Waiting for an explanation for how you know so much more than Tucker Carlson etc all. I mean, you obviously have much better connections than National Media Pundits.
Dominion Lawsuit against FoxNews
- Thread starter dpic73
- Start date
Waiting for an explanation for how you know so much more than Tucker Carlson etc all. I mean, you obviously have much better connections than National Media Pundits.
All based on the same BS crap that the Fox News pundits admitted they knew was totally false. So either you admit Tucker Carlson was right and the idea of widespread election fraud was untrue, or you say that Tucker Carlson has no idea what he is talking about and stop using him as a source.
I do not care what fox news pundits believe or not related to mass election fraud and its that simple. I have my own opinion on what occurred. This thread is about the lawsuit though and not an argument over whether the election fraud itself occurred or not.
You libs in your darkest and most private moments know that the 2020 election was stolen.
Nope, not does any intelligent person. You are not taken seriously by anyone. You have been taken advantage of and used by Trump. I feel sorry for you.
You've lost your damn mind. Us libs believe in the truth and since the facts are overwhelmingly on our side, we know we are right. On the contrary, you have ZERO evidence of mass election fraud so you just look like a single-celled hayseed to the rest of us. Life is so much easier when you believe in the truth - you should try it some time.
Again, no facts, no counter argument, no intelligence, complete lack of understanding of the issue or topics, but belligerent and insulting.
I totally can see why you love Donald Trump.
My facts are countless court cases where the lies were exposed as complete BS, the Fox news pundits who all admitted it was crazy, and common sense.
You have zero facts. You just "know"
And yet 2 years later you've got NOT A SINGLE COURT CASE to prove your point. Just a bunch of garbage articles from TGP alleging whatever the flavor of the week is. Just like I posted the other day with the Republican AG of Arizona's investigation. Turns out that there was a whole bunch of nothing there. NOW, you are saying that drug addict Hunter Biden (who apparently can't even keep track of his laptop with all the secrets of the world on it) somehow manipulated the entire vote? Sure man...
The way I understand things is that the libel suit against FoxNews depends on a couple of key points.
1. The company bringing the suit has to show measurable damages to reputation and bottom line. I suspect that Dominion will have NO PROBLEM showing that with as much bad press as they got from 2020 on. No way that hasn't effected their bottom line.
2. This is the really hard one. The company bringing the suit has to prove that the journalist in questions KNEW and BELIEVED what they were reporting was a lie and kept doing it anyway. This is an extremely heavy lift and rightfully so. I'm just going to pull that top quote again that was on the air:
BARTIROMO: "Sidney, we talked about the Dominion software. I know that there were voting irregularities. Tell me about that."
Look at the bold part there in the context of the Dominion machines. And there's no doubt of the context b/c Dominion was qualified in the previous sentence. She said on air that she KNEW that there were voting irregularities, yet from her texts we know that she didn't believe that.
Again, I'm no lawyer and I don't even know that I want FoxNews to go down for this. I mean I know that you believe Tucker Carlsen and Hannity, and unfortunately a lot of folks do. But when FoxNews' own lawyers argue IN COURT that no reasonable person would believe Carlsen, well...
So, objectively, I'm not 100% sure that there's a case to be made here mostly because these folks aren't reporters, they are political pundits with an agenda that are on record in court as being people that no reasonable person would believe. But that quote above (given the texts that just came out... is pretty damning). We'll see how it plays out.
That's not a fact you fricking retard but just a judgement from a human assigned to be a judge of which most are bought and paid for.
"Retard" I love how you counter facts with insults.
My facts are the multitude of court cases where it has been proven that there was no fraud. My facts are the court discovery that shows that the Fox news pundits knew that there was no fraud, and the people closest to Trump including his own campaign leaders and family knew that there was no fraud.
In spite of all of that, you continue to just "know" because you didn't like the outcome. You love Donald Trump and he hates you. He loves your attention and your money. Other than that, he cares for nobody except Trump.
You have your opinion and I have mine you flaming prick. No need to hit me as I will hit back. I never started the insults with you and never forget that. I never start it.
Bartiromo's words will come back to bite her and the network. You cannot hear these words and say that she wasn't alleging fraud. I don't know if this will be admissible in the Dominion case but she clearly wants her viewers to believe that fraud occurred.
"President Donald Trump on Sunday spoke with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo – his first TV interview since the election. The conversation was riddled with lies and conspiracy theories.
Bartiromo opened the interview with a question about election fraud, telling Trump, “The facts are on your side.” Trump responded, falsey saying, “This election was a fraud; it was a rigged election.” The Fox anchor then reflected the president’s anger, saying, “This is disgusting and we cannot allow America’s election to be corrupted.”
The interview highlighted that Trump is “unable or unwilling to accept reality,” CNN’s Chief Media Correspondent Brian Stelter said on “Reliable Sources” Sunday.
Trump spewed misinformation throughout the conversation.
False allegations of voting issues
“We had glitches where they moved thousands of votes from my account to Biden’s account,” Trump falsely told Bartiromo as he continued to bash mail-in voting and incorrectly claimed “dead people were applying to get a ballot.”In addition to Trump’s unwillingness to acknowledge Joe Biden won the election, Bartiromo’s unchallenged acceptance of Trump’s false narrative also presents a danger to American democracy, said CNN’s Senior Media Reporter Oliver Darcy on “Reliable Sources.”
“News organizations — and I think Fox claims to be one — have a responsibility,” Darcy said. “The president of the United States is trying to overturn the election. …Frankly, there is not much daylight between Maria and [Infowars conspiracy theorist] Alex Jones.”
Except mine isn't opinion. I have facts. You have feelings. Also, I haven't insulted you, I point out that you peddle conspiracy,lies,and never admit when it's wrong.
You have facts in your little pea brain maybe. LMFAO!!
Can you tell us about a time when you actually believed in a fact?
It's just not worth it, It's like trying to talk with a 3 year old.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
A Never-Trump Who’s Who at Fox News
Peter Navarro's Taking Back Trump's America Podcast
peternavarro.substack.com
FWIW, network names don't always align with their content.
"Say Yes to the Dress", "90 Day Fiancé" and "MILF Manor" are current shows on TLC (The Learning Channel).
"Say Yes to the Dress", "90 Day Fiancé" and "MILF Manor" are current shows on TLC (The Learning Channel).
"Executives at all levels of Fox — both (Fox News Network) and (Fox Corporation) — knowingly opened Fox’s airwaves to false conspiracy theories about Dominion," Dominion wrote in its filing.
Asked by a Dominion lawyer if some of Fox’s commentators had endorsed the idea that the 2020 election was stolen, Murdoch responded, “Yes. They endorsed,” according to the filing.
Asked by a Dominion lawyer if some of Fox’s commentators had endorsed the idea that the 2020 election was stolen, Murdoch responded, “Yes. They endorsed,” according to the filing.
"Another filing today in the defamation lawsuit of Dominion Voting Systems against the Fox News Network has revealed more of the machinations behind the construction of the Big Lie that former president Trump won the 2020 presidential election.
A previous filing showed that Fox News Channel hosts knew full well that Biden had won and that Trump loyalists saying the election was fraudulent had no evidence. Personalities like Tucker Carlson continued to push the Big Lie, though, apparently out of fear that they would lose their audience to Newsmax and other right-wing outlets that continued to parrot the idea that Trump had won the election.
Today’s filing shows that executives at the highest levels of the Fox Corporation and the Fox News Network knowingly permitted Fox News Channel personalities to spread false conspiracy theories about the election in order to protect their profits. It includes testimony from Rupert Murdoch, the chair of the Fox Corporation, showing that Murdoch and his son Lachlan Murdoch, the executive chair and chief executive officer of the Fox Corporation, as well as Suzanne Scott, the chief executive officer of Fox News Media, were all deeply involved in the question of how to deal with Trump’s lies and with the personalities who were echoing those lies, without losing viewership.
Rupert Murdoch spoke with Scott frequently, and testified: “I’m a journalist at heart. I like to be involved in these things.” Lachlan Murdoch, as well, was in the loop with his father and Scott. Ultimately, although they knew that claims of massive election fraud were unfounded, they decided to give the lies airtime anyway to stop their audience from abandoning them for other channels. Fox board member and former House speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-WI) warned them “that Fox News should not be spreading conspiracy theories,” but they ignored him.
Murdoch also revealed FNC’s role as a wing of the Republican Party when he testified that he “provided Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor, Jared Kushner, with Fox confidential information about Biden's ads, along with debate strategy… (providing Kushner a preview of Biden's ads before they were public).”
Political writer Rick Wilson summed it up: “They knew Trump lost. They knew there was not then (nor is there now) a scintilla of fraud. They knew, and lied. Over, and over, and over. They chose guests they knew were lying. They allowed story meetings promoting a massive, dangerous lie that reduced faith and belief in the American system. The entire top level of Fox management knew their lies were leading to danger for this nation…. They knew the lies were lies. They fed and fed the beast.”
The Big Lie has become central to the worldview of far-right Republicans. On February 23, in Arizona, newly elected Republican, conspiracy theorist, and election denier Liz Harris hijacked a hearing of the House and Senate election committees to feature a speaker who talked of election fraud and made wild and unsubstantiated accusations that state lawmakers and judges are taking bribes from a Mexican drug cartel.
When another election denier, state senator Wendy Rogers, said the hearing was “not the appropriate venue” to talk about potential criminal activity, one of her own supporters accused her of being “compromised,” and another said that revolution was now “inevitable.”
heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
A previous filing showed that Fox News Channel hosts knew full well that Biden had won and that Trump loyalists saying the election was fraudulent had no evidence. Personalities like Tucker Carlson continued to push the Big Lie, though, apparently out of fear that they would lose their audience to Newsmax and other right-wing outlets that continued to parrot the idea that Trump had won the election.
Today’s filing shows that executives at the highest levels of the Fox Corporation and the Fox News Network knowingly permitted Fox News Channel personalities to spread false conspiracy theories about the election in order to protect their profits. It includes testimony from Rupert Murdoch, the chair of the Fox Corporation, showing that Murdoch and his son Lachlan Murdoch, the executive chair and chief executive officer of the Fox Corporation, as well as Suzanne Scott, the chief executive officer of Fox News Media, were all deeply involved in the question of how to deal with Trump’s lies and with the personalities who were echoing those lies, without losing viewership.
Rupert Murdoch spoke with Scott frequently, and testified: “I’m a journalist at heart. I like to be involved in these things.” Lachlan Murdoch, as well, was in the loop with his father and Scott. Ultimately, although they knew that claims of massive election fraud were unfounded, they decided to give the lies airtime anyway to stop their audience from abandoning them for other channels. Fox board member and former House speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-WI) warned them “that Fox News should not be spreading conspiracy theories,” but they ignored him.
Murdoch also revealed FNC’s role as a wing of the Republican Party when he testified that he “provided Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor, Jared Kushner, with Fox confidential information about Biden's ads, along with debate strategy… (providing Kushner a preview of Biden's ads before they were public).”
Political writer Rick Wilson summed it up: “They knew Trump lost. They knew there was not then (nor is there now) a scintilla of fraud. They knew, and lied. Over, and over, and over. They chose guests they knew were lying. They allowed story meetings promoting a massive, dangerous lie that reduced faith and belief in the American system. The entire top level of Fox management knew their lies were leading to danger for this nation…. They knew the lies were lies. They fed and fed the beast.”
The Big Lie has become central to the worldview of far-right Republicans. On February 23, in Arizona, newly elected Republican, conspiracy theorist, and election denier Liz Harris hijacked a hearing of the House and Senate election committees to feature a speaker who talked of election fraud and made wild and unsubstantiated accusations that state lawmakers and judges are taking bribes from a Mexican drug cartel.
When another election denier, state senator Wendy Rogers, said the hearing was “not the appropriate venue” to talk about potential criminal activity, one of her own supporters accused her of being “compromised,” and another said that revolution was now “inevitable.”
February 27, 2023
Another filing today in the defamation lawsuit of Dominion Voting Systems against the Fox News Network has revealed more of the machinations behind the construction of the Big Lie that former president Trump won the 2020 presidential election. A previous filing showed that Fox News Channel hosts...
heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
Fox News Channel is going to go on record in court that no reasonable person should consider their content news.
I leave this board only to come back to be completely dumbfounded by this mfers ability to be the most willingly biased hack imaginableLOL, how did I know the collusion angle was coming? It's like all the MAGAs go to boot camp and learn all the same talking points and no matter what you hear afterwards, the same talking points get repeated.
You're accusing the liberal media of lying because they FOLLOWED the collusion story that was started by Republican Rod Rosenstein and investigated by Republican Robert Mueller? How could they know what was true or what wasn't if they weren't involved in the investigation?? Lame as are the other talking points.
This is no joke man, you are the definition of an ideologue. Like there is absolutely no part of you that is capable of being rational or impartial on any level
How could the media have known collusion was bullshit?
IDK MAYBE IF THEY WOULD HAVE DONE THEIR ****ING JOBS???
You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground because you're so ensconsed in your conspiratorial echo bubble that you never hear the truth. The people you pay attention to intentionally lie to you for clicks because they know you're not interested in balanced coverage.
The media WAS DOING THEIR JOB by following the investigation as best they could but they weren't sitting in on the depositions now WERE THEY? They didn't have access to all the information that Mueller had now DID THEY?
I bet you believe that the dossier started this investigation DON'T YOU? because everything is Hillary's fault amirite? Well you would be wrong because the probe was started because of Papadopoulos criming with a Russian agent - Even Trey Gowdy said so, ANOTHER REPUBLICAN, but waaah, it's all CNN's fault! 😖 MSNBC hurt my pussy! 😭Hillary is a devil! 🤬
Dossier Not What 'Started All of This' - FactCheck.org
In an interview about the special counsel's report, Rep. John Ratcliffe said that what "started all of this" was "a fake, phony dossier." But a House Republican intelligence committee memo said it was information about a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser that sparked the FBI's...
www.factcheck.org
Trey Gowdy says GOP memo won't have "any impact" on Russia probe
The South Carolina Republican responded to President Trump's claim that the memo "totally vindicates" him
www.cbsnews.com
“There is a Russia investigation without a dossier,” Gowdy said in an interview that aired Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” days after he announced his decision not to seek re-election."
"South Carolina Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy said the recently released, controversial GOP memo alleging FBI abuses of its surveillance authority does not have “any impact on the Russia probe,” and even without the Steele dossier, there would be a Russia investigation."
“To the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower,” Gowdy said. “The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos’ meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice.”
I hope you'll be back complaining about FoxNews' coverage of Hunter's laptop when they come up with NOTHING! If you don't we will beat you over the head about their salacious coverage of a nothing burger for years on end! Dumbass
Last edited:
Now we have the FBI admitting they lied about the COVID origin after supressing it
We have this following the Hillary Clinton abomination of an investigation by the DOJ and FBI
Followed by the FAKE Russian Collusion of Trump with Conspiracy by Democrats FBI DOJ OBAMA MSM to propagate this across the US
Numerous Government Officials with Clearances lying publicly about the laptop being Russian disinformation
FBI and DOJ attacking parents free speech which Chris Wray admitted to as wrong
People supporting pedophile grooming of underage children
So what makes me think that my belief is off base on the fraud in the last election of all the mail in ballots
Of course this list could go on but there are people who will never admit anything even now as the people being confronted by Congress admit they lied
I am waiting for more to come to light
Of course nothing that is hard evidence means anything to the liberals and beartrap minds
We have this following the Hillary Clinton abomination of an investigation by the DOJ and FBI
Followed by the FAKE Russian Collusion of Trump with Conspiracy by Democrats FBI DOJ OBAMA MSM to propagate this across the US
Numerous Government Officials with Clearances lying publicly about the laptop being Russian disinformation
FBI and DOJ attacking parents free speech which Chris Wray admitted to as wrong
People supporting pedophile grooming of underage children
So what makes me think that my belief is off base on the fraud in the last election of all the mail in ballots
Of course this list could go on but there are people who will never admit anything even now as the people being confronted by Congress admit they lied
I am waiting for more to come to light
Of course nothing that is hard evidence means anything to the liberals and beartrap minds
Latest posts
-
-
So in the span of ~5 years we went from the envy of CFB to being totally inept???- Latest: Buzzards Roost
-
