IDK about mass shooters being left or right, really doesn't matter to me, they are sick bastards, mentally ill SOB's
I, personally don’t think it’s ok for an ex-president to sell classified info about our nuclear weapons
- Thread starter ClemTigsCo
- Start date
Old Lizzy served her country so well that she is going to lose her election in a landslide. Damn fine job she did.
The logic you people use is .... amusing? Don't even know what to call it, probably because its not logic at all.
My pronouns are Bro/Bruh and they are not suggested, they are required
You need a humor tune-up
Sincerely
I would love to know all the social and environmental factors that create these demons.
Haha I couldn’t believe last night that nobody had taken the bait. But you guys are so predictable that you were bound to react. In a thread about Trump, you pounce on the first ambiguous pronoun and bring up trans people. You know what they say about obsessions, they reveal one person’ true self. I hope you find the right transwoman for you and that she makes you happy.
I agree with you. I do not buy into the cause being Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto ...
You don't think desensitization towards violence might be an issue?
Well I guess my question to you is how is that desensitization? Are you saying that playing a game like GTA where you run around and shoot anyone in the street might make you feel more likely to feel like its okay to go do the same thing in real life? Maybe I am not following your question...
These threads aren’t exactly humanity inspiring and full of humor. Lots of mudslinging, hard to tell when someone telling someone else has mental illness was actually trying to be humorous. But, my apologies if I misread your intentions.
I know, was trying to see if this would be one of those automatic reactions from the MAGA camp, like whataboutism, etc
Have a nice day, bro!
Did it slow the spread? Because I've seen reports that since it made many infected people non-symptomatic, it may have increased the spread.
I'm not saying that's a reason to NOT have a vaccine. Just kind of a theory.
Same here. I don't want Trump to run in 2024. If he does, he will likely win the Republican primary and lose the general election. Then we get four more years of either Joe "Where am I?" Biden, "Heels Up" Harris or someone even worse.
And if he wins the general, I don't really want that either. I think there are better candidates.
Of the likely Republican candidates, DeSantis is probably the pick of the ones we expect to run. Though honestly he and Trump are the only people I can name that I think will run. More will I'm sure but I don't know who they are.
RELEASE THE AFFIDAVIT! What do they have to hide?
These People Are Lawless -- Biden's DOJ Asks Judge to Refuse Release of Affidavit for Raid on Mar-a-Lago | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
A week ago on Monday the Stasi-FBI and Joe Biden’s Department of Justice raided President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in a 9-and-a-half hour siege on his historic compound.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Doesn't the Affidavit have the names of the confidential informants? I don't think Jared and Ivanka want that to happen.
It is funny how Trump is still lying his ass off. He is on Troth Sential calling the raid "unannounced" still, even after his own lawyer admitted they knew about it and were there.
Old Lizzy aint done yet. Most likely she will be running for prez just to destroy your cult leader in primary debates. Do you remember what Liz Warren did to Bloomberg? This is going to be much, much worse.
Yeah, I did an absolutely awful job of wording that. Mea Culpa.
Do you think that violent video games causes a desensitization towards violence?
I was obviously being facetious.
I was obviously oblivious to you being facetious
I'll try and do better next time
Couldn't they just redact the CI's names? I'm not sure how the whole redaction process works, but that seems reasonable to me.
She's a Cheney and is in the establishment royalty family. Of course she's not going anywhere. In the shortime, I think she ends up with a gig on MSNBC/CNN or The View.
I was obviously oblivious to you being facetious
LOL gotcha, I wasn't sure but wanted to confirm my understanding. I think it definitely could possibly have an impact, of course depends though on a case by case basis.
Take Crux for example whos on trial for death penalty. It could definitely be argued that him playing COD could have had an impact on him wanting to commit the heinous act at Stoneman Douglas. But, in his case, he was so obsessed with guns in general and violence, had a very troubling family situation, history of being bullied, extreme anger issues, amongst several other factors. This case in point, I would argue the later factors having more impact on his mental health leading to the shooting, not his playing of COD; however, playing that game could perhaps have led his mind to somehow drift to an alternate reality that the act he would (and did) commit would be normal (i.e. desensitizing), but not sure how that can be proven.
But taking violent games as a whole, I would say at the most, one could consider them a "gateway drug", if you will, particularly considering your question here. But I also think mental illness would have to play a part as well.
So far, Garland and the DOJ have done nothing but lie.......There's a lot more to it than that.
-He said they only speak through the courts, that was a lie as they leaked info Immediately.
-He said the warrant was incredibly narrow, that was a lie as it's literally the opposite
-He said they had no choice but to react urgently but took weeks to decide on the warrant which would indicate there was no urgency.
It would almost be in their best interest to release it at this point, withholding is weakening their case not helping it.
I guess you missed it that they wouldn't have said a word publicly if Trump hadn't announced it as they prefer to do their work quietly and discreetly. The "leak" was in response to the alarming rise in threats against the FBI in hopes it would tamp down on some of the hysteria.
They leaked "nuclear secrets" not the actual raid. They were always going to do that regardless of Trump's decision to make it public. Let's not kid ourselves.
Just one more time for clarity:
-Leaked nuclear secrets to media
-Lied about scope of the warrant
-Lied about urgency
Either they are the most inept group of idiots in the country or they just don't care at this point.
Are you just excusing all of the lies that Trump and his lawyers have uttered about this situation?
1. Secret Raid - nope, the lawyers knew and were there.
2. Didnt allow cameras on- nope, family watched on security.
3. Nobody knows what they took- nope, lawyer signed the receipts.
4. Lied about having classified documents?
5. Lied that they had returned all of the documents.
You telling me you believe that guy?
1. Why does it matter if it was secret or not? They were notified by the secret service I'm told as the FBI had to let them know in order to gain access to the premises.
2. They asked them to turn the cameras off, the attorneys said no.......don't think anyone said they didn't keep them on
3. They have a generic list of what was taken, have been asking for a week now what specifically was taken. (no response from DOJ.....who btw, are refusing to share it with the intelligence committee who have oversight)
4. Did he? He seems pretty confident and his staff have corroborated that he had a standing order that all documents taken into the white house were declassified. He also didn't pack the boxes. He also was cooperating with the subpoena. So really really hard to say what he had vs what he didn't have in his eyes
5. Again, see point 3.....he could very easily say he thought he did return all of the documents in question.....we haven't seen the subpoena so hard to say
Just because you don't like the guy doesn't mean you can infringe on his rights or go on a fishing expedition looking for a crime. You're somehow using his track record for stretching the truth to justify the efforts here but you're looking past the track record of the FBI and DOJ in regards to honesty and transparency.
His lawyers have admitted that they weren't truthful. They had claimed to have returned all documents marked classified and that was proven to be false.
Why again would you defend that guy who has a terrible record of being truthful? He is literally the king of deny,deflect,deny,attack,deny,blame,deny.
He has a very long track record of being a lying scumbag. At some point you have to realize that he is what he is. He is the same guy he's always been.
And you are jumping really far to make some pretty big conclusions. Truth - we don't know much about what is exactly going on. You are being spoon fed narratives from conservative shit sites and regurgitating it here
But if they were under the impression that those documents had been declassified, then they didn't lie.
They all have a long track record of lying and being scumbags.......name a politician that hasn't been caught in some form of a lie or scandal? The list is short. Joe lied to you as recently as last week when he said there was 0% inflation and the media gave him a hand job for it.
This is not about supporting Trump, it's about ensuring his rights aren't infringed upon and also ensuring that our government agencies aren't being used as political weapons, which at present seems very very likely.
Dude, it didn't matter if the documents had been classified or not, they did not belong to him and the National Archives asked him to return them. After waiting six months, he gave them 15 boxes but withheld 33 boxes. Now why would he do that? Would it be because he didn't want them to know what was in them?
When they realized they didn't have them all, they were subpoenaed. His lawyer lied and said they returned them all.
So his rights weren't infringed upon. He was treated with extreme deference compared to any other human being who would have done the same thing. Anyone else would have had their front door kicked in and a perp walk to a waiting van. He was wrong and he was guilty. Accept it and quit being such a damn sycophant.
Last edited:
You talking about Pocahontas? Once Trump gives you a nickname you are done!
Pocahontas
Lyin Ted
Crooked Hillary
Sleepy Joe (He didn't win lol)
Mini Mike
Losing Lizzy sounds good to me.
How many did Hillary return? What difference, at this point, does it make?!?!?
I have never seen someone with their head so far up a politician's ass before. Well, except for @TigerGrowls .
How many did she have in her house and did she refuse to return them?
Similar threads
