ADVERTISEMENT

⚖️ MURDAUGH MURDERS & TRIAL THREAD ⚖️

Not sure if this has been posted yet, as I might have missed a page or two. Episode 15 of the podcast with Matt Harris and Seton (someone) contains interview with the lawyer for the housekeepers kids. Bottom line is he says the boys haven’t seen a dime and he thinks his case is one of the more pivotal cases. He thinks if nothing else, several people including AM will go down for tax evasion.
The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.
 
I don’t have the time to catch up on tMB thread when I’ve been so involved in this, but I’m shocked I have seen any theories on the side chick with a daughter killing everybody. Seems like fvcking golden motive to me.
Oh there's a theory involving the daughter. Probably no evidence to support it but there is a theory......
1511997_759574114093699_3204812126537954299_o.jpg


It is possible if you look at her when she was younger. She certainly blossomed when she hit college.
Lol man take this fifth grade girl off the west zone 😂😂😂….also yes I suppose possible. Touché. Makeup really is unfair man.
[/QUOTE]

That picture is on the thread on TMB also. IMO probably should be taken down - that's pushing it too far IMO.
 
How is saying a family seems to produce some ugly looking people racist?

Does it matter if I’m also white? Good grief, woke much?
Hey I get it. The family seems evil. I have read all 2000 posts about it on the MB and Jr. post here.
If I were of Irish descendants I may have a problem with your post. But I laffed and" woke" is absolutely the last thing I should be accused of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: justinjcu
Hey I get it. The family seems evil. I have read all 2000 posts about it on the MB and Jr. post here.
If I were of Irish descendants I may have a problem with your post. But I laffed and" woke" is absolutely the last thing I should be accused of.
Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.

These guys still look like a generation removed from the banjo player from Deliverance.
 
Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.

These guys still look like a generation removed from the banjo player from Deliverance.
Ha poor kid from Deliverance was Incest. not in real life tho.
 
The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.

4m is what the lawyer said in the podcast. He also discussed how AM’s law firm got the venue law changed. He gives credit to all the lawyers there that he believes are about be board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: L III
Hey, I’m from Irish decedents as well and from much less means and power and even our family has some half-way good looking people in it, especially 3-4 generations in and when they smile.

These guys still look like a generation removed from the banjo player from Deliverance.


If you haven’t watched this, do yourself a favor. Best 5 mins you’ll spend today. ☘️🇮🇪
 
4m is what the lawyer said in the podcast. He also discussed how AM’s law firm got the venue law changed. He gives credit to all the lawyers there that he believes are about be board.
Supposedly the overall settlement was for $4M, but the attorney kept saying that $500,000 was supposed to go to the sons from the primary insurance claim. But he didn't tell the whole story so there are some gaps.
 
Supposedly the overall settlement was for $4M, but the attorney kept saying that $500,000 was supposed to go to the sons from the primary insurance claim. But he didn't tell the whole story so there are some gaps.

There are gaps. I have no connection to anyone involved. I do know if what was said and AM told them to use his best friend as their attny and then they suggested a banker to be their proxy, this is totally wrong And the guys got screwed.
 
1511997_759574114093699_3204812126537954299_o.jpg


It is possible if you look at her when she was younger. She certainly blossomed when she hit college.
Lol man take this fifth grade girl off the west zone 😂😂😂….also yes I suppose possible. Touché. Makeup really is unfair man.
[/QUOTE]

I said the same thing on TMB's thread. Went about how you could expect.

She grew up to be absolutely gorgeous but there is something about a picture of a kid on that board that is a little scary....
 
Now we need to check the chic-fil-a thread for updates? Someone who would appear to be connected based on their screen name suggested Alex did try to kill himself on 9/4 on the side of the road. Not sure if that means he got someone else to shoot him or if he pulled the trigger. Either way, he looked fine in the mug shot.
 
Is Tony Elliot involved with this as well? Is he purposely tanking the offense so that this thread will die and be forgotten?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pvilletigerfan
Some of you legal experts explain what Cook and his attorney are looking for??? I mean, other than a cash payment to go away .
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
 
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Now or never. The moneys going to be gone soon. They are being investigated 17 different ways right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: my95GTHO
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Very nice, detailed answer

many thanks

and yes, I was curious about the cause of action, as you stated
 
Hopefully the law firms liability insurance was paid up
Insurance company scrambling to get out from under some of the Murdaugh issues
 
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.

giphy.gif
 
First, you answered your own question. That's essentially what you're looking for in any case. Second, what they are "looking for" is also probably what borders on the intangible (ie- revenge, payback, justice, etc.) for the killing of his cousin's girlfriend and the subsequent, seemingly blatant, coverup and attempt to frame him. Third, you may have meant what particular causes of action is he alleging, or, in other words, what are the legally cognizable theories of liability under which he is seeking a recovery. And that is a good question, wondering the same myself. Would need to read his Complaint to know. From this language in the article: "extreme and outrageous as to exceed all possible bounds of decency and must be regarded as atrocious" I would hazard a guess that one of the causes of action is intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress.
The Fourth is for a guy like McCullough, who is wealthy and has a strong brand in this space, this case keeps his name at the top of the pile of SC and SE region plaintiffs attorneys and get him plenty of name ID and media mentions which has real value.
 
Hopefully the law firms liability insurance was paid up
Insurance company scrambling to get out from under some of the Murdaugh issues
I wonder about this too. And perhaps McCullough can link it directly to the firm and/or other attorneys. In that case you’ll see very quick settlements.
 
The firm Alex set Satterfield's sons up with is going down for good. The banker is too. Insurance likely paid out several million for the claim. Alex and his buddies misled a fuggin judge so he would rubber stamp the case. Then, they didn't even pay out the $500k to the sons. That case alone would mean criminal convictions and huge fines.
You are on point it seems.

 
Looks like a case of insurance fraud. Murdaugh gave fake docs to the insurance company to get them to pay out to a bank account he controlled. I’m seeing a theme here
Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.
 
Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.
As many have indicated, I suspect that we are going to see a lot of cockroaches once SLED shines a light on all of this. Continually brazen, even now with the "suicide" fiasco and a huge spotlight on everything. It is very hard to believe.
 
You are on point it seems.

Talk about making lemonade out of Lemons, Alex. Your son kills the maid and you turn it into a quick $4 million dollar payday.

Next time someone questions weather Alex killed his wife and kid, remember to think in terms of how Alex would handle things, which defies any normal, decent human with any sort of morals.

Need a motive:

“A disbursement signed by the judge says my clients were supposed to get $2.76 million of this,” Bland told The State. “Somebody else got that money.”

And this is just the tip of the Iceberg.
 
Themes. (1) Death preceding (2) large insurance payments cloaked in (3) mysterious circumstances with (4) truth obscured all using (or appearing to use) (5) legitimate levers of society - the legal system (6) in concert with others and (7) affiliated with Alex Murdaugh or his family members. Woven together, seems to be a productive formula. Amazing, though, if true the number of people who kept quiet.
Just another interesting twist, I believe Westendorf just took over as the President of IBSC (Independent Banks of South Carolina) the first of September.
 
Just looking at the posting dates, this was clearly a course requirement that had to have a certain number of entries. He does a few in September, then drops off. Then second week of December he’s like “oh sh*t, the blog posts” and starts spamming his blog with all these posts before the deadline. Game recognize game.
That is exactly what I thought. Totally reads like something my 12 year old threw together last minute.
 
Very nice, detailed answer

many thanks

and yes, I was curious about the cause of action, as you stated
The summons and complaint are linked in the article. I scanned through and there are something are like five causes of action.

Negligence/Dram Shop claims against the store and its employee who sold $50 of alcohol to underage Paul, who was apparently using his brother Buster’s ID and paid for it with the family credit card.

Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.

Intentional Infliction of emotional distress against Alex for trying to cover for Paul, conner being considered a suspect, and getting conner’s family to initially hire Alex’s buddy/fixed Fleming as attorney. Seems like Fleming could be named also.

I think the claim or claims against Buster relate to Paul using his ID to buy alcohol underage.

Edit: meant to say “Alex’s buddy/fixer Fleming”
 
Last edited:
The summons and complaint are linked in the article. I scanned through and there are something are like five causes of action.

Negligence/Dram Shop claims against the store and its employee who sold $50 of alcohol to underage Paul, who was apparently using his brother Buster’s ID and paid for it with the family credit card.

Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.

Intentional Infliction of emotional distress against Alex for trying to cover for Paul, conner being considered a suspect, and getting conner’s family to initially hire Alex’s buddy/fixed Fleming as attorney. Seems like Fleming could be named also.

I think the claim or claims against Buster relate to Paul using his ID to buy alcohol underage.

Edit: meant to say “Alex’s buddy/fixer Fleming”
Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.

I've been following this thread since the beginning due to somewhat close knowledge of those involved and the area and had seen the reference 'Timmy' multiple times. Where did this come from? Is this a TMB thing, because I don't venture over there. This place is plenty enough for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tallulahtiger30319
Negligent entrustment against Alex for letting Paul, who everyone apparently knows turns into “Timmy” when he gets intoxicated, have access to the Center Counsel boat.

I've been following this thread since the beginning due to somewhat close knowledge of those involved and the area and had seen the reference 'Timmy' multiple times. Where did this come from? Is this a TMB thing, because I don't venture over there. This place is plenty enough for me.
Timmy is the name Paul’s friends gave the erratic, enraged, idiot persona that Paul became while entoxicated.

Everyone knows about this Timmy problem.

For example, While in high school, Paul got drunk and got in his truck weaving back and forth on Hwy 278, running other cars off the road. It was reported to Alex who promptly took his keys from him for one night.

This problem has been going on and embraced and developed by the family for some time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT