Agree. Prosecution will prove a lot of lies in his statement.
⚖️ MURDAUGH MURDERS & TRIAL THREAD ⚖️
- Thread starter OldMTPTiger
- Start date
This interview is probably when AM realized that law enforcement was onto him.
Yep. Also aligns with the timing of when he went to Blanca the housekeeper asking about the blue shirt. This interview is likely what led to him questioning blanca.
His attorney really screwed up in allowing Alex to be interviewed. Or possibly Alex thought he was so smart he overruled his attorney and agreed to it. All these lies will end up hanging him
Yes and this attorney is Cory Fleming who was also suspended or disbarred - the attorney that was involved in the Satterfield mess
Cory's initial instinct was to stop the interview but Alex said to continue
his lawyer was trying to figure out what was about to happen and the investigator answered in a perfect way. Even told him he didn't have to answer a question if they did not want to. Alex should have realized they thought he did it at this point and shut it down
That’s why you shut up and lawyer up
Fleming - "I can get a probate done like that (fingers snap)" - ohhhh the irony
As @nmerritt11 mentioned, his attorney tried to stop it and Alex insisted. I think this is where you see a little bit of the narcissistic personality of Alex that he probably thinks he's two steps ahead of law enforcement and can talk his way out of this. Or he was also trying to get information as to what SLED had so he could stay ahead of law enforcement.
However, what screwed Alex in this interview is that he didn't realize SLED already had evidence completely destroying his story and alibi that he had told over and over up until that point.
Also, they talking about "all the internet wackos", and SLED mentions some of the stuff is so far fetched. Could this be reference to this great thread here? We know Cris mentioned interested parties were monitoring this thread when he pushpinned the thread.
yep lead him directly into his lies and he likely lied to attorney so he was trying to expedite info that further screws him and shows more lies
As the investigator said, they had to find reason to remove Alex from the case and this interview just furthered he needed to be the focus of it
@tigerbean - I am stunned that Alex allowed himself to be interviewed with only Cory as defense counsel here. You and I know them both and... seems like he committed malpractice on himself. I would not have gone in there withtout someone the caliber of Poot/Griffin/Swerling/Gasser/Barbier etc. Cory is not that guy.
Last edited:
This is making my office day productivity go way down and I had a ton of shit to do. And I can't watch tomorrow or Friday as I have someone flying in for work
Anyone else find it particularly damning also that from day one he never mentioned anything in any of these interviews about being confronted at work about the missing $792,000 on the day of the murders. Not once.
very good point just made on the Law and Court stream...which has been made on here but they said it very good.
Everything after the video busting him in the lie, was very manufactured. Calling people he knows won't answer because he knows what happened to them.
Very damning interview and timeline. Not one piece of his timeline aligns
Everything after the video busting him in the lie, was very manufactured. Calling people he knows won't answer because he knows what happened to them.
Very damning interview and timeline. Not one piece of his timeline aligns
Earlier testimony from one of Paul's friends is Maggie didn't like Moselle in the summer because of yellow flies. Also, she was doing work at Edisto property.
Nothing wacko about this thread.
Call in sick and work over the weekend. This is a once in a century true crime saga. Work is always there.
luckily I do not have to call in sick. And cannot push this person off that is flying in since I planned it and set up our next 2 days of meetings. She might just have to be willing to listen to the trial. Being from Florida she should be thrilled to get drawn into this trial.
But worst case TI will keep me updated
SLED and SC Law Enforcement is coming across as competent so far in this case.
Very much so…been impressed and they are going against high powered attorneys and phrasing things pretty good from my non-expert view point. Very careful in wording but also very strategic
I
There are multiple other bat shit crazy trials always starting and finishing. Had em on in the background the last cpl years.
Bet she is thinking, "I have to fly in to see Merritt and going to lose 2 days of keeping up with the Murdaugh trial...." maybe he will call and cancel with some lame excuse
Nah…just talked to her and Boole her hotel room. She has airfare.:.no turning back
She will just have to listen and then we will go to happy hour for a debriefing
I saw this out on the internet via twitter ... from interview 2 ....
I think Alex is talking about the little red light mounted on the missing rifle. He mentions that he uses it "that night".
the video is cued up to this 15 sec sound clip.
I think Alex is talking about the little red light mounted on the missing rifle. He mentions that he uses it "that night".
the video is cued up to this 15 sec sound clip.
Because the crime scene was terribly managed by the sheriff’s dept. They walked all over the place around the bodies, playing detective. All of those officers should be reprimanded. Watch the body cam videos they clearly mishandled the scene prior to SLEDs arrival
Sorry to have to ask this but when today did this bombshell testimony take place? Who was the witness?
I've been preoccupied today until now and would like to hear it. Sounds very interesting.
Thanks to whoever.
I've been preoccupied today until now and would like to hear it. Sounds very interesting.
Thanks to whoever.
Yeah I don't even watch, I just follow Avery hahaha
To confirm my interpretations, can someone explain the relevance of this?
Alex worked for his office in some capacity - so a direct conflict when he was considered a suspect - when possibly should have been a conflict from day 1
Keeping up via Avery Wilks tweets. Looks like defense may have gotten a little bit of win on Griffin's cross of the head investigator for SLED. Got Owen (head investigator) to admit that he told the Colleton County grand jury that indicted Murdaugh that there was blood spatter on Murdaugh's shirt when in fact there was a SLED report showing there was no blood spatter on Murdaugh's shirt. Griffin also established that SLED found no DNA in the blue jacket, no blood, DNA or wet spots in Surbuban and no blood or other evidence anywhere in Moselle home.
I think the cell phone data will be what gets Alex bc it seems like he did an excellent job of covering up evidence and his tracks when it comes to physical evidence.
I think the cell phone data will be what gets Alex bc it seems like he did an excellent job of covering up evidence and his tracks when it comes to physical evidence.
I was just coming here to say same. He is abusing the SLED agent. The sled agent is very defensive. Juries typically pick up on that. Griffin is poking major holes
This is like scoring with 10s left in the fourth to take the lead but then giving up a KO return for TD
this is what i expected of the defense - less is more - only ask questions when they poke holes or make an important point - first time in 4 weeks
