How is saying a family seems to produce some ugly looking people racist?Wow but I did laugh a little. Reverse Racism much?
Does it matter if I’m also white? Good grief, woke much?
How is saying a family seems to produce some ugly looking people racist?Wow but I did laugh a little. Reverse Racism much?
The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.Not sure if this has been posted yet, as I might have missed a page or two. Episode 15 of the podcast with Matt Harris and Seton (someone) contains interview with the lawyer for the housekeepers kids. Bottom line is he says the boys haven’t seen a dime and he thinks his case is one of the more pivotal cases. He thinks if nothing else, several people including AM will go down for tax evasion.
Oh there's a theory involving the daughter. Probably no evidence to support it but there is a theory......I don’t have the time to catch up on tMB thread when I’ve been so involved in this, but I’m shocked I have seen any theories on the side chick with a daughter killing everybody. Seems like fvcking golden motive to me.
Lol man take this fifth grade girl off the west zone 😂😂😂….also yes I suppose possible. Touché. Makeup really is unfair man.
It is possible if you look at her when she was younger. She certainly blossomed when she hit college.
Hey I get it. The family seems evil. I have read all 2000 posts about it on the MB and Jr. post here.How is saying a family seems to produce some ugly looking people racist?
Does it matter if I’m also white? Good grief, woke much?
Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.Hey I get it. The family seems evil. I have read all 2000 posts about it on the MB and Jr. post here.
If I were of Irish descendants I may have a problem with your post. But I laffed and" woke" is absolutely the last thing I should be accused of.
Years ago, my brother in-law’s mother did that. Her mother opens the paper, one morning, and sees her daughter’s obit. Needless to say, she was batshit crazy.Hahaha that is crazy I’ve never heard of anyone doing that
Ha poor kid from Deliverance was Incest. not in real life tho.Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.
These guys still look like a generation removed from the banjo player from Deliverance.
Who’s in more trouble, Big Red or TE?I had to come back to this thread. After reading all that about our offense, I needed some encouragement
The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.
Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.
These guys still look like a generation removed from the banjo player from Deliverance.
Supposedly the overall settlement was for $4M, but the attorney kept saying that $500,000 was supposed to go to the sons from the primary insurance claim. But he didn't tell the whole story so there are some gaps.4m is what the lawyer said in the podcast. He also discussed how AM’s law firm got the venue law changed. He gives credit to all the lawyers there that he believes are about be board.
Supposedly the overall settlement was for $4M, but the attorney kept saying that $500,000 was supposed to go to the sons from the primary insurance claim. But he didn't tell the whole story so there are some gaps.
Lol man take this fifth grade girl off the west zone 😂😂😂….also yes I suppose possible. Touché. Makeup really is unfair man.
It is possible if you look at her when she was younger. She certainly blossomed when she hit college.
Some of you legal experts explain what Cook and his attorney are looking for??? I mean, other than a cash payment to go away .Joe McCullough now representing Cook from boat tragedy. This is who I wanted to see take on Murdaugh.
Passenger in 2019 deadly boat crash sues Alex, Buster Murdaugh
One of the people aboard the boat that crashed and killed Mallory Beach in 2019 is now suing Alex and Buster Murdaugh.www.wistv.com
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.Some of you legal experts explain what Cook and his attorney are looking for??? I mean, other than a cash payment to go away .
Now or never. The moneys going to be gone soon. They are being investigated 17 different ways right now.First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Very nice, detailed answerFirst, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The Fourth is for a guy like McCullough, who is wealthy and has a strong brand in this space, this case keeps his name at the top of the pile of SC and SE region plaintiffs attorneys and get him plenty of name ID and media mentions which has real value.First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
I wonder about this too. And perhaps McCullough can link it directly to the firm and/or other attorneys. In that case you’ll see very quick settlements.Hopefully the law firms liability insurance was paid up
Insurance company scrambling to get out from under some of the Murdaugh issues
You are on point it seems.The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.
Looks like a case of insurance fraud. Murdaugh gave fake docs to the insurance company to get them to pay out to a bank account he controlled. I’m seeing a theme hereYou are on point it seems.
SC lawyer says he’s found the missing order in $4.3M ex-Murdaugh nanny insurance case
Gloria Satterfield’s heirs were supposed to get $2.75 million – but got nothing, their attorney says. Here’s what the order says.amp.thestate.com
Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.Looks like a case of insurance fraud. Murdaugh gave fake docs to the insurance company to get them to pay out to a bank account he controlled. I’m seeing a theme here
As many have indicated, I suspect that we are going to see a lot of cockroaches once SLED shines a light on all of this. Continually brazen, even now with the "suicide" fiasco and a huge spotlight on everything. It is very hard to believe.Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.
Talk about making lemonade out of Lemons, Alex. Your son kills the maid and you turn it into a quick $4 million dollar payday.You are on point it seems.
SC lawyer says he’s found the missing order in $4.3M ex-Murdaugh nanny insurance case
Gloria Satterfield’s heirs were supposed to get $2.75 million – but got nothing, their attorney says. Here’s what the order says.amp.thestate.com
Just another interesting twist, I believe Westendorf just took over as the President of IBSC (Independent Banks of South Carolina) the first of September.Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.
That is exactly what I thought. Totally reads like something my 12 year old threw together last minute.Just looking at the posting dates, this was clearly a course requirement that had to have a certain number of entries. He does a few in September, then drops off. Then second week of December he’s like “oh sh*t, the blog posts” and starts spamming his blog with all these posts before the deadline. Game recognize game.
The summons and complaint are linked in the article. I scanned through and there are something are like five causes of action.Very nice, detailed answer
many thanks
and yes, I was curious about the cause of action, as you stated
Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.The summons and complaint are linked in the article. I scanned through and there are something are like five causes of action.
Negligence/Dram Shop claims against the store and its employee who sold $50 of alcohol to underage Paul, who was apparently using his brother Buster’s ID and paid for it with the family credit card.
Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.
Intentional Infliction of emotional distress against Alex for trying to cover for Paul, conner being considered a suspect, and getting conner’s family to initially hire Alex’s buddy/fixed Fleming as attorney. Seems like Fleming could be named also.
I think the claim or claims against Buster relate to Paul using his ID to buy alcohol underage.
Edit: meant to say “Alex’s buddy/fixer Fleming”
Timmy is the name Paul’s friends gave the erratic, enraged, idiot persona that Paul became while entoxicated.Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.
I've been following this thread since the beginning due to somewhat close knowledge of those involved and the area and had seen the reference 'Timmy' multiple times. Where did this come from? Is this a TMB thing, because I don't venture over there. This place is plenty enough for me.
I've been following this thread since the beginning due to somewhat close knowledge of those involved and the area and had seen the reference 'Timmy' multiple times. Where did this come from?