternative to leaving it up to the states?Interesting. So any debated issue that not everyone agrees on, should be left to the states. Got it.
There's no federal law enshrining abortion. what's the alternative to leaving it up to the states?Interesting. So any debated issue that not everyone agrees on, should be left to the states. Got it.
lol. Fail.Interesting. So any debated issue that not everyone agrees on, should be left to the states. Got it.
He can’t even tell you the substance behind why he’s afraid of his daughters’ rights being in danger. Can’t specify exactly what right, besides abortion, and will just move the goal post when his talking points are depleted. He went from asking about abortion and states to saying “EVERY debated issues that’s not consensus should be sent to the states.”There's no federal law enshrining abortion. what's the alternative to leaving it up to the states?
Glad I could help. Feel free to reach out on any other issues you may be confused about. Always willing to lend a helping hand!Interesting. So any debated issue that not everyone agrees on, should be left to the states. Got it.
How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
We can debate when life actually begins. I think based on evidence it begins when there is fertilization. I think that life is certainly present by time their is a heartbeat which is around the 5th week. A woman may not even realize she is pregnant by this point. So, yes I think abortion affects the baby.You think it affects a clump of cells more than the woman carrying it? Weird people say you guys don’t give a shit about women’s rights.
You’re truly worried about your daughters’ rights in America? Or is this just a cool thing to say?Ok so if I'm understanding you correctly. The state governments have a right to make this choice. Thats how it should be. That the government, gets to decide.
The dem party has basically given lip service to minorities and low/no wage earners for decades with little results to improve their actual quality of life. In large part, that can only be done through work opportunities that make people no longer dependent on govt.We can debate when life actually begins. I think based on evidence it begins when there is fertilization. I think that life is certainly present by time their is a heartbeat which is around the 5th week. A woman may not even realize she is pregnant by this point. So, yes I think abortion affects the baby.
What I find ironic is that the left and the democratic party have always tried to say that they stand up for the oppressed or the "voiceless." But not in this case. The baby has no voice so it's OK to kill it. I think that speaks to broader problem that the left has. They have created this huge block of voters in the working class who feel like the left has ignored their voice and these people are voting for Republicans now. You see it with minority groups especially males. These groups are starting to realize that the left has used them for decades and essentially kept them voiceless. The Republicans' especially Trump, started listening to them, And many of them showed up to vote for him. That is why he won.
You love it so much. Baal is proud.How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?I think there is a balance to be struck. It's absolutely no joyous thing for the woman. It's also not a joyous thing to terminate life. Regardless of how far a woman was into a pregnancy, I would always feel more disturbed by someone kicking her in the stomach than a woman who wasn't pregnant. Seems as though even the potential for full-fledged human life is something we should value and do subconsciously value
Do you think a woman has an absolute right over the baby because she's carrying it? I doubt anyone here is pushing for abortion to be legal during the third trimester. At some point people believe that society's interest in protecting a life outweighs the individual woman's interest in ending one. Is that unfair? It doesn't even need to be a religious thing.
What if I told you that you don't give a shit about human rights if you don't protect human life? It'd get us nowhere, and there's no point insulting you or anyone else.
I think you have to have a framework, though. The “clump of cells” has a heartbeat and is 100% life. The argument on which week is purely deciding what is most palatable for an individual’s conscience. For most women, this is a HUGE decision, and the reason is because you are destroying a life. If it’s just a “clump of cells”, then no woman would think twice about abortion.You think it affects a clump of cells more than the woman carrying it? Weird people say you guys don’t give a shit about women’s rights.
You’re more than happy to reduce their rights because of your beliefs. You sound like a dad every girl would dream of.You’re truly worried about your daughters’ rights in America? Or is this just a cool thing to say?
I worry about a lot of stuff for my daughters, but I have no concern over their rights.
Maybe they'll be informed that actions have consequences. And getting pregnant while having protected sex is one of the outcomes.Hope your daughters don’t have the misfortune of a condom tearing or forgetting a birth control pill. Would be an awful, preventable tragedy if one of them were to become permanently infertile after a delay in care due to shit abortion laws.
I would feel genuine sympathy for you and your family. Although I guess you and your wife would just disown her from the family because she will have deserved it.
Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.As per each separate state’s law, yes.
And there’s still between 1,500 and 2,500 abortions PER DAY in America.
The abortion laws are rarely preventing the actual abortions from happening, when desired, even in a lot of the 6 week ban states.
STFU moron.Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.
Sorry but I’m not a fan of violating the constitution because a bunch of pussies are scared of letting women decide what to do with their own bodies.
Sorry I hurt your feelings. I know MAGA is a sensitive little bunch.STFU moron.
My well hasn't run dry. I just went to bed at a sensible hour.He can’t even tell you the substance behind why he’s afraid of his daughters’ rights being in danger. Can’t specify exactly what right, besides abortion, and will just move the goal post when his talking points are depleted. He went from asking about abortion and states to saying “EVERY debated issues that’s not consensus should be sent to the states.”
His well has run dry.
What you call a “right”How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
This right here!Only about 4-5% of abortions in the United States are because of non-viable fetuses, rape, incest, and most justifiable reasons to have an abortion. The rest are basically an elective procedure because two people (1 man with XY and 1 woman with XX.. I know this confuses a lot of you) make a mistake and have a pregnancy..
I get there’s some variable as it pertains to abortions in state’s with 6 week bans and such, but that’s only 13 states, and the numbers are the numbers. I guess we can agree that maybe more abortions happen because of the justifiable reasons in some of the 13 states if the laws weren’t as strict, but not enough to really move the needle much.
You’re afraid of a hypothetical that has a very minuscule chance of even happening.
Should slavery be decided by the states? What about legalizing murder? Isn’t the federal government supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? By passing down to the state for a ban on abortion, IVF, no fault divorce, you are violating all three.
Sorry but I’m not a fan of violating the constitution because a bunch of pussies are scared of letting women decide what to do with their own bodies.
You are using a less than 3% example to justify the other 1 million elective procedures.Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?
Lmao.My well hasn't run dry. I just went to bed at a sensible hour.
Also, I'm asking questions, not accusing people of things.
My concerns and fears are that the Heritage foundation will have top advisors in the white house pushing for a federal ban. https://www.heritage.org/protect-unborn-life-and-family-formation#:~:text=The Heritage enterprise will protect,(or better) on abortion.
We will defend the court victory by advancing pro-life legislation in the states and at the federal level and blocking the Democrats’ efforts to enshrine abortion on demand in federal law. The steps outlined below represent significant progress toward these goals that can be achieved even in a divided government.
My concerns are not unfounded as I take these people seriously. They are organized and will execute on their plans.
My wife is a lifelong Democrat and she is quite pissed that I voted for someone who "doesn't support women's rights". It was quite a shock to see her reaction when he won. I needed some defense, so I did some research. I found this:How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
Glad it was informative for you.Lmao.
In the least shocking news of the day, Lib circles back to yet another hoax boogeyman.
2025 is the proverbial ghosts that I have been referring to.
Thanks for the rational discussion, but I’m through with our conversation. I hope your daughters never have to make a decision on whether to abort a baby or not.
Dude , are you just stupid or what?What about when it fails? It’s not 100%
don't you have a "partner" or have we misremembered? I think the media blitz and Obama devil's empire has fried the libs brains about the truth - Trump says it's a state issue - end of story - no federal mandate promoted by Trump - if you somehow get pregnant or identify as pregnant, you can go to states whose constituents approved abortions in lawful ballotingHope your daughters don’t have the misfortune of a condom tearing or forgetting a birth control pill. Would be an awful, preventable tragedy if one of them were to become permanently infertile after a delay in care due to shit abortion laws.
I would feel genuine sympathy for you and your family. Although I guess you and your wife would just disown her from the family because she will have deserved it.
A you really a licensed medical professional--or am I incorrectly inferring this from your recent posts?How much do your daughters hate you right now? What’s the discussion at dinner like? “Sorry honey I had to take away your rights to own the libs”
You are an idiot.
Slavery is a moral issue for sure. No one should be subjected to such an awful practice.
Killing babies is a moral issue for sure. No baby should be killed.
Your opinion is that slavery should not be sent to the states but are content with the fed government abolishing it. You believe that abortion should also be a fed issue.
I personally don’t disagree EXCEPT, you are for killing babies. In your crappy example, that’s like saying you’re ok if the fed government allowed slavery for all states.
There’s a major difference in your idiotic example. Slavery (bad) is abolished (good). Killing babaies (bad) was not abolished (bad).