Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
marginal tax rates, how do they work?
Excuse it however you'd like. When the high wage earners take a hit, the medium/low wage earners hit is soon to follow.
Yep......aggressive tax hike = flailing economy.
Luckily, Trump is going to win in a landslide, rendering all of this moot.
Right?
Why do you think the "great" depression lasted so long? The same reason Obama's economic policies didn't fix the economy in 8 years.Well, I'd point you at the end of the great depression. FDR hiked the tax rates for companies and the wealthy. People were screaming about how everyone was going to be out of work and socialism too. BUT that move catapulted the US out of the depression and fueled the rise of the middle class. In fact the US was at the height of it's economic power in the 50s and 60s under this scheme. Reagan rolled back the FDR tax brackets and from that point forward, the middle class started to shrink (and that's continued until this day) and the wealth of this country started to shift from the middle class to the wealthy (and that's continued to this day as well).
I'm not all for huge taxes on everyone (including the wealthy), but if you think that the wealthy and companies automatically hire people and give raises when their taxes go down, well, I've got some beachfront property up here in Idaho to sell you cheap. There's a balance to be struck here. Companies hire and give raises when they feel they need to... NOT when they have "extra money". When they have extra cash, they buy back stock, give bonuses to the execs and increase dividends (not that that last part is a bad thing). The wealthy in this country are doing JUST FINE. And they were doing just fine before Trump's tax cuts. As expected, companies didn't go on a hiring spree or start handing out raises when they got that return... they started buying back stock and handing out bonuses to high level execs... and yes, a few CRUMBS trickled down.
Sure man... And no companies made any money and America sucked for the next 50 years after FDRs new deal. I'm sure the middle class would have expanded just fine under the policies of the 1920s. Again... AS SOON AS Reagan rolled back those policies, the middle class started to shrink and the wealth of the country started getting concentrated upward...Why do you think the "great" depression lasted so long? The same reason Obama's economic policies didn't fix the economy in 8 years.
shoot rudy turned in a facetime chat to delaware state police
hunter was chatting with 14 year old chinese girl apparently
if you STILL doubt the laptop evidence
then you are in denial and need mental help
You mean the guy that donated millions to Trump... uhhh OK.
Sure man... And no companies made any money and America sucked for the next 50 years after FDRs new deal. I'm sure the middle class would have expanded just fine under the policies of the 1920s. Again... AS SOON AS Reagan rolled back those policies, the middle class started to shrink and the wealth of the country started getting concentrated upward...
I have no problem with people and companies getting rich. That's capitalism and it's a great thing. BUT unregulated capitalism sucks just like total socialism does. The wealthy should not control what the people do any more than the government should. BOTH things are very very bad... there needs to be a balance struck between the two extremes.
I agree with this.
Well, I'd point you at the end of the great depression. FDR hiked the tax rates for companies and the wealthy. People were screaming about how everyone was going to be out of work and socialism too. BUT that move catapulted the US out of the depression and fueled the rise of the middle class. In fact the US was at the height of it's economic power in the 50s and 60s under this scheme. Reagan rolled back the FDR tax brackets and from that point forward, the middle class started to shrink (and that's continued until this day) and the wealth of this country started to shift from the middle class to the wealthy (and that's continued to this day as well).
I'm not all for huge taxes on everyone (including the wealthy), but if you think that the wealthy and companies automatically hire people and give raises when their taxes go down, well, I've got some beachfront property up here in Idaho to sell you cheap. There's a balance to be struck here. Companies hire and give raises when they feel they need to... NOT when they have "extra money". When they have extra cash, they buy back stock, give bonuses to the execs and increase dividends (not that that last part is a bad thing). The wealthy in this country are doing JUST FINE. And they were doing just fine before Trump's tax cuts. As expected, companies didn't go on a hiring spree or start handing out raises when they got that return... they started buying back stock and handing out bonuses to high level execs... and yes, a few CRUMBS trickled down.
This is Minor compared to ........
Remember the Flynn unmasking? How you were running your mouth about that? Big old NOTHING BURGER... no charges, investigation shut down BY TRUMP'S own people. I'll wait and see...
We can agree that monopolies are bad. Tech companies are definitely our complicated dilemmas of the immediate future. Genetic moral judgements and robotics limits are also as has to tackle as Travis Etienne. God bless my friend!Sure man... And no companies made any money and America sucked for the next 50 years after FDRs new deal. I'm sure the middle class would have expanded just fine under the policies of the 1920s. Again... AS SOON AS Reagan rolled back those policies, the middle class started to shrink and the wealth of the country started getting concentrated upward...
I have no problem with people and companies getting rich. That's capitalism and it's a great thing. BUT unregulated capitalism sucks just like total socialism does. The wealthy should not control what the people do any more than the government should. BOTH things are very very bad... there needs to be a balance struck between the two extremes.
the unmasking issue- we got what we wanted
23 govt officials requested the "name" of the trump campaign official who spoke the russian ambassador.
joe biden swore up and down he did not do it and had nothing to do with and he swore on his mommas grave and scouts honored.
well of the 23 people, joe biden was one.
so we just wanted to show the public another actual lie from joe biden.
crazy how you can have video of joe saying anything and his swamp creatures dont believe it.
talk about loyalty to hitler level here.
So you are telling me that Joe Biden lied and you are holding it against him? This is the exact thing that drives me crazy about Trump supporters. Trump lies all the time. On tape.
So you are telling me that Joe Biden lied and you are holding it against him? This is the exact thing that drives me crazy about Trump supporters. Trump lies all the time. On tape. In front of you. But that doesn't matter. But let someone else get caught and it's terrible. Again, Trump can do and say ANYTHING and not lose a single vote. If Trump turned the nuclear codes over to Putin, you'd be on here welcoming our Russian overlords b/c Donald Trump agrees with it.