I, personally don’t think it’s ok for an ex-president to sell classified info about our nuclear weapons
- Thread starter ClemTigsCo
- Start date
I do love how they keep churning out excuses. One comes out, gets explained away, then another one comes out, rinse and repeat and RW media laps it up.
Honestly everyone just needs to sit back and wait for more info to come out, bc no one except the DOJ knows exactly what’s going on and they aren’t releasing info pertinent to their investigation.
Honestly everyone just needs to sit back and wait for more info to come out, bc no one except the DOJ knows exactly what’s going on and they aren’t releasing info pertinent to their investigation.
Project Veritas: DHS Whistleblower Leaks New Joint Intelligence Bulletin on 'Domestic Violent Extremists' Following FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Graphic courtesy of Project Veritas Project Veritas on Tuesday released a leaked DHS bulletin on ‘domestic violent extremists’ in wake of the FBI’s raid of Trump’s Florida residence.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Project Veritas: DHS Whistleblower Leaks New Joint Intelligence Bulletin on ‘Domestic Violent Extremists’ Following FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago
By Cristina LailaPublished August 16, 2022 at 5:50pm
Graphic courtesy of Project Veritas
Project Veritas on Tuesday released a leaked DHS bulletin on ‘domestic violent extremists’ in wake of the FBI’s raid of Trump’s Florida residence.
The DHS told its agents that Americans who discuss topics such as “government overreach” and “election fraud” are a threat.
“The threats we have observed, to date, underscore that DVEs [Domestic Violent Extremists] may view the 2022 midterm election as an additional flashpoint around which to escalate threats against perceived ideological opponents, including federal law enforcement personnel.” – according to the document obtained by Project Veritas.
The DHS also warned the agents that the public should not be aware of the information in the new bulletin.
TRENDING: DOWN GOES CHENEY! WARMONGER SPANKED AND SENT HOME TO DADDY! Wyoming 2022 Primary Results -- RACE CALLED FOR HARRIET HAGEMAN!
Oops. Too late.
“Information contained in this intelligence bulletin is for official use only. No portion of this bulletin should be released to the media, the general public, or over nonsecure Internet servers. Release of this material could adversely affect or jeopardize investigative activities.”
Click here to read the leaked bulletin.
Via Project Veritas:
You can support James O’Keefe and Project Veritas by clicking here.
AG Garland "Deliberated for Weeks" Over Raiding President Trump's Home - But Nuclear Secrets Were at Risk? This Doesn't Make Sense | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
There are a bunch of corrupt and dishonest people running Biden’s DOJ and FBI. They’re not too bright either. After the Biden DOJ gang raided the President’s home in Florida, it was reported that AG Garland didn’t know about the raid.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The DOJ cannot even keep its own stories straight. So Garland deliberates for weeks over raiding Trumps home for stolen nuke documents then gets the warrant signed on a Friday and proceed to wait until Monday to execute the raid. This doesnt pass the smell test at all!
Sit back and wait, just like we did for 2 years for the Mueller report after the fake Russia Collusion Hoax (among other)
The People are wise to the democratic ways now. No need to sit back and wait. The little boy has cried wolf too many times!
Sure the MAGA cult. Call it whatever you want, the movement no longer cares what lying, dishonest, libs like yourself call us.
Yeah, I mean heaven forbid I use a little deductive reasoning or inference to come up with my own conclusions based on info available, timelines and just general common law best practices.
But yes, loading up on narratives from these crazy right wing media sources.......you once again have nailed it.
Your sense of humor makes my soul hurt its so embarrassing…i cant imagine how many lockers you were stuffed in
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Trump Got'em - Huge Concerns About Peter Strzok Working for the CIA Are Likely at the Heart of Mar-a-Lago RAID | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
The brazen raid of President Trump’s home in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, likely has its roots in the Russia collusion story with a particular focus on Peter Strzok and his affiliation with the CIA.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Trump Got’em – Huge Concerns About Peter Strzok Working for the CIA Are Likely at the Heart of Mar-a-Lago RAID
By Joe HoftPublished August 17, 2022 at 1:00pm
The brazen raid of President Trump’s home in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, likely has its roots in the Russia collusion story with a particular focus on Peter Strzok and his affiliation with the CIA.
We reported back in May 2020 that Peter Strzok was somehow connected to the CIA. General Michael Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell even said so on Hannity’s show on FOX News at that time:
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: It's Likely Dirty Cops Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka Both Worked for the FBI and John Brennan's CIA | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
It was all a major Deep State lie.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
These are HUGE questions. Did the Deep State lie to President Trump when they claimed they fired Peter Strzok from the FBI because he never worked for the FBI? How could he have been fired from the FBI if he worked for the CIA?
Confirmed: Dirty Cop Robert Mueller Destroyed Peter Strzok's Text Messages Before He was Fired | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Guest post by Joe Hoft In December we reported that Mueller’s Special Counsel gang scrubbed Peter Strzok’s phone and then turned it over to the Office of Inspector General investigators AFTER Peter Strzok was fired from the special counsel.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Did President Trump trump the Deep State?
There is no evidence that Peter Strzok ever worked or served in any FBI field office. Nor is there any evidence that Strzok attended the FBI academy in Quantico, Virginia. There is no evidence Strzok ever graduated from Quantico. Any of these would indicate his attachment to the FBI but they cannot be found.Strzok’s history shows that he left the Army and was immediately assigned to the White House. (See picture above of Strzok in the late 1990’s in the Clinton White House.) When did Strzok have time to attend the FBI academy if he went directly to the White House?
Another indication of Strzok’s connection to the CIA is that he signed a document with the title not of an FBI employee but with a CIA title.
It appears Peter Strzok was under the FBI to allow the CIA to operate in the US and that Crossfire Hurricane was a political operation by the CIA disguised as an FBI operation.
More to be revealed…
Kinda like how people would ask where you went to med school if you called bs on absurd covid and vaccine policy. No, just common sense, which the science continues to admit was correct the entire time.
the amount of bs here has all been spelled out. Dont need a criminal justice background to apply common sense and see where this goes. But by all means trust in garlands integrity
I love it. Slick Willie is going to end up helping the Don!
justthenews.com
By John Solomon
Updated: August 17, 2022 - 8:56pm
When it comes to the National Archives, history has a funny way of repeating itself. And legal experts say a decade-old case over audio tapes that Bill Clinton once kept in his sock drawer may have significant impact over the FBI search of Melania Trump's closet and Donald Trump's personal office.
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.
"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.
"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.
You can read the full ruling here:
File
memorandum opinion.pdf
The judge noted a president could destroy any record he wanted during his tenure and his only responsibility was to inform the Archives.
As to whether records a president concluded were personal can be forcibly seized after he leaves office, the court concluded it was unreasonable to force NARA to go get the tapes
"Because the audiotapes are not physically in the government's possession, defendant submits that it would be required to seize them directly from President Clinton in order to assume custody and control over them," Jackson noted. "Defendant considers this to be an 'extraordinary request' that is unfounded, contrary to the PRA's express terms, and contrary to traditional principles of administrative law. The Court agrees."
That defendant was the same Justice Department that authorized the raid on Trump's estate. You can read their arguments a decade earlier here:
File
Hearing Transcript.pdf
Jackson also concluded that a decision to challenge a president's decision lies solely with the National Archives and can't be reviewed by a court. If the Archives wants to challenge a decision, that agency and the attorney general can initiate an enforcement mechanism under the law, but it is a civil procedure and has no criminal penalty, she noted.
The search warrant the FBI enforced sought two types of records: classified materials and records created during the Trump presidency. Trump has been adamant the records he took to Mar-a-Lago were both declassified and deemed personal by him.
Some government lawyers reached out privately to Just the News in recent days questioning the use of the FBI to collect presidential records, citing Jackson's ruling and suggesting it was a civil and not criminal matter where deference to Trump is required by law.
On the classification issue, both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama signed executive orders — which remain in force to this day — declaring that presidents have sweeping authority to declassify secrets and do not have to follow the mandatory declassification procedures all other government officials do.
The Jackson ruling and the declassification powers have left some experts worried the FBI raid was heavy-handed under the current laws.
Kevin Brock, former assistant FBI director for intelligence, told Just the News the bureau's search warrant was overly broad and went beyond what the FBI manual for agents recommended. "Specificity is important in order to protect fourth amendment rights from exuberant government overreach designed to find whatever they can," he told Just the News.
Brock added he did not believe DOJ and FBI had authority to criminalize the retention of presidential records.
The warrant "apparently makes a novel legal assertion that any presidential record kept by a former president is against the law," Brock said. "You have to wonder what the other living former presidents think about that. They have the right and, apparently, clear desire to remain silent."
Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch who was on the losing end of the Clinton sock drawer case, said he believes Jackson's ruling could have a profound impact on the coming legal battles over the Trump search.
"The government, the lawyer for the Archives, said, 'You know what? If documents are in the former President's hands, where they're presumptively personal, we just, you know, we presume they're personal,'" Fitton said.
"The Justice Department previously had told us in response to a question about Bill Clinton: 'Tough luck, it's his.' But they changed their mind for Donald Trump?" he asked. "… The law and court decision suggests that Trump is right. And frankly, based on this analysis, Trump should get every single document they took from him back. It's all personal records."
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.
justthenews.com
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.By John Solomon
Updated: August 17, 2022 - 8:56pm
When it comes to the National Archives, history has a funny way of repeating itself. And legal experts say a decade-old case over audio tapes that Bill Clinton once kept in his sock drawer may have significant impact over the FBI search of Melania Trump's closet and Donald Trump's personal office.
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.
"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.
"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.
You can read the full ruling here:
File
memorandum opinion.pdf
The judge noted a president could destroy any record he wanted during his tenure and his only responsibility was to inform the Archives.
As to whether records a president concluded were personal can be forcibly seized after he leaves office, the court concluded it was unreasonable to force NARA to go get the tapes
"Because the audiotapes are not physically in the government's possession, defendant submits that it would be required to seize them directly from President Clinton in order to assume custody and control over them," Jackson noted. "Defendant considers this to be an 'extraordinary request' that is unfounded, contrary to the PRA's express terms, and contrary to traditional principles of administrative law. The Court agrees."
That defendant was the same Justice Department that authorized the raid on Trump's estate. You can read their arguments a decade earlier here:
File
Hearing Transcript.pdf
Jackson also concluded that a decision to challenge a president's decision lies solely with the National Archives and can't be reviewed by a court. If the Archives wants to challenge a decision, that agency and the attorney general can initiate an enforcement mechanism under the law, but it is a civil procedure and has no criminal penalty, she noted.
The search warrant the FBI enforced sought two types of records: classified materials and records created during the Trump presidency. Trump has been adamant the records he took to Mar-a-Lago were both declassified and deemed personal by him.
Some government lawyers reached out privately to Just the News in recent days questioning the use of the FBI to collect presidential records, citing Jackson's ruling and suggesting it was a civil and not criminal matter where deference to Trump is required by law.
On the classification issue, both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama signed executive orders — which remain in force to this day — declaring that presidents have sweeping authority to declassify secrets and do not have to follow the mandatory declassification procedures all other government officials do.
The Jackson ruling and the declassification powers have left some experts worried the FBI raid was heavy-handed under the current laws.
Kevin Brock, former assistant FBI director for intelligence, told Just the News the bureau's search warrant was overly broad and went beyond what the FBI manual for agents recommended. "Specificity is important in order to protect fourth amendment rights from exuberant government overreach designed to find whatever they can," he told Just the News.
Brock added he did not believe DOJ and FBI had authority to criminalize the retention of presidential records.
The warrant "apparently makes a novel legal assertion that any presidential record kept by a former president is against the law," Brock said. "You have to wonder what the other living former presidents think about that. They have the right and, apparently, clear desire to remain silent."
Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch who was on the losing end of the Clinton sock drawer case, said he believes Jackson's ruling could have a profound impact on the coming legal battles over the Trump search.
"The government, the lawyer for the Archives, said, 'You know what? If documents are in the former President's hands, where they're presumptively personal, we just, you know, we presume they're personal,'" Fitton said.
"The Justice Department previously had told us in response to a question about Bill Clinton: 'Tough luck, it's his.' But they changed their mind for Donald Trump?" he asked. "… The law and court decision suggests that Trump is right. And frankly, based on this analysis, Trump should get every single document they took from him back. It's all personal records."
If what the NyTimes is reporting as the timeline is accurate (and we don't know for sure yet), then it makes many of the conspiratorial conclusions that you guys have been jumping to pretty silly. Here is what they are saying (going off of memory here, so a few details might be off):
Trump took classified documents to MAL.
The government asked for them to be returned.
Trump said no.
The government issued a subpoena for the documents.
The government met with Trump attorneys who returned the documents and signed a statement that they had all been returned.
A CI came to the DOJ and said they were lying and that there were still a significant number of classified docs at MAL, that were not secured.
DOJ issued a subpoena for the MAL camera footage.
When reviewing the footage, they saw many different people accessing the room where the documents were said to be held.
The DOJ raided MAL to secure the additional classified docs.
As for Trump's claim that he had a standing order to declassify everything that he took, I am not sure that is true. Why would his lawyers have given back anything if that were true?
I guess the question is if they had a human informant in the ranks, does that mean they are openly admitting they spied on him pre, during and post office?
Who coulda seen that comingProject Veritas: DHS Whistleblower Leaks New Joint Intelligence Bulletin on 'Domestic Violent Extremists' Following FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Graphic courtesy of Project Veritas Project Veritas on Tuesday released a leaked DHS bulletin on ‘domestic violent extremists’ in wake of the FBI’s raid of Trump’s Florida residence.
Project Veritas: DHS Whistleblower Leaks New Joint Intelligence Bulletin on ‘Domestic Violent Extremists’ Following FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago
By Cristina Laila
Published August 16, 2022 at 5:50pm
Graphic courtesy of Project Veritas
Project Veritas on Tuesday released a leaked DHS bulletin on ‘domestic violent extremists’ in wake of the FBI’s raid of Trump’s Florida residence.
The DHS told its agents that Americans who discuss topics such as “government overreach” and “election fraud” are a threat.
“The threats we have observed, to date, underscore that DVEs [Domestic Violent Extremists] may view the 2022 midterm election as an additional flashpoint around which to escalate threats against perceived ideological opponents, including federal law enforcement personnel.” – according to the document obtained by Project Veritas.
The DHS also warned the agents that the public should not be aware of the information in the new bulletin.
TRENDING: DOWN GOES CHENEY! WARMONGER SPANKED AND SENT HOME TO DADDY! Wyoming 2022 Primary Results -- RACE CALLED FOR HARRIET HAGEMAN!
Oops. Too late.
“Information contained in this intelligence bulletin is for official use only. No portion of this bulletin should be released to the media, the general public, or over nonsecure Internet servers. Release of this material could adversely affect or jeopardize investigative activities.”
Click here to read the leaked bulletin.
Via Project Veritas:
You can support James O’Keefe and Project Veritas by clicking here.
No, it appears that the DOJ thought the matter was over after Trump's attorneys returned some of the documents. They were approached by someone in Trump's orbit.
You guys lean on this "spying" charge all the time. I would refer more as enforcing laws. Besides, I doubt any of you cared when Ken Starr used Linda Tripp to spy on Monica, and by extension, President Clinton. The next time I get pulled over, I am going to accuse the police officer of spying on me.
Shoulda spied on his lolita express trips…interns were grizzled vets for him but at least of age
what would you call making up a story about someone that got a wire tap rubber stamped? Guess thats just enforcing laws.
too bad well never learn anything about this informant or what they supposedly knew…tooooooo classified democracy would be at risk again i guess. Just more laws being enforced…good ol mystery man shows up outta the blue exactly one day after trump refused to end his rico case…a mystery man whos super trustworthy and provided info on super duper extremely classified docs he knows trumps holding onto. Take that straight to the shady judge whos got a bone to pick with trump to get that search warrant. Just laws being enforced whatre you gonna do?
So, I am trying to translate this, as usual, but I think what you are saying is that the documents at MAL wewre proof that the FBI spied on Trump's campaign? If so, I have some questions:
Has Trump said that? I believe he said the documents were planted.
If that is true, what was Trump waiting on? Why had he not released these smoking gun documents?
I said nothing of the sort…i was referring to carter page. You know that whole thing…
all i said about mal is it smells like a whole load of bs … i have no idea what the fbi did or didnt do there. All i know is its pretty obvious they orchestrated the raid and stands to reason that was cya not some national security threat
The FBI spied on Trump's campaing and then his office when he was president. They should be disbanded and replaced with honest people who can be held accountable. The current group is nothing but a bunch of politcal operatives and a disgrace to this country. They are the little boys who cried wolf at this point. Whatever they find going forward will always be dismissed because they lost all trust by lying and cheating the first time.
I back the honest blue, not the corrupt blue.
Glad you are not part of the democratic policy of defunding the blue. What an idiotic statement and policy. Last i looked San Fran was increasing their budget. lol
I get that. Why have a spine or an operational brain when the blue team will just tell you what to think?
Why when has the ny times ever been wrong? Factcheckers havent found anything
EXCLUSIVE TRUMP RICO CASE I - Clinton Appointed Judge Allowed Government to Insert Itself in Trump RICO Case in Place of Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page and Clinesmith | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
A series of events have led the Deep State to act in ways Americans never thought possible. Does President Trump have them where he wants them?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
EXCLUSIVE TRUMP RICO CASE I – Clinton Appointed Judge Allowed Government to Insert Itself in Trump RICO Case in Place of Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page and Clinesmith
By Joe HoftPublished August 18, 2022 at 3:00pm
A series of events have led the Deep State to act in ways Americans never thought possible. Does President Trump have them where he wants them?
Yesterday, TGP released a report about former and fired ‘FBI’ Agent Peter Strzok.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Trump Got'em - Huge Concerns About Peter Strzok Working for the CIA Are Likely at the Heart of Mar-a-Lago RAID | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
The brazen raid of President Trump’s home in Florida, Mar-a-Lago, likely has its roots in the Russia collusion story with a particular focus on Peter Strzok and his affiliation with the CIA.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
TRENDING: EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP RICO CASE II - Epstein Related Judge Recused Himself from Trump RICO Case Then Signed FBI Warrant for Raid on Mar-a-Lago - FBI Likely Took Docs to Hide from Case
President Trump declassified a number of documents related to the Deep State’s attempted coup of his administration only days before he left office. More than a foot-high pile of documents were declassified by President Trump at this time. The Deep State FBI reportedly held on to these documents and would not release them up to that time. This was reported by Lou Dobbs on FOX Business on January 14, 2021. (Note that The Gateway Pundit was noted in this segment as well for its reporting on the Jan 6 Capitol protests where we already knew that there were bad actors involved.)
On January 19, 2021, President Trump made it official and per a memorandum announced he was releasing a trove of documents related to the Deep State Russiagate scam. President Trump noted that the FBI objected to his declassification request on January 17, a few days earlier. Nevertheless, President Trump ordered the documents to be released.
Much later, in February of 2022, Senator Chuck Grassley released a report where the noted that these documents that were declassified by President Trump have never been released by the Deep State FBI.
Next, in March of 2022, President Trump sued Hillary Clinton and members of the Deep State. Along with Hillary and her campaign team of John Podesta and Robert Mook, and others, President Trump singled out five specific individuals who worked with or for the FBI – James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Kevin Clinesmith.
Comey, McCabe and Strzok were fired from the FBI, while Page and Clinesmith resigned in shame.
President Trump Sues Hillary Clinton and Host of Others in RICO Suit Over Russia Collusion Hoax | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor
President Trump filed a federal RICO suit in Miami, Florida Thursday against Hillary Clinton and others over the Russia collusion hoax orchestrated by the Clinton campaign in 2016 to undermine Trump’s candidacy and derail his presidency.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
President Trump’s team added more to this case in June 2022, while Hillary and the others identified in the case asked to be removed from the case.
Then on July 22, 2022, the judge over the case at that time, U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, who was appointed by Bill Clinton, whose wife Hillary is named in the case, agreed to remove the five FBI-related individuals from the case and insert the DOJ in their place.
Judge Middlebrook never should have made that ruling and never should have taken over the case. He should have recused himself. His appointment to the court was made by Bill Clinton – Hillary Clinton’s husband! Also, the bigger item of note is why did the DOJ offer to substitute these five individuals in the first place? Three were fired, a fourth was convicted of at least one crime related to the case, and the other, Lisa Page, resigned from the FBI.
When in US history has the government represented fired employees and a convicted former employee, all who participated in what most all Americans would consider a coup of the Trump Presidency, in a court case against them?
Much more will be revealed…
EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP RICO CASE II - Epstein Related Judge Recused Himself from Trump RICO Case Then Signed FBI Warrant for Raid on Mar-a-Lago - FBI Likely Took Docs to Hide from Case | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
The motives behind the FBI’s raid of President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago are many. All relate to corruption in our government. None provide support for the raid. President Trump unclassified documents related to Russiagate, the Deep State’s attempted coup of the Trump Administration. Then he filed...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP RICO CASE II – Epstein Related Judge Recused Himself from Trump RICO Case Then Signed FBI Warrant for Raid on Mar-a-Lago – FBI Likely Took Docs to Hide from Case
By Joe HoftPublished August 18, 2022 at 6:30pm
The motives behind the FBI’s raid of President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago are many. All relate to corruption in our government. None provide support for the raid.
President Trump unclassified documents related to Russiagate, the Deep State’s attempted coup of the Trump Administration. Then he filed a RICO suit against the government. This scared the bad actors in the Deep State.
It took a corrupt Clinton judge to step in and remove certain actors from President Trump’s case against the Deep State.
EXCLUSIVE TRUMP RICO CASE I - Clinton Appointed Judge Allowed Government to Insert Itself in Trump RICO Case in Place of Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page and Clinesmith | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
A series of events have led the Deep State to act in ways Americans never thought possible. Does President Trump have them where he wants them?
www.thegatewaypundit.com
But this wasn’t the only suspicious or outright corrupt act by judges involved in the case.
There were actually many judges involved in this case. Not just Clinton Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks noted above. Five judges have participated in President Trump’s RICO case so far.
The list of recusals on the Trump RICO suit is sizable. The first magistrate judge to be assigned recused the day after the case was filed in March 2022. Epstein related Judge Reinhart was put on the case as a replacement magistrate judge in April because his predecessor had also recused. Since Reinhart, three additional magistrate judges have recused themselves (1, 2, and 3). The current magistrate judge, Patrick M. Hunt, has been on the case for only about five weeks now.
It’s important to note that the day before Reinhart recused himself (June 21, 2022), The president’s counsel filed an amended complaint. The original complaint was entered in March 2022; the amended complaint almost doubled the number of facts asserted in evidence. Many of the claims of facts in the amended complaint came from John Durham’s court filings (which made it difficult for the plaintiffs to deny their validity).
It was after Trump’s second filing that the exodus of magistrate judges began. Following the filing of the amended complaint was a request from the U.S. Department of Justice (“United States”) to substitute itself as a defendant for five of the original defendants: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, (Lisa) Page, and Clinesmith.
The request was filed on July 14, 2022. This is noted in our prior post attached above. It’s unheard of that the federal government would attempt to replace three fired former employees (Comey, McCabe, and Strzok), one convicted former employee (Clinesmith), and another former FBI employee who resigned (Page). The DOJ in this motion asserted that all the actors’ actions were legitimate, including Kevin Clinesmith’s behavior of falsifying claims for the FISA authorization on Carter Page which was deemed a criminal act by the courts.
Note also that this whole time the DOJ knew what President Trump brought with him to Mar-a-Lago, since at least February of 2022. The FBI also sent someone to look into Mar-a-Lago on June 3, 2022 as well.
Then on August 4, 2022, in response to Clinton Judge Donald Middlebrooks granting the government’s request, the Trump team responded. President Trump’s team filed an opposition to the judge’s July 21 decision to substitute the United States and dismiss the complaint against the FISA Five. The opposition motion opened with this argument:
On the same day, August 4, 2022, President Trump’s team filed an opposition against Hillary Clinton’s earlier motion to dismiss the RICO complaint (Clinton claimed the president failed to state a claim). His counsel also answered in opposition to motions to dismiss four other defendants.
The clustering of these events is significant because the warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid was requested/issued on the next day, August 5, 2022.
Judge Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart – of Jeffrey Epstein’s defense – signed off on the Mar-a-Lago warrant for the U.S. District of Southern Florida 44 days after recusing himself from the RICO case against Hillary Clinton et al.
It’s now believed that the dirty cops were there at Mar-a-Lago to steal documents from the President that he declassified so they can then turn around and prevent the documents from seeing the light of day by claiming they’re part of an ongoing investigation.
Corrupt courts, Corrupt Judges. Corrupt Justice Department. But we have God, the truth, and President Trump.
Weeks before Mar-a-Lago search, ex-Trump DOD official vowed to publish classified documents from National Archives
Seven weeks before the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, a former Trump DOD appointee vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them online.
In June of this year, seven weeks before the FBI raided former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in search of classified materials, former Defense Department appointee and outspoken Trump loyalist Kash Patel vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them on his website.
Trump had just issued a letter instructing the National Archives to grant Patel and conservative journalist John Solomon access to nonpublic administration records, according to reporting at the time.
look up Occam’s razor. What is more likely? That trump once again defied the norms and kept some classified documents as trophies in MAL? Or that he was hanging onto documents proving deep state corruption, and just got distracted playin golf and had not gotten around to making those public in 18 months.
Weeks before Mar-a-Lago search, ex-Trump DOD official vowed to publish classified documents from National Archives
Seven weeks before the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, a former Trump DOD appointee vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them online.abcnews.go.com
In June of this year, seven weeks before the FBI raided former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in search of classified materials, former Defense Department appointee and outspoken Trump loyalist Kash Patel vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them on his website.
Trump had just issued a letter instructing the National Archives to grant Patel and conservative journalist John Solomon access to nonpublic administration records, according to reporting at the time.
Trevor Noah said it best. When you fire someone, you don’t let them run off with secret documents or access them whenever they want. That’s like if you fired a babysitter and she still kept showing up to pick up your kids from school.
Weeks before Mar-a-Lago search, ex-Trump DOD official vowed to publish classified documents from National Archives
Seven weeks before the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, a former Trump DOD appointee vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them online.
In June of this year, seven weeks before the FBI raided former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in search of classified materials, former Defense Department appointee and outspoken Trump loyalist Kash Patel vowed to retrieve classified documents from the National Archives and publish them on his website.
Trump had just issued a letter instructing the National Archives to grant Patel and conservative journalist John Solomon access to nonpublic administration records, according to reporting at the time.
You do realize that seven months ago FORMER President Trump had no power whatsoever to instruct anyone to release anything from the government.
Similar threads
