Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The guy is threatening civil war if he doesn’t win and yet some people are worried about the democrats.
So who exactly is going to fight in this war? The few 100 idiots from 1/6? I'm curious who you think will truly fight?The guy is threatening civil war if he doesn’t win and yet some people are worried about the democrats.
What "war" are you referring to??So who exactly is going to fight in this war? The few 100 idiots from 1/6? I'm curious who you think will truly fight?
I was commenting on his post. You can't see that?What "war" are you referring to??
Biden is out of his mind and not fit for office.
The guy is threatening civil war if he doesn’t win and yet some people are worried about the democrats.
How do you feel getting Okey doked or are you just knowingly spreading BS?
Quit letting people think for you:
Would you like to defend leading off the rally with the Jan. 6th anthem, while calling those traitors "incredible patriots" and saying that Biden ran against Obama? We know what he said but we also know he uses that kind of loaded language for a reason.
Would you like to defend leading off the rally with the Jan. 6th anthem, while calling those traitors "incredible patriots" and saying that Biden ran against Obama? We know what he said but we also know he uses that kind of loaded language for a reason.
What reason is that? What exactly do you think he was implying?Would you like to defend leading off the rally with the Jan. 6th anthem, while calling those traitors "incredible patriots" and saying that Biden ran against Obama? We know what he said but we also know he uses that kind of loaded language for a reason.
Not interested in re-litigating Jan. 6th or your tired story thast I've heard 25 times now. And I didn't say a damn thing about a civil war - I said he intentionally uses incendiary language to rile up his base and Jan. 6th is a perfect example of that. You'll point out what he didn't say that day but we know what his terror cell heard. Who knows what will happen but do you think he'll let it go peacefully if he loses? Do you think his supporters will? If you do, you're a ****ing fool.What reason is that? What exactly do you think he was implying?
In threads about gun control you love to point out that no number of citizens would stand a chance against the military. Are you now saying he is setting up an actual civil war or even small armed attack if he loses?
Lol, at libs derangement. Not one shot was fired on Jan 6 by any trump supporter. As a matter of fact, not one person in the capital building was even seen with a gun, despite there being thousands of hours of video and pictures. Yet now, morons like you are jumping straight to a civil war being threatened, when he was CLEARLY talking about the auto industry and other manufacturing/economy issues.
Trump is a childish, boorish, human being who I dislike. However, the outright dishonesty from the media and liberals in regards to what he has said or done is otherworldly.
How many trump supporters actually attempted to use a gun to harm someone, or even threatened someone with a gun on Jan6? ZERO that I have seen. Zero, out of thousands of people. I may be wrong, but I know of less than 10 that have even been charged with having a gun.Not interested in re-litigating Jan. 6th or your tired story thast I've heard 25 times now. And I didn't say a damn thing about a civil war - I said he intentionally uses incendiary language to rile up his base and Jan. 6th is a perfect example of that. You'll point out what he didn't say that day but we know what his terror cell heard. Who knows what will happen but do you think he'll let it go peacefully if he loses? Do you think his supporters will? If you do, you're a ****ing fool.
Gun-toting Jan. 6 defendant says 'instinct took over' when he charged police line with wooden pallet
Christopher Alberts was arrested with a gun on the night of Jan. 6, one of the few rioters to be taken into custody that day.www.nbcnews.com
PolitiFact: Tucker Carlson is wrong. Firearms, other weapons at Capitol on Jan. 6
Tucker Carlson is wrong. Firearms, other weapons were found at the Capitol on Jan. 6www.statesman.com
He “tells it like it is” and also “he didn’t mean that.”
lol! Because they stormed the capital and physically harmed the police, but didn’t use a gun, then it’s not really a threat.What reason is that? What exactly do you think he was implying?
In threads about gun control you love to point out that no number of citizens would stand a chance against the military. Are you now saying he is setting up an actual civil war or even small armed attack if he loses?
Lol, at libs derangement. Not one shot was fired on Jan 6 by any trump supporter. As a matter of fact, not one person in the capital building was even seen with a gun, despite there being thousands of hours of video and pictures. Yet now, morons like you are jumping straight to a civil war being threatened, when he was CLEARLY talking about the auto industry and other manufacturing/economy issues.
Trump is a childish, boorish, human being who I dislike. However, the outright dishonesty from the media and liberals in regards to what he has said or done is otherworldly.
He has told the same sanitized version of that day countless times and it always starts with it couldn't have been an insurrection because Trump said "peacefully" and they weren't properly equipped to finish the job, therefore Trump is innocent and it was no biggie.lol! Because they stormed the capital and physically harmed the police, but didn’t use a gun, then it’s not really a threat.
Do you not realize how disgraceful Jan 6 was to the history of this country? And that Trump is now calling them hostages?
Just shocking that some are trying to minimize this.
I am not minimizing Jan 6. I have said multiple times I would have shot the first one that breached the barriers before they made it o the building. You just can not allow anyone to breach that building.lol! Because they stormed the capital and physically harmed the police, but didn’t use a gun, then it’s not really a threat.
Do you not realize how disgraceful Jan 6 was to the history of this country? And that Trump is now calling them hostages?
Just shocking that some are trying to minimize this.
I am not minimizing Jan 6. I have said multiple times I would have shot the first one that breached the barriers before they made it o the building. You just can not allow anyone to breach that building.
My point was how ridiculous it is the way his comments have been treated. First, and most importantly, his "bloodbath" comment was CLEARLY in reference specifically to the auto industry, and more broadly to the entire economic/manufacturing situation. Beyond that, even if you want to make it into something it is not, what exactly could he have meant? That he or his supporters would start some type of civil war that actually resulted in a literal bloodbath? There is zero, evidence to support that.
The bold is not true at all. The biggest point is that there was a small fraction of the protest group that WAS, or could have been properly equipped to do whatever they wanted to. Yes, Trump did say peacefully protest also.He has told the same sanitized version of that day countless times and it always starts with it couldn't have been an insurrection because Trump said "peacefully" and they weren't properly equipped to finish the job, therefore Trump is innocent and it was no biggie.
So why don't you tell me what you think he said and what you think it meant.
And here is the evidence that republicans are actually discussing civil war…I am not minimizing Jan 6. I have said multiple times I would have shot the first one that breached the barriers before they made it o the building. You just can not allow anyone to breach that building.
My point was how ridiculous it is the way his comments have been treated. First, and most importantly, his "bloodbath" comment was CLEARLY in reference specifically to the auto industry, and more broadly to the entire economic/manufacturing situation. Beyond that, even if you want to make it into something it is not, what exactly could he have meant? That he or his supporters would start some type of civil war that actually resulted in a literal bloodbath? There is zero, evidence to support that.
He’s slippery enough to have an out but knows like leading up to Jan 6 he wants to stoke angry and violence among Y’all Queda. I will admit he is a master at toeing the line of committing crime but plausible deniability.So why don't you tell me what you think he said and what you think it meant.
You know as as well as I do this is just hyperbolic talk. Yes, there are fringe idiots in both parties. Do you really believe the ga state hwy patrol are planning to participate in a civil war? Lol.And here is the evidence that republicans are actually discussing civil war…
Republicans just can’t stop calling for civil war
Ask a MAGA Republican what will happen if former President Donald Trump is convicted in any of his four criminal trials and the answer is almost always the same: civil war.thehill.com