It did move 59ish steps after locking when Alex was likely putting it on the golf cart and going back to the house. It also had some orientation changes.
I THINK her point was to say that your testimony is that it was shot from above and that exploded the matter out backwards but the brain was largely intact?
Who knows. It could have just been part of staging it to look like an outside person was there and stole an item but Alex freaked out that it could be tracked to his mom's he so tossed it. Ask yourself why would an outside shooter take her phone, throw it on the side of the road rather than selling it. Why did they not smash it before tossing? Phones are expensive and the person who owns it (Alex) may have a momentary instinct to not smash it because he paid for it.
What evidence do you have that it was Alex and now Maggie taking those steps?
After spending millions you think he would second guess a phone, gth out of here. You seem to easily dismiss simply questions that put huge conflicts in the states case.
Because Alex was the only person alive.
You seem to need this not guilty verdict in your life. Sorry this is happening to you.
How do you get there? Phone was still active you don’t know if he was there or not. He said he left and could have. No evidence contradicts that. The 29 steps and failed unlock could have easily been Maggie.
The same could be said about you. You are in here contradicting almost as much.
The phone was moved. face recognition security was activated and FAILED. It mean she wasn't the one looking at the screen. He took the phone in the cart with him.
I don’t see how you can just say it wasn’t here . Phone recognition is not 100%. I put in my pin enough to say it could have not been her.
Well I virtually never have had my face recognition fail....and if you do it correctly and are not slovenly it works perfect
You still didn’t answer the question. Where is the proof that it was Alex taking the 29 steps and trying to open the phone? The state has that burden to dispute that claim.
This is actually one of the big questions I have. We know AM was at the house, but Maggie’s phone never shows up there.
Gamecocks stick together. Lol
They don't have to remove all doubt, just prove beyond Reasonable doubt. That's a very big difference.
Kind of "unwoke" to think a 5'2" person is 12 or under and someone that height cannot kill. (🤪)
Why take Maggie's, but not Paul's?
I don't put much into him saying the killer planned it for a long time. That might be something I would say to throw the investigation away from me. Especially toward boat death vigilantes.
I would assume so, but neither side has called him. I think both sides are worried about what he would say.
I don't see how jurors can keep up with everything without being able to take notes. Can the prosecution introduce a spreadsheet with the timeline (and supporting evidence) like the one posted above?
I think he took it because he had the code and wanted to make sure there was nothing incriminating on it. I agree with you that it probably dawned on him on the way to his mother's that it could be tracked and he quickly tossed it out the window.
5’2” vigilante ninjas can move swiftly and deftly without being seen or heard, and I’m sure they were wearing all black. There’s no reason to doubt Alex’s new story or his credibility. The man is innocent.
