Identity isn't a choice? Really?
You've proven time and again to be an anti-vaxxer. Saying otherwise doesn't make it true.
Please show me the evidence that says it isn't safe. The blood clotting issue has a smaller risk of killing you than Covid (or a birth control pill) does.
Just like all of the other mandatory vaccines should only be between you and your doctor?
Please show us evidence that it's safe over a period of say...pick a number. You cannot, because it's only been around a short while.
And how many people have died of the vaccine? That's right, significantly less than 218.
You don't understand how vaccines work. They don't stay around in your system for years. If you think that the vaccine is going to have negative health effects 5-10 years from now, you are crazy. That argument is anti-vaccination bullshit.
Actually, discrimination isn't discrimination. When there are legitimate differences between things that are relevant to a business, that's not the kind of arbitrary discrimination that ought to be prohibited. After all, discrimination is just recognizing differences between things, which we do all the time.
How am I crazy? BTW, as I have said before you cannot prove they do not cause any long term effect? Just because you have fed into the vaccination is for everyone BS, doesn't make it right to force it.
I think these people are just ornery about being told what to do more than they're really anti-vaxxers. But they don't mind repeating anti-vax talking points.
I can prove it because no vaccine has ever had side effects that appear more than 1-2 months after inoculation. Pretty simple. What's your proof?
You also can't prove the sun won't turn blue tomorrow, but it's not very likely.
True. But repeating anti-vaxxer talking points isn't really any different than being an anti-vaxxer.
We’ve been here before my friend.
You have history on your side for arguments sake. It's on OUR side and I hope it repeats itself! Just because one speaks of long term effects and chooses to not vaccinate for that particular reason can be stupid or ignorant in your eyes, but it is a choice they make and personally they should give $0.02 what you think of them, but you have that choice as well.
So history shows I am correct but you are going to choose to continue to be ignorant over a made-up theory that the vaccine could kill you in 5-10 years.
Dems also were the first to bring up the Tuskegee experiments when it was “Trump’s” vaccine. They changed their rhetoric when Biden took office.
The vaccine shouldn't be political. The only reason that it is political is there are dumbasses on both sides who can't seem to grasp even simple concepts without viewing them through a political lens.
This doesn’t get brought up enough.This argument seems to work for killing babies. Should be the same of vaccinations then right?
I do believe it should be a choice and I do believe it should not be required!
This is gobbledegook. If you're going to compare vaccines to COVID, then you have to look at people allegedly harmed by vaccines versus what we'd expect to happen without vaccines. It's clear that vaccines are saving lives relative to what would happen without vaccines. I also wonder what actual point you're trying to make about vaccines here.
Again, lumped into a category. I have had the vaccine. I just prefer a choice in the matter!
Well, if you aren't an anti-vaxxer I wasn't referencing you, was I?
I mean you can be salty all you want but anti-vaxxers absolutely need to be confronted on their misinformed views
Not salty at all. Just figured since you were cheerleading that I would join in
Let me be clear here: I absolutely think universities, employers, etc. should be entirely free to require the vaccine as a condition for attendance/employment.
Most concepts are beyond simple and so people gravitate towards a herd mentality including very smart people. Just because a person isn't a dumbass in one respect, doesn't mean they understand the basis for anything particular that requires some expertise. Most people form opinions based on what their group thinks. Politics capitalizes on this tendency which is why many topics become political including the people who discuss these topics on social media. They actually work for political organizations.
Again, all side effects for every vaccine are known within the first two months of inoculation. I'm sure that your anti-vaxxer approach has nothing to do with politics.
Not public universities. You could make that argument for private universities. Also, if employers are now going to be allowed to discriminate, are you OK with them not promoting women?
No politics involved and AGAIN, it's not a anti-vaxxer approach. It's a pro-choice approach. I made a different choice than some of my family members. It's not always politic with every single person.
