Now imagine 5000+ Navy Sailors doing the same on a 7 month deployment while working 16 hour days.
⚖️ MURDAUGH MURDERS & TRIAL THREAD ⚖️
- Thread starter OldMTPTiger
- Start date
Gotcha.
I guess I was wondering how Buster can afford the 10 million?
But I guess he’s got everything now. But if Alex was in debt, when Buster sells everything to pay his dad’s debt , I just wonder how he can afford it.
Like would a bank loan him the rest? Or does Tinsley reduce the 10 million?
Assume they voluntarily enlisted and are making more than $10/day
never heard the detailed admonition at beginning the case but the daily instruction was “please do not discuss the case with anyone”
I think he had added a $10mil commercial or farm policy in the preceding 12 months
maybe it was an umbrella but it was 10 and they got 500k from house and 4 or 4.3 from whatever new policy
I think the way that defense opened up all the financial crimes was when they asked one witness something like: 'can you imagine what reason a loving family man would have to do this....?'
roughly paraphrased
Tinsley doesn’t have a 10 million judgment he said they should pay @ that much - his remaining claims go to trial in August
based on Tinsley’s new national reputation, I would think all available monies will be paid before trial
You think Parkers settles? I do agree they have more reason to after watching Tinsley's performance in this murder trial.
Edmund Bigham ( "A Piece of The Fox's Hide" book)
I don’t see why not
typical dram shop liability theory
drunk kills someone - where were they drinking or who provided alcohol?
I know liquor stores carry 1 million policy minimum
not familiar with Parker’s but if multiple locations then likely more than 1 mil policy
She said that he was more interested in clearing Paul's name over the boat crash than finding who killed Paul and Maggie on the stand.
I took the conversation as a lack of understating that help was on the way. I wonder if Maggie thought the lady was asking questions in order to determine if help should be sent or not. Hard to know in that moment.
Her comment was ”Alex frequently mentioned clearing Paul’s name in the boat accident” and she thought that was odd given she was more interested in finding the killers, but Alex never talked about that.
It is actually a little worse. Buster had a duplicate ID made so Paul could keep Buster‘s original and use it at his leisure to buy alcohol.
I think Tinsley settled with all of the Murdaughs, I may be wrong about that. Believe they are getting the proceeds from the two properties being sold.
Buster was allowed to keep 500k i think.
He had a large umbrella policy that ended up covering the majority of the Satterfield claim. He got 500 K form home owners and like 4 mil from umbrella.
He was having trouble getting it renewed after the settlement and took out a commercial hunting policy on the property instead. That was part of the reason Tinsley was wanting more money from Alex is because that particular Policy wouldn’t cover anything about the boat accident.
I think it depends. I would like to have a better understanding on what the merits of the claims are. The video that I saw showed the cashier scanning the license handed to her by Paul and then she looked at it and then at him.
Paul and buster looked a lot alike, so I think it is reasonable to assume she thought the ID belonged to the patron buying the beer.
I heard Tinsley say in AM’s trial that Parker’s didn’t follow their own procedure when the alcohol was sold to Paul. I don’t know what that means.
Judge Newman was very tight (and correct) on all of his major rulings. He gets a lot of discretion on these evidentiary issues.
The thought of IAC against Harpootlian and Griffin is laughable as a Murdaugh claiming he was scared of Lowcountry law enforcement.
The State should be fine on that, as my recollection is they commented on his false statements, not on his failure to say anything. If the latter, then it could be a 5th Amendment problem. But really, since Alex's lies started during his 911, the State can comment on his lies.
If it is a constitutional violation, then it has to be proven harmless beyond a reasonable doubt -- which is a very high bar. Based on the overwhelming evidence in this case, Alex's repeated lies (to law enforcement and on the stand), and the vast forensic evidence outlining his moves that night, this case could still be upheld even at that high level of appellate scrutiny.
It is all over the internet if you google Beach Murdaugh settlement. Buster walked away with $530 K
Forensics experts said Paul saw his dad shoot him. I'm not sure about Maggie.
eta: it's possible Paul saw Alec shoot him twice so he would've known Alec's intent to KILL him. That part gives me nightmares bc I got the impression Paul adored his dad.
another juror speaks. Young Clemson grad… TI member??
www.foxnews.com
Alex Murdaugh juror reveals final moments deliberating verdict, how dog kennel video proved key to the case
A juror in Alex Murdaugh's murder trial said the dog kennel video was 'crucial,' and the panel's faith with getting them through the wearying six-week trial in Walterboro, South Carolina.
I asked for a A Few Good Men and Tom Cruise and I got it
Explore - Find your favourite videos on TikTok
Discover the latest TikTok videos on our Explore page. Stay up-to-date on the latest trends and explore your interests here!www.tiktok.com
Amazing
Only Buster and Maggies estate were dropped from the suit. AM is still in, so any assets he has are still in play.
Is there any known treatment for MTWS??
Murdaugh Trial Withdrawal Syndrome. Suffering badly.
GO TIGERS! Beat the chickens!
Murdaugh Trial Withdrawal Syndrome. Suffering badly.
GO TIGERS! Beat the chickens!
Previous link provide about 5 pages ago. Buster's part of that case has been settled already.
No kidding. It was timed nicely with the recruiting dead period and prior to Spring ball.
And.......... that whomever did it, thought about it for a long time!! ??A tell??
No. He bought the umbrella shortly before she died. That is what made the big payout.
I have no idea but....
1) My policy, which is nothing special, pays $2M.
2) I doubt when he purchased that policy is a matter of public record.
I know the NetFlix video said $4mil, but court records say the amount was $500k.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
He took those to Almeda immediately when he “went to see his mom” to hide them and then later disposed of them. Likely bottom of the river.
Most logical explanation.
