Which is it(Climate change)
- Thread starter TigerRagRob
- Start date
Australian broadcaster, Alan Jones, utterly schools a panel of climate zealots on the reality of the #ClimateScam.
"CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere, and human beings are responsible for 3% of that 0.04%... It's like saying: 'There's a granule of sugar on the Harbour Bridge. Clean the bridge up, it's dirty'."
new energy production methods can't be made without existing energy. go figure, gomer.
Did you expect them to use the wind energy from the turbine that hadn’t been built yet?
In The Name Of Climate Change NASA Will Be Spraying Millions Of Tons Of Ice Particles 11 Miles High Each Week
“The goal is to spray tons of ice particles into the upper atmosphere from high altitude aircraft”
Who Remembers Voting For This? They Say This Will Stop Gas From Forming & Trapping Heat
“Well, well, well. NASA plans to inject Earth's atmosphere with millions of tons of ice to tackle climate change. It's known as what? Geoengineering. Oh, that's just a conspiracy theory.
Right? It's just a representational image of a plane that scientists would use to inject 2 tons of particles of ice 11 miles high each week. Each week? If not every day. The goal is to spray tons of ice particles into the upper atmosphere from high altitude aircraft that rises about 60,000 feet above ground, which is more than 20,000 feet higher than commercial aircraft.
The idea is that by freezing water, water vapor would be removed before it could be converted into the greenhouse gas emissions which would keep heat from escaping into space and eventually raise Earth.
The water would be frozen by the ice particles and fall back to Earth, eliminating extra water vapor and dehydrating the stratosphere, which is where water transforms into gas and traps heat. Gonna leave this here just for a second. Y'all just think about this. — How about that?”
The post misrepresents an AP article, which proposes a hypothetical solution for climate change as an area for further scientific research. There is no plan to inject ice particles in the atmosphere, because humanity does not currently possess the technology to do that.
how about that?
When you say we don’t have that technology, what do you mean?
I don’t know one way or another but are you saying that we don’t have the technology to release water from a plane at 60,000 feet?
I mean we can't do it as we don't have the delivery method nor the capacity to do it. It's a speculative article that the idiot in chief around here, took as fact after a paid dumbass fed him the headline
So just checking to make sure I understand, we don’t have the capability to release water from a plane at 60,000 feet?
What other limitation are you talking about?
Please just go and read the article cited and hyper radicalized. The claims are dubious as there's no capability to perform it. It's a thought experiment, which is what we are only allowed when it comes to climate change.
Global ocean temperatures breaking records, experts say
El Niño has peaked, now weakening
www.wcvb.com
Read this carefully. World leaders appear to be trying to engineer a mass die off of humans especially when you combine this with all of the other incredibly sketchy stuff they want to do.
