Pretty remarkable story related to the Twitter files

[Willence]

So it came out recently that the person who was filtering/vetting the release of the Twitter files was Jim Baker himself who was once with the FBI and up to his ass in all of this controversy since he's an avowed partisan. He's been fired but again it's yet another example of just how political social media is and how corrupted the FBI has become. The world needs a lot more people like Ro Khanna with whom I disagree about most things but would vote for in a second! I would be honored to have him as my Congressman.

 

[nytigerfan]

So it came out recently that the person who was filtering/vetting the release of the Twitter files was Jim Baker himself who was once with the FBI and up to his ass in all of this controversy since he's an avowed partisan. He's been fired but again it's yet another example of just how political social media is and how corrupted the FBI has become. The world needs a lot more people like Ro Khanna with whom I disagree about most things but would vote for in a second! I would be honored to have him as my Congressman.

this post is woke

 

[dpic73]

So it came out recently that the person who was filtering/vetting the release of the Twitter files was Jim Baker himself who was once with the FBI and up to his ass in all of this controversy since he's an avowed partisan. He's been fired but again it's yet another example of just how political social media is and how corrupted the FBI has become. The world needs a lot more people like Ro Khanna with whom I disagree about most things but would vote for in a second! I would be honored to have him as my Congressman.

 

[Willence]

Least surprising response ever from you. You would never want to be held accountable in any way for the backward ass nature of some of the folks on your side.

 

[dpic73]

Least surprising response ever from you. You would never want to be held accountable in any way for the backward ass nature of some of the folks on your side.

Are we still talking about that stupid laptop that doesn't show in any form or fashion that Joe is a criminal? Some of you think wiener pics would have overturned the election and you're prepared to die on that hill aren't you? Knock yourself out...

 

[jakefest]

The hits just keep on coming......

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

Least surprising response ever from you. You would never want to be held accountable in any way for the backward ass nature of some of the folks on your side.

To add what news I al listening in response to the deflection on not me

The FBI was spying on the 2020 Trump election staff and campaign and a huge amount of staff and Republicans

James Baker snd the deep state used Twitter and other sources to commit in my opinion election crimes and violations beyond all imagination

The Liberal left and Democratic Party have taken election fraud to the levels of dishonorable conduct surpassing anything one could dream of

Flyover America needs to wake up and start participating more in governance

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

There is also rumors that the FBI sponsored and encouraged the J6 riots and tried to pin the source and what happened on Trump and the Republicans

please note I said rumors however because of the so called rumors of Russian Collusion and the Fake Hunter Laptop being falsely pushed by the Liberals and Democratic party this rumor may unfortunately prove to be true

The FBI and DOJ need to be cleaned out of the sewer scum and those people replaced with inbiased decent law abiding Americans

So say I

 

[nytigerfan]

To add what news I al listening in response to the deflection on not me

The FBI was spying on the 2020 Trump election staff and campaign and a huge amount of staff and Republicans

James Baker snd the deep state used Twitter and other sources to commit in my opinion election crimes and violations beyond all imagination

The Liberal left and Democratic Party have taken election fraud to the levels of dishonorable conduct surpassing anything one could dream of

Flyover America needs to wake up and start participating more in governance

Woke

 

[dpic73]

 

[dpic73]

 

[PawsFan_]

Funny the party that screams "voter suppression" at the drop of a hat, cares nothing about colluding to suppress information that all Americans deserve to know.

The democratic party is the party of hypocrisy.

 

[WapPride]

Is Twitter the sole disseminator of information in the US?

 

[Willence]

Is Twitter the sole disseminator of information in the US?

Since a lot of people on this board can't think without it telling them what to do, I would say for many it is.

 

[CUT93]

Are we still talking about that stupid laptop that doesn't show in any form or fashion that Joe is a criminal? Some of you think wiener pics would have overturned the election and you're prepared to die on that hill aren't you? Knock yourself out...

The point is not really what was on the laptop. The point is that is was censored(free speech) for no reason by the left. The fact you can not see the problem with this is not surprising.

 

[CUT93]

Is Twitter the sole disseminator of information in the US?

Is twitter the only media/news outlet that stated it was untrue and/or refused to cover it?

 

[nytigerfan]

Is twitter the only media/news outlet that stated it was untrue and/or refused to cover it?

Stating it is untrue and stating that you are unable to verify if it is true are two very different things.

 

[CUT93]

Stating it is untrue and stating that you are unable to verify if it is true are two very different things.

There were absolutely outlets reporting it was untrue. Furthermore, when has it stopped the left wing media from covering something that was claimed even if they could not verify it? They covered Trump/Russia collusion for YEARS and obviously could not verify that as it was not true.

 

[nytigerfan]

There were absolutely outlets reporting it was untrue. Furthermore, when has it stopped the left wing media from covering something that was claimed even if they could not verify it? They covered Trump/Russia collusion for YEARS and obviously could not verify that as it was not true.

There was a special counsel investigating trump russia collusion.

 

[CUT93]

There was a special counsel investigating trump russia collusion.

.... and that special council found there was not proof of collusion. Thank you for proving my point. There was no proof and still is no proof, yet it was covered at the very least with the implication as being true by the majority of news outlets -mouthpiece of the dem party.

Edit to say there was also no special council when it was initially being covered,

 

[nytigerfan]

.... and that special council found there was not proof of collusion. Thank you for proving my point. There was no proof and still is no proof, yet it was covered at the very least with the implication as being true by the majority of news outlets -mouthpiece of the dem party.

Edit to say there was also no special council when it was initially being covered,

So you don't think that news organizations should have covered a special counsel investigation into a sitting president? Were you equally offended at the media coverage of Bill Clinton?

 

[CUT93]

So you don't think that news organizations should have covered a special counsel investigation into a sitting president? Were you equally offended at the media coverage of Bill Clinton?

Like I said, there was no special council when it was first covered. What media coverage of Bill are you talking about?

 

[dpic73]

The point is not really what was on the laptop. The point is that is was censored(free speech) for no reason by the left. The fact you can not see the problem with this is not surprising.

The NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were the ones hawking the story two weeks before the election and implied that Joe was implicated in criminal behavior. Not only were they sleazy sources but the other outlets didnt have access to the hard drive. Obviously something that should be covered carefully, if at all. Now here we are two years later and there's still no evidence that Joe committed a crime. Imagine what a disgrace it would have been if Joe lost the election because of that knowing what we know now. The other outlets did the right thing.

 

[dpic73]

Like I said, there was no special council when it was first covered. What media coverage of Bill are you talking about?

You know he's talking about the Mueller investigation

 

[CUT93]

You know he's talking about the Mueller investigation

Are you saying there was no coverage of "Trump/Russia collusion" before the the Mueller investigation began?

 

[CUT93]

The NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were the ones hawking the story two weeks before the election and implied that Joe was implicated in criminal behavior. Not only were they sleazy sources but the other outlets didnt have access to the hard drive. Obviously something that should be covered carefully, if at all. Now here we are two years later and there's still no evidence that Joe committed a crime. Imagine what a disgrace it would have been if Joe lost the election because of that knowing what we know now. The other outlets did the right thing.

You are completely full of it. You know if another outlet the size of the new york post came out with a story about trump they said had been verified, every new outlet in the country would have run with it.

 

[CUT93]

The NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were the ones hawking the story two weeks before the election and implied that Joe was implicated in criminal behavior. Not only were they sleazy sources but the other outlets didnt have access to the hard drive. Obviously something that should be covered carefully, if at all. Now here we are two years later and there's still no evidence that Joe committed a crime. Imagine what a disgrace it would have been if Joe lost the election because of that knowing what we know now. The other outlets did the right thing.

The ny post article did not accuse Joe of any criminal behavior and everything it the article has been accepted as true by pretty much every media outlet. They said they had verified the information. There was ZERO reason for that article to be banned or censored by any platform then.
The fact that it may have cost Joe the election is not even remotely relevant if what was in the article was true- which we know it was and was verified by the news outlet before the article was released.

 

[nytigerfan]

The ny post article did not accuse Joe of any criminal behavior and everything it the article has been accepted as true by pretty much every media outlet. They said they had verified the information. There was ZERO reason for that article to be banned or censored by any platform then.
The fact that it may have cost Joe the election is not even remotely relevant if what was in the article was true- which we know it was and was verified by the news outlet before the article was released.

Wait... are you saying that there are systemic injustices in the mainstream media that are unfair to conservatives?

 

[CUT93]

Wait... are you saying that there are systemic injustices in the mainstream media that are unfair to conservatives?

I am saying that the vast majority of MM outlets are politically motivated in their coverage/actions. On top of that, big tech(twitter/FB) are went a step further than advocating for a party and denied discussion or posts from individuals of factually true information in an effort to protect a political party.

If you want to characterize it as "systematic injustices", that is fine. How you define it is of no relevance, imo.

 

[nytigerfan]

I am saying that the vast majority of MM outlets are politically motivated in their coverage/actions. On top of that, big tech(twitter/FB) are went a step further than advocating for a party and denied discussion or posts from individuals of factually true information in an effort to protect a political party.

If you want to characterize it as "systematic injustices", that is fine. How you define it is of no relevance, imo.

I'll tell you how I would define you....

 

[CUT93]

I'll tell you how I would define you....

Well, that is just further evidence of your lack of intellect - not that more evidence was necessary.

 

[nytigerfan]

Well, that is just further evidence of your lack of intellect - not that more evidence was necessary.

Well, for one, I know the difference between "counsel" and "council". One is the correct usage with "Special Counsel."

 

[dpic73]

The ny post article did not accuse Joe of any criminal behavior and everything it the article has been accepted as true by pretty much every media outlet. They said they had verified the information. There was ZERO reason for that article to be banned or censored by any platform then.
The fact that it may have cost Joe the election is not even remotely relevant if what was in the article was true- which we know it was and was verified by the news outlet before the article was released.

Then what would have been the reason to run it if it wasn't to create an innuendo of wrongdoing? Despite the fact that it was disgusting that they took Hunter's personal property to splash it all over the web, simply because he was Joe's son, there was no major revelation beyond proving that Hunter is an addict. Why is that relevant?

 

[WapPride]

Is twitter the only media/news outlet that stated it was untrue and/or refused to cover it?

they refused to publish information about it as it violated their revenge porn policy. they weren't aware if it was legitimate, if it was gained illegally, or what, so they did what they thought was responsible per their company guidelines. twitter not sharing tweets about it didn't stop all the MSM from talking about it

 

[CUT93]

they refused to publish information about it as it violated their revenge porn policy. they weren't aware if it was legitimate, if it was gained illegally, or what, so they did what they thought was responsible per their company guidelines. twitter not sharing tweets about it didn't stop all the MSM from talking about it

The my post said where they got the information from and that it was verified. The legitimacy should not have been in question.

 

[CUT93]

Then what would have been the reason to run it if it wasn't to create an innuendo of wrongdoing? Despite the fact that it was disgusting that they took Hunter's personal property to splash it all over the web, simply because he was Joe's son, there was no major revelation beyond proving that Hunter is an addict. Why is that relevant?

Why was trump sleeping with stormy daniels relevent?

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

Woke

Donald Trump’s Wayward Son

Donald is so proud you are the mirror image of him

Red Hair too

 

[TigerGrowls]

The NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were the ones hawking the story two weeks before the election and implied that Joe was implicated in criminal behavior. Not only were they sleazy sources but the other outlets didnt have access to the hard drive. Obviously something that should be covered carefully, if at all. Now here we are two years later and there's still no evidence that Joe committed a crime. Imagine what a disgrace it would have been if Joe lost the election because of that knowing what we know now. The other outlets did the right thing.

Totally incorrect partisan reply.

 

[TigerGrowls]

they refused to publish information about it as it violated their revenge porn policy. they weren't aware if it was legitimate, if it was gained illegally, or what, so they did what they thought was responsible per their company guidelines. twitter not sharing tweets about it didn't stop all the MSM from talking about it

No one cares about shrimp dick Hunter. We are after commie Joe for influence peddling US taxpayer funds and access to US govt resources to get their family rich. Dont try to play dumb with us libs. It will not work.

 

[dpic73]

No one cares about shrimp dick Hunter. We are after commie Joe for influence peddling US taxpayer funds and access to US govt resources to get their family rich. Dont try to play dumb with us libs. It will not work.

How did the laptop show that Growlsy?