ADVERTISEMENT

Trump 2024

I’d be sh!t talking to if we cheated and won. Good job. You elected Joe Biden and look at our country.
Lol, cheating for 20 years now? Any proof of the other cheating scandals or even of 2020 for that matter?
 
Russian Collusion. 50 Intelligence agents. Honestly, the list is too long.

You keep spiting 50 intelligence agents even though this has been thoroughly explained. I swear some of you guys just ignore stuff that doesn't conform to the theory in your mind.

For example, @TigerGrowls has said that no evidence will convince him that the election wasn't stolen. Do you understand how crazy that is? Literally decided that it was a stolen, and can not be convinced no matter what that it wasn't.

Guys. Seriously. It's so hard to even talk with y'all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
You keep spiting 50 intelligence agents even though this has been thoroughly explained. I swear some of you guys just ignore stuff that doesn't conform to the theory in your mind.

For example, @TigerGrowls has said that no evidence will convince him that the election wasn't stolen. Do you understand how crazy that is? Literally decided that it was a stolen, and can not be convinced no matter what that it wasn't.

Guys. Seriously. It's so hard to even talk with y'all.
Thoroughly explained? I've never heard it explained other than they signed the letter that they knew was false.

Just like Obama, Biden, Comey, Clapper, Rice et al knew that Russian Collusion was false. And not a damn one of them said anything about it.
 
Thoroughly explained? I've never heard it explained other than they signed the letter that they knew was false.

Just like Obama, Biden, Comey, Clapper, Rice et al knew that Russian Collusion was false. And not a damn one of them said anything about it.

It has been explained on this site. They signed a letter saying that the story had all of the signs of a Russian Disinformation Mission, which it did. We know that the Russians have been extremely involved in influencing elections in the past, and were actively trying to influence this election.

You see the as a devious act, I see it as fairly common sense. It's also how Intelligence agencies work. They rarely know things with 100% certainty, they make judgements based on experience and patterns along with on the ground Intel they have.

We were fairly certain that Iraq had WMD, that was proven false, but the intelligence communities world wide were pretty confident.
 
Thoroughly explained? I've never heard it explained other than they signed the letter that they knew was false.

Just like Obama, Biden, Comey, Clapper, Rice et al knew that Russian Collusion was false. And not a damn one of them said anything about it.
How did they KNOW it was false when no one else did and it wasn't proven to be false after the Mueller Investigation? You just jumped to that conclusion, even though he said Trump was not absolved. Reminder, the main witness refused to be deposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
It has been explained on this site. They signed a letter saying that the story had all of the signs of a Russian Disinformation Mission, which it did. We know that the Russians have been extremely involved in influencing elections in the past, and were actively trying to influence this election.

You see the as a devious act, I see it as fairly common sense. It's also how Intelligence agencies work. They rarely know things with 100% certainty, they make judgements based on experience and patterns along with on the ground Intel they have.

We were fairly certain that Iraq had WMD, that was proven false, but the intelligence communities world wide were pretty confident.
You see it as common sense to sign letters that you know are false? That says a lot about you.

The only Russian influence on our elections has been the False Russian Collusion allegations against Trump. Obama knew, Biden knew, Comey knew, Hillary knew, Rice knew, Clapper knew. For 3 years + no one said anything.
 
You see it as common sense to sign letters that you know are false? That says a lot about you.

The only Russian influence on our elections has been the False Russian Collusion allegations against Trump. Obama knew, Biden knew, Comey knew, Hillary knew, Rice knew, Clapper knew. For 3 years + no one said anything.

They didn't know that they were false. I don't know where you are getting that from. Good lord due. You keep saying this stuff likes it a personal litany. Is this how you pray the rosary each day?
 
They didn't know that they were false. I don't know where you are getting that from. Good lord due. You keep saying this stuff likes it a personal litany. Is this how you pray the rosary each day?

The democrat playbook. Cheat and when confronted "ah man, it wasn't like that. Nah"

Like choir boy Comey on the Russian Collusion sh!t.

I was just responding to:

Lol, cheating for 20 years now? Any proof of the other cheating scandals or even of 2020 for that matter?
So there is the proof.
 
The democrat playbook. Cheat and when confronted "ah man, it wasn't like that. Nah"

Like choir boy Comey on the Russian Collusion sh!t.

I was just responding to:


So there is the proof.

And apparently the Trump fan playbook is blame others, say others cheat, but never actually prove any of that.

What is so frustrating is you keep stating things like "Russian Collusion" as if it was absolutely false and nothing was discovered that showed improper actions. Trump wasn't found innocent by Mueller, he just wasn't prosecuted due to being a sitting president. Is this really so hard to understand?
 

Tim Pool On Why He Would Vote for Donald J. Trump Over Ron DeSantis for President in 2024 [VIDEO]​

By Patty McMurray May. 9, 2023 4:40 pm

100 Percent Fed Up reports – On Saturday, popular podcast host Tim Pool appeared on the PBD Podcast, where he revealed why he would vote for former President Donald Trump instead of potential challenger Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL).​

tim-pool-screengrab.jpg

During the podcast, Pool praised DeSantis as the “best governor this country has.”
However, Pool then said that he would vote for Trump over DeSantis in the primaries because he believes that Trump would dismantle federal agencies and purge the bureaucratic class, something that would be good for the United States.
“What do I like about Trump? The reason I’d vote for him not because I think he’s the greatest leader we’ve ever had, I think his foreign policy has been absolutely fantastic considering presidents we’ve had in the past,” said Pool.

“Donald Trump’s gonna fire everybody. He wants revenge,” he continued. “And I think if the one thing I can get out of the next presidency is the purging of the bureaucratic class, this country will be better off for it.”

“I don’t know if Ron DeSantis would do that. I think he’s a negotiator. I think he’s gonna go in and say, how can we make this clean, and it’s gonna be like Trump’s first term all over again. they’re gonna attack him; they’re gonna smear him; they’re gonna lie; they’re gonna get their key-positioned people to sludge everything up.
“I think at this point with Donald Trump; he’s unleashed, he’s so angry, he’s been slighted, he’s been lied about, they’ve impeached him, they’re… prosecuting him in New York, they’re trying to get him in D.C., they’re trying to get him in Georgia. Now they’re accusing him of a 30-year-old rape case. I mean, these people are relentless, and almost every single time, these stories turn out to be fake or, even worse, it’s them.”
“I think Trump gets elected, he walks in and says ‘I don’t care how, I don’t care why, we are going to terminate these people. We’re going to send them out with nice little boxes full of their belongings, and we’re going to figure out how to do it.'”
“That’s the number one thing this country needs right now,” Pool concluded. “I don’t think DeSantis does it.”
WATCH:


Here’s the interview in its entirety:
look idk how many times I gotta say this: I'll never respect Lindsey Graham to be honest with the american people until he comes out as a gay man, and I'm not going to listen to a single thing Tim Pool has to say until he takes that ridiculous beanie off his head. Like your bald my guy, just accept it and move on.
 
look idk how many times I gotta say this: I'll never respect Lindsey Graham to be honest with the american people until he comes out as a gay man, and I'm not going to listen to a single thing Tim Pool has to say until he takes that ridiculous beanie off his head. Like your bald my guy, just accept it and move on.
Tl,dr version is Tim Pool wholeheartedly supports authoritarianism...apparently.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Kind of blows your whole theory that they didn't know they were false.
Daily Wire LMAO. Please stfu about this laptop that didn't implicate Joe in any crimes. None of this shit matters but if story suppression is the thing you're hanging your hat on, why aren't you enraged about the criminal payments Mango Mussolini made to those two porn stars before the 2016 election? Those are real crimes and you don't seem to care about them at all. What a fake, whiny loser you are.
 
You keep spiting 50 intelligence agents even though this has been thoroughly explained. I swear some of you guys just ignore stuff that doesn't conform to the theory in your mind.

For example, @TigerGrowls has said that no evidence will convince him that the election wasn't stolen. Do you understand how crazy that is? Literally decided that it was a stolen, and can not be convinced no matter what that it wasn't.

Guys. Seriously. It's so hard to even talk with y'all.
I did not say that. I said it would take some clear and convincing evidence to change my mind.
 
It has been explained on this site. They signed a letter saying that the story had all of the signs of a Russian Disinformation Mission, which it did. We know that the Russians have been extremely involved in influencing elections in the past, and were actively trying to influence this election.

You see the as a devious act, I see it as fairly common sense. It's also how Intelligence agencies work. They rarely know things with 100% certainty, they make judgements based on experience and patterns along with on the ground Intel they have.

We were fairly certain that Iraq had WMD, that was proven false, but the intelligence communities world wide were pretty confident.
They already knew the laptop was legit and real and this fact has been confirmed without a doubt for anyone with a brain that wants to see it. It was a malicious and premeditated lie designed to help Joe Biden win the election.
 
And apparently the Trump fan playbook is blame others, say others cheat, but never actually prove any of that.

What is so frustrating is you keep stating things like "Russian Collusion" as if it was absolutely false and nothing was discovered that showed improper actions. Trump wasn't found innocent by Mueller, he just wasn't prosecuted due to being a sitting president. Is this really so hard to understand?
Russian collusion was absolutely false. Obama knew, Biden knew, comey knew, clapper knew, Clinton knew.

There is no terminology in our justice system that finds you innocent, that’s not even possible. Not surprising coming from someone who doesn’t understand the difference between civil and criminal courts.
 
Russian collusion was absolutely false. Obama knew, Biden knew, comey knew, clapper knew, Clinton knew.

There is no terminology in our justice system that finds you innocent, that’s not even possible. Not surprising coming from someone who doesn’t understand the difference between civil and criminal courts.

Not sure what gave you the impression that I don't understand the difference between civil court and criminal court. I assure you I understand. You however seem to have some issues with understanding basic facts.
 
Not sure what gave you the impression that I don't understand the difference between civil court and criminal court. I assure you I understand. You however seem to have some issues with understanding basic facts.
So you are a fan of a convicted sexual abuser? Good to know.

He was found guilty of sexual abuse in a Civil case. Obviously no jail time, but he's still found guilty of the crime. Fairly similar to OJ Simpson...
And apparently the Trump fan playbook is blame others, say others cheat, but never actually prove any of that.

What is so frustrating is you keep stating things like "Russian Collusion" as if it was absolutely false and nothing was discovered that showed improper actions. Trump wasn't found innocent by Mueller, he just wasn't prosecuted due to being a sitting president. Is this really so hard to understand?

Here is what gives me the impression you don't understand the difference between civil and criminal court.

in a civil court, you are not convicted of anything. You aren't found guilty of anything. You are found liable. There is a MUCH higher legal standard to prove guilt and thus why the difference is significant.

In our court system, either civil or criminal, there is no such thing as being found innocent. You are trying to hold Trump to a standard that does not exist in "innocent." You are found Not Guilty which was the verdict rendered by the Special Counsel, who by the way, had access to the full powers of the United States Government and the NSA in addition to an unlimited budget. If he colluded we would know about it.

The fact is Russian Collusion was a political dirty trick that caused half the nation to lose faith in our system. It did more to damage our country than any other political trick in the history of our nation. It was so effective, that it has people like you applying legal standards that don't exist. You still believe that something was discovered that shows improper actions despite the MOUNTAINS of evidence that it was a trick concocted by none other than Hillary Clinton.

So either you didn't know the difference between a civil and criminal court, or you were just parroting what you heard from the news sources you watch. Neither one is a good excuse for framing your arguments the way you did. Clemson deserves better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Here is what gives me the impression you don't understand the difference between civil and criminal court.

in a civil court, you are not convicted of anything. You aren't found guilty of anything. You are found liable. There is a MUCH higher legal standard to prove guilt and thus why the difference is significant.

In our court system, either civil or criminal, there is no such thing as being found innocent. You are trying to hold Trump to a standard that does not exist in "innocent." You are found Not Guilty which was the verdict rendered by the Special Counsel, who by the way, had access to the full powers of the United States Government and the NSA in addition to an unlimited budget. If he colluded we would know about it.

The fact is Russian Collusion was a political dirty trick that caused half the nation to lose faith in our system. It did more to damage our country than any other political trick in the history of our nation. It was so effective, that it has people like you applying legal standards that don't exist. You still believe that something was discovered that shows improper actions despite the MOUNTAINS of evidence that it was a trick concocted by none other than Hillary Clinton.

So either you didn't know the difference between a civil and criminal court, or you were just parroting what you heard from the news sources you watch. Neither one is a good excuse for framing your arguments the way you did. Clemson deserves better.
This is akin to when you idiots harp on about calling them “clips” instead of the proper term of “magazines.”

It’s pedantry for the sake of obfuscating the issue.
 
Here is what gives me the impression you don't understand the difference between civil and criminal court.

in a civil court, you are not convicted of anything. You aren't found guilty of anything. You are found liable. There is a MUCH higher legal standard to prove guilt and thus why the difference is significant.

In our court system, either civil or criminal, there is no such thing as being found innocent. You are trying to hold Trump to a standard that does not exist in "innocent." You are found Not Guilty which was the verdict rendered by the Special Counsel, who by the way, had access to the full powers of the United States Government and the NSA in addition to an unlimited budget. If he colluded we would know about it.

The fact is Russian Collusion was a political dirty trick that caused half the nation to lose faith in our system. It did more to damage our country than any other political trick in the history of our nation. It was so effective, that it has people like you applying legal standards that don't exist. You still believe that something was discovered that shows improper actions despite the MOUNTAINS of evidence that it was a trick concocted by none other than Hillary Clinton.

So either you didn't know the difference between a civil and criminal court, or you were just parroting what you heard from the news sources you watch. Neither one is a good excuse for framing your arguments the way you did. Clemson deserves better.

He was found to have sexually abused and caused harm to the tune of $5million. Use whatever language you'd like to use. The facts remains you are a fan of a man who is a sexual abuser. Trump has an awful history with how he has treated,talked about,and cheated women. This behavior has been verified in articles, Trump's own words, and now by a jury of his peers.
 
nm
He was found to have sexually abused and caused harm to the tune of $5million. Use whatever language you'd like to use. The facts remains you are a fan of a man who is a sexual abuser. Trump has an awful history with how he has treated,talked about,and cheated women. This behavior has been verified in articles, Trump's own words, and now by a jury of his peers.
Its not whatever language I would like to use, they are called facts. You got the information wrong and what you were wrong about was material and significant. Clemson deserves better.

You probably believe the sexual assault accuser, i don't. The same biased jury found that she lied about the rape. There was a special carve out in the statue of limitations, just to get Trump. This lady was so violently sexually assaulted she waited 20+ years to do something about it?

Its no surprise you are falling for this just like you fell hook line and sinker for Russian Collusion and the intelligence letter and every other fabricated the MSM pours in your feed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
nm

Its not whatever language I would like to use, they are called facts. You got the information wrong and what you were wrong about was material and significant. Clemson deserves better.

You probably believe the sexual assault accuser, i don't. The same biased jury found that she lied about the rape. There was a special carve out in the statue of limitations, just to get Trump. This lady was so violently sexually assaulted she waited 20+ years to do something about it?

Its no surprise you are falling for this just like you fell hook line and sinker for Russian Collusion and the intelligence letter and every other fabricated the MSM pours in your feed.

You clearly have no clue about the fact that many,many victims don't scream,don't report it, and it still happens.


What makes you feel that the jury was biased? Because Trump said so? His lawyers have the ability to strike jurors and select jurors.

Also, why do you insist on discussing other issues like it's a freaking litany every single post? What in the world does Russian Collusion, or Intelligence letters have to do with Trump's trial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and WapPride
It has been explained on this site. They signed a letter saying that the story had all of the signs of a Russian Disinformation Mission, which it did. We know that the Russians have been extremely involved in influencing elections in the past, and were actively trying to influence this election.

You see the as a devious act, I see it as fairly common sense. It's also how Intelligence agencies work. They rarely know things with 100% certainty, they make judgements based on experience and patterns along with on the ground Intel they have.

We were fairly certain that Iraq had WMD, that was proven false, but the intelligence communities world wide were pretty confident.
Do you still see it as common sense when Brennan admits it was all politics? @yoshi121374

You still think that’s just how intelligence agencies work?



 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
He was found to have sexually abused and caused harm to the tune of $5million. Use whatever language you'd like to use. The facts remains you are a fan of a man who is a sexual abuser. Trump has an awful history with how he has treated,talked about,and cheated women. This behavior has been verified in articles, Trump's own words, and now by a jury of his peers.
Still believe this hoar?

 
It has been explained on this site. They signed a letter saying that the story had all of the signs of a Russian Disinformation Mission, which it did. We know that the Russians have been extremely involved in influencing elections in the past, and were actively trying to influence this election.

You see the as a devious act, I see it as fairly common sense. It's also how Intelligence agencies work. They rarely know things with 100% certainty, they make judgements based on experience and patterns along with on the ground Intel they have.

We were fairly certain that Iraq had WMD, that was proven false, but the intelligence communities world wide were pretty confident.
@yoshi121374

Durham concluded that “neither U.S. nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”

Do you stand by your comments above? Your common sense didn't turn out to be very good. What do you have to say for yourself? Wrong on Russian Collusion and wrong on 50 intel agents in one post. You believed it all.

But remember, there is NO WAY they could have changed any votes. Just trust em.

 
Durham concluded that “neither U.S. nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”

Do you stand by your comments above? Your common sense didn't turn out to be very good. What do you have to say for yourself? Wrong on Russian Collusion and wrong on 50 intel agents in one post. You believed it all.

But remember, there is NO WAY they could have changed any votes. Just trust em.


Yes, this post doesn't dispute that the agents felt that the information was similar to Russian Disinformation tactics and should be investigated further.

I'm not sure you understand the nuance and certainly don't understand how Intelligence works.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT