ADVERTISEMENT

Walmart raising mimimum wage and giving bonuses thanks to Tax Reform

scotchtiger

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 15, 2005
19,891
16,012
113
Mount Pleasant, SC
Minimum wage up to $11/hr
Bonuses up to $1K

https://www.wsj.com/articles/wal-mart-to-raise-minimum-u-s-wage-to-11-an-hour-1515676452

Wal-Mart to Raise Minimum U.S. Wage to $11 an Hour
Retailer also plans to pay one-time bonuses of up to $1,000
BN-WY392_3ixBM_OR_20180111081032.jpg

Employees speak at a Wal-Mart location in Burbank, Calif. Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg News
By
Sarah Nassauer
Updated Jan. 11, 2018 9:37 a.m. ET
131 COMMENTS

Wal-Mart WMT +0.00% Stores Inc. said it would raise starting pay to $11 per hour for all its U.S. employees and hand out one-time bonuses as competition for low-wage workers intensifies and new tax legislation will add billions to the retailer’s profits.

The giant retailer is the largest private employer in the world with 2.3 million employees, including around 1.5 million in the U.S. Its current starting salary in the U.S. is $10 an hour after workers take a training course. The new wage increase will take effect in February.

This is the third U.S.-wide minimum wage increase at the company since 2015 as it works to improve its 4,700 U.S. stores while investing heavily to compete with Amazon.com Inc. online.

The company said the salary change would add $300 million to its annual expenses and it expects to take a $400 million charge in the current quarter for the one-time bonus. The amount of the bonus will vary based on length of service, reaching up to $1,000 for an individual with 20 years of service.

Related
The retailer, which had nearly $500 billion in global revenue last year, is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%. Retailers have had one of the highest average effective tax rates because much of their operations are U.S.-based. Also, their industry has done little manufacturing or research and development so they don’t benefit from deductions on those activities.

“We are early in the stages of assessing the opportunities tax reform creates for us to invest in our customers and associates and to further strengthen our business,” said Wal-Mart Chief Executive Doug McMillon in a release.

With the additional expected profit, Wal-Mart is considering investments in “lower prices for customers, better wages and training for associates and investments in the future of our company, including in technology,” he said.

The wage increase comes at a time when competition for low-wage workers is rising among retailers, e-commerce warehouses and other industries that require a large, unskilled employee base. The monthly U.S. unemployment rate has held at a 17-year low since October. Retail trade workers in the U.S. earned an average hourly wage of $15.51 in December, an increase of about 11% versus five years ago, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Related Video
A Brief History of Retail
The retail industry is undergoing another major shift -- to e-commerce. How did we get here? Photo: Associated Press
When Wal-Mart increased wages and added training through 2015 and 2016 the moves cost the retailer $2.7 billion, an expense that put pressure on the company’s stock price.

This increase will cost less because Wal-Mart already has a “sizeable” group of stores paying employees at least $11 an hour and already had plans to increase wages in some stores during the coming fiscal year, which starts Feb. 1, said spokesman Kory Lundberg.

Still, the “vast majority” of store employees will see an increase with the change, Mr. Lundberg said.

Several other large U.S. employers have announced plans to raise wages or pay bonuses in the wake of the tax overhaul. The day the legislation was signed by President Donald Trump, AT&T Inc. and Comcast Corp. said they would pay a $1,000 bonus to most of their U.S. employees, or more than 300,000 people. Wells Fargo & Co. said it would raise its starting pay to $15 an hour.

The federal minimum wage has remained $7.25 an hour since 2009, but dozens of states and municipalities have implemented higher levels in recent years. An $11 hourly wage is the minimum required in Massachusetts and Washington state. Retailers, restaurants and other employers of hourly workers have also raised wages to compete for talent, economists say.

Wal-Mart’s average hourly wage for full-time U.S. store employees is expected to rise to around $14.50 an hour after the latest change, up from $13.85 an hour currently, said Mr. Lundberg.

In 2015 the company kicked off a round of increases in its industry by lifting store workers’ starting wages to $9 an hour, later increasing that to $10 an hour for employees who completed a training course. Others including Gap Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corp. also raised their minimum pay levels.

Late last year Target Corp. , which employs more than 300,000 people, raised its starting pay to $11 an hour and pledged to increase it to $15 within three years.

Retailers have “a broad, long-term problem because the labor market is tight and it’s going to get tighter,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics in the wake of the Target move.

The latest increase comes at a time of relative strength for Wal-Mart, despite the woes of some smaller and mall-based chains. The company, which is one of the biggest sellers of groceries, has reported strong sales over the last year as it ramped up its online business to fend off Amazon and benefited from the troubles at store closings by smaller retailers. Wal-Mart shares surged more than 40% last year, hitting record highs. The share price inched higher in premarket trading to $100.20.

71L2-U1vlpL._SY550_.jpg
 
Good for them. What percentage of companies do you think will do this? Walmart was already under significant pressure over the "living wage" discussion, so this is a good time and situation for them to address it.

I still hold a healthy level of skepticism that many of the big companies will follow suit on their lower wage earners. I'm certainly for it, but perhaps my 20+ years in corporate America have me jaded.
 
Wait, so the increase wages will cost Wal-Mart 300 million. Yet with the bill, walmart "is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%."

Am I missing something?

Yes. You are missing the fact that just because a company "only" disperses hundreds of millions of their tax savings within a month of the bill passing, it's still good news for 'murica.
 
Yes. You are missing the fact that just because a company "only" disperses hundreds of millions of their tax savings within a month of the bill passing, it's still good news for 'murica.

This ^^^
They didn’t have to give anything back. It is a great start, And I would bet more increases and bonuses are on the way as companies like this get a better feel for what tax reform will really mean to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiger Champ
Trump = winner. It’s amazing how much more effective he is than our previous 2 clowns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Munson
My company gave the same bonus we've had the last 3 years, which is a profit share. If we make more profit my bonus will go up next year, and it should. We didnt get any tax-cut-derived bonus from this plan so far.
 
Walt-Mart also raised wages in 2015 and 2016 and gave bonuses in 2016, but no tax cut to tie those too.

Good job though continuing to rise wages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marshmk
Wow. Who the hell wouldn’t trade millions for billions? The increase in wages were going to happen regardless. More than likely, just to stay competitive, all workers would be in that 3.5% annual raise, so .35 cents was already baked into 2018 budgets. The one time bonuses will not come anywhere near $1k, because you have to be here 20 years to get this amount. How many people do you know (that’s not already moved into management) works at a damn Walmart for 20 years??!

This is a big ass PR stunt to proactively counter the backlash when workers find out that Walmart will soon be flushed with billions more in profit while they are still paying workers less than a solid living standard.

Congratulate this move all you want. This is mere crumbs to the masses while the Uber rich continues the massive transfer of wealth in this country.
 
Trump = winner. It’s amazing how much more effective he is than our previous 2 clowns.

So much winning. Already making moves on entitlement reform. Want free stuff from the government? Work...


WASHINGTON—The Trump administration issued guidelines Thursday to help states impose the first-ever work requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries, one of the biggest changes in the program’s 50-year history.

That approach contrasts with a move the administration made with less fanfare earlier in the week to extend waivers that allow food-stamp recipients in 33 states to avoid work requirements.

The different approaches reflect the complex political forces that surround safety-net programs. Many conservatives argue that people shouldn’t receive government aid without working if they can, but officials in some states want to spare their residents such requirements.

The new work guidelines issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services aim to transform Medicaid, in states seeking a program revamp, from a guaranteed benefit based on income to a program that can deny aid to many adults if certain conditions aren’t met. States can determine what can qualify as work under the requirements, such as education or community service.

“This is in response to proposals we are receiving from states,” said Seema Verma, who heads CMS. “This effort is about helping people rise out of poverty.”
 
Wow. Who the hell wouldn’t trade millions for billions? The increase in wages were going to happen regardless. More than likely, just to stay competitive, all workers would be in that 3.5% annual raise, so .35 cents was already baked into 2018 budgets. The one time bonuses will not come anywhere near $1k, because you have to be here 20 years to get this amount. How many people do you know (that’s not already moved into management) works at a damn Walmart for 20 years??!

This is a big ass PR stunt to proactively counter the backlash when workers find out that Walmart will soon be flushed with billions more in profit while they are still paying workers less than a solid living standard.

Congratulate this move all you want. This is mere crumbs to the masses while the Uber rich continues the massive transfer of wealth in this country.
You are referencing Wal-Mart like you are there. Do you work there or just on TI while shopping?
 
This can't be said enough. The last 16 years have been a joke.

glad ron is back to grace us with his terrible political takes.

i hated bush but i can't fathom how anyone would think this administration thus far has been any better. we literally have a mentally ill man running the country. that alone makes it the biggest disaster since reagan's final years.
 
Minimum wage up to $11/hr
Bonuses up to $1K

https://www.wsj.com/articles/wal-mart-to-raise-minimum-u-s-wage-to-11-an-hour-1515676452

Wal-Mart to Raise Minimum U.S. Wage to $11 an Hour
Retailer also plans to pay one-time bonuses of up to $1,000
BN-WY392_3ixBM_OR_20180111081032.jpg

Employees speak at a Wal-Mart location in Burbank, Calif. Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg News
By
Sarah Nassauer
Updated Jan. 11, 2018 9:37 a.m. ET
131 COMMENTS

Wal-Mart WMT +0.00% Stores Inc. said it would raise starting pay to $11 per hour for all its U.S. employees and hand out one-time bonuses as competition for low-wage workers intensifies and new tax legislation will add billions to the retailer’s profits.

The giant retailer is the largest private employer in the world with 2.3 million employees, including around 1.5 million in the U.S. Its current starting salary in the U.S. is $10 an hour after workers take a training course. The new wage increase will take effect in February.

This is the third U.S.-wide minimum wage increase at the company since 2015 as it works to improve its 4,700 U.S. stores while investing heavily to compete with Amazon.com Inc. online.

The company said the salary change would add $300 million to its annual expenses and it expects to take a $400 million charge in the current quarter for the one-time bonus. The amount of the bonus will vary based on length of service, reaching up to $1,000 for an individual with 20 years of service.

Related
The retailer, which had nearly $500 billion in global revenue last year, is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%. Retailers have had one of the highest average effective tax rates because much of their operations are U.S.-based. Also, their industry has done little manufacturing or research and development so they don’t benefit from deductions on those activities.

“We are early in the stages of assessing the opportunities tax reform creates for us to invest in our customers and associates and to further strengthen our business,” said Wal-Mart Chief Executive Doug McMillon in a release.

With the additional expected profit, Wal-Mart is considering investments in “lower prices for customers, better wages and training for associates and investments in the future of our company, including in technology,” he said.

The wage increase comes at a time when competition for low-wage workers is rising among retailers, e-commerce warehouses and other industries that require a large, unskilled employee base. The monthly U.S. unemployment rate has held at a 17-year low since October. Retail trade workers in the U.S. earned an average hourly wage of $15.51 in December, an increase of about 11% versus five years ago, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Related Video
A Brief History of Retail
The retail industry is undergoing another major shift -- to e-commerce. How did we get here? Photo: Associated Press
When Wal-Mart increased wages and added training through 2015 and 2016 the moves cost the retailer $2.7 billion, an expense that put pressure on the company’s stock price.

This increase will cost less because Wal-Mart already has a “sizeable” group of stores paying employees at least $11 an hour and already had plans to increase wages in some stores during the coming fiscal year, which starts Feb. 1, said spokesman Kory Lundberg.

Still, the “vast majority” of store employees will see an increase with the change, Mr. Lundberg said.

Several other large U.S. employers have announced plans to raise wages or pay bonuses in the wake of the tax overhaul. The day the legislation was signed by President Donald Trump, AT&T Inc. and Comcast Corp. said they would pay a $1,000 bonus to most of their U.S. employees, or more than 300,000 people. Wells Fargo & Co. said it would raise its starting pay to $15 an hour.

The federal minimum wage has remained $7.25 an hour since 2009, but dozens of states and municipalities have implemented higher levels in recent years. An $11 hourly wage is the minimum required in Massachusetts and Washington state. Retailers, restaurants and other employers of hourly workers have also raised wages to compete for talent, economists say.

Wal-Mart’s average hourly wage for full-time U.S. store employees is expected to rise to around $14.50 an hour after the latest change, up from $13.85 an hour currently, said Mr. Lundberg.

In 2015 the company kicked off a round of increases in its industry by lifting store workers’ starting wages to $9 an hour, later increasing that to $10 an hour for employees who completed a training course. Others including Gap Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corp. also raised their minimum pay levels.

Late last year Target Corp. , which employs more than 300,000 people, raised its starting pay to $11 an hour and pledged to increase it to $15 within three years.

Retailers have “a broad, long-term problem because the labor market is tight and it’s going to get tighter,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics in the wake of the Target move.

The latest increase comes at a time of relative strength for Wal-Mart, despite the woes of some smaller and mall-based chains. The company, which is one of the biggest sellers of groceries, has reported strong sales over the last year as it ramped up its online business to fend off Amazon and benefited from the troubles at store closings by smaller retailers. Wal-Mart shares surged more than 40% last year, hitting record highs. The share price inched higher in premarket trading to $100.20.

71L2-U1vlpL._SY550_.jpg
Meanwhile, many Walmart employees are on welfare due to their low wages. Walmart "double dippin'..."
 
Wait, so the increase wages will cost Wal-Mart 300 million. Yet with the bill, walmart "is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%."

Am I missing something?
Nevermind at those wages Walmart employees are still dependent on government assistance. This is more fodder for Trump voters to monitor working Americans EBT cards in grocery lines.
 
So much winning. Already making moves on entitlement reform. Want free stuff from the government? Work...


WASHINGTON—The Trump administration issued guidelines Thursday to help states impose the first-ever work requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries, one of the biggest changes in the program’s 50-year history.

That approach contrasts with a move the administration made with less fanfare earlier in the week to extend waivers that allow food-stamp recipients in 33 states to avoid work requirements.

The different approaches reflect the complex political forces that surround safety-net programs. Many conservatives argue that people shouldn’t receive government aid without working if they can, but officials in some states want to spare their residents such requirements.

The new work guidelines issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services aim to transform Medicaid, in states seeking a program revamp, from a guaranteed benefit based on income to a program that can deny aid to many adults if certain conditions aren’t met. States can determine what can qualify as work under the requirements, such as education or community service.

“This is in response to proposals we are receiving from states,” said Seema Verma, who heads CMS. “This effort is about helping people rise out of poverty.”
Am I misunderstanding or does this article not say the President is allowing food stamp recipients to avoid work requirements? Are these the same waivers President Obama got crucified over by Republicans?
 
Most surprising part of the whole article is that everybody at Wally World was already making $10/hr.

Who knew?
 
Wow. Who the hell wouldn’t trade millions for billions? The increase in wages were going to happen regardless. More than likely, just to stay competitive, all workers would be in that 3.5% annual raise, so .35 cents was already baked into 2018 budgets. The one time bonuses will not come anywhere near $1k, because you have to be here 20 years to get this amount. How many people do you know (that’s not already moved into management) works at a damn Walmart for 20 years??!

This is a big ass PR stunt to proactively counter the backlash when workers find out that Walmart will soon be flushed with billions more in profit while they are still paying workers less than a solid living standard.

Congratulate this move all you want. This is mere crumbs to the masses while the Uber rich continues the massive transfer of wealth in this country.
This a typical statement from someone who has never put HIS OWN MONEY into a business. Why don't you and E warren and Barry start your own company; with your attitude you would see very quickly how EVIL ALL COMPANIES ARE. The govt. doesn't make
money, they just take money. It astounds me how many people think like you do, It's always someone else that is screwing the whole world. This why minimum wage increases won't work. If they went to $15.00/hr, then you would say $20.00 is needed.
This is just a revolving door issue that would never get solved.
Be happy for the people that have a job and for the bonuses that they do get. It takes BALLS to start a business and MEGA BALLS
to grow the business.
 
Good for Wal Mart. That said, people need to keep this in perspective. I said before that the corporate tax rate was too high and needed to be lowered. Even Obama was in favor of lowering the corporate tax rate, though not enough IMO.

I have never had an issue with lower corporate tax rates. The major problem I have with the tax bill that was signed as it relates to the corporate tax rate cuts is that there were no provisions to ensure the money that corporations received as a result of the tax cuts were invested in ways that lead to American jobs, benefit the American economy, and benefit American workers within the US. It should have been tied to American investment and American growth. But unfortunately there were absolutely ZERO regs on how businesses spend those tax cuts. That was a major problem with NAFTA and TPP, etc. NAFTA benefited American businesses, especially the top executives and business owners, but they were disasters for the American worker and American jobs for the same reason I just mentioned. NAFTA and TPP are needed, they just need to be more tightly regulated domestically to ensure they benefit the American worker and not just the elite. Its not about us getting a bad deal with foreign economies, it's about more American workers getting their share of a good deal.

The wage increases, as the article indicates, won't impact all employees, only the ones making less than $11 per hour. Many already make above that and won't see a wage increase. Also, this wage increase was already planned for by Wal Mart regardless of the tax cuts and was already scheduled for the 1st quarter of this year. This is the 3rd minimum wage increase of at least $1 per hour dating back to 2015 for Wal Mart and both of the 2 previous ones had nothing to do with tax reform and more to do with competition, corporate image, and their strategic growth planning. Target had previously raised wages to $11 and this was a strategic move to compete for retail workers and tamp down community resistance to Wal Mart stores. But even still, good for Wal Mart.

The $1k bonus is a direct result of the tax cuts. However, the $1k bonus is not a $1k bonus for all employees. Only those with 20 years service qualify for the full $1k. Others receive a lesser share. Also, the tax cut bonus is a one time benefit being paid that amounts to about 10% of the one year tax savings and about 1% of the 10 year tax savings Wal Mart will receive from the tax bill. So it's not a very big chunk. Its peanuts, really. What will be more interesting to see is how Wal Mart chooses to spend and invest the remaining 99% of the tens of billions they will save in taxes over the next decade and how it will impact the American worker and jobs in the U.S. Hopefully 100% of those savings are invested in America, but right now all we know is at least 1% will be.

I just think the average person is too naive, and a few bucks thrown at them keeps them from see the billions going elsewhere and allows the bad guys to drive a false narrative. Hopefully our corporations invest heavily in America with this money, but a measily 1% here or there spent by a extreme minority of corporations isn't evidence that that is happening... Yet. Be hopeful, but be smart, people.

After all, this bill is going to cost all of us between $ 1 and $1.5 trillion dollars over 10 years. We need to make sure we see that money invested in America. If our economy and wages don't grow at a rate to support $1.5 trillion in additional tax revenues returning to the government, we lose. If government programs elsewhere get cut and those programs directly impact your family to offset the $1.5 trillion, you lose. Don't let a few hundred bucks here or there take your eye off of where the real money is going. All we know is what 1% of the money received by AT&T, Wal Mart, etc. is being spent on. Don't build a narrative and form an opinion until you see where the other 99% of their investment goes and where the other 99.9% of corporations invest their tax savings. Don't look foolish. Be hopeful for the best, but don't get suckered by a slight of hand trick and a false narrative.
 
Good for Wal Mart. That said, people need to keep this in perspective. I said before that the corporate tax rate was too high and needed to be lowered. Even Obama was in favor of lowering the corporate tax rate, though not enough IMO.

I have never had an issue with lower corporate tax rates. The major problem I have with the tax bill that was signed as it relates to the corporate tax rate cuts is that there were no provisions to ensure the money that corporations received as a result of the tax cuts were invested in ways that lead to American jobs, benefit the American economy, and benefit American workers within the US. It should have been tied to American investment and American growth. But unfortunately there were absolutely ZERO regs on how businesses spend those tax cuts. That was a major problem with NAFTA and TPP, etc. NAFTA benefited American businesses, especially the top executives and business owners, but they were disasters for the American worker and American jobs for the same reason I just mentioned.

The wage increases, as the article indicates, won't imoact all employees. Only the ones making less than $11 per hour. Many already make above that and won't see a wage increase. Also, this wage increase was already planned for by Wal Mart regardless of the tax cuts and was already scheduled for the 1st quarter of this year. This is the 3rd minimum wage increase of at least $1 per hour dating back to 2015 for Wal Mart and both of the 2 previous ones had nothing to do with tax reform and more to do with competition, corporate image, and their strategic growth planning. Target had previously raised wages to $11 and this was a strategic move to compete for retail workers and tamp down community resistance to Wal Mart stores. But even still, good for Wal Mart.

The $1k bonus is a direct result of the tax cuts. However, the $1k bonus is not a $1k bonus for all employees. Only those with 20 years service qualify for the full $1k. Others receive a lesser share. Also, the tax cut bonus is a one time benefit being paid that amounts to about 10% of the one year tax savings and about 1% of the 10 year tax savings Wal Mart will receive from the tax bill. So it's not a very big chunk. What will be more interesting to see is how Wal Mart chooses to spend and invest the remaining 99% of the tens of billions they will save in taxes over the next decade and how it will impact the American worker and jobs in the U.S. Hopefully 100% of those savings are invested in America, but right now all we know is at least 1% will be.

I just think the average person is too naive, and a few bucks thrown at them keeps them from see the billions going elsewhere and allows the bad guys to drive a false narrative. Hopefully our corporations invest heavily in America with this money, but a measily 1% here or there spent by a extreme minority of corporations isn't evidence that that is happening... Yet. Be hopeful, but be smart, people.

After all, this bill is going to cost all of us $1.5 trillion dollars over 10 years. We need to make sure we see that money invested in America. If our economy and wages don't grow at a rate to support $1.5 trillion in additional tax revenues returning to the government, we lose. If government programs elsewhere get cut that directly impact your family to offset the $1.5 trillion, you lose. Don't let a few hundred bucks here or there take your eye off of where the real money is going. All we know is what 1% of the money received by AT&T, Wal Mart, etc. is being spent on. Don't build a narrative and form an opinion until you see where the other 99% of their investment goes and where the other 99.9% of corporations invest their tax savings. Be hopeful for the best, but don't get suckered by a slight of hand trick and a false narrative.

And don't be suckered into believing the 1.5 trillion. Those figures were derived from dumbing down Obama era terrible growth data....expect much better than that.
 
Wait, so the increase wages will cost Wal-Mart 300 million. Yet with the bill, walmart "is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%."

Am I missing something?
Yes you are. You are missing a basic understanding of economics....you and millions of other Americans. Econ 101 shoul
Wait, so the increase wages will cost Wal-Mart 300 million. Yet with the bill, walmart "is expected to get billions in savings from the tax overhaul, which lowers the U.S. corporate rate to 21% from 35%."

Am I missing something?
Yes you are. You're missing a basic understanding of economics.
 
Good for Wal Mart. That said, people need to keep this in perspective. I said before that the corporate tax rate was too high and needed to be lowered. Even Obama was in favor of lowering the corporate tax rate, though not enough IMO.

I have never had an issue with lower corporate tax rates. The major problem I have with the tax bill that was signed as it relates to the corporate tax rate cuts is that there were no provisions to ensure the money that corporations received as a result of the tax cuts were invested in ways that lead to American jobs, benefit the American economy, and benefit American workers within the US. It should have been tied to American investment and American growth. But unfortunately there were absolutely ZERO regs on how businesses spend those tax cuts. That was a major problem with NAFTA and TPP, etc. NAFTA benefited American businesses, especially the top executives and business owners, but they were disasters for the American worker and American jobs for the same reason I just mentioned.

The wage increases, as the article indicates, won't imoact all employees. Only the ones making less than $11 per hour. Many already make above that and won't see a wage increase. Also, this wage increase was already planned for by Wal Mart regardless of the tax cuts and was already scheduled for the 1st quarter of this year. This is the 3rd minimum wage increase of at least $1 per hour dating back to 2015 for Wal Mart and both of the 2 previous ones had nothing to do with tax reform and more to do with competition, corporate image, and their strategic growth planning. Target had previously raised wages to $11 and this was a strategic move to compete for retail workers and tamp down community resistance to Wal Mart stores. But even still, good for Wal Mart.

The $1k bonus is a direct result of the tax cuts. However, the $1k bonus is not a $1k bonus for all employees. Only those with 20 years service qualify for the full $1k. Others receive a lesser share. Also, the tax cut bonus is a one time benefit being paid that amounts to about 10% of the one year tax savings and about 1% of the 10 year tax savings Wal Mart will receive from the tax bill. So it's not a very big chunk. What will be more interesting to see is how Wal Mart chooses to spend and invest the remaining 99% of the tens of billions they will save in taxes over the next decade and how it will impact the American worker and jobs in the U.S. Hopefully 100% of those savings are invested in America, but right now all we know is at least 1% will be.

I just think the average person is too naive, and a few bucks thrown at them keeps them from see the billions going elsewhere and allows the bad guys to drive a false narrative. Hopefully our corporations invest heavily in America with this money, but a measily 1% here or there spent by a extreme minority of corporations isn't evidence that that is happening... Yet. Be hopeful, but be smart, people.

After all, this bill is going to cost all of us $1.5 trillion dollars over 10 years. We need to make sure we see that money invested in America. If our economy and wages don't grow at a rate to support $1.5 trillion in additional tax revenues returning to the government, we lose. If government programs elsewhere get cut that directly impact your family to offset the $1.5 trillion, you lose. Don't let a few hundred bucks here or there take your eye off of where the real money is going. All we know is what 1% of the money received by AT&T, Wal Mart, etc. is being spent on. Don't build a narrative and form an opinion until you see where the other 99% of their investment goes and where the other 99.9% of corporations invest their tax savings. Be hopeful for the best, but don't get suckered by a slight of hand trick and a false narrative.

WELL SAID
 
Watching liberals try to discredit what is going on right now is worth the price of admission.

what exactly is "going on" that we're missing? this tax cut is the only major piece of legislation from the trump admin, and it's been largely panned by economists and the general public; trump continues to have an approval rating in the high 30s; and he continues to act like an unhinged idiot on twitter, the only place where he allows himself to interact in any meaningful way with the world.
 
Good for Wal Mart. That said, people need to keep this in perspective. I said before that the corporate tax rate was too high and needed to be lowered. Even Obama was in favor of lowering the corporate tax rate, though not enough IMO.

I have never had an issue with lower corporate tax rates. The major problem I have with the tax bill that was signed as it relates to the corporate tax rate cuts is that there were no provisions to ensure the money that corporations received as a result of the tax cuts were invested in ways that lead to American jobs, benefit the American economy, and benefit American workers within the US. It should have been tied to American investment and American growth. But unfortunately there were absolutely ZERO regs on how businesses spend those tax cuts. That was a major problem with NAFTA and TPP, etc. NAFTA benefited American businesses, especially the top executives and business owners, but they were disasters for the American worker and American jobs for the same reason I just mentioned.

The wage increases, as the article indicates, won't imoact all employees. Only the ones making less than $11 per hour. Many already make above that and won't see a wage increase. Also, this wage increase was already planned for by Wal Mart regardless of the tax cuts and was already scheduled for the 1st quarter of this year. This is the 3rd minimum wage increase of at least $1 per hour dating back to 2015 for Wal Mart and both of the 2 previous ones had nothing to do with tax reform and more to do with competition, corporate image, and their strategic growth planning. Target had previously raised wages to $11 and this was a strategic move to compete for retail workers and tamp down community resistance to Wal Mart stores. But even still, good for Wal Mart.

The $1k bonus is a direct result of the tax cuts. However, the $1k bonus is not a $1k bonus for all employees. Only those with 20 years service qualify for the full $1k. Others receive a lesser share. Also, the tax cut bonus is a one time benefit being paid that amounts to about 10% of the one year tax savings and about 1% of the 10 year tax savings Wal Mart will receive from the tax bill. So it's not a very big chunk. What will be more interesting to see is how Wal Mart chooses to spend and invest the remaining 99% of the tens of billions they will save in taxes over the next decade and how it will impact the American worker and jobs in the U.S. Hopefully 100% of those savings are invested in America, but right now all we know is at least 1% will be.

I just think the average person is too naive, and a few bucks thrown at them keeps them from see the billions going elsewhere and allows the bad guys to drive a false narrative. Hopefully our corporations invest heavily in America with this money, but a measily 1% here or there spent by a extreme minority of corporations isn't evidence that that is happening... Yet. Be hopeful, but be smart, people.

After all, this bill is going to cost all of us $1.5 trillion dollars over 10 years. We need to make sure we see that money invested in America. If our economy and wages don't grow at a rate to support $1.5 trillion in additional tax revenues returning to the government, we lose. If government programs elsewhere get cut that directly impact your family to offset the $1.5 trillion, you lose. Don't let a few hundred bucks here or there take your eye off of where the real money is going. All we know is what 1% of the money received by AT&T, Wal Mart, etc. is being spent on. Don't build a narrative and form an opinion until you see where the other 99% of their investment goes and where the other 99.9% of corporations invest their tax savings. Be hopeful for the best, but don't get suckered by a slight of hand trick and a false narrative.

Bingo.

20 years of service at WalMart, a company that generates 500 billion in revenue and it takes a tax cut that will create a windfall of billions for the corporation for those serving 20 years to a grand?

Let’s not act like this is Wal-Mart doing this from the goodness of their heart. This is a calculated PR move IMO.
 
Meanwhile, many Walmart employees are on welfare due to their low wages. Walmart "double dippin'..."

Exactly why we need to revamp welfare. Now the absolute poorest person at Walmart will make over $22K per year assuming full time employment. That's also assuming no overtime and no 2nd job. Want more? Ask for overtime or get a 2nd job. Taxpayers shouldn't have to supplement your income at that level. We're already signing off on that person not contributing to the tax base.
 
Market roaring

Taxes decreasing

Employment increasing

GDP growth accelerating

Pretty much winning in general

all those things were happening under obama, minus the tax decreases, and none of them address the massive wealth inequality that persists in this country. if anything, this ridiculous tax bill only widens it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT