No civilian needs a weapon like that, ever.
Last time I looked its the Bill of Rights not the bill of needs, where in the constitution does it say you've got to articulate a need to exercise a right? If it was based on need, there's quite a few folks on here who should get those 1st amendment rights taken away!
Norway is set to ban semi-automatic weapons
The July 22 massacre in 2011 “was committed using that type of weapon
using a semi-automatic gun
A glock is a "semi-automatic gun" and/or "semi-automatic weapon" so nothing you posted disproves my statements, yall are the ones that keep saying "rifle" and that's different. "semi-automatic gun" would include most rifles, pistols, and shotguns in existence. I'm realizing now that the side that can't tell the difference between a man and woman probably has a difficult time distinguishing other realities as well. I guess 4 pages in, the argument has changed from "ban assault rifles" to ban all firearms?
The VT shooting is just proof that getting rid of "assault weapons" won't solve the problem.
Look at the Boston Marathon bombing. It's an absolute miracle the death count there wasn't exponentially higher. Had that second device been placed 4' away up on a table rather than on the ground at the base of that tree so the shrapnel went out at chest height rather than ground level the death toll could have been triple digits. When someone pulls that off better are you going to be lobbying for armed men to go door to door rounding up pressure cookers?
Timothy V did a number in OKC with fertilizer
The new go to in Europe is to rent a box truck and drive it into a crowd
All examples of evil people doing awful things and all that an assault rifle ban wouldn't prevent. What would you do/say if in your Utopian dream world you actually got rid of guns and people still killed other people in mass?
No American citizen should be allowed to legally own an AR-15, or any similar weapon, anymore. For decades the right had insisted that the left was "comin fer arr guns," when it wasn't even happening.
Now these weapons are being used to commit murders of school children on a weekly basis. So guess what? Now we really are coming for them, and we'll get them. And you'll cry about your freedom, likely try to start a war, lose the war but kill millions in the process, and be worse off, from your perspective, than if you had just been willing to accept some tougher regulations in the first place.
Biggest moral failing from one political party in my lifetime, bar none.
Another reality you can't seem to grasp in all your disillusion..........you aren't getting sh*t. Who's going to come and take them? You? The majority of military and police support the 2nd amendment. You think they're going to turn on their own beliefs AND the oath they made to defend the constitution, kill their fellow citizens, and as you've pointed out likely get themselves killed in the process? Please enlighten me as to who exactly is signing up to bust into all these homes and take 400 million firearms by force? The left doesn't have the means to wage war, so trying to act tough like yall would get to wield the full weight of the military or police against the citizenry is laughable. You're are a bunch of neutered little yappy puppy dogs just making noise, but can't actually do a damn thing.
I laughed out loud at your "one political party" comment. The democrats controlled the house, senate, and white house for how long? And did what? Where was that legislation when they had the numbers to get it passed? The 2 party system is a joke..............all puppets of the same master. Our political system is nothing more than the WWE in suits!
This has been real fun guys, I've thoroughly enjoyed it!!!