ADVERTISEMENT

Speaker of the House - Who's up next? Welcome, Rep Mike Johnson - Louisiana

A huge majority of Republicans wanted McCarthy to remain Speaker and a handful of Republicans including hair gel voted with the Democrats and the Squad to kick him out. And there a lot of Republicans who are not happy about it.
A majority of establishment republicans wanted McCarthy to remain. McCarthy made a deal and then welched on it. Our nation is going down the shitter and I support Gaetz and his agenda to rock the ship.
 
A majority of establishment republicans wanted McCarthy to remain. McCarthy made a deal and then welched on it. Our nation is going down the shitter and I support Gaetz and his agenda to rock the ship.
And the Republicans will have the house for only 2 years because of hair gel. Why doesn't he run?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Very few rank and file republicans give any regard to these bozos opinions.
MAGA Republicans also don't care about democracy or the rule of law. In addition, Jordan has never passed a single bill the whole time he's been in office so he would be a horrific choice when it comes to moving legislation through the House. You want him in place for one reason only and it's because he's Trump's top enabler. No way an insurrectionist should be third in line to the Presidency. No fvckin way.
 
I do not agree with the assumption that this infighting will hurt the America First wing. The rinos should get primaried though.

That is another of the dumbass statements that you make against all available evidence. In the last election, so called America First candidates got creamed.

You also need some help with the term RINO since you are using it completely wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueRidgedf
387049191_722195259945662_2043619582739922453_n.jpg
 
You mean a story about a hard drive that only slimy agents of Biden's opponent (Bannon, Giuliani) had access to at the time? Why would anyone trust a story like that, coming from those two ghouls, right before the election? That's not election interference, that's called exercising caution.

Also, Twitter did not BAN the story. They did what any responsible media would do and they took a couple days to discuss how they should responsibly address the issue.

The government was Trump's administration at that time.

Holy sh*tballs, if his re-election hinged on a laptop story that didn't implicate Joe in any wrongdoing, then he deserved to lose the election, period.
I've said this all along...

Look, I've no use for Hunter Biden. He's a druggy and pretty much always has been. I feel bad for him. His mother and sister died in a car crash and his older brother died from brain cancer. That's rough for sure. But the bottom line is that this dude is profoundly f'd up and you can't trust him. I wouldn't put anything past him. I've got a few NCIS style Gibbs rules. One of them is: You can't trust a junky.

That being said, when and if a trial takes place, the contents of that laptop are going to get laughed out of court. The pawnshop owner had access THEN called Rudy to take the laptop. Rudy is already on record for admitting that he lied about the Ga elections officials. There's certainly reasonable doubt that he could have put stuff on that laptop. Not that I think he necessarily did, but there's certainly a chain of evidence problem there. Thems just the facts.
 
I've said this all along...

Look, I've no use for Hunter Biden. He's a druggy and pretty much always has been. I feel bad for him. His mother and sister died in a car crash and his older brother died from brain cancer. That's rough for sure. But the bottom line is that this dude is profoundly f'd up and you can't trust him. I wouldn't put anything past him. I've got a few NCIS style Gibbs rules. One of them is: You can't trust a junky.

That being said, when and if a trial takes place, the contents of that laptop are going to get laughed out of court. The pawnshop owner had access THEN called Rudy to take the laptop. Rudy is already on record for admitting that he lied about the Ga elections officials. There's certainly reasonable doubt that he could have put stuff on that laptop. Not that I think he necessarily did, but there's certainly a chain of evidence problem there. Thems just the facts.
Even the owner of the computer repair shop said on FoxNews that data may have been manipulated and also raised concerns about chain of custody.

"John Paul Mac Isaac, the Delaware computer repairman who went public with the alleged contents of Hunter Biden's laptop, admitted a few things during an interview on Fox News that threw his credibility out the window.

Isaac admitted that "there have been several attempts to insert fake data" into the President's son's laptop. In addition, he also admitted that over the last two years, the computer has been through "countless numbers of hands."

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
at this point who would think this laptop would be admissible?
Yep... And that's not to say that the stuff on there is not legit. I have no idea if it is or not and I certainly wouldn't doubt that a junkie with a ton of cash isn't going to party hard with hookers and drugs.

The question is... Is there reasonable doubt that someone else could have put that info on there and it's not HBs. I don't think anyone can say there isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
More interested how the Robert Hur's report will so lightly tell us how Biden had no idea of confidential data and how it was secure in his garage when it was discovered. It will basically be a UNC judgement for Biden.
 
That's literally what happened wrt the "51 intelligence agents."

The letter from the 51 former intelligence officials came out in the days leading up to the 2020 presidential election, warning that reporting about the laptop’s alleged contents “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” Although the signees stressed they did not know if emails being reported at the time were genuine and they insisted they had no evidence of Russian involvement, the letter was nevertheless used to dismiss the laptop and its provenance.

That is literally NOT what the Biden said during the debates, NOT what the media said/implied, on numerous shows and news casts, NOT what the dnc promoted, etc, etc.
Yes, that is what the letter said, but the people using that letter repeatedly misrepresented the letter and the majority of the people who signed it knew very well that was the plan all along. It was repeatedly alluded to as proof of Russian disinformation.
How many of them have come out and admonished all the dems who purposely misrepresented what that letter said? How many of them gave context about the letter at the time? That right there tells you it was a planned deception from the beginning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
That is literally NOT what the Biden said during the debates, NOT what the media said/implied, on numerous shows and news casts, NOT what the dnc promoted, etc, etc.
Yes, that is what the letter said, but the people using that letter repeatedly misrepresented the letter and the majority of the people who signed it knew very well that was the plan all along. It was repeatedly alluded to as proof of Russian disinformation.
How many of them have come out and admonished all the dems who purposely misrepresented what that letter said? How many of them gave context about the letter at the time? That right there tells you it was a planned deception from the beginning.
Once again, I was replying to OleFastball's post where he said that 51 intelligence officials signed a false letter. That's demonstrably false, as stated by the GOP House Judiciary. What others did is moot. If you have an issue with our media, you won't hear any complaints from me. It's the one thing Trump harped on that I agreed 100% with him about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Once again, I was replying to OleFastball's post where he said that 51 intelligence officials signed a false letter. That's demonstrably false, as stated by the GOP House Judiciary. What others did is moot. If you have an issue with our media, you won't hear any complaints from me. It's the one thing Trump harped on that I agreed 100% with him about.
It wasn't just the media. It was Biden on the debate stage, multiple other dem politicians, etc. - which was exactly what was intended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls


"The House is about to vote on Jim Jordan for Speaker. Let’s see who he is: 1. Never passed a bill in his 16 years in Congress 2. Founder of the extreme right Freedom Caucus 3. Supports national abortion ban without exceptions 4. Supported Trump’s attempt to overturn the election Republicans: you can choose to govern or destroy. But you can’t choose both."

 
It would take a few more Pub defections to make that happen so not sure about that, but if it does - wow
Actually, five Republicans would have to pick Jeffries and that won't happen so this will be an ongoing saga, like McCarthy's was. More Pubs not voting for Jordan than I expected though.
 
Once again, I was replying to OleFastball's post where he said that 51 intelligence officials signed a false letter. That's demonstrably false, as stated by the GOP House Judiciary. What others did is moot. If you have an issue with our media, you won't hear any complaints from me. It's the one thing Trump harped on that I agreed 100% with him about.
They damn well knew the laptop was real at the time they signed the letter. That is an intentional lie.
 
Isn't Jordan a sexual predator enabler???? I mean, he had some serious accusations at Ohio State.
That's true... Like 10 witnesses said he knew all about it and did nothing. Now most on here are all against this sort of thing as a general rule, BUT Jorden supports Donald Trump, so he's all good, and is a great candidate for HoR Speaker.
 
That's true... Like 10 witnesses said he knew all about it and did nothing. Now most on here are all against this sort of thing as a general rule, BUT Jorden supports Donald Trump, so he's all good, and is a great candidate for HoR Speaker.
Rationalization can work wonders.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT