No, I was referencing the 8/11 video that @Clemblack was talking about. Did he see that 8/11 video while watching the trial or is there a place to go find it to view?
I believe this is the interview in question.
No, I was referencing the 8/11 video that @Clemblack was talking about. Did he see that 8/11 video while watching the trial or is there a place to go find it to view?
Yes, Law & Crime, CourtTV, FITSNews are doing daily live feeds and adding that as saved content; including shortened videos on topics, commentary feeds, etc. YouTube is a goldmine.Is there a website where all of these videos are located (i.e. tree video, etc.)?
I think he really thought he would easily get away with it, but Karma did him in. Where would this case be without the two videos, the extensive phone data, and the extensive car data?
What the prosecution has wasn't even possible 15 years ago.
Seems like there were two main triggers:
1. The lawsuit discovery on his finances that was just days away
2. Being asked that day by his firm about the missing $800K
What I don't have a clear understanding of is why he killed Maggie. Had he told her something that would add fuel to the embezzlement fire? Did he suspect that she was going to divorce him already, or because of the embezzlement? Was he such a narcissist that he couldn't stand how she would react to the embezzlement? Did he believe that she would pin Paul's murder on him for some reason if he killed Paul?
Idk...
No doubt, but when you’re in the National Championship game, you sub out as needed and otherwise suck it up. Be more like Deshaun beating Scar with a torn ACL than Kearse.It's a marathon, not a sprint, and you have to share the labor.
You can't have your top running back in on every play, just like Waters can't handle every single witness -- especially if the witness is a highly technical one, as those can take a long time to prep an effective cross-examination for.
Have a ? for attorneys on here.
Sawtwo separate gun experts on shows last night who were asked to comment on the expert yesterday sayin the shooter likely was 5'2". they said you cannot determine the height of a shooter . Gun can be held on many ways, etc. Also refuted some of the sound stuff and other things. They basically laughed at what the guy said but did say his delivery was smooth
My question is ...can the prosecution bring an expert in after the defense closes to call the bullshit for what it is ? At this point that is all the defense has other than no man would butcher his family like that and claiming the prosecution's stated motive is BS
It’s on Google, I heard it while listening to the trial. The silence was deafening when he was asked about video. His first question is what time was that. LE “looks like dusk” he says I guess when we ate dinnerIs this video online to watch or did y’all just see it while watching the trial?
![]()
Alex Murdaugh to take stand in his own defense Thursday
The disbarred South Carolina attorney accused of the double murder of his wife and son says he will testify in his own defense on Thursday in the Colleton County Courthouse.www.foxnews.com
Question for the lawyers….is is difficult to cross examine the person you are accusing of murder?
Pure speculation on my part but if that happens, I have to believe it is clear window into their thinking ... as in an indicator that they feel they probably have to have it, an indicator that they don't feel this is heading toward the outcome they're seeking as things stand today.Most don’t get the chance. I can’t see how in the world they put that cat on the stand.
Pure speculation on my part but if that happens, I have to believe it is clear window into their thinking ... as in an indicator that they feel they probably have to have it, an indicator that they don't feel this is heading toward the outcome they're seeking as things stand today.
Agreed. I don’t believe they need it either. The cell phone expert for the defense today blew up the whole “Alex threw the phone out the window” theory and the csi expert showed that law enforcement failed in their job of evidence collecting.Pure speculation on my part but if that happens, I have to believe it is clear window into their thinking ... as in an indicator that they feel they probably have to have it, an indicator that they don't feel this is heading toward the outcome they're seeking as things stand today.
I am speculating here... I think Jim was friends with Paul and Maggie as well as Buster.... but it almost seems like there is a softening in his demeanor... in that he knows his client has lied and lied and lied to him and he feels betrayed, fed up with even. He appears to be a shrewd dude. If AM testifies it may be sign that Jim is ready for this charade to end.I just watched the interrogation of Mr Ball. How could the defense be so stupid to let him be on the stand. Waters nailed that cross and made AM look terrible.
This would be "must see TV." Hopeful to hear directly from the accused, if he wants to take the stand.![]()
Alex Murdaugh to take stand in his own defense Thursday
The disbarred South Carolina attorney accused of the double murder of his wife and son says he will testify in his own defense on Thursday in the Colleton County Courthouse.www.foxnews.com
![]()
Alex Murdaugh to take stand in his own defense Thursday
The disbarred South Carolina attorney accused of the double murder of his wife and son says he will testify in his own defense on Thursday in the Colleton County Courthouse.www.foxnews.com
No doubt, but when you’re in the National Championship game, you sub out as needed and otherwise suck it up. Be more like Deshaun beating Scar with a torn ACL than Kearse.
Different experience for different technical witnesses, sure. But Buster? Cmon. The second he sat thru this entire trial as a spectator and then took the stand in that manner…fair fvckin game. Not really drilling Sutton even harder, as has been outlined in this thread. Easy.
Damn, I'd hate to bet on this either way. I'm confident he did it, but not sure 12/12 jurors will feel the same wayIs Vegas running any odds on how this whole thing might turn out???
Oh boy!This would be "must see TV." Hopeful to hear directly from the accused, if he wants to take the stand.
I disagree the phone expert blew anything up. An iPhone doesn’t light up simply when moved. It has to be in the direction of a face. If the phone was locked and AM threw it out the truck window, that phone would have never lit up which it didn’tAgreed. I don’t believe they need it either. The cell phone expert for the defense today blew up the whole “Alex threw the phone out the window” theory and the csi expert showed that law enforcement failed in their job of evidence collecting.
Simple closing for the state. The facts prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there were 3 people in the kennels the night of June 7 and 2 of them are dead. The facts prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the numerous motives for the murders by the defendant that were malicious. The facts prove beyond a reasonable doubt the victims were lured to the location by the defendant and that the outcome was premeditated. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, your duty is clear. Remember ladies and gentlemen…there were 3 people present and 2 of them are now dead.Pure speculation on my part but if that happens, I have to believe it is clear window into their thinking ... as in an indicator that they feel they probably have to have it, an indicator that they don't feel this is heading toward the outcome they're seeking as things stand today.
I just lifted my phone 10 times away from any face. I’m in a dark room. All 10 times the phone lit up when I lifted it an inch or two.I disagree the phone expert blew anything up. An iPhone doesn’t light up simply when moved. It has to be in the direction of a face. If the phone was locked and AM threw it out the truck window, that phone would have never lit up which it didn’t
Thanks!I believe this is the interview in question.
I thought the same thing. When I read what he testified about (I can' watch it live so I basically read the transcript of the testimony) I could have sworn he was called for the prosecution. He proved the prosecutions case even more.I just watched the interrogation of Mr Ball. How could the defense be so stupid to let him be on the stand. Waters nailed that cross and made AM look terrible. Ball better watch his back and both sides going forward.
I’ll tell ya if he does take the stand, I’m calling in sick. The State might shut down for the day🤣Those lawyers are saying he could take the stand is smart...even thought they know there's no way in hell he gets up there.
Hmmmmm....Defense alleges the shooter is 5'2"; Poot says AM isn't the shooter; Poot knows how to hold that weapon and aim at a human....so maybe the shooter is in fact in the courtroom, is an attorney, is sitting at the Defense table, and goes home each night not to jail but his wife......hmmmmm🥸
Anybody need a new avatar? The look of joy and confusion on Poots face is great.
My thinking as well. Its a hail mary from midfieldPure speculation on my part but if that happens, I have to believe it is clear window into their thinking ... as in an indicator that they feel they probably have to have it, an indicator that they don't feel this is heading toward the outcome they're seeking as things stand today.
The netflix doc is wild
Hell, it ain't even midfield. It is standing in your own endzone. At least at midfield you have a shot of making it to the endzone.My thinking as well. Its a hail mary from midfield
What iPhone do you have? May be a setting thing because mine sure doesn’tI just lifted my phone 10 times away from any face. I’m in a dark room. All 10 times the phone lit up when I lifted it an inch or two.
Seems like maybe the expert knew what he was talking about.